Attachment 3 - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 34 KB Posted

Attached to
Contract Business Analyst
Solicitation number
HT940826QE031
Issued by

About this file

This is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) to be completed by references for contractors bidding on a Defense Health Agency (DHA) Request for Proposal (RFP) for a 100% Small Business Set-Aside contract (Solicitation Number HT940826QE031). The questionnaire is designed to validate contractor past performance on similar work and must be completed and returned via email to corey.a.black.civ@health.mil and abby.e.allen2.civ@health.mil by a specified deadline. References are asked to provide information about their contracting activity, the contractor's point of contact, contract details, contract magnitude (annual and total dollar values, number of FTEs, and facility type), and the contractor's role (prime, subcontractor, teaming partner, or joint venture).

The questionnaire assesses contractor performance across five key rating areas aligned with the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS): Overall Fill Rate (Quality of Service), On-Time Fill Percentage (Schedule), Turnover Rate (Management), and Replenishment Rate (Management). For each area, references rate performance using a five-point scale (Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, Unsatisfactory, or Not Applicable) based on the contractor's ability to provide qualified Medical Administrative Technicians in accordance with contract terms and conditions. The questionnaire includes a performance summary section requiring references to indicate whether they would award another contract to the firm and whether the contract was terminated for default or cause. This template is specific to the Contract Business Analyst position in support of San Antonio Medical Health Services at Joint Base San Antonio (JBSA) Lackland and JBSA Randolph.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
HT940826QE031.pdf PDF
Attachment 2 - Past Performance Summary Sheet.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)

The Defense Health Agency, Healthcare Contracting Division – South has issued a Request for Proposal (RFP) for a 100% Small Business Set-Aside. The offeror has identified you as a reference to validate past performance.

Solicitation Number HT940826QE031

Please complete the following questionnaire to assist our evaluation of the Contractor’s past performance, and return via email no later than XXXXXXXXXXX to corey.a.black.civ@health.mil and abby.e.allen2.civ@health.mil.

RESPONDENT INFORMATION:

Contracting Activity/Customer:

Point of Contact (POC):

Title of POC:

Telephone:

Email:

OFFEROR’S REFERENCE INFORMATION:

Contractor Name:

Point of Contact (POC):

Telephone Number:

Email:

CONTRACT INFORMATION:

Contract Number:

Task Order Number:

Type of Contract:

Performance Period: (Base plus any options):

Description of Services:

MAGNITUDE

Annual Contract Value:

Total Contract Dollar Value:

COMPLEXITY

Number of FTEs:

Facility Type (i.e., Hospital/Clinic):

Contractor performed on this contract as (include an X in the appropriate cell):

Prime
Subcontractor
Teaming Partner
Joint Venture

Please refer to the following assessment definitions to assess the Contractor’s performance in each of the areas listed in this questionnaire:

(E) Exceptional - The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

(V) Very Good - The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

(S) Satisfactory - The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were resolved satisfactorily.

(M) Marginal - Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the Contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

(U) Unsatisfactory - Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

(N) Not Applicable – Unable to assess the area.

Overall Fill Rate (CPARS “Quality of Service” Rating Area)

Assess how the Contractor:
E
V
S
M
U
NA

Provided qualified Medical Administrative Technician IAW the terms and conditions of the contract.

Ensured that qualified Medical Administrative Technician remained filled IAW the terms and conditions of the contract.

Recruited, placed and retained qualified Medical Administrative Technician with minimal disruption for hard-to-fill (specialty) positions or at remote locations.

If other than “Satisfactory,” explain how the performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:

On-Time Fill Percentage (CPARS “Schedule” Rating Area)

Assess how the Contractor:
E
V
S
M
U
NA

Provide qualified Medical Administrative Technician on time IAW the Terms and conditions of the contract.

Provided complete, current and accurate qualifying package for each Medical Administrative Technician IAW the Terms and conditions of the contract.

Provided complete, current and accurate credentialing/privileging packages within established time frames IAW the Terms and conditions of the contract.

If other than “Satisfactory,” explain how the performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:

Turnover Rate (CPARS “Management” Rating area)

Assess how the Contractor:
E
V
S
M
U
NA

Retained qualified Medical Administrative Technician without frequent turnover and minimal operations disruption IAW the terms of the contract.

If other than “Satisfactory,” explain how the performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:

Replenishment Rate (CPARS “Management” Rating area)

Assess how the Contractor:
E
V
S
M
U
NA

Planned for and provided replacement candidates during the life of the contract to, include pre-planned/unplanned absences and extended leave of absence to avoid disruption of services and/or work schedule IAW the terms of the contract.

If other than “Satisfactory,” explain how the performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:

PERFORMANCE SUMMARY
Yes
No

Would you award this firm another contract:

If you answered “No” provide an explanation:

Was the contract terminated for default or cause:

If you answered “Yes” provide an explanation:

Additional Comments:

Signature: _________________________________________ Date: __________________

Print Name: ________________________________________

Title: ______________________________________________

Telephone: _________________________________________

Thank you for your participation in providing a detailed and accurate history of past performance for this offeror.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .