Questions_and_Answers_to_Solicitation_HSHQEC13R00013.docx
DOCX document 17 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Protective Security Officer
- Solicitation number
- HSHQEC-13-R-00013
About this file
Questions and Answers to Solicitation HSHQEC13R00013
View the file
Other files
Show all 17
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Questions and Answers to Solicitation HSHQEC-13-R-00013 SF 30 Continuation Sheet 1.) Question:
PSO solicitation page 2 states questions are due on Friday, September 20 @ 1 pm. But in Solicitation Notice to Offerors on page 69, it states questions are due Monday, September 23 @ 12pm. Will the government clarify last date for questions?
Answer:
The government will amend the solicitation to correct page 69 to read Friday, September 20, 2013 @ 1:00 p.m.
2.) Question:
No quantities are listed in the exhibits from 8A through 9D. Will the government verify quantities and post new exhibits?
Answer:
The exhibits (attached hereto) have been updated to reflect the quantities.
3.) Question:
Please verify that M-F excludes holidays and 7 days includes holidays?
M-F excludes holidays and 24/7 includes holidays.
4.) Question:
Will the government verify how guard mount is currently conducted, 15 minutes or 30 minutes before each shift?
Answer:
There are no provisions in CBA 2013-5859 regarding guard mount 5.) Question:
We are not able to open the SF 1449- Pricing Schedule. Will the government post a new like for the SF1449 and pricing schedule?
Answer:
The SF 1449 –Pricing Schedule is assessable.
6.) Question:
If the prime does not have 3 past performances of similar scope, magnitude and complexity as a mitigating factor for a lack of Past Performance would the Government consider the resume of the prime’s Corporate Security Officer as one of the PPs; our company has a very experienced Corporate Security Officer who is going to oversee this contract and will the Government take into account this experience?
Answer:
See Notes 1 and 2 under “Notes for Relevant Past Performance” on pp. 57-58 of the RFP.
7.) Question:
If the prime does not have 3 past performances of similar scope, magnitude and complexity, in a partnering arrangement, how much of the partner’s aggregate experience offset the lack of the prime’s PPs?
Answer:
See Notes 1 and 2 under “Notes for Relevant Past Performance” on pp. 57-58 of the RFP.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .