question_and_answers.doc
DOC document 23 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- HSCG80-17-Q-P45150
About this file
Questions
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Q3_and_Q4.doc | DOC document | |
| Amendment_5.pdf | ||
| Q3.doc | DOC document | |
| question_and_answers_(2).doc | DOC document | |
| SF_30-AMEND-CUTTYHUNK3.pdf | ||
| Amendment_002.pdf | ||
| question_and_answers.doc | DOC document | |
| SF_30-AMEND-CUTTYHUNK_(2).pdf | ||
| GFE.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| Spec_for_DryDock_Repairs-CUTTYHUNK.doc | DOC document | |
| Schedule_B.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| Solicitation_CGC_cuttyhunk.doc | DOC document |
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Q1. Looking at the CUTTYHUNK DD solicitation, I see there’s no geographic restriction.
We work with yards on all coasts, but get our best rates on the Gulf Coast in Texas.
It appears the vessel is homeported on the west coast in Washington.
Would a bid from a Texas yard be compared to a yard in Washington the same, or would you calculate a mobilization cost to each and add it to the bid amounts?
Answer: Please read Amendment 002 that is posted today, 02/22/17. It will provide the factors associated with the price evaluation only.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .