Questions_and_Answers_to_Solicitation_HSHQEC13R00013.docx

DOCX document 17 KB Posted

Attached to
Protective Security Officer
Solicitation number
HSHQEC-13-R-00013
Issued by

About this file

Questions and Answers to Solicitation HSHQEC13R00013

View the file

Other files

Show all 17

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Questions and Answers to Solicitation HSHQEC-13-R-00013 SF 30 Continuation Sheet 1.) Question:

PSO solicitation page 2 states questions are due on Friday, September 20 @ 1 pm. But in Solicitation Notice to Offerors on page 69, it states questions are due Monday, September 23 @ 12pm. Will the government clarify last date for questions?

Answer:

The government will amend the solicitation to correct page 69 to read Friday, September 20, 2013 @ 1:00 p.m.

2.) Question:

No quantities are listed in the exhibits from 8A through 9D. Will the government verify quantities and post new exhibits?

Answer:

The exhibits (attached hereto) have been updated to reflect the quantities.

3.) Question:

Please verify that M-F excludes holidays and 7 days includes holidays?

M-F excludes holidays and 24/7 includes holidays.

4.) Question:

Will the government verify how guard mount is currently conducted, 15 minutes or 30 minutes before each shift?

Answer:

There are no provisions in CBA 2013-5859 regarding guard mount 5.) Question:

We are not able to open the SF 1449- Pricing Schedule. Will the government post a new like for the SF1449 and pricing schedule?

Answer:

The SF 1449 –Pricing Schedule is assessable.

6.) Question:

If the prime does not have 3 past performances of similar scope, magnitude and complexity as a mitigating factor for a lack of Past Performance would the Government consider the resume of the prime’s Corporate Security Officer as one of the PPs; our company has a very experienced Corporate Security Officer who is going to oversee this contract and will the Government take into account this experience?

Answer:

See Notes 1 and 2 under “Notes for Relevant Past Performance” on pp. 57-58 of the RFP.

7.) Question:

If the prime does not have 3 past performances of similar scope, magnitude and complexity, in a partnering arrangement, how much of the partner’s aggregate experience offset the lack of the prime’s PPs?

Answer:

See Notes 1 and 2 under “Notes for Relevant Past Performance” on pp. 57-58 of the RFP.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .