TECHNICAL EVALUATION CRITERIA.doc

Request for Proposal (RFP)

Unplanned Dockside Repairs of CGC SHERMAN (WHEC 720)

TECHNICAL EVALUATION CRITERIA

CATEGORY A: PAST PERFORMANCE

A.1 In accordance with FAR 15.305(a)(2)(1), the offeror is invited to identify past or current contracts (including Federal, State, and local government and/or private) for efforts similar to the Government requirement for this availability. The government shall consider this information, as well as information obtained from any other sources, when evaluating the offeror’s past performance. The offeror is further reminded that the source selection authority shall determine the relevance of similar past performance information. The offeror shall limit this information to no more than five contracts performed within the last three years, each listed separately. Include any dockside repairs of cutters 378’ in length or more. The offeror is requested to provide this information in the following format for each contract:

a. Contract number, and agency point of contact and telephone number;

b. Ship name, hull number, type, and displacement;

c. Type of availability (dry dock, dockside, etc.) and where performed;

d. Original contract commencement and completion dates, actual commencement and completion dates, and explanation of (i.e. reasons for) schedule slippage/extensions, if any;

e. Award and final (award plus growth) contract prices, including the total number of growth work changes and scope of these changes;

f. Total number of actual man-hours expended, and how many of those hours were for additional /changed work;

g. The number of and reasons for any deficiency reports issued by the customer for each specification item. Provide copies of these reports if requested;

h. Discuss problems encountered and the offeror’s corrective actions.

A.2 The quality of past performance and relevance of experience to the Coast Guard will be evaluated. The ability to manage and maintain a qualified workforce will be considered. Customer satisfaction will be an integral consideration. In evaluating past performance the Government will consider contracts performed during the last three years. Emphasis will be placed upon the contractor’s administration of the contractual responsibilities. For example:

(1) Adequacy of contract start up.

(2) Performance in accordance with proposed method of performance.

(3) Sufficiency of proposed personnel to perform contract.

(4) Filling of key positions with qualified individuals.

(5) Quality performance of work.

(6) Response to emergency situations.

(7) Schedule adherence (including administrative aspects of performance.)

(8) Responsiveness to Government requirements.

(9) Performance in accordance with contract requirements.

(10) Customer satisfaction.

(11) Complete submittals.

(12) Timely delivery of paperwork.

(13) Timely and accurate invoice submittals

(14) Quality of drawings.

(15) Knowledge of customer requirements and expectations.

(16) Ability to manage numerous constructions projects occurring simultaneously.

ATTACHMENT J.4