Attachment 7

HTC711-09-R-0036

Attachment 7

JOINT FLOW AND ANALYSIS SYSTEM FOR TRANSPORTATION (JFAST)

HTC711-09-R-0036

SUMMARY EVALUATION MATRIX

Offerors shall complete the Summary Evaluation Matrix provided below and submit with their proposal. This matrix does not count in the total page count. The purpose of the matrix is to show critical interrelationships and dependencies between the Performance Work Statement (PWS), Section L Instructions to Offerors and Section M Evaluations and the Offeror’s proposal. The Government has completed Sections L, M and PWS columns. The Offerors shall complete the Proposal Reference column by listing the applicable Volume, page and paragraphs.

If this matrix conflicts with any other requirement, direction, or provision of this solicitation, the other reference shall take precedence over this matrix. Additionally, to the extent this matrix discloses details as to the extent or manner by which the Government intends to evaluate offeror’s proposals for award, Section M references in the matrix are for information purposes only, and the Government shall be obligated to evaluate proposals solely in conformance with the provisions of the Section M of the solicitation. This Matrix is for cross-reference purposes only.

REFERENCE (Identify location in proposal that addresses requirement)

L-4, B. 2. VOLUME II – TASK ORDER (TO) APPROACH

Offerors shall submit a sound plan for accomplishing the requirements of TO 0001 within the required period of performance. The plan shall adequately identify all major project activities in logical order and realistic milestone dates. Rationale for the proposed labor categories and hours mix of personnel shall be provided in a narrative. Additionally, offerors shall show their approach in a personnel matrix which identifies all labor categories to be used in performing TO 0001. The matrix shall correlate positions by labor category to the PWS paragraphs. The format for this matrix is as the offeror deems appropriate. The personnel matrix is included in the page count.

M-1, C. 2. Factor II – TASK ORDER (TO) APPROACH

Measures of merit for this factor are met when the offeror submits:

(a) a sound plan for accomplishing the requirements of the task order within the required period of performance. The plan shall adequately identify all major project activities in logical order and realistic milestone dates;

(b) A sound approach as reflected in a personnel matrix which identifies all labor categories the contractor will use in performing the task order that properly correlates positions by labor category to the PWS paragraphs and reflects a realistic approach to accomplishing the requirements of the PWS.

ATTACHMENT 4, TASK ORDER 0001 – PRICING TABLE

PWS Paragraphs:

1.3.1.1 – 1.3.1.8, 1.3.2, 1.3.3, 1.3.4.1 – 1.3.4.4,1.3.5.1-1.3.5.3, 1.3.6.1-1.3.6.4, 1.3.7 – 1.3.7.2, 1.3.8.1-1.3.8.4, 1.3.9, 1.3.9.1, 1.3.10.1, 1.3.10.2, 1.3.10.3.1-1.3.10.3.5, 1.11.1 – 1.11.17