Attachment_5_PPQ.docx

HTC711-13-R-D003

ATTACHMENT 5

Recent and Relevant Past Performance

USTRANSCOM

HTC711-13-R-D003 Enterprise Architecture/Enterprise Engineering/Enterprise Data Office

Please provide concise comments regarding your overall assessment of the contractor’s performance on the contract or workload identified below. Your ratings (i.e. Satisfactory, Exceptional, etc.) should include comments for any question rated exceptional or lower than satisfactory. Definitions for ratings are provided on page 7. Please respond by sending the entire completed questionnaire, including these instructions, via e-mail to the address below.

Index Number _____________________ (To be completed by USTC/TCAQ upon receipt of completed questionnaire.)

I. WORK PERFORMED IDENTIFICATION

Contractor (Company/Division):

Contract Number/Type (FFP, CPFF, etc):

Work Performed Title:____________________________________________________________________

Brief Description of Work Performed:________________________________________________________

Dollar value:____________________________________________________________________________

Period of Performance:____________________________________________________________________

II. RESPONDENT(S) TO QUESTIONNAIRE

Name:____________________________________________________________________________ Position/Title:______________________________________________________________________ Business Address:___________________________________________________________________ Relation to Program:_________________________________________________________________ Phone:(DSN)__________________________(Commercial)__________________________________ FAX:(DSN)__________________________(Commercial)__________________________________ Email Address:______________________________________________________________________ Other suggested points of contact:___________________________________________________________

Give a brief, general description of what the contractor was required to provide/deliver. Please note that if your response indicates a weakness in the contractor’s performance, a notification may be submitted to the contractor, and they may be made aware of the comment. The contractor will not be made aware of the commenter’s name or office.

REMARKS:___________________________________________________________________________

III. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

NOTE: Remarks may be continued on separate pages. Please identify category and question number.

1. Staffing

a. Were the types of personnel (skill, expertise, and certification level) the contractor used adequate to accomplish the effort without Government intervention?

Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____

REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________

b. Did the contractor provide replacement personnel of the same quality, skills, and certification level of vacancies with minimum disruption to the support effort?

Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____

REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________

c. Did the contractor provide personnel meeting the DOD 8570 requirement?

Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____

REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________

d. How effective was the contractor in aligning and re-aligning resources (personnel and other) to meet varying workloads?

Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____

REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________

e. How would you rate the contractor’s emphasis on customer satisfaction?

Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____

REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________

2. Technical Approach

a. How would you rate the contractor's overall technical approach?

Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____

REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________

b. How effective was the contractor in accomplishing planned project activities/requirements within the established milestones/timeframes?

Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____

REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________

c. How effective was the contractor in accomplishing quality checks to ensure that the final deliverables met the Performance Work Statement requirements?

Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____

REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________

d. How effective was the contractor in identifying and resolving enterprise data quality issues, and utilizing DQ tools (e.g. DataFlux) to address these identified issues?

Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____

REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________

e. How effective was the contractor in supporting System Interface Management at an enterprise level, to include the mining and documentation of these interfaces with the goal of minimizing redundancy?

Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____

REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________

f. How effective was the contractor in the development and validation of service-oriented architecture artifacts (e.g. XSGs, XMLs, Service Level Agreements and service definition framework) and Electronic Data Interchange/Electronic Business transactions adhering to X12 standards?

Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____

REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________

g. How effective was the contractor in developing and maintaining enterprise-wide data models (LDM and PDM ?

Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____

REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________

h. How effective was the contractor in utilizing DOD Architecture Framework Version 2.0 to develop enterprise- and solution-level architectures?

Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____ REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________

i. How effective was the contractor in utilizing modeling techniques such as structured and/or object-oriented analysis that meet integrated enterprise architecture requirements?

Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____

REMARKS:___________________________________________________________________________________

j. How effective was the contractor in analyzing internally-/externally-developed architectures for potential linkage and/or integration with the Enterprise Architecture (EA) and/or system/program architectures?

Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____

REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________

k. How effective was the contractor in providing functional expertise to customers in order to facilitate the modification, update, documentation, and coordination of architecture of your customers IT systems?

Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____ REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________

l. How effective was the contractor in tracking and publishing action items for customer review, gathering and publishing the agenda, taking minutes, and building slide presentations?

Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____

REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________

m. How effective was the contractor in developing and providing instructional and training solutions in support of automated business processes and supporting technology principles?

Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____

REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________

n. How effectively did the contractor perform database administration and maintenance particularly in an Oracle environment?

Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____

REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________

o. How effective was the contractor in providing technical expertise and support in response to rapidly evolving IT system environment and military like operational tempo of time sensitive customer demands and the need for greater reliance on IT solutions to fulfill critical customer needs?

Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____

REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________

p. How effective was the contractor in developing and maintaining individual program/project data models required to meet organizational requirements, particularly for mission critical data?

Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____

REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________

q. How effective was the contractor in developing and maintaining the enterprise-level test program consisting of writing test plans, establishing criteria that must be met before starting and concluding the integrated test phase, documenting the test procedures and participating in testing? Describe how well the testing progressed using test results to identify opportunities for improving system performance and functional capability.

Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____

REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________

r. How effective was the contractor in providing analysis and feedback on the data, data exchanges, and data flows supporting multiple automated functions in terms of data quality criteria such as timeliness, accuracy, completeness, validity, consistency, and uniqueness?

Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____

REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________

s. How effective was the contractor in providing data structure and database engineering support for the maintenance and modification of IT systems comprised of multiple hardware and operating system, and system architecture configurations?

Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____

REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________

t. How effective was the contractor in assisting program/product manager in understanding published IT systems data models, data dictionaries and to provide recommendations for improving system performance?

Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____

REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________

u. How effective was the contractor in managing a MS Server 2008 environment?

Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____

REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________

v. How effective was the contractor in providing automated tools for storing, accessing, managing, and relating information about enterprise level data, software systems and services?

Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____

REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________

w. How effective was the contractor in storing IT system data consisting of such items as exchange performance, interface design documents, operational and system-level business rules and metadata that readably accessible by interested stakeholders?

Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____

REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________

x. How effective was the contractor in developing ISPs or TISPs supporting systems in accordance with DOD Instruction 4630.08, Procedures for Interoperability and Supportability of Information Technology (IT) and National Security Systems (NSS) and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Instruction (CJCSI) 6212.01E, Interoperability and Supportability of Information Technology and National Security Systems, and other applicable guidance?

Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____

REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________

3. Cost Control.

a. If the contract was other than firm fixed price, did the contractor use effective methods and effective cost controls?

Yes___________ No_______

REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________

4. Contractor’s Overall performance

l. Were there any penalties for non-performance assessed against the contractor and if so, to what extent?

Yes ___________ No_______

REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________

2. How would you rate the Contractor’s overall performance?

Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____

REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________

5. Would you award to this contractor in the future?

Yes___________ No_________

If “no”, why?_____________________________________________________________________________

Any additional comments: ________________________________________________________________________________________

DOD uses a common DOD assessment rating system to evaluate a contractor’s past performance. Ratings range from “Unsatisfactory” to “Exceptional”.