I_8_2032H8-25-R-00015 Synopsis REV1.pdf

2032H8-25-R-00015 Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity Contract for Architect-Engineering Design and Related Services, National Support Services Contract

ALL INFORMATION NEEDED FOR INTERESTED PARTIES TO SUBMIT A STANDARD FORM

SF330, ARCHITECT-ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS, IS CONTAINED HEREIN.

All questions must be submitted in writing in order to be answered. Questions will be answered via sam.gov. No phone calls will be responded to during open procurements. Questions must be submitted by October 24, 2025, at 2PM ET to tamela.t.lewis@irs.gov, mathew.nelker@irs.gov, or nicole.m.jackson@irs.gov.

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is seeking to provide comprehensive architectural engineering design services to support the IRS Facilities Management and Security Services (FMSS) Division, National Office headquarters, business unit divisions/functions and their associated territory, area and industry offices, ten (10) submission processing sites, several customer services sites, three (3) campus locations- Austin, Kansas City, and Ogden, two (2) Enterprise Computing Center- Martinsburg and Memphis and various Posts of Duty (POD) Nationwide. The FMSS division serves as the IRS focal or central point dealing with the planning, coordinating, directing and implementing of all projects and tasks that impact real estate and personal property across various business units and associated territories. Support to FMSS in these areas will be known as the National Support Services Contract (NSSC). The geographic locations are: Mid-Atlantic – DE, MD, NJ, NY, PA – Northeast – CT, ME, MA, NH, RI, VT – Midwest - IL, IN, IA, KS, MI, MN, MO, NE, ND, SD, WI – Southeast- AL, AR, FL, GA, LA, MS, NC, SC, TN, VA – Southwest – AZ, NM, TX, OK, UT – Ohio Valley - OH, KY, WV – West Coast – CA, OR, WA –Pacific Territories – Puerto Rico, U.S. Virgin Islands

This procurement will result in one (1) Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract with a base year, four one-year option periods, and one six-month extension option. The total fee for the contract ordering period (including option periods) shall not exceed $35,000,000. The guaranteed minimum for the contract term is $20,000. Firm-fixed price task orders will be negotiated off this contract. There will be no dollar limit per task order and no dollar limit per year. The anticipated start date is February 2026.

This proposed contract is being solicited as a SMALL BUSINESS SET-ASIDE. The Small Business size standard classification is North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) Code 541330, Architectural-Engineering Services, size standard: $25.5M. The Government seeks the most highly qualified firm to perform the required services, based on the demonstrated competence and qualifications, in accordance with the selection criteria. Small business firms will not pay more than 50 percent of the amount paid by the Government for contract performance to subcontractors that are not similarly situated entities per FAR clause 52.219-14 Limitations on Subcontracting.

These services will be procured in accordance with 40 USC Chapter 11, Selection of Architects and Engineers as implemented by FAR Subpart 36.6. The selected Architect-Engineer (A-E) firm shall be capable of providing single-discipline or multi-discipline design services for various mailto:mathew.nelker@irs.gov project requirements for the IRS-FMSS Division, field Facilities Management and Branch Offices Professional A-E service’s needs. These disciplines may include, but are not limited to:

Architectural, Structural, Civil, Mechanical, Plumbing and HVAC, Electrical design, Planning, Environmental, Fire Protection, and Interior Design.

The firm shall perform a wide range of A-E services, including but not limited to:

Facility planning and programming, defining project scope and requirements, preparing design requirements and specifications, performing engineering evaluations and feasibility studies, developing cost estimates, conducting economic analysis and alternatives, evaluating site condition, including infrastructure analysis and utility access, environmental impact assessments, and potential constraints, conducting surveys, and developing concept design, Conducting hazardous materials testing and identification (e.g., asbestos, lead-based paint), performing engineering evaluations, energy computations, obtaining permits and regulatory approvals, review design submittals and shop drawing reviews, recommendations for project selections and approvals, conducting inspection during construction, and commissioning, development of Operation & Maintenance (O&M) Manuals, standards and guidelines, identifying and recommending sustainable design practices, workspaces efficiencies analysis, office space layout design and alteration, identifying and recommending sustainable design practices, preparing Design Intent Drawing (DID) and CD's, safety analysis and other related services.

IRS Facilities A-E services compliance key requirement and standard including but not limited to:

• The contractor shall comply with the architectural Barrier Act (ABA) and the Access Board Standard (ABAAS/UFAS), ensure accessibility compliance are meet for the ADA Title III equivalency for public access area.

• The contractor shall comply with the Interagency Security Committee (ISC) standard, defining physical security criteria based on IRS Facility risk levels. Conduct historic reservation for section 106 a review under the National Historic Preservation ACT (NHPA) impact on historic properties and apply secretary of the Interior Standards for preservation/rehabilitation.

• The contractor shall comply with the International Building Code (IBC) as amended for federal use for Security and accessibility. Use the Whole Building Design Guide (WBDG) for integrated design principles. The contractor shall prioritize U.S.-made material and equipment under the Buy American ACT (BAA).

• The contractor shall comply and pay prevailing wages per the Davis-Bacon Act for all construction labor. Comply with environmental and safety compliance -conduct NEPA Environmental impact assessment (ELS/EA) as required

• The contractor shall comply with EPA stormwater, air quality, and hazardous material regulations. Meet fire & life safety requirement (e.g., NFPA 101 Life Safety Code) for fire protection systems. The contractor shall submit designs using Building Information Modeling (BIM) and documentation. Comply and protect IT/OT Systems per Federal Information Security Management ACT (FISMA).

• The contractor shall comply and follow GSA-PBS-Facility Standards for space, security and sustainability standard. Comply with FMSS Design Standards, National Workplace

Standards (NWS) and the oversight and coordination with the General Services Administration (GSA), Territories, state, and local regulatory requirements as applicable.

Additionally, hazardous material assessments, such as asbestos and lead-based paint evaluations, may be necessary to identify potential risks associated with removals, demolition, or utility connections.

The General Services Administration (GSA) plays a crucial role in the project review process, ensuring that construction design documents comply with relevant codes, standards, and contractual requirements. Their involvement includes overseeing the review of design submissions to confirm alignment with safety regulations, and industry’s best practices. GSA, working closely with the IRS project management, architects, and engineers, will review and inspects services for facility design and construction projects to ensure alignment with future needs compliance with federal regulations. This includes assistance with design solution and the exploration of innovative technologies and construction methods aimed at enhancing efficiency and maintaining compliance while safeguarding the project's integrity and long-term sustainability. GSA review inputs ensures that the final design meets operational needs, functionality, and aesthetic goals while mitigating potential risks. The GSA level of involvement in the design and construction review process will be determined based on the criticality of the project and its contract value.

IRS project teams are responsible for facilitating the review and approval process for contractor-submitted documents, such as shop drawings, material specifications, and work plans. They coordinate with project consultants and stakeholders to evaluate the contractor's submissions for adherence to project requirements and technical accuracy. This oversight ensures that construction progresses according to approved plans, preventing costly errors, delays, or rework. By actively participating in project reviews, the building owner helps maintain quality control and ensures the successful execution of the project within the defined scope, budget, and timeline.

Selection Procedures:

The firm shall demonstrate its capability to perform A-E services under this contract using Standard Form 330 (SF330). The firm is required to complete ALL sections of Part I and Part II of SF330, which will be evaluated by the Government. This section outlines the process for ensuring a fair, comprehensive, and impartial selection process.

1. Evaluation Process: The evaluation for this project will be conducted by a single Slate/Selection Board. The Slate-Selection Board Chairman (SSBC) will coordinate the evaluation after the Contracts Division completes the initial screening of the SF330 submissions. Each SF330 will be reviewed individually and independently.

2. Evaluation Board Composition: The A-E evaluation board will consist of professionals with expertise in various areas of architecture, engineering, and government acquisitions. Non-voting advisory members may also be included. Before evaluations begin, the Chairman will convene the evaluation team to review the synopsis, rating methodology, and individual responsibilities.

3. Communication Protocol: Evaluation board members will communicate via email and verbally when necessary. All email communications related to the evaluation process shall be protected as sensitive source selection information.

4. Slate Evaluation Process: Each evaluation board member will independently assess each SF330, identifying compliance with the synopsis. Evaluations will be conducted and documented in accordance with the synopsis.

5. Evaluation Ratings: Each evaluation criterion will be assessed based on a determination of Excellent, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal or Unsatisfactory.

Strengths, weaknesses, and deficiencies will be documented to support all determinations. No overall rating will be assigned.

6. Consensus Meeting: Once individual evaluations are completed, the evaluation team and Chairman will convene to finalize ratings for each firm. Ratings will reflect a consensus, not an average. The Chairman will document these results and present them to the Bureau Chief Procurement Officer or designee.

7. Discussions and Interviews: A minimum of three of the most highly qualified firms will be shortlisted for interviews. The firms will be given an opportunity to provide a presentation followed by a Q&A session. Questions may be provided in advance, but additional questions may arise during the interview. Any new information obtained may influence firm ratings.

8. Selection and Final Decision: After interviews, the Evaluation Board will finalize the ratings of shortlisted firms and submit a Slate/Selection Board Report. This report will recommend the most highly qualified firm and provide clear justification for their selection, based solely on the evaluation criteria in the synopsis. The final selection decision will be made by the Bureau Chief Procurement Officer or designee.

9. Post-Selection Procedures: Once the Slate/Selection Board Report is approved, the Contracting Officer may release the names of the selected A-E firm for negotiation. If a fair and reasonable price cannot be agreed upon with the top-ranked firm, negotiations may proceed with the next highest-ranked firm, and their name may be released at that time.

Rating Definitions:

Excellent - Contains several strengths, most are significant, with no deficiencies or weaknesses. Based on information provided, there is no doubt that the contractor demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the services required to meet or exceed most contract requirements. The highest quality of contract performance is anticipated.

Very Good - The indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths.

Satisfactory - Contains no or very few strengths, may contain some minor weaknesses that will not prevent successful completion of the contract, and no deficiencies. Based on the information provided, the contractor demonstrates the minimum level of understanding of the services required to meet contract requirements.

Unsatisfactory - Contains many deficiencies and/or gross omissions, and many weaknesses, with minimal or no strengths. The contractor does not demonstrate an understanding of the scope of work necessary to perform the required tasks, failure to provide a reasonable, logical approach to fulfilling much of the government's requirements.

Strength, weaknesses and deficiency are described as follows:

Strength – A strong attribute or quality of particular worth or utility; an inherent asset. Note:

Simple adherence to the requirements or ability to meet a requirement is compliance and should not be listed as a strength.

Weaknesses – An aspect of or an omission that may contribute to a failure in meeting specified minimum performance or capability requirements.

Deficiency – A material failure to meet a government requirement or a combination of weaknesses that increase the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level.

Selection Criteria:

Firms responding to this synopsis will be evaluated to determine the most highly qualified firm to perform the required services in accordance with the published Selection Criteria. Failure to comply with instructions or provide complete information may affect the firm’s evaluation or disqualify the firm from further consideration. The following four selection criteria will be used to evaluate and award this contract.

The evaluation criteria are listed in descending order of importance for the evaluation process.

Specific selection criteria include:

1. Professional Qualifications

2. Specialized Experience and Technical Competence

3. Past Performance

4. Program Management, Capacity and Geographic Areas

Criterion 1 — Professional Qualifications (SF330, Part I, Sections E & G):

Firms will be evaluated based on the professional qualifications, competence, and experience of their proposed key personnel in performing the tasks required under this contract. This includes their involvement in example projects listed in SF330, Part I, Section G.

Key personnel are those responsible for major contract or project management duties and/or those providing specialized expertise. The proposed team shall include key personnel from the following specific disciplines:

Management and Primary Disciplines: (Resume required)

A. Program Manager: - Provide one (1) Program Manager who shall have a minimum of seven (7) years of experience in program management or a related role. A Project Management Profession (PMP) Certificate or equivalent is highly desired.

B. Project Managers: Provide two (2) Project Managers who have proven experience managing projects from initiation to completion. Shall have a minimum of five (5) years of experience in project management or related role.

C. Architecture: Provide one (1) Licensed Professional who shall have a minimum of five

(5) years of continuous experience in architectural engineering and design

D. Electrical Engineering: Provide one (1) Licensed Professional who shall have a minimum of five (5) years of continuous experience in Electrical engineering and design.

E. Mechanical Engineering: Provide one (1) Licensed Professional who shall have a minimum of five (5) years of continuous experience in mechanical engineering and design including HVAC, Plumbing for commercial or industrial projects.

F. Fire Protection Engineering /Life Safety: Provide one (1) Licensed Professional Fire Protection Engineer who shall meet the qualifications of a Qualified Fire Protection Engineer (QFPE) and have a minimum of five (5) years of continuous experience in applicable Fire Protection Engineering and design.

G. Interior Designer: Provide two (2) Licensed Interior Designers who shall be qualified by the National Council of Interior Design Qualifications (NCIDQ) and shall have a minimum of five (5) years of continuous experience in facility interior design.

Firms with Interior Designers having relevant experience in facilitating the Federal procurement process may be considered more favorably.

Specialists (Submission of Resumes Not Required)

a. Landscape Architect: Licensed, Registered, Professional Landscape Architect with a minimum of five (5) years of experience in designing landscaped environments similar to those encountered at federal installations.

b. Environmental Engineering Specialist: Licensed Engineer with a minimum of five (5) years of experience performing field investigation, analysis, and reporting for hazardous materials, shall include expertise in asbestos, lead paint, mold remediation, and polychlorinated biphenyls encountered on project sites and vertical facilities.

c. Mechanical Specialist: Certified by NEBB, ACG, ICB/TABB, AEE, University of Wisconsin- Madison, ASHRAE, or BCA in the commissioning of HVAC systems, and shall have a minimum of five (5) years of continuous, relevant experience performing commissioning processes.

d. Electrical Specialist: Engineering Technician with a minimum of five (5) years of continuous, relevant experience inspecting, testing, and calibrating electrical distribution and generation equipment, systems, and devices.

Section D – Organizational Chart

Submit an Organizational Chart of the proposed team’s Key Personnel in Section D of the SF330. The chart should include:

• Management, Primary Disciplines and Specialists (as defined in Criterion 1, subsections A-G and a-d).

• Individuals fulfilling multiple roles (e.g., a Specialist also serving as a Licensed Professional) if they meet all necessary qualifications.

• Professional registrations (e.g., PE, RA, NCIDQ, etc.) for each listed individual for the company affiliation.

Section E – Key Personnel Resumes

Provide resumes for all proposed key personnel demonstrating experience relevant to the work under this contract. Resumes Shall:

• Be limited to one (1) page per individual and shall include professional registration, certification, licensure, and/or accreditation in the appropriate disciplines.

• Detail experience on at least two (2) representative projects that achieved their design completion milestones within the last five (5) years prior to the issuance of this notice and shall clearly indicate the individual’s proposed role under this contract.

Additionally, document the participation of key personnel in example projects within SF330, Part I, Section G.

Include resumes for the following selected Key Personnel in Section E of the SF330:

• Management (as identified in Criterion 1, subsections A-B).

• Primary Disciplines (as identified in Criterion 1, subsections C-G).

Resumes for additional key personnel listed in Section D (Organizational Chart) are not required at this time. A minimum of seven (7) resumes shall be included as specified.

Experience of key personnel may be given greater consideration if it demonstrates the following:

a. Project Management Experience: Demonstrated accountability and successful management of scope, schedule, cost, and quality for the design of Federal agency facilities projects.

Experience should highlight the ability to manage complex projects while ensuring compliance with federal regulations and requirements.

b. Federal Facilities Design Experience: Experience in the design of facilities projects specifically for Federal agencies. This includes knowledge of federal design standards, security requirements, and sustainability practices applicable to government projects.

c. A-E Services Delivery Experience: Proven experience in delivering multiple types of the A-E services expected to be performed under this contract. Firms should provide examples of successful execution of A-E services, demonstrating expertise in various aspects of facility design, engineering, and construction support.

d. Multi-Facility Design Experience: Demonstrated experience in the design of multiple facility types expected to be performed under this contract. This includes expertise in designing office buildings, laboratories, secure facilities, and other specialized government structures.

e. Experience of the A-E Team in Example Projects: The qualifications and experience of the A- E team, as demonstrated in the example projects submitted in SF330, Section G. Greater consideration will be given to the participation of Prime Contractor personnel over the experience of their Subcontractor(s).

Criterion 2— Specialized Experience and Technical Competence (SF330, Part I, Section F):

The proposed design team shall demonstrate specialized experience through the submission of up to eight (8) relevant example projects in Sections F and G of the SF330. The selected projects shall reflect expertise in delivering multidiscipline design services with a focus on construction design and federal building requirements. The design team shall demonstrate experience in the following areas:

1. Provide a minimum of two (2) representative projects demonstrating experience preparing comprehensive multi-discipline design services (100% Design plans and specifications) for design projects. Projects Shall integrate sustainability principles through a cost-effective, all-inclusive design approach. The design team should also demonstrate a broad, nationwide understanding of federal government operational procedures and policies.

2. Provide one (1) to two (2) representative projects demonstrating the development of complete design construction documents (100% plans and specifications) the design projects that meet Public Buildings Service (PBS) Interim Core Building standards system integration. Projects shall include full-scope or two of the engineering discipline i.e.

architectural, structural, interior design, electrical, mechanical/HVAC, fire alarm design and uninterruptible power supply (UPS) system design.

3. Provide a minimum of one (1) representative project that utilized Building Information Modeling (BIM) methodologies, including 3D parametric modeling, to deliver comprehensive design packages for federal facilities, preferably aligned with GSA or agency-specific BIM guidelines showcases the project coordination support among disciplines and territory stakeholder, resolve design conflicts, and improve constructability.

4. Submit one (1) to two (2) representative projects that demonstrate the preparation of Scope of Work (SOW) A& E design and interior design services. These projects shall reflect the creation of functional, efficient, and aesthetically pleasing interior spaces follows the federal interior design guidelines and agency-specific standards and design aligns with mission requirements and occupant workflows.

5. Submit one (1) to two (2) representative projects showcasing strategic office space layout programming and furniture design. Projects shall emphasize optimizing workspace functionality, flexibility, and occupant workflows through modular furniture solutions adaptable to evolving operational needs. The project should demonstrate consideration of ergonomic, accessibility (ADA), and sustainability factors in furniture and space design.

The firms will be evaluated based on demonstrated specialized experience in providing design services similar in scope and complexity to those anticipated under this contract. Key areas of evaluation include:

a. Demonstrated ability to maintain compliance with project budget and schedule constraints throughout design development.

b. Experience preparing complete construction design packages, including narratives, technical specifications, drawings, and cost estimates.

c. Familiarity and compliance with Interim Core Building standards, agency policies, and other applicable federal agency design criteria.

Firms may receive favorable consideration for demonstrating the following:

a. Experience in delivering the full spectrum of multidisciplinary A-E design across a wide variety of federal facility types (e.g., office buildings, historic structures, secure facilities).

b. Experience in design and construction cost estimating, including budgetary, lifecycle cost modeling in detailed and cost estimating methodologies.

c. Experience delivering facility design services for federal agencies, particularly within the contract primary geographic area.

d. Experience coordinating and collaborating with federal agencies throughout the planning and design process, including sub-consultant integration align with agency facility-specific projects.

e. Understanding and adherence to base access procedures, security protocols, environmental regulations, safety standards, and accident prevention requirements, ensuring timely task order execution.

f. Experience working on projects in historic districts requiring coordination with the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) throughout the design process.

g. Familiarity with and adherence to federal security procedures to submit base access documentation. Experience compliance with agency-specific security, safety, environmental, and accident prevention regulations.

Criterion 3 — Past Performance Evaluation

Firms will be evaluated based on their past performance with government agencies and private industry, focusing on Work Quality, Compliance with Schedules, Cost Control, and Customer Satisfaction.

The evaluation of past performance and experience will be derived from various sources, including Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQs), CPARS evaluations for projects under Criterion 2, Customer inquiries, Government databases and Other available government information, including points of contact related to other criteria.

Past performance information for projects listed under Criterion 2 may be given greater weight.

Submit a completed CPARS evaluation for each project under criterion 2. If a completed CPARS evaluation is not available, the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) (Attachment (A)) is provided for the firm or its team members to submit to the client for each project included under Criterion 2, Specialized Experience. DO NOT SUBMIT A PPQ WHEN A

COMPLETED CPARS IS AVAILABLE.

If a CPARS evaluation is not available, ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Completed PPQs should be submitted with your SF330. Questionnaires may also be submitted directly to the Government's point of contact, tamela.t.lewis@irs.gov, mathew.nelker@irs.gov, or nicole.m.jackson@irs.gov, prior to the response date. If the firm is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before the response date set forth in this notice, firms should provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). Firms may submit a PPQ previously submitted under a different Notice/RFP (legible copies are acceptable) as long as it is on the same form as posted with this Synopsis. Firms should follow up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. Firms shall not incorporate by reference into their response PPQs or CPARS previously submitted in response to other A-E services procurements. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.

Firms may provide any information on problems encountered and the corrective actions taken on projects submitted under Criterion 2 Specialized Experience. Firms may also address any adverse past performance issues.

Awards, letters of commendation, certificates of appreciation, etc. shall not be submitted and will not be considered in the evaluation.

Criterion 4 —Program Management, Capacity and Geographic Areas (SF330, Part I, Section H):

Firms will be evaluated based on their ability to effectively plan and manage work under the contract, their capacity to complete tasks within the required timeframe, and the location of the office(s) handling the work. Firms shall also demonstrate knowledge of the primary geographic areas where projects may be located.

mailto:tamela.t.lewis@irs.gov mailto:nicole.m.jackson@irs.gov

1. Organizational Structure and Management Plan:

• Provide an organizational chart of your team and describe the management plan for this contract, detailing the roles and responsibilities of personnel involved.

• Detail the firm's ability to manage, coordinate, and work effectively with both internal staff and consultants.

• Include information on your firm's history of working relationships with team members, including joint venture partners and mentor-protégé arrangements, if applicable.

2. Workload and Availability:

• Describe your firm’s current workload and the availability of the project team (including consultants) for the duration of the specified contract performance period.

• Provide details on the availability of key personnel during the anticipated contract period and explain how your firm can ensure the continuity of services with qualified backup staffing for key roles.

• Avoid general statements of availability/capacity, as these may be considered less favorable.

3. Geographic Location: Evaluation will include consideration of your firm’s location within the primary geographic areas:

Mid-Atlantic - DE, MD, NJ, NY, PA Northeast – CT, ME, MA, NH, RI, VT Midwest - IL, IN, IA, KS, MI, MN, MO, NE, ND, SD, WI Southeast- AL, AR, FL, GA, LA, MS, NC, SC, TN, VA Southwest – AZ, NM, TX, OK, UT Ohio Valley - OH, KY, WV West Coast – CA, OR, WA Pacific Territories – Puerto Rico, U.S. Virgin Islands

• The prime firm is required to have offices in at least four of the primary geographic regions.

• Indicate the location(s) of the office(s) that will be performing the work. This includes main offices, branch offices, and offices of team members.

• Provide a narrative describing your team’s knowledge of the primary geographic areas covered by this contract.

• Describe your team’s ability to provide timely responses to requests for on-site support, including support from primary team members, sub-consultants, and sub-contractors.

Teams with a proven track record of delivering timely support may be evaluated more favorably.

SF-330 Submission Requirements:

A-E firms desiring to be considered for this contract shall submit a completed SF330 package.

The SF330 shall be typed, one sided, at least 11-point Times New Roman or larger. Part I shall not exceed fifty-five (55) single-sided 8.5 by 11-inch pages. The page limit does not include certificates, PPQs, CPARS, licenses, nor does the page limit include cover sheets, dividers, or other requested documentation (e.g., joint venture agreement, proof of AE firm registration) provided that these do not contain any substantive information submitted in response to the synopsis or intended to demonstrate the qualifications of the firm. Part I pages shall be numbered sequentially. The organizational Chart may be one page single sided 11 by 17 foldout, using 11-point font or larger (font limitations do not apply to graphics, captions or tables). Introductions shall be included in Sections E and F. Please include your Unique Entity ID, CAGE, and TIN numbers in Section H of the SF330. In accordance with the FAR 36.601- 4(b) the AE firm shall be a registered/licensed Architectural and/or Engineering firm to be eligible for award. Provide proof that the firm is permitted by law to practice the professions of Architecture or Engineering, (e.g., state registration number, or a brief explanation of the firm’s licensing in jurisdictions that do not register firms, etc.). Failure to submit the required proof could result in a firm’s elimination from consideration.

Selection will be based on qualification criteria, evaluation factors, and/or interviews that may be scheduled as needed. Responses shall include an electronic version of the original submission, inclusive of original signatures, as required by Standard Form 330, Part I – Architect-Engineer Qualifications. All firms shall provide signed and dated qualification forms within the past 12 months.

Architect-Engineer firms that meet the requirements described in this synopsis are invited to submit the SF330 electronically to tamela.t.lewis@irs.gov, mathew.nelker@irs.gov, or nicole.m.jackson@irs.gov. Responses are due no later than 2:00pm ET on November 10, 2025.

THIS IS NOT A REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL.

Late responses will be handled in accordance with FAR 52.215-1. It is the contractor’s responsibility to allow sufficient time for the SF330 to be delivered electronically.

The SF330 submittals may need to be delivered in separate packages due to email size constraints. SF330 submittals packages shall not exceed 10mb in size in one email. The IRS cannot accept zip files.

Inquiries concerning this procurement should include synopsis number and title and be forwarded via email to nicole.m.jackson@irs.gov, tamela.t.lewis@irs.gov, or mathew.nelker@irs.gov.

mailto:tamela.t.lewis@irs.gov mailto:nicole.m.jackson@irs.gov mailto:nicole.m.jackson@irs.gov mailto:tamela.t.lewis@irs.gov