HSFE70-14-R-0023_Attachment_2_Evaluation_Criteria.pdf
PDF 68 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Disposable Cutlery
- Solicitation number
- HSFE70-14-R-0023
About this file
Attachment 2 Evaluation Criteria
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| HSFE70-14-R-0023_Attachment_1_SOW.pdf | ||
| HSFE70-14-R-0023_Pricing_Sheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
HSFE-14-R-0023 – Attachment 2
Evaluation Criteria-Disposable Cutlery IDIQ Basis for Award
| The | award | will | be | made | based | on | a | Lowest | Priced | Technically | Acceptable | basis. |
| The | evaluation | criteria | consist | of | the | following: | Technical, | Past | Performance, | and |
Price.
| Evaluation | Rating | for | Technical | Factors |
| Rating | Definition |
Acceptable/Satisfactory S Proposal meets or exceeds requirements as
| specified | in | the | statement | of | work. | |||||||||
| Unacceptable | U | The | proposal | does | not | meet | the | requirements | as |
stated in the statement of work..
TECHNICAL
Offorers will be evaluated on their ability to demonstrate technical sufficiency in their proposed technical approach to perform and support the requirements of the Statement of Work (SOW).
Please provide a response to each question. You must respond to ALL questions to be considered for this requirement. Contractor(s) must be able to meet all technical specifications in the SOW not limited to, but including the following three (3) major criteria.
1. Is the contactor able to meet the emergency response requirements as follows:
a. Delivery of up to 180,000 items within 48 hours of issuance of delivery order to any Continental United States (CONUS) location (Outside the Continental United States (OCONUS) items need to be at the nearest CONUS port in 48 hours)
b. Demonstrate ability to meet maximum quantity of 180,000 items
2. Is the contractor able to continuously electronically monitor and report location of shipments from origin to destination?
3. Does the contractor have the capability to meet the packaging requirements of the SOW?
Past Performance
| Present | and | Past | Performance | will | be | evaluated | as | a | measure | of | the | Government’s | ||
| confidence | in | the | offeror’s | ability | to | successfully | perform | based | on | previous | and | |||
| current | contract | efforts | within | the | last | three | years. | Provide | no | less | than | three | (3) | |
| references | to | include | the | following: |
| 1. Name | of | Company | |||
| 2. Point | of | Contact | |||
| 3. Current | Telephone | Number | and | Address | |
| 4. Title | of | Work | |||
| 5. Period | of | Performance |
HSFE-14-R-0023 – Attachment 2
Evaluation Rating for Past Performance
Rating Definition
Satisfactory S Past Performance results indicate previous satisfactorily performance.
Neutral/Unknown Risk
| N | The | offeror | had | little | or | no | recent/relevant | past |
| performance | information. |
| Unsatisfactory | U | Past | Performance | results | indicate | previous |
| unsatisfactory | performance. |
Price: Lowest Firm Fixed Price Technically Acceptable basis.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .