HSG IDIQ N62742-22-R-0002 Synopsis FINAL all.pdf

N62742-22-R-0002 INDEFINITE DELIVERY/INDEFINITE QUANTITY CONTRACT FOR

ARCHITECT-ENGINEER SERVICES FOR HOUSING PROJECTS AND OTHER LODGING

TYPE PROJECTS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS UNDER THE COGNIZANCE OF NAVAL

FACILITIES ENGINEERING SYSTEMS COMMAND, PACIFIC

ALL INFORMATION NEEDED FOR INTERESTED PARTIES TO SUBMIT A STANDARD

FORM SF 330, ARCHITECT-ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS, IS CONTAINED HEREIN.

THERE IS NO SEPARATE REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) PACKAGE TO

DOWNLOAD.

This procurement will result in one Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract for multi-discipline Architect-Engineer (AE) services for housing projects and other lodging type projects at various locations under the cognizance of Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command (NAVFAC), Pacific. These services will be procured in accordance with 40 USC Chapter 11, Selection of Architects and Engineers, as implemented by FAR Subpart 36.6. The IDIQ contract will be for a base period of one year and four one-year option periods (if exercised). The total fee for the contract term shall not exceed $49,000,000. The guaranteed minimum for the contract term (including option years) is $10,000. Firm-fixed price task orders will be negotiated for this contract. There will be no dollar limit per task order and no dollar limit per year. Estimated start date is October 2022.

This proposed contract is being solicited on an UNRESTRICTED basis. The Small Business size standard classification is North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Code 541310, Architectural Services. The Government seeks the most highly qualified firm to perform the required services, based on the demonstrated competence and qualifications, in accordance with the selection criteria.

The market research study (Sources Sought Number: N6274222R0002) conducted by NAVFAC Pacific included an assessment of relevant qualifications and capabilities of potentially qualified firms. As a result of the market research analysis, a determination was made to solicit this procurement on an unrestricted basis inviting full and open competition. The NAVFAC Pacific small business office concurs with this decision.

The type of design and engineering services for architectural projects expected to be performed under this contract include, but are not limited to, the execution and delivery of Military Construction (MILCON) project documentation (DD Form 1391), Functional Analysis Concept Development (FACD)/Design Charrettes; Final Design construction documents; technical surveys and reports including site engineering investigation, topographic survey, geotechnical investigation, hazardous material survey, Munitions of Explosive Concern (MEC) survey, Cost and Schedule Risk Analysis (CSRA), and others; construction cost estimates; Comprehensive Interior Design (CID) including Structural Interior Design (SID) and Furniture, Fixtures, and Equipment (FF&E); Collateral Equipment (CEQ) Buy Packages; and Post Construction Award Services (PCAS). PCAS consist of technical consultation during construction, including, but not limited to, review of construction submittals, response to RFIs, site visits, and other miscellaneous services. Housing projects consist of new construction of one- or two-story multi-family development, consisting of 50 units or more, $10 million or more in construction value, completed within the past ten (10) years immediately preceding the date of issuance of this notice, and in tropical environments similar to Hawaii and Guam.

All contractors are advised that registration in System for Award Management (SAM) Database is required prior to award of a contract. Failure to register in the SAM Database may render your firm ineligible for award. For more information, check the SAM Web site: https://www.sam.gov.

The awarded contract will be subject to specific provisions addressing the avoidance of organizational conflicts of interest, including NFAS 5252.209-9300, Organizational Conflicts of Interest. The prime firm for this contract will be required to perform throughout the contract term.

Interviews may be scheduled with firms slated as the most highly qualified. Firms slated for interviews may be asked to clarify information contained in the SF330 submittal. Elaborate presentations are not desired.

Completion of electronic annual representations and certifications are also mandatory prior to award of a contract. Refer to FAR 52.204-8 Annual Representations and Certifications.

The contract will require that the selected AE firm have e-mail and internet access for routine exchange of correspondence. Fee proposals may be subject to an advisory audit performed by the Defense Contract Audit Agency.

In accordance with the FAR 36.601-4(b) contracts for AE services may only be awarded to firms permitted by law to practice the professions of architecture or engineering. Firms must submit proof that they are permitted by law as required by FAR 36.601-4(b). If a firm is in a jurisdiction that requires AE firm registration, the firm must provide proof of registration. If a firm is in a jurisdiction that does not require AE firm registration, the firm must provide proof eligibility to practice (e.g., a summary explaining eligibility under the laws of that jurisdiction). Failure to submit the required proof could result in a firm’s elimination from consideration.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Firms responding to this synopsis will be evaluated to determine the most highly qualified firms to perform the required services in accordance with the published selection criteria. Failure to comply with instructions, or to provide complete information under each criterion, may affect the firm’s evaluation or disqualify the firm from further consideration. The following selection criteria are listed in descending order of importance:

(1) Firm’s Specialized Experience

(2) Key Personnel Professional Qualifications, and Specialized Experience and Technical

Competence

(3) Past Performance

(4) Quality Control Program

(5) Program Management and Capacity https://www.sam.gov/

(6) Sustainable Design

(7) Small Business Participation

(8) Firm Location

(9) Volume of Work

SELECTION CRITERION (1): FIRM’S SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE

Firms will be evaluated on specialized experience in performance of services similar to those anticipated under this contract through evaluation of experience in:

Firm's recent specialized experience in the design of relevant projects. ”Relevant project” is defined as the design of a new housing development consisting of approximately 50 or more multi-family units (one- or two-story), $10 million or more in construction value, professional services and/or construction completed within the past ten (10) years immediately preceding the date of issuance of this notice, in tropical environments similar to Hawaii and Guam (subject to high winds and high humidity/corrosion). Revitalization, renovation, addition, and repair projects will not be considered as relevant projects; only new construction projects will qualify. Firm’s specialized experience in the design of a new housing development consisting of approximately 100 multi-family units or more (one- or two-story) $20 million or more in construction value, completed within the past ten (10) years immediately preceding the date of issuance of this notice, in tropical environments similar to Hawaii and Guam (subject to high winds and high humidity/corrosion) will be more favorably considered. Firm’s relevant projects with construction completion within the past ten (10) years immediately preceding the date of issuance of this notice will be more favorably considered.

Firm’s specialized experience in specified design and engineering services shall include execution of:

(1) DD1391 or similar project programming document

(2) FACD/design charrettes

(3) Final Design construction documents

“Design” of new housing development projects shall be defined as Final Design construction documents, including Design-Bid-Build (DBB) Final Design plans and specifications and/or Final Design plans and specifications prepared by the Design-Build (DB) contractor’s Designer-of-Record. DB Request for Proposal (RFP) solicitation documents will not be considered Final Design construction documents.

Prime contractor/prime A-E and subcontractor/sub-consultant with a demonstrated history of working together on prior housing development projects will be considered more favorably than those without such history.

Firms with new housing development projects that contain several of the specified design and engineering services will be given more favorable consideration than projects that contain only one of these services.

SELECTION CRITERION (1) SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

SF330, Part I, Section F. Submit a maximum of ten (10) relevant projects, $10 million or more in construction value per project, construction completed within the past ten (10) years immediately preceding the date of issuance of this notice, which best demonstrate the firm’s recent specialized experience in the design of new housing development projects. If more than ten (10) projects are submitted, the Government will evaluate the first ten (10) projects listed in Part I, Section F and disregard any other project information.

Each project shall include (1) project title; (2) location; (3) year professional services completed;

(4) year construction completed; (5) project owner; (6) point-of-contact name, e-mail address, and phone number; (7) contract number or project identification number; (8) construction cost;

(9) specified design and engineering services provided; and (10) description of project and relevance to this solicitation. A project is defined as either a stand-alone contract or a single task order in an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract. For IDIQs, the Government will not evaluate information provided for an IDIQ contract and will only evaluate individual task order information.

All projects provided in the SF330 must have been completed by the actual office/ branch/ regional office proposed to manage and perform work under this contract. Projects not meeting this requirement will be excluded from consideration in the evaluation. To enable verification, firms should include the DUNS number along with each firm name in the SF330 Part 1, Section F, Block 25, “Firm Name”. Include a contract number or project identification number in Block

21. Include an e-mail address and phone number for the point of contact in Block 23. In Block 24, include the project description, original construction contract award amount, final construction contract amount, and a summary of the work performed that demonstrates relevance to specialized experience as described above.

The submission shall include a discussion of who executed the project as pertinent to demonstrating specialized experience. For projects performed as a subcontractor or a joint venture or a limited liability company (LLC) involving different partners or member companies, specifically indicate the percentage of the work performed as a subcontractor or by those firms proposed for this contract, and identify the specific roles and responsibilities performed as a subcontractor or by those firms on the project rather than the work performed on the project as a whole. If the project description does not clearly delineate the work performed by the entity/entities offering/teaming on this contract, the project could be eliminated from consideration.

If the firm is a joint venture or an LLC, projects performed by the joint venture or LLC should be submitted. However, if there are no relevant projects performed by the joint venture or LLC, projects may be submitted for either joint venture partner or LLC member company, not to exceed a total of ten (10) relevant projects.

A subcontractor's or sub-consultant's specialized experience on a design-bid-build project will not be given the same level of consideration as either the prime contractor or the joint venture partner(s).

Prime contractor-subcontractor/subconsultant with a demonstrated history of working together on prior housing development projects will be considered more favorably than those without such history.

For submittal purposes, a task order on an IDIQ contract is considered a project, as is a stand-alone contract award. Do not submit an IDIQ contract as an example project. The Government will not evaluate information provided for an IDIQ contract.

All information for Selection Criterion (1) shall be submitted in the SF 330, Part I, Section F.

The Government WILL NOT consider information submitted in addition to Part I, Section F in evaluation of Selection Criterion (1).

SELECTION CRITERION (2): KEY PERSONNEL PROFESSIONAL

QUALIFICATIONS, AND SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE AND TECHNICAL

COMPETENCE

Firm’s key personnel will be evaluated for professional qualifications, and specialized experience and technical competence to accomplish the tasks required under this contract.

(a) Professional Qualifications: Professional qualifications of key personnel proposed for two (2) design teams.

SELECTION CRITERION (2)(A) SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

SF330, Part I, Section H. Identify key personnel for two (2) design teams proposed for the design of new housing development projects, consisting of approximately 50 or more multi-family units (one- or two-story), $10 million or more in construction value, completed within the past ten (10) years immediately preceding the date of issuance of this notice, in tropical environments similar to Hawaii and Guam (subject to high winds and high humidity/corrosion).

Key personnel for each team shall be limited to the following:

• Principal-in-Charge (PIC) of the prime A-E firm

• Project Manager or Project Architect

• Civil Project Engineer

• Structural Project Engineer

• Mechanical Project Engineer

• Electrical Project Engineer

• Fire Protection Project Engineer

• Cost Estimator

The PIC of the prime A-E firm may be the same person for both teams.

If more than two (2) design teams are submitted, the Government will only evaluate the first (2) design teams and will disregard any design teams submitted after the first two (2) design teams.

SF330, Part I, Section E. Submit professional qualifications for these key personnel, including active U.S. professional registration (include State/Territory and discipline), number of years of experience, role in this contract, firm name and location, and education. For Cost Estimator, indicate years of experience, role in this contract, firm name and location, and education.

Professional registration for Cost Estimator is not required. Professional qualifications of personnel of the design teams other than the key personnel (e.g., Architect, Structural Engineer, Civil Engineer, Mechanical Engineer, Electrical Engineer, Fire Protection Engineer, Environmental Engineer, Geotechnical Engineer, Topographic Surveyor, etc.) shall not be submitted, and if submitted, shall not be considered in the evaluation. Do not use other company titles such as “Type I Engineer” where the discipline and role are unidentifiable.

(b) Specialized Experience and Technical Competence: Key personnel specialized experience and technical competence in the design of a new housing development projects, consisting of approximately 50 or more multi-family units (one- or two-story), $10 million or more in construction value, professional services and/or construction completed within the past ten (10) years immediately preceding the date of issuance of this notice, in tropical environments similar to Hawaii and Guam (subject to high winds and high humidity/corrosion). Repair and alteration projects shall not be considered in the evaluation; only new construction projects shall qualify. Specified design and engineering services shall include execution of (1) DD1391 or similar project programming document, (2) FACD/design charrettes, and (3) Final Design construction documents. Final Design construction documents shall include Design-Bid-Build (DBB) Final Design plans and specifications and/or Final Design plans and specifications prepared by the Design-Build (DB) contractor’s Designer-of-Record. DB Request for Proposal (RFP) solicitation documents shall not be considered Final Design construction documents. Collectively, new housing development projects submitted shall demonstrate experience in ALL specified design and engineering services. Specified design and engineering services for new housing development projects do not have to be all included within a single project scope; however, new housing development projects that contain several of these services will be given more favorable consideration than projects that contain only one of these services. Key personnel specialized experience and technical competence in the design of a new housing development consisting of approximately 100 multi-family units or more (one- or two-story), $20 million or more in construction value, completed within the past ten (10) years immediately preceding the date of issuance of this notice, in tropical environments similar to Hawaii and Guam (subject to high winds and corrosion), will be considered more favorably. Firm’s relevant projects with construction completion within the past ten (10) years immediately preceding the date of issuance of this notice will be more favorably considered.

SELECTION CRITERION (2)(B) SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

SF330, Part I, Section E. Specialized experience and technical competence shall be limited to the Project Managers or Project Architects on the two (2) proposed design teams. Relevant project information for other key personnel on these teams is not required and if submitted, will not be considered in the evaluation. For key personnel other than the Project Managers or Project Architects, complete Blocks 12 through 18; and leave Block 19, Relevant Projects, blank.

Complete Section E for each Project Manager or Project Architect, providing all requested information.

Submit a maximum of five (5) relevant projects for each Project Manager or Project Architect, demonstrating specialized experience and technical competence in relevant housing development projects. A project is defined as either a stand-alone contract of a single task order in an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract. If more than five (5) projects for each Project Manager or Project Architect are submitted, the Government will evaluate the first five

(5) projects listed in Part I, Section E and disregard any other project information.

Each project shall include project title and location, year professional services and construction completed, brief description, point-of-contact name, e-mail address, phone number, contract number or project identification number, contract period of performance, contract award amount, estimated construction cost, and the role and work performed by the Project Manager or Project Architect demonstrating relevance to specialized experience. Experience in a role other than Project Manager or Project Architect for project submitted will not qualify as specialized experience and technical competence. If project description does not clearly define the work performed by the Project Manager or Project Architect or if a project does not include the requested data, that project may be evaluated as less favorable or less qualified.

SELECTION CRITERION (3): PAST PERFORMANCE

Firms will be evaluated on past performance on relevant projects with Government agencies and private industry in terms of work quality, compliance with schedules, cost control, small business utilization and stakeholder/customer satisfaction. Evaluation of past performance will include information provided in Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQs) or CPARS for Selection Criterion (1) relevant projects and may include customer inquiries, Government databases, and other information available to the Government. [Note: Past performance information for relevant projects listed under Selection Criterion (1) will be considered more favorably.]

SELECTION CRITERION (3) SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

SF330, Part I, Section H. For each relevant project submitted in response to Selection Criterion (1), Firm’s Specialized Experience, submit a DD2631, Performance Evaluation (Architect- Engineer) or Contractor Performance Assessment Report (CPARS) Architect-Engineer evaluation. If a DD2631 or CPARS is not available, submit a NAVFAC/USACE Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ), included with this announcement as Attachment A, with the SF330. Ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Do not submit a PPQ when a completed DD2631 or CPARS is available.

NAVFAC/USACE Past Performance Questionnaire shall be from the contracting agent and/or their representative responsible for the contract administration, or from the facility owner/user.

It shall not be from the prime contractor on a Design-Build project nor shall it be from a prime contractor to a subcontractor. If work was performed as a subcontractor for a project under Selection Criterion (1), provide a completed Past Performance Questionnaire.

NAVFAC/USACE Past Performance Questionnaire previously completed for other announcements/RFPs may also be submitted.

The information provided in the SF330 may provide the major portion of the information used in the Government’s evaluation for past performance. The Government however, is not restricted to the information provided in the SF330 and may use other sources to assess past performance information such as the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) and inquiries with previous customers/owners. PPIRS will be evaluated for the firm that will perform the work and search will be based upon the CAGE/DUNS number provided for the firm.

If the AE received any less than Satisfactory past performance evaluations from customers/owners for projects submitted under Selection Criterion (1), it is incumbent upon the AE to provide an explanation of the rating, problems encountered, the corrective actions taken on the project, and what will be done to preclude less than satisfactory ratings on future contracts.

Information shall not exceed two double-sided pages (or four single sided pages) in total.

Awards, letters of commendation, certificates of appreciation, etc. shall not be submitted and will not be considered in the evaluation.

A-E subconsultant's past performance on a Design-Bid-Build project will not be given the same level of consideration as the A-E prime contractor’s or JV partner’s. Past performance of an A-E subcontractor or subconsultant, serving as the prime A-E or Designer-of-Record on a Design- Build project, will be given the same level of consideration as an A-E firm’s for a DBB project.

However, past performance of an A-E subcontractor or subconsultant, serving as the prime A-E or Designer-of-Record on a DB project, shall be demonstrated by the submission of a Past Performance Questionnaire, as described above, and not by the prime contractor’s Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) or Construction Contractor Appraisal Support System (CCASS) rating.

SELECTION CRITERION (4): QUALITY CONTROL PROGRAM

Firms will be evaluated on the strength of their quality control program to ensure quality products and services under this contract, and means of ensuring quality services from their subconsultants/subcontractors.

SELECTION CRITERION (4) SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

SF330, Part I, Section H. Describe the design quality control organization structure that will be utilized for all deliverables of this contract and the management approach for quality control processes and procedures. The description shall:

1. Explain the quality control program including an example of how the plan has worked for one of the projects submitted as part of SF330, Section F, or how the plan will work if it has not been used previously.

2. Provide a quality control process chart showing the inter-relationship of the management and team components.

3. Describe specific quality control processes and procedures proposed for this contract, including checking documents for errors, omissions, inconsistencies, and quality;

tracking and incorporating review comments; and implementing the latest criteria and lessons learned.

4. Describe how the prime AE will ensure quality consistently across the entire team, and how quality of subcontractor’s work is assured.

5. Describe internal quality assurance procedures and indicate the level of effectiveness.

6. Identify the quality control manager and any other key personnel responsible for the quality control program, and a description of their roles and responsibilities.

7. Describe how the firm’s quality control program extends to management of subcontractors.

SELECTION CRITERION (5): PROGRAM MANAGEMENT AND CAPACITY

Firms will be evaluated on their ability to plan for and manage work under the contract and their capacity to accomplish multiple large projects concurrently within the required timeframe.

SELECTION CRITERION (5) SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

SF330, Part 1, Section H.

1. Provide an organizational chart for the two (2) design teams proposed per Selection Criterion (2). Identify composition for these two (2) teams, including design firms [prime AE, subcontractors/subconsultants of major design disciplines (architectural, civil, structural, mechanical, electrical, fire protection, cost estimates), other required design and engineering services] and design personnel [key personnel per Selection Criterion (2) and other major roles of major design disciplines].

2. Discuss the management plan for this contract and personnel roles in the organization.

Describe the ability of the firm to manage, coordinate and work effectively with team members, both internal staff and consultants. Discuss the history of working relationships with team members, including joint venture partners where applicable.

Address how the firm's organizational construct is most efficient and effective in the execution of work. For all key personnel identified in Selection Criterion (2), explain their roles and responsibilities in the proposed organization. With the exception of the Principal-in-Charge, if the same key personnel is proposed for more than one (1) design team, provide explanation substantiating such designation and ability to accomplish multiple projects concurrently.

3. Describe the firm’s present workload and the availability of the project teams (including subconsultants) for the specified contract performance period. Describe the workload/availability of the key personnel during the anticipated contract performance period and the ability of the firm to provide qualified backup staffing for key personnel to ensure continuity of services. General statements of availability/capacity may be considered less favorably.

SELECTION CRITERION (6): SUSTAINABLE DESIGN

Firms will be evaluated on their knowledge and demonstrated experience in applying sustainability concepts through an integrated design approach and in designing in accordance with sustainable design rating systems leading to Third Party Certification.

SELECTION CRITERION (6) SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

SF330, Part I, Section H. Provide a maximum of three (3) projects that have attained or been submitted for sustainable design Third Party Certification (LEED, Green Globes, Guiding Principles Compliance, Guiding Principles Assessment, or other equivalent certification). For projects not yet certified, identify the date the project was submitted. For all projects, identify the team’s major contributions (design elements, features, equipment, etc.) in attainment of the certification. If more than three projects are submitted for evaluation, the Government will evaluate the first three projects and disregard any other project information after the first three projects. Certified projects will be evaluated as more favorable in comparison to projects that are not yet certified. Discuss key sustainable design personnel experience and qualifications.

SELECTION CRITERION (7): SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION:

All firms will be evaluated on the levels of small business participation proposed and the degree of commitment to use named sources. The Government will assess proposal realism and the likelihood of success in achieving the small business objectives of this acquisition.

SELECTION CRITERION (7) SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

SF330, Part I, Section H.

(1) Small Business Participation: All firms shall submit Attachment B, Small Business Participation Commitment Document.

a. Identify in terms of dollar value and percentage of the total acquisition the extent of work the firm will self-perform as the prime contractor. If submitting an offer as a joint venture, identify the percentage of work each member will be responsible for and indicate the size status of each member (e.g. small business, woman-owned small business, other than small business).

b. Include supplemental narratives (shall not exceed two (2) single-sided pages) to address other elements of the firm’s strategy such as agreements binding the offeror to team, partner or subcontract to named small business concerns, specific initiatives and tools that will be employed under the contract to enhance small businesses opportunities to both participate in this acquisition and build capabilities to support future NAVFAC acquisitions.

c. The Minimum Quantitative Requirement (MQR) of small business participation for this acquisition (i.e. work to be performed by small businesses as the prime and/or subcontractors) is 20% of the Total Contract Value (TCV). Firms are encouraged to exceed this percentage and seek meaningful levels of participation in each of the small business socioeconomic programs listed in Attachment B consistent with efficient contract performance. Firms shall explain in their participation and commitment strategies how proposed participation rates were established.

The small business participation and commitment strategy must be in agreement with any required small business subcontracting plan and will be made a part of the contract upon award.

Slated large business firms will be required to submit a Small Business subcontracting plan prior to the interview.

SELECTION CRITERION (8): FIRM LOCATION

Provided that the application of this criterion leaves an appropriate number of qualified firms, given the nature and size of the contract, firms will be evaluated on the locations of their office or offices that will be performing the work under this contract and demonstrated knowledge of the general geographic areas in which projects could be located. Evaluation of firms will include consideration of their location within the general geographic area of the anticipated projects, primarily Hawaii and Guam.

SELECTION CRITERION (8) SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

SF330, Part I, Section H. Indicate the location of the office(s) within Hawaii and Guam that will be performing the work including main offices, branch offices, and offices of team members/subconsultants, and include description(s) of staffing and functions for each office.

Describe the team’s knowledge of the primary geographic areas to be covered by this contract.

Address ability of the firm to ensure timely response to requests for on-site support.

SELECTION CRITERION (9): VOLUME OF WORK

Firms will be evaluated in accordance with DOD Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) Procedures, Guidance and Information (PGI) 236.602-1 from data extracted from the Federal Procurement Data System. Firms will be evaluated in terms of work previously awarded to the firm by DOD within the past twelve months with the objective of effecting an equitable distribution of contracts among qualified AE firms including small, disadvantaged business firms, and firms that have not had prior DOD AE contracts.

SELECTION CRITERION (9) SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

Firms do not submit data for this selection criterion.

SF-330 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

The selected firm, its subsidiaries or affiliates that design or prepare specifications for a construction contract cannot provide the construction services for the same contract. This includes concept design, which includes preparation of project programming documents (DD1391), facility siting studies, environmental assessments, or other activities that result in identification of project scope and cost.

Completion of electronic annual representations and certifications are also mandatory prior to award of a contract. Refer to FAR 52.204-8 Annual Representations and Certifications.

The contract will require that the selected AE firm have e-mail and Internet access for routine exchange of correspondence. Fee proposals may be subject to an advisory audit performed by the Defense Contract Audit Agency.

In accordance with the FAR 36.601-4(b) contracts for AE services may only be awarded to firms permitted by law to practice the professions of architecture or engineering. Firms must submit proof that they are permitted by law as required by FAR 36.601-4(b). If a firm is in a jurisdiction that requires AE firm registration, the firm must provide proof of registration. If a firm is in a jurisdiction that does not require AE firm registration, the firm must provide proof eligibility to practice (e.g., a summary explaining eligibility under the laws of that jurisdiction).

Failure to submit the required proof could result in a firm’s elimination from consideration.

In addition to the information provided in the SF330, provide the CAGE and DUNS number for each member of the proposed team. Joint Ventures (JV), Limited Liability Partnerships (LLP), Limited Liability Companies (LLC), and Limited Companies (LTD) shall submit the following additional documentation regarding their business entities:

a. A copy of the JV, LLP, LLC, or LTD agreement. Failure to include the applicable agreement with the SF330 may result in the firm’s elimination from further evaluation.

b. A detailed statement outlining the following in terms of percentages where appropriate -

(1) The relationship of the team/partners/parties in terms of business ownership, capital contribution, profit distribution or loss sharing.

(2) The management approach in terms of who will conduct, direct, supervise, and control.

(3) The structure and decision-making responsibilities of the partners/parties in terms of who will control the manner and method of performance of work.

(4) Identify (by name and title) the personnel having the authority to legally bind the partners/parties (including authority to execute the contract documents).

c. A list of partners/parties, to include company name, DUNS and CAGE numbers, address, point of contact, Email address, phone number and facsimile number.

AE firms desiring to be considered for this contract must submit a completed Standard Form (SF) 330 package, AE Qualifications. The printed format shall be in an 8-1/2 x 11 paper format, bound in a 3-ring binder, typed with a minimum 11-point font size or larger (font limitations do not apply to graphics, captions or tables), and one-sided. Part I pages shall be numbered sequentially. Except for the Organization Chart, sheets larger than 8-1/2” X 11” including fold-out sheets will not be accepted. Part II, shall be submitted for each firm identified in Part I, Section C. Please include your DUNS and CAGE numbers in Block 30 of the SF-330. Any other information submitted such as company brochures, leaflets, etc., will not be considered. If submitting as a Joint Venture, and you do not yet have DUNS, CAGE, and TIN for the Joint Venture, then DUNS, CAGE and TIN should be submitted for each firm. DUNS, CAGE, and TIN for the Joint Venture, if selected, would be required prior to the award of any contract.

AE firms that meet the requirements described in this announcement are invited to submit a SF-330 package that addresses each requirement within the selection criteria. The SF-330 package submitted in response to this announcement must include one (1) original and three (3) paper copies, and one (1) CD of the completed SF330 is required.

The delivery addresses for SF 330s are as follows:

(1) For SF 330s sent via United States Postal Services (USPS):

Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Pacific Code CON31:AT (N62742-22-R-0002) 258 Makalapa Drive, Suite 100

JBPHH, HI 96860-3134

(2) For SF 330s sent via courier service or hand-delivered:

Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Pacific Code CON31:AT (N62742-22-R-0002) 4256 Radford Drive, Building 62 Honolulu, HI 96818-3296

Notifications will be sent via email to the email address identified in Part I, Section B, Block 8.

Firms responding to this announcement shall submit a SF-330 package by 2:00 p.m. Hawaii Standard Time (HST) on 17 February 2022.

Late responses will be handled in accordance with FAR 52.215-1.

THIS IS NOT A REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL.

The main point of contact is Annette Tijerina, Contract Specialist. The alternative point of contact is Erik Torngren, Contracting Officer.

All questions should be submitted in writing to include solicitation number “N6274222R0002” in the Subject line and forwarded via e-mail to shaun.bissen@navy.mil and shaun.m.bissen.civ@us.navy.mil; and copy to annette.tijerina@navy.mil, annette.t.tijerina.civ@us.navy.mil, and erik.torngren@navy.mil, erik.s.torngren.civ@us.navy.mil no later than 20 days of the closing date. Questions submitted after this date may not be addressed by the Government due to time constraints.

If an SF 254 / SF 255 is submitted for this solicitation, it will not be reviewed or considered. As required above, provide verifiable evidence that your firm is permitted by law to practice the professions of architecture or engineering (e.g., state registration number).

All potential offerors are advised to check the BETA SAM web site https://beta.sam.gov for information pertaining to this announcement.

It is the offerors responsibility to check the BETA SAM website periodically for any modifications to the announcement.

Electronic (E-mail, facsimile, etc.) submissions are not authorized.

mailto:shaun.bissen@navy.mil mailto:shaun.m.bissen.civ@us.navy.mil mailto:annette.tijerina@navy.mil mailto:erik.torngren@navy.mil

ANNOUNCMENT NO. N6274222R0002

NAVFAC PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0) CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. Contractor Information Firm Name: CAGE Code:

Address: DUNs Number:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify):

Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):

Explain Differences:

4. Project Description:

Complexity of Work High Med Routine How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)

5. Client Information Name:

Title:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

6. Describe the client’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client’s Signature:

NOTE: NAVFAC REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS QUESTIONNAIRE AND SUBMITS DIRECTLY BACK TO THE OFFEROR. THE OFFEROR WILL SUBMIT THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO NAVFAC WITH THEIR PROPOSAL, AND MAY DUPLICATE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FUTURE SUBMISSION ON NAVFAC SOLICITATIONS. CLIENTS ARE HIGHLY ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE OFFEROR. HOWEVER, QUESTIONNAIRES MAY BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO NAVFAC. PLEASE CONTACT THE OFFEROR FOR NAVFAC POC INFORMATION. THE GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

RATING DEFINITION NOTE

(E) Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

(VG) Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.

(S) Satisfactory Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.

(M) Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.

(U) Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.

(N) Not Applicable

No information or did not apply to your contract

Rating will be neither positive nor negative.

Contractor Information (Firm Name): ________________________________________________ Client Information (Name): ________________________________________________________

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.

1. QUALITY:

a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts E VG S M U N

b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance E VG S M U N

c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance

E VG S M U N

d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)

E VG S M U N

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)

E VG S M U N

b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract

E VG S M U N

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project? E VG S M U N

b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes;

responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)

E VG S M U N

c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer?

E VG S M U N

d) Overall customer satisfaction E VG S M U N

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR

a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force?

E VG S M U N

b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort E VG S M U N

c) Government Property Control E VG S M U N

d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel E VG S M U N

e) Utilization of Small Business concerns E VG S M U N

f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines E VG S M U N

g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes

E VG S M U N

h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)

E VG S M U N

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)?

E VG S M U N

Contractor Information (Firm Name): ________________________________________________ Client Information (Name): ________________________________________________________

b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client

E VG S M U N

c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns)

E VG S M U N

d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section.

Yes No

e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.

Yes No

f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below.

Yes No

6. SAFETY/SECURITY

a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues?

(Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)

E VG S M U N

b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements.

E VG S M U N

7. GENERAL

a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).

E VG S M U N

b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues) E VG S M U N

c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below) Yes No

d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor.

E VG S M U N

Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary):

N62742-22-R-0002

ATTACHMENT B

SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION COMMITMENT

DOCUMENT (SBPCD)

OFFEROR’S NAME

OFFEOR’S DUNS

ADDRESS

ANNOUNCEMENT N62742-22-R-0002

Architect-Engineer Services For Housing Projects And Other Lodging Type Projects At Various Locations Under The Cognizance Of Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command, Pacific

Insert introduction/executive summary (Up to 2 pages maximum)

Prime Contractor Size: Indicate the applicable size and all applicable socioeconomic categories

Total value of the contract proposed to be performed by the Prime: $______________

Total Contract Value Proposed (TCV): $49,000,000

Small Business Participation

(Including Small Business prime offeror’s participation)

Business Category Dollar Value % of TCV

Total Small Business (SB)1 $ % HUBZone Small Business (HUBZone) $ % Woman-Owned Small Business (WOSB) $ % Small Disadvantaged Business (SDB) $ % Veteran-Owned Small Business (VOSB) $ % Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) $ %

Round to whole dollars and percentages to the nearest tenth of a percent.

Company Name Small Business Category(ies)2

Products/Services, including type & variety of work NAICS Nature of

Commitment

1 This number represents total planned dollars that will be awarded to small business concerns as well as awards under the AbilityOne Program to SourceAmerica (formerly NISH) and National Industries for the Blind (NIB) organizations, and Alaskan Native Corporations (ANCs) and Indian Tribes as prescribed in FAR 19.703(c) & FAR 52.219-9.

2 Small business concerns include SBs, Small Disadvantaged Businesses (SDB), Women-Owned Small Businesses (WOSB), Historically Underutilized Business Zone (HUBZone) small businesses, Veteran-Owned Small Businesses (VOSB) and Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Businesses (SDVOSB)). Reference FAR Part 2 definition of “Small Business Concern.