Draft_RFP_Atch_B_PPQ_ID0419107_20190918.docx
DOCX document 40 KB Posted
- Attached to
- PEO Maritime Requirements
- Solicitation number
- ID04190107
About this file
This document contains a draft request for proposal and past performance questionnaire for engineering services to support maritime systems assessments. The General Services Administration Federal Acquisition Service will issue the RFP on October 15, 2019, with responses due November 14, 2019. The contract will have a single award for a base period of five years from January 27, 2020 to January 26, 2025 using cost-plus-fixed-fee and cost reimbursement contract types. The work will focus on maritime systems engineering, research, development, prototyping and testing to support assessments. Factors such as technical approach, past performance and price will be considered, with technical and past performance significantly more important than price.
Draft RFP Attachment B PPQ
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Draft_CDRL_A003_ID0419107.pdf | ||
| Draft_CDRL_A004_ID0419107.pdf | ||
| Draft_CDRL_A001_ID0419107.pdf | ||
| Draft_RFP_FBO_ID0419107_9.30.19.docx | DOCX document | |
| Draft_CDRL_A002_ID0419107.pdf | ||
| Draft_PEO-M_PWS_ID04190107_9.18.2019.docx | DOCX document | |
| Draft_RFP_Attachment_A_Pricing_Matrix_ID04190107_09182019.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Contract # Being Evaluated ___________________ Attachment – Past Performance Questionnaire
SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
INSTRUCTIONS: This section is to be filled out by the contractor requesting information and sent to the respondent.
PEO MARITIME REQUIREMENTS PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
A. Contractor Name: ___________________________________________________________________________
B. Contract Number: ___________________________________________________________________________
C. Contract type: ______________________________________________________________________________
D. Period of performance: ________________________________________________________________________
E. Brief Description of Work Performed: _________________________________________________________________________________________
F. Dollar Value (include per year cost and life cycle cost): ______________________________________________
G. Location (countries) where service was performed under this contract:__________________________________
H. Contractor being evaluated performed as the: _____ Prime or ______ Subcontractor (Mark one)
SECTION 2: RESPONDENT INFORMATION
INSTRUCTIONS: The remaining sections are to be filled out by Respondent. Questionnaires must be returned no later than XX XX 2019, to GSA 4QFACC via E-mail: Jonathan.Rinkinen@gsa.gov and Libia.Cristancho@gsa.gov.
Please indicate “Performance Survey – ID04190107” in the subject.
A. Customer or agency name: _____________________________________________________________________
B. Respondent's name: __________________________________________________________________________
C. Respondent's title: ____________________________________________________________________________
D. Respondent's phone number: ________________________________________________________________
E. Respondent’s Email: __________________________________________________________________________
F. Contract Performance Data assessed in Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS):
________Yes or ________No
G. Description of work performed under this contract:_________________________________________________
SECTION 3: PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
INSTRUCTIONS: Choose the term that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation.
The results of this survey will aid the Government in determining whether there is a reasonable expectation that the contractor will successfully perform the required effort under the USSOCOM PEO Maritime Requirements. In responding to the survey, please justify and explain Marginal or Unsatisfactory ratings. Respondent may be contacted to clarify comments or ratings. In order for the government to review and assess the contractor’s past performance rating, please use the following ratings to describe the offeror’s performance on your contract or project:
Exceptional (E) - Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded many to your company’s (or agency’s) benefit. Problems, if any, were negligible and were resolved in a timely, highly effective manner.
Very Good (VG) - Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded some to your company’s (agency’s) benefit. There were a few minor problems that the contractor resolved in a timely, effective manner.
Satisfactory (S) - Performance met contract requirements. There were some minor problems and corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Marginal (M) - Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. There were problems, some of a serious nature, for which corrective action was only marginally effective or was not fully implemented.
Unsatisfactory (US) - Performance did not meet most contractual requirements. There were serious problems and the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.
Unknown (U) - No record of past performance or the record is inconclusive.
NOTE: PPIRS may be reviewed for the contractors as well as responses to this questionnaire. Although you may have filed a CPARS for the contract listed, we would appreciate your response to this questionnaire because some of the questions relate to areas not covered by CPARS.
| 1. Quality of Product or Service |
| US |
| M |
| S |
| VG |
| E |
| U |
| A |
| Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance |
| B |
| Compliance with contractual terms and conditions. |
| C |
| Did the contractor show an understanding of the scope of the requirements and an appreciation of the complexity of the requirements? |
| D |
| Were the services comprehensive, complete, and feasible (Met the needs, performed successfully, and accommodated changing requirements.)? |
| E |
| Quality/integrity of Technical Manuals or Commercial Manuals |
| F |
| Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements |
| G | |
| Timely recognition and notification of administrative, engineering, production, problems affecting the program: |
| H |
| Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations. |
| I |
| Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements |
| 2. Management Controls |
| US |
| M |
| S |
| VG |
| E |
| U |
| A |
| Effectiveness of overall contract management (ability to lead, manage and control program). |
| B |
| Effectiveness management control, including subcontractors. |
| C |
| Effectiveness of acquisition management. |
| D |
| Effectiveness of material management. |
| E |
| Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance. |
| F |
| Ability to hire/retain a qualified workforce on this effort |
| 4. CUSTOMER SERVICE |
| US |
| M |
| S |
| VG |
| E |
| U |
| A |
| Was the contractor committed to customer satisfaction? |
| B |
| Did the contractor work and communicate well with contracting officers, contracting officer’s technical representatives, end users, other contractors, program staff, and subcontractors? |
| C |
| Commitment to customer satisfaction and business-like concern for its customers’ interests. |
| 5. OVERALL PERFORMANCE |
| US |
| M |
| S |
| VG |
| E |
| U |
| A |
| Effective program/contract management. |
| B |
| Overall performance of the contractor. |
SECTION 4: NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION
1. Please discuss each and response for which you indicated Marginal or Unsatisfactory in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).
2. Government Contracts Only: Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? YES________ NO________
If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc.)
3. Explain the contractor’s greatest strengths and/or weaknesses and your rationale for why you would or would not award a future contract to them.
4. Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?
5. Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .