Exhibit_4 _Addenda_to_FAR_Provisions_7-26-13_.docx

HTC711-13-R-W001

Exhibit 4, Addenda to FAR Provisions Page of

ADDENDUM TO FAR 52.212-1, INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS-COMMERCIAL ITEMS (FEB 2012)

FAR 52.212-1, Paragraphs (b) and (c), are hereby amended as indicated below. Paragraphs (d) through (l) are re-numbered as (f) through (n).

(b) Submission of Offers

(1) In response to this request for proposals (RFP), an offeror must mail or hand-deliver a written proposal in accordance with Paragraph (c) titled "Written Proposals", including all representations and certifications to the address listed in Paragraph (b)(4)(i) below.

(2) Offerors must also electronically submit proposed rates using the Carrier Analysis & Rate Evaluation System, Service Module (CARE II HQ). The CARE II HQ is accessible through the Internet using the CARE II System Center Web Site at the Internet address listed in Paragraph (d)(1) below.

(3) Offerors intending to respond to this solicitation must provide a written request for a CARE II HQ user account in accordance with Paragraph (d)(3) below. All of the information necessary to complete the electronic submission of the offer can be found at the Internet address provided in Paragraph (d)(1) below.

(4) Written and electronic proposals must be submitted to the addresses listed below and must arrive prior to 4:00 PM CDT on 06 Aug 2013. The offeror agrees to hold the prices in its offer firm for 180 days from the date specified for receipt of offers. The written proposal must be enclosed in a sealed envelope marked "Request for Proposal No. HTC711-13-R-W001.” The offeror's name and address should appear in the upper left-hand corner, and the envelope should be enclosed in a second envelope that must be sent to the address listed below.

(i) The written proposal must be sent to the Contracting Officer, Mr. JR Oliver, at the following address:

USTRANSCOM / TCAQ-I

ATTN: MR. JR OLIVER

SEALIFT BRANCH

508 SCOTT DRIVE

SCOTT AFB, IL 62225

(ii) Any and all questions concerning the RFP must be submitted in writing and received prior to 17 July 2013. Send any questions to:

And

(5) Company facsimile number and email/internet addresses must be provided with the written proposal.

(6) All offerors are required to submit their Standard Carrier Abbreviation Code (SCAC) with their written proposal.

(c) Written Proposals

(1) In addition to the CARE II HQ data required in Paragraph (d) below, offerors must submit written proposals as described below in the quantities stated:

(i) VOLUME I – Executed RFP Documents (Submit original documents and one copy)

(ii) VOLUME II - Technical Proposal (Submit original and five copies)

(iii) VOLUME III – Past Performance Information (Submit original and four copies)

(iv) VOLUME IV – Pricing Proposal (Submit original and two copies for tariffs information). All other pricing is to be submitted in the CARE II HQ as required in Paragraph(c)(6)(i) below).

NOTE: Instructions for submitting Volumes I through IV are as follows:

(2) Executed RFP Documents (VOLUME I). Offerors shall submit all documents requiring signature or completion by the offeror. Each offeror shall complete applicable fill-ins and signatures and submit the original documents listed below. An authorized official of the firm shall sign the offer and all certifications requiring original signature.

Standard Form 1449, including acknowledgment of amendments, if applicable.

FAR Clause 52.212-3, Offeror Representations and Certifications – Commercial Items

FAR Clause 52.203-2, Certificate of Independent Price Determination

FAR Clause 52.222-41, Service Contract Act of 1965, as amended. Contractors shall obtain and download the applicable wage determinations for all areas of performance on-line at the following Department of Labor website: www.wdol.gov. The wage determinations in effect at the time of proposal submission shall govern the base year period of performance. Should the Government elect to exercise a Contractor’s option period, the wage determination in effect at the time of the exercise of the option shall govern that specific option period of performance.

(3) Technical Proposal (VOLUME II). Offerors are required to submit a written technical proposal which describes their approach to meeting the requirements of the solicitation. For routes/zones for which rates are offered, offerors will provide a narrative for each of the designated route (as listed at paragraph 3.A.6.1 of Exhibit 3, PWS) indices at TAB 1 of this volume and a single consolidated narrative for all non-designated route (all other routes) indices at TAB 2 with each narrative not to exceed 15 pages in a minimum of 10-point font. Narratives shall consist of schedule profiles and service profiles on ocean service associated with each trade route for which rates are offered. Narrative data may be submitted through the Integrated Booking System (IBS) or the CARE II HQ, an Excel spreadsheet or any other comparable form. If the offeror chooses to utilize information which has been submitted and exists in IBS or the CARE II HQ on the date specified for receipt of offers, the offeror must submit a signed statement as part of their technical proposal certifying the narrative data in IBS or the CARE II HQ is accurate as of the date specified for receipt of offers and can be used for evaluation purposes.

Technical Proposals shall also address the following subfactors:

(i) Vessel Profile. Provide a vessel profile for vessels owned by, or under the offeror’s control of, the offeror which will be utilized in performance of the requirements of this solicitation. Offerors shall either provide documented evidence of vessel ownership or control, or they must submit a signed statement as part of their technical proposal certifying vessel ownership or control. Vessel profiles must include the name of the vessel, type of vessel, capacity of the vessel and the flag of registry. Data may be submitted through the Integrated Booking System (IBS) or CARE II HQ, an Excel spreadsheet or any other comparable form. If the offeror chooses to utilize information which has been submitted and exists in IBS or the CARE II HQ on the date specified for receipt of offers, the offeror must submit a signed statement as part of their technical proposal certifying the Vessel Profile data in IBS or the CARE II HQ is accurate as of the date specified for receipt of offers and can be used for evaluation purposes. US Domestic Shipyard information must be provided showing the overhaul, maintenace, and repairs done inside the US and foreign countries withing the past three years.

(ii) Port Coverage. Describe the offeror’s existing or planned port coverage in relationship to the Performance Work Statement requirements, to include use of alternate ports. Describe how feeder vessels including barges, transshipments, and landbridge arrangements will be used and managed to expand port coverage. Describe the offeror's policy for establishing cutoffs and obtaining late gates to accommodate special requirements for selected shipments.

(iii) Electronic Data Interchange (EDI). Describe the offeror’s approach to providing the mandatory EDI interface requirements identified in the solicitation and the offeror’s plans and ability to meet the EDI requirements. Offerors who are unable to provide any (one or more) of these reports must advise the Contracting Officer in their proposal of the report they will not provide during the period of the contract. Offerors must either demonstrate that they have Trading Partner Agreements (TPA) in place or submit a copy of their TPA as part of their offer. Information on TPAs can be obtained by contacting the Military Surface Deployment and Distribution Command (SDDC). A copy of the TPA and guidance is enclosed with the solicitation for your review. Contact phone numbers and e-mail addresses are on the internet at: http://www.sddc.army.mil/Contact/default.aspx.

(iv) Information Assurance & Industrial Security Plan. Offeror’s shall provide a plan that describes the offeror’s strategy for implementation of Information Assurance and Industrial Security requirements specified in the Performance Work Statement throughout the life of the contract. The plan must be tailored in scope and depth appropriate to the requirements of the solicitation.

(v) Small Business Subcontracting Plan (Applies to Large Businesses Only). The offeror shall submit a Small Business Subcontracting Plan IAW FAR Part 19.7, The Small Business Subcontracting Program, FAR Clause 52.219-9, Small Business Subcontracting Plan, and DFARS Clause 252.219-7003, Small Business Subcontracting Plan (DoD Contracts). In accordance with FAR 19.702, the offeror’s Small Business Subcontracting Plan reflect the offeror’s agreement that small business, veteran-owned small business, service-disabled veteran small business, HUBZone small business, small disadvantaged business and women-owned small business concerns will have the maximum practicable opportunity to participate in contract performance consistent with the offeror’s efficient performance.

(4) Past Performance Information (Volume III)

(i) The offeror shall submit no more than five past performance references, public or private, for which the offeror has performed services, within the previous three calendar years, similar in nature to the services described in this solicitation. Each reference should include the name of the company or Government agency services were performed for and a point of contact and phone number for the references listed. The Government may contact those references to verify information and/or gather additional information. Offerors may identify awards or recognition that they have received from their commercial customers and professional/trade organizations as evidence of their past performance for public and private organizations. References provided should address the contractor’s performance in the following areas:

(a) On-time delivery: Provide a description of the offeror's on-time delivery metrics of previous contracts either Government or Commercial.

(b) Quality of EDI data: Provide a description of the offeror's ability to meet the EDI requirements of previous contracts either Government or Commercial.

(c) Consistency and reliability of service: Provide a description of the offeror's ability to maintain service per advertised schedules to include ports of call.

(d) Loss of and/or damage to shipments: Provide a description of the offeror's ability to provide loss and damage free shipments.

(ii) Past Performance Questionnaires. The offeror shall send out a Past Performance Questionnaire (Attachment 12 to Exhibit 1) to each of the offeror’s references identified in their proposal along with a request for the reference to complete the questionnaire and return it to the Government by the date specified for receipt of offers. The responsibility to send out the Past Performance Questionnaires rest solely with the offeror; it shall not be delegated to any other entity. Once the questionnaires are completed by your reference points of contact, the information therein shall be considered procurement sensitive and shall not be released to you, the offeror. Completed Past Performance Questionnaires shall be submitted via email to dorothy.dailey@ustranscom.mil and bill.lindquist@ustranscom.mil.

(5) Pricing Proposal Narrative (Volume IV)

(i) Proposed rates shall be submitted using the CARE II HQ system. Pricing information shall not be included in offeror’s written technical proposal.

(ii) Tariffs. To allow for a price comparison review, the offeror must submit with its Pricing Proposal information sufficient to enable proposal evaluators to access internet web sites containing all effective commercial tariffs published by the offeror for all trade routes for which service is offered under this solicitation.

(d) Electronic Offers

(1) The electronic proposal must be submitted using the following Internet address:

https://eta.sddc.army.mil/

(2) CARE II HQ Application Instructions:

(i) Instructions for the CARE II HQ application can be obtained from the CARE II System Center Web Site.

(ii) Carriers should enter the service that provides the shortest transit time the carrier is willing to offer between the origin and destination.

(iii) Note that a rate offered with the value of "$0" (zero dollars) will be considered as "no charge" for service by the Contracting Officer.

(iv) Carriers should not offer a rate in the CARE II HQ for contract line item numbers (CLINs) they do not offer service on.

(v) All basic container rates, unless otherwise specified, are to be offered in whole dollars per container (lump sum).

(vi) All basic breakbulk rates, unless otherwise specified, are to be offered in whole dollars per measurement ton (MsT) of 40 cubic feet manifest measure and apply on a Free In and Out (FIO) basis.

(vii) Changes to rate offers can be made to any Contract Rate Submission as identified in the CARE II HQ up until the date specified for the receipt of offers. The offeror must enter changes to offers in whole dollars per measurement ton (MT), per container, or as otherwise specified, in the appropriate line item field.

(viii) Carriers must notify the Contracting Officer within 72 hours of the solicitation issuance date if they are unable to obtain a CARE II HQ account.

(ix) Once a CARE II HQ account is established, carriers must immediately notify the Contracting Officer in the event difficulties are encountered in accessing the CARE II HQ. If carriers are unable to access the CARE II HQ to enter the required data in sufficient time to be received by the Government by the date established for receipt of proposals, they may request authorization from the Contracting Officer to submit a hard copy containing the required proposal data. Offerors are advised that in the event submission of hard copies is authorized, timely submission of offers is still required in accordance with the terms of the solicitation. In the event both electronic proposal and hard copy proposal are received in a timely manner from the same carrier, the electronic proposal will take precedence.

(3) Request for CARE II HQ User Account.

(i) The CARE II HQ application will be provided only upon receipt of an electronic request submitted via the SDDC Electronic Transportation Acquisition (ETA) web site (https://eta.sddc.army.mil/). Click on the "New User Registration" link on the left side of the page. Scroll down the page to "CARE II (Carriers)" and put a check in the box to the left. Scroll down to the bottom of the page and click "Generate Request Form". Fill in all applicable information and click "Submit Request". The CARE II HQ user account will consist of a User ID and Password, each unique to the individual offeror. Upon receipt of the request, the CARE II HQ user ID and password will be made available to the requesting party via e-mail within two working days. Help with access to CARE II HQ is available by contacting Roosevelt Mitchell at 618-220-5659 or at roosevelt.t.mitchell.civ@mail.mil.

(ii) How to Sync Certificate with ETA:

(a) Log in to ETA with User ID and Password at https://eta.sddc.army.mil/

(b) On the top banner select “Support”

(c) Click on “Register certificate (CAC/ECA/TWIC)” in the dropdown

(d) Click on “Register certificate”

(e) Submit CAPTCHA answer and click “SAVE”

(f) CAC/ECA is now registered

(iii) Hardware and Software Requirements

(a) The minimum hardware and software requirements for the operation of the CARE II HQ application are:

� 1 Gigahertz (GHz) 32-bit (x86) or 64-bit (x64) � Windows XP or newer version

� 2GB RAM

� 200 MB hard disk space � Super VGA monitor with 1024 x 768 resolutions � Microsoft Mouse or compatible pointing device

(b) In order to access the CARE II HQ from the web, offerors must have internet access and the following minimum web browser specifications:

� Microsoft Internet Explorer Internet Explorer 7.0 � Browser must support 128-bit encryption for secure transmission of data

USTRANSCOM will release the successful offeror's contract award information, including unit prices (rates), when requested by an unsuccessful offeror at a debriefing pursuant to FAR 15.506. Unless you can demonstrate that the release of successful offeror's information is likely to cause substantial harm to your present or future competitive position if it were released to one of your competitors, USTRANSCOM will release the successful offeror's information at contract award debriefings.

In response to this notification, you are invited to provide justification for USTRANSCOM to withhold successful offeror's information, including unit prices, from release at a debriefing. You must provide this written justification with your proposal. USTRANSCOM will carefully consider your response, and if we determine that some or all of the successful offeror's information, by law, should be released at debriefings, we will notify you in writing.

Listed below are Guidelines that may assist you in justifying a request for USTRANSCOM to not release successful offeror's contract award information in a debriefing.

GENERAL GUIDANCE FOR WITHHOLDING INFORMATION

UNDER EXEMPTION 4 (U.S.C. & 552(b)(4))

OF THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT

FOR USE BY CONTRACTORS OR POTENTIAL CONTRACTORS

The United States Transportation Command (USTRANSCOM) must have a detailed justification to protect material you believe should not be released under the provisions of Exemption 4 of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The following general guidelines may help you to identify exemption 4 material that you have provided to us and it may assist you in the preparation of a statement to support protection of the identified information.

Explanatory material and headings associated with cost and pricing data are normally released unless you can justify its deletion.

(e) Pre-Proposal Conference

USTRANSCOM will host the RDC-7 Preproposal Conference on 02 May 2013, from 0800 to NOON at Scott AFB, IL in the 932nd Air Wing Auditorium ( Building 3650). Due to the room capacity, seating is limited to three (3) individuals per carrier.

Names of attendees must be submitted to Dorothy Dailey (dorothy.dailey@ustranscom.mil) and William Lindquist (Bill.Lindquist@ustranscom.mil) via e-mail no later than 29 April 2013 in order to facilitate a base pass.

(End of Addendum to FAR 52.212-1)

ADDENDUM TO FAR 52.212-2

FAR 52.212-2 is amended in its entirety as follows:

(a) The Government will award multiple contracts resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offerors whose offers conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. Multiple contracts will be awarded to provide Government shippers flexibility of choice and service coverage. Low-price technically-acceptable source selection procedures will be utilized in accordance with FAR 15.101-2, DFARS 215.101-2 and DoD Source Selection Procedures. In accordance with the Cargo Preference Act and Jones Act, this acquisition requires that all goods transported by water between US ports are carried by US Flag ships, constructed in the US, owned by US citizens, and crewed by US citizens or US permanent residents.

The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

(1) Technical. Offeror’s written Technical Proposals will be evaluated to determine if the offeror’s technical approach is Acceptable or Unacceptable. Offeror’s technical proposals will be evaluated on a by-lane basis (specific CLINs in the CARE II System under various routes – i.e., “US East Coast to Puerto Rico”). Therefore, an offeror’s technical proposal may be rated Acceptable on some lanes and Unacceptable on others. Offerors will be eligible for an award if their technical proposal is rated Acceptable on at least one lane. The Government reserves the right to reject any offer of service on those route indices or route zones (where applicable) where the Government determines that the technical capability to serve the route index or indices as stated in the contractor’s offer is less than the contractor’s service offered commercially. The following subfactors will be evaluated under the Technical Factor:

(i.) Vessel Profile. To be rated Acceptable, offerors must propose vessels that they own, or have control of, that meet the requirements of the solicitation for the routes/zones proposed.

(ii) Port Coverage. To be rated Acceptable, the offeror must: a) clearly describe their planned port coverage in relationship to the Performance Work Statement requirements and discuss the usage of alternate ports; b) include a description of how feeder vessels including barges, transshipments, and landbarge arrangements will be used and managed to expand port coverage; and c) describe their policy for establishing cutoffs and obtaining late gates to accommodate special requirements for selected shipments to ensure. Information submitted confirms that the offeror will meet all requirements of the solicitation. Offeror’s proposals must also demonstrate they have access to all ports for the routes/zones they are proposing rates on to be rated Acceptable. Port Coverage will be evaluated on a by-lane basis (specific CLINs in the CARE II System under various routes – i.e., “US East Coast to Puerto Rico”). Therefore, an offeror’s port coverage may be rated Acceptable on some lanes and Unacceptable on others.

(iii) EDI Capability. To be rated Acceptable, the offeror must demonstrate that they will provide all mandatory EDI interface requirements as described in the solicitation and they must also demonstrate that they have Trading Partner Agreements in place.

(iv) Information Assurance & Industrial Security Plan: To be rated Acceptable, the offeror’s plan must describe their strategy for implementation of Information Assurance and Industrial Security requirements specified in the Performance Work Statement throughout the life of the contract. The offeror’s plan must be tailored in scope and depth appropriate to this effort and meet the requirements of the solicitation.

(v) Small Business Subcontracting Plan (Applies to Large Businesses Only). Offeror’s Small Business Subcontracting Plan will be evaluated to determine if the offeror’s proposed plan is Acceptable or Unacceptable. To be rated Acceptable, the offeror’s proposed Small Business Subcontracting Plan must meet all of the requirements in FAR Part 19.7, FAR Clause 52.219-9, Small Business Subcontracting Plan, and DFARS Clause 252.219-7003, Small Business Subcontracting Plan (DoD Contracts), and in accordance with FAR 19.702, the offeror’s Small Business Subcontracting Plan must reflect the offeror’s agreement that small business, veteran-owned small business, service-disabled veteran-owned small business, HUBZone small business, small disadvantaged business, and women-owned small business concerns will have the maximum practicable opportunity to participate in contract performance consistent with the offeror’s efficient performance.

(2) Past Performance. Offeror’s Past Performance Information for efforts completed within the past three years will be evaluated to determine if the offeror’s past performance is Acceptable or Unacceptable. If, based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown, their offer will be rated Acceptable. If, based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort then their offer will be rated Unacceptable.

(i) The Government will begin the Past Performance evaluation by determining the recency and relevancy of each referenced contract. Recency is defined as any work performed within the past three years from the date of issuance of the solicitation. The following relevancy ratings will be utilized in evaluating the relevancy of the offeror’s past performance. Only those references that are determined to be recent and relevant will be evaluated.

(ii) Next, the Government will determine how well the offeror performed on the recent and relevant contracts.

(iii) Finally, the Government will assign an overall Past Performance Information rating of Acceptable or Unacceptable to each offer based on the past performance information submitted by the offeror, and any other past performance information obtained by the Government through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), other databases, interviews with Program Managers, Contracting Officers, Fee Determining Officials or any other source available to the Government.

(3) Price. Offeror’s proposed pricing will be evaluated to determine if the offeror’s proposed pricing is considered fair and reasonable, as well as realistic. Price evaluation for all proposed rates will be performed in accordance with FAR 15.404-1, utilizing the rates the offeror has inserted into the CARE II HQ. Reasonableness may be determined based on comparison to prices submitted by the competition, current market conditions, comparison to the Government estimate, or utilization of any other price analysis technique identified in FAR 15.404-1(b)(2). Price realism will be based on an evaluation of prices to determine whether the specific elements of the proposal reflect a clear understanding of the requirements and are consistent with the unique methods of performance described in the offeror's technical proposal. Offeror’s pricing will be evaluated on a by-lane basis (specific CLINs in the CARE II System under various routes – i.e., “US East Coast to Puerto Rico”). Therefore an offeror’s pricing may be determined fair, reasonable and realistic on some lanes and not on others. Offerors will be eligible for an award if their pricing is determined fair, reasonable and realistic on at least one lane. Any unreasonably or unrealistically priced lanes are subject to removal from the competitive range on the basis that the offeror does not understand the requirement for the lane or has submitted an unrealistic price for the lane. The Government may accept some or all rates or services initially offered without conducting discussions. If discussions are conducted, they will be limited to those offers considered to be within the competitive range and may be limited to certain rates or services specifically identified in writing by the Contracting Officer to the offerors. Offerors remaining within the competitive range upon conclusion of discussions will be afforded an opportunity to submit a final proposal revision.

(i) Applicable to Ocean Rates – In addition to evaluation under FAR Part 15, U.S. Flag Service offers will be evaluated for compliance with the Cargo Preference Act of 1904 (10 U.S.C. 2631, as amended). A rate will not be considered for award should the Contracting Officer (CO) determine that the rate exceeds charges to private persons for carriage of like goods, pursuant to the Cargo Preference Act of 1904 (or other law or regulation).

(ii) The Contracting Officer will not consider an offer to be fair and reasonable, if it contains rates higher than the highest commercial service contract rate; or that are clearly and substantially in excess of the rates stated in comparable commercial service contracts to which the offeror is party, for the same trades and similar services.

(b) Voluntary Intermodal Sealift Agreement (VISA) Priorities Preference Application

(1) Application of the VISA priority preference will proceed as follows:

(2) Submitted offers that are responsive to this solicitation, have been rated as acceptable under Technical, Past Performance, and have proposed fair and reasonable, as well as realistic, pricing will be grouped into the VISA participant categories for each trade lane. VISA participant categories are the prioritized order for utilization of commercial sealift capacity to meet Department of Defense requirements. Specifically, the categories of priority of vessel capacity offered to perform these services in order from highest priority to lowest priority are as follows:

(i) U.S. Flag vessel capacity operated by a VISA "Participant" that has made a current, minimum commitment of its U.S. Flag vessel capacity to Stages I, II and III of VISA or that has made a current, minimum commitment of its Jones Act capacity (capacity exclusively engaged in the domestic trades) to Stage III of VISA and a current, minimum commitment of the remainder of its U.S. Flag vessel capacity to Stages I, II and III of VISA or, with regard to an offer for a long-term charter to DoD, that has made a current, minimum commitment of its U.S. Flag vessel capacity to Stage III of VISA. The U.S. Flag Vessel Sharing Agreement (VSA) capacity of such a Participant also is grouped in this category of priority.

(a) U.S. Flag vessel capacity operated by a VISA "Participant" that has made a current, minimum commitment of its U.S. Flag vessel capacity to Stage III of VISA and the U.S. Flag Vessel Sharing Agreement (VSA) capacity of such a Participant.

(b) U. S. Flag vessel capacity operated by a non-Participant.

(c) Combination U.S./foreign flag vessel capacity operated by the kind of "Participant" described in paragraph 1 above and the combination U.S./foreign flag VSA capacity of such a Participant.

(d) Combination U.S./foreign flag vessel capacity operated by the kind of "Participant" described in paragraph 2 above and the combination U.S./foreign flag VSA capacity of such a Participant.

(e) Combination U.S./foreign flag vessel capacity operated by a non-Participant.

(f) U.S. owned or operated foreign flag vessel capacity and VSA capacity of the kind of "Participant" described in paragraph II.A.1 above.

(g) U.S. owned or operated foreign flag vessel capacity and VSA capacity of the kind of "Participant" described in paragraph II.A.2 above.

(h) U.S. owned or operated foreign flag vessel capacity or VSA capacity of a non-Participant.

(i) Foreign-owned or operated foreign flag vessel capacity of a non-Participant.

(c) Options. The Government will evaluate offers for award by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. The two one-year option periods will be priced at the time of award. The Government will conduct a price analysis to determine whether the prices are fair and reasonable. A price realism analysis will also be conducted to determine whether the specific elements of the proposal reflect a clear understanding of the requirements, and are consistent with the unique methods of performance described in the offeror’s technical proposal.

(d) Basis for Award. Beginning with the low-priced offeror, awards will be made by lane to offerors whose proposals are determined technically acceptable, have acceptable past performance, and have proposed fair and reasonable, as well as realistic, pricing. Awards will be made to contractors having the highest VISA priority 1 and highest US Domestic Shipyard 1 rating then proceed to contractors with a lower VISA priority and lower US Domestic Shipyard only after the higher priorities have been exhausted. The process will continue in this manner until all contract awards are made to ensure the Government’s anticipated transportation requirements are met.

(e) A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer’s specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

(f) If the Government extends the contract pursuant to FAR 52.217-8, Option to Extend Services, such extension shall be at the rates in effect under the contract when the option is exercised.