PAST_PERFORMANCE_QUESTIONNAIRE.pdf

PDF 121 KB Posted

Attached to
Base Operation Support Services for Base Kodiak, AK
Solicitation number
HSCG84-16-R-PKC001
Issued by

About this file

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Amendment_16_-_HSCG84-16-R-PKC001.pdf PDF
Amendment_15_-_HSCG84-16-R-PKC001.pdf PDF
HSCG84-16-R-PKC001_-BOSS_Kodiak_Solicitation_-_Amend_15.pdf PDF
Amendment_14_-_HSCG84-16-R-PKC001.pdf PDF
Amendment_13_-_HSCG84-16-R-PKC001.pdf PDF
TE_1.5_Historic_Averages_and_Priorities_for_Service_Work_-_AMEND_13.pdf PDF
HSCG84-16-R-PKC001_-BOSS_Kodiak_Solicitation_-_Amend_12.pdf PDF
Amendment_12_-_HSCG84-16-R-PKC001.pdf PDF
Amendment_11_-_HSCG84-16-R-PKC001.pdf PDF
RFI_with_Answers_-_4_-_FINAL.pdf PDF
RFI_with_Answers_-_3_-_FINAL.pdf PDF
Amendment_10_-_HSCG84-16-R-PKC001.pdf PDF
RFI_with_Answers_-_2_-_FINAL.pdf PDF
TE_5.2_Sports_Fields_-_Amend_8.docx DOCX document
Seniority_List_Averages_-_Amend_8.pdf PDF
HSCG84-16-R-PKC001_-BOSS_Kodiak_Solicitation_-_Amend_8.pdf PDF
Base_Kodiak_BOSS_PWS_-_Amendment_8.pdf PDF
Amendment_8_-_HSCG84-16-R-PKC001.pdf PDF
Wage_Determination_with_CBA_-_Amend_8.pdf PDF
CLIN_Schedule_-Amendment_7.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Amendment_7_-_HSCG84-16-R-PKC001.pdf PDF
Amend__7_-_Revised_Refs1of2.zip ZIP file
Amend__7_-_Revised_Refs2of2.zip ZIP file
Amend__7_-_Revised_Append.zip ZIP file
RFI_with_Answers_-_1.pdf PDF
Base_Kodiak_BOSS_PWS_-_Amendment_7.pdf PDF
Amendment_6_-_HSCG84-16-R-PKC001.pdf PDF
Amendment_4_-_HSCG84-16-R-PKC001.pdf PDF
Amendment_3_-_HSCG84-16-R-PKC001.pdf PDF
HSCG84-16-R-PKC001_-BOSS_Kodiak_Solicitation_-_Amend_2.pdf PDF
References_2_of_3.zip ZIP file
Prepropsal_Conf-BOSS_Kodiak-08-JUN-2016_-_Rev_2.ppt PPT presentation
References_1_of_3.zip ZIP file
Amendment_2_-_HSCG84-16-R-PKC001.pdf PDF
Amendment_1_-_HSCG84-16-R-PKC001.pdf PDF
QASP.pdf PDF
Wage_Determination_with_CBA.pdf PDF
Appendices_A-E.zip ZIP file
BOSS_Kodiak_PWS.pdf PDF
HSCG84-16-R-PKC001_-BOSS_Kodiak_Solicitation.pdf PDF
Technical_Exhibits.zip ZIP file
CLIN_Schedule_of_Prices.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Draft_CLIN_Schedule.pdf PDF
Draft_PWS_for_BOSS_Kodiak.pdf PDF
Kodiak_Installation_Access.pdf PDF
PWS_Comments_June_2015_2.pdf PDF
Base_Kodiak_QA_s.pdf PDF
Attendance_List.docx DOCX document
Draft_PWS_for_Site_Visit_With_Watermark.pdf PDF
Sources_Sought_BOSS_Kodiak.doc DOC document
Show 40 more

50 files listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)

U.S. COAST GUARD

SHORE INFRASTRUCTURE LOGISTICS CENTER

CONTRACTOR EVALUATION FORM

The Coast Guard, Shore Infrastructure Logistics Center is currently procuring Base

Operating Support Services as required by the U.S. Coast Guard at Base Kodiak, AK under solicitation HSCG84-16-R-PKC001. As a result, we are performing a past performance survey and reference investigation on potential contractors for the upcoming contract.

The information contained herein is considered “Source Selection Information” in accordance with FAR 3.104. Therefore, it is asked that you treat it accordingly. While the results of the overall past performance survey may be discussed with the contractor, FAR 15.610 and 15.1004 prohibits the release of the name of the individual responding to the survey.

Responses to this questionnaire should be EMAILED TO MICHAEL HASSETT, USCG-SILC-COB2W at michael.t.hassett@uscg.mil.

Should you have any questions concerning this survey, please contact the above named person at (510) 437-3009.

This portion is to be completed by the Offeror.

Contract Number:

Offeror’s Company Name:__________________________________________________

Address:____________________________________________________________

Telephone/Fax Number: __________________________________________________

Point of Contact:_____________________________________________________

Email: ____________________________________________________________

Was work performed as a subcontractor under a prime contract? Yes No If yes, include, Prime Contract Number:

Prime Contractor’s Name:

Address:

mailto:michael.t.hassett@uscg.mil

Telephone/Fax Number:

Point of Contact: ________________________________________________________

Email: ___________________________________________________________

Project Title and Detailed Description of Work for which the Contractor was responsible to perform:

This portion is to be completed by the Respondent:

Name and Title of Evaluator:

Company Name:

Address:

Telephone/Fax Number:

Point of Contact:__________________________________________________________

Email:____________________________________________________________

1. Contractor performed as Prime Contractor Subcontractor Key Personnel

2. The description of work as stated above accurately or does not accurately describe the work that was performed by Contractor being rated.

3. The contract was IAW (check all that apply): FFP CR T&M IDIQ

SCA Davis Bacon Sole Source Subcontracting

4. The total dollar value awarded:

5. The total dollar value performed to date:

6. The Period of Performance awarded:

7. The Period of Performance performed to date:

Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, G, S, M, U, and N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A

NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF E, G, M or U.

E Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements with many exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

G Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements with some exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

S Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

M Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub- element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

U Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective

N Neutral Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.

Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.

The contractor: E G S M U N

QUALITY

1 Followed approved quality control plan.

2 Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.

3 Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.

4 Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.

SCHEDULE

1 Developed realistic progress schedules.

2 Met established project schedules.

3 Provided timely resolution of warranty defects.

4 Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner.

COST CONTROL

1 Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task.

2 Managed Government furnished materials and supplies effectively and not in a wasteful manner

MANAGEMENT

1 Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.

2 Home office participated in solving significant local problems.

3 Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements.

4 Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies.

5 Identified problems as they occurred.

6 Suggested alternative approaches to problems.

7 Displayed initiative to solve problems.

8. Was responsive to contract changes.

9 Provided adequate project supervision.

10 Managed Program w/Integration & Coordination of the customer.

11 Managed Key Personnel

12 Managed Subcontracts

13 Integrity/Ethics Program

14 Reasonable and Cooperative in Behavior with Government personnel

REGULATORY

1 Complied with Environmental laws and regulations

2 Complied with Labor laws and regulations

3 Complied with other regulations and codes and safety requirements

4 How would you rate the contractor's overall performance?

Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract?

If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”

YES/NO Contract discrepancy reports (or equivalent) frequent YES/NO

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS ON ANY RATING ELEMENT CAN BE MADE BELOW:

Offeror Name: ___________________________ Solicitation HSCG84-16-R-PKC001

End of Survey

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .