Att 2 HT941026Q2033 Past Perf Quest.docx
DOCX document 31 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Intraoperative Neuromonitoring Services
- Solicitation number
- HT941026Q2033
- Issued by
-
Defense Health Agency
About this file
This is a past performance questionnaire template designed to evaluate contractor performance for solicitation HT941026Q2033, a Firm-Fixed Price Competitive solicitation for Intraoperative Neuromonitoring Services at Naval Medical Center San Diego, California. The questionnaire requests that identified contractor references complete and return the assessment by June 4, 2026, via email to dania.suazo.civ@health.mil.
The questionnaire assesses contractor performance across five key rating areas using a six-point scale (Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, Unsatisfactory, or Not Applicable). The evaluation criteria include: Overall Fill Rate, measuring the contractor's ability to provide and retain qualified Health Care Workers in accordance with contract terms; On-Time Fill Percentage, assessing timely provision of qualified personnel and complete credentialing packages; Turnover Rate, evaluating retention of qualified staff with minimal operational disruption; and Replenishment Rate, measuring the contractor's planning and provision of replacement candidates for absences and extended leave. The questionnaire also includes sections requiring respondent information, offeror reference information, a performance summary with yes/no questions regarding contract award eligibility and termination history, and space for additional comments. This template is used by the Defense Health Agency's Healthcare Contracting Division-West to validate past performance of offerors competing for this non-personal services contract.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Combined Synopsis Solicitation.docx | DOCX document | |
| Att 3 PRICING.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Att 1 PWS - Neuro Monitoring Services.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
THIS SAMPLE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
DHA Western Markets is conducting a Firm-Fixed Price Competitive solicitation. The offeror has identified you as a reference to validate past performance.
Solicitation Number, HT941026Q2033 is for non-personal services of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring Services at NAVAL MEDICAL CENTER SAN DIEGO, CA.
Please complete the following questionnaire to assist our evaluation of the Contractor’s past performance and return via email no later than 06/04/2026 to dania.suazo.civ@health.mil.
RESPONDENT INFORMATION:
Contracting Activity/Customer:
Point of Contact (POC):
Title of POC:
Telephone:
Email:
OFFEROR’S REFERENCE INFORMATION:
Contractor Name:
Point of Contact (POC):
Telephone Number:
Email:
CONTRACT INFORMATION:
Please refer to the following assessment definitions to assess the Contractor’s performance in each of the areas listed in this questionnaire:
(E) Exceptional - The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.
(V) Very Good - The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
(S) Satisfactory - The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were resolved satisfactorily.
(M) Marginal - Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the Contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
(U) Unsatisfactory - Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
(N) Not Applicable – Unable to assess the area.
Overall Fill Rate (CPARS “Quality of Service” Rating Area)
| Assess how the Contractor: |
| E |
| V |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
Provided qualified Health Care Workers (HCW) IAW the terms and conditions of the contract.
Ensured that qualified HCW’s remained filled IAW the terms and conditions of the contract.
Recruited, placed, and retained qualified HCW’s with minimal disruption for hard-to-fill (specialty) positions or at remote locations.
If other than “Satisfactory,” explain how the performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:
On-Time Fill Percentage (CPARS “Schedule” Rating Area)
| Assess how the Contractor: |
| E |
| V |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
Provide qualified HCW’s on time IAW the terms and conditions of the contract.
Provided complete, current and accurate qualifying package for each HCW IAW the terms and conditions of the contract.
Provided complete, current and accurate credentialing/privileging packages within established time frames IAW the terms and conditions of the contract.
If other than “Satisfactory,” explain how the performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:
Turnover Rate (CPARS “Management” Rating area)
| Assess how the Contractor: |
| E |
| V |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
Retained qualified HCWs without frequent turnover and minimal operations disruption IAW the terms of the contract.
If other than “Satisfactory,” explain how the performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:
Replenishment Rate (CPARS “Management” Rating area)
| Assess how the Contractor: |
| E |
| V |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
Planned for and provided replacement candidates during the life of the contract to, include pre-planned/unplanned absences and extended leave of absence to avoid disruption of services and/or work schedule IAW the terms of the contract.
If other than “Satisfactory,” explain how the performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:
| PERFORMANCE SUMMARY |
| Yes |
| No |
Would you award this firm another contract:
If you answered “No” provide an explanation:
Was the contract terminated for default or cause:
If you answered “Yes” provide an explanation:
Additional Comments:
Signature: _________________________________________ Date: __________________
Print Name: _________________________________________
Title: _______________________________________________
Telephone: __________________________________________
Thank you for your participation in providing a detailed and accurate history of past performance for this offeror.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .