Past_Performance.doc

DOC document 116 KB Posted

Attached to
RECOVERY - INSTALLATION OF FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS
Solicitation number
HSCG40-09-Q-50106
Issued by

About this file

ATTACHMENT B - RELEVANT PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
WD 05_HONOLULU.doc DOC document
WD 05_CHARLESTON.doc DOC document
WD 05_SANDIEGO.doc DOC document
FIRE ALARM AMENDMENT0004 .doc DOC document
378_E_MASTER.pdf PDF
QnA1211.doc DOC document
378_W_MASTER.pdf PDF
Attch_1_PWS_Fire - Smoke Detection_FINAL1223.doc DOC document
RFQ_FINAL.doc DOC document
Attch_1_PWS_Fire - Smoke Detection_FINAL.doc DOC document

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

HSCG40-09-Q-50106

Attachment B

RELEVANT PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Note: To be completed by your references and returned by your references to the Contract Specialist by 01/07/2010. Failure to do so may result in rejection of your quotation.

Your organization has been identified for participation in the relevant past performance evaluation on a current solicitation at the United States Coast Guard (USCG), Baltimore, Maryland. This survey will be used to evaluate the relevant past performance for the contractor and contracting action identified below.

Your candid response to the questions is important to our evaluation effort and may affect the award outcome. Please indicate "N/A" in any area which is not applicable to work performed on your contracting action. In accordance with Office of Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP) Letter Number 92-5, the names of individuals supplying relevant past performance information will remain confidential.

Please take a moment to complete the enclosed survey and email or fax the completed and signed survey to the contact listed below by 01/07/2010. A representative of USCG may contact you to arrange a time for a phone interview to review the survey. If you have any questions regarding this survey please contact Paul Premoe [USCG Contract Specialist] at:

Email: Paul.B.Premoe@uscg.mil

Phone: 410.762.6078 Fax:

410.762.6095 The following information is being requested:

Contract number:

Contractor’s name, operating unit and address:

Type of contract:

Program Name:

Contract Initiation date:

Contract completion date (including extensions):

Years Remaining:

Describe any schedule changes and reasons for schedule changes (if any):

Award Amount:

Current Contract $ Value (including exercised options and extensions):

Projected Final Contract $ Value (including exercised options and extensions):

Reason why Award Amount and Current or Projected Final Contract $ Value differ (if they differ):

Description of the work performed (include the size, scope, and complexity of the project):

Evaluators name, position, organization, and role on the contract:

Evaluator’s phone # and email address:

Number of month’s contractor performance was monitored by evaluator:

1. Please rate each item listed below (circling is preferable; Use 1 through 5 with 5 being outstanding and 1 being unsatisfactory; N/O (Not Observed)) and Provide Comments to identify Specific Strengths/Weaknesses in each area

1 – Substantially did not meet expectations for this element

2 – Met most (>80%) expectations for this element

3 – Met all expectations for this element

4 – Met all expectations and exceeded some expectations for this element

5 – Substantially exceeded expectations for this element

A1. Quality of Products or Services: Assess the contractor’s conformance to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship (e.g., technical, professional, environmental, or safety and health standards).

Issue Anticipation/Prevention
1
2
3
4
5
N/O
Process Improvement
1
2
3
4
5
N/O
Lesson Learned Incorporation
1
2
3
4
5
N/O
Overall Quality
1
2
3
4
5
N/O

A2. Proficiency in:

Installation Services
1
2
3
4
5
N/O

A3. Management of Key Personnel: Assess the contractor’s performance in selecting, retaining, supporting, and replacing, when necessary, key personnel.

Retention
1
2
3
4
5
N/O
Replacement Speed and Quality
1
2
3
4
5
N/O

Comments (List specific strengths and weaknesses):

B. Timeliness of Performance - Assess the timeliness of the contractor against the completion of the contract, task orders, milestones, delivery schedules, administrative requirements (e.g., efforts that contribute to or affect the schedule variance).

Extent to which work and deliverables were delivered on time
1
2
3
4
5
N/O

Comments (List specific strengths and weaknesses):

C. Cost Control - Assess the contractor’s effectiveness in forecasting, managing, and controlling contract costs (*Do not rate this item for Firm Fixed Priced contracts).

Performed Within Estimates
1
2
3
4
5
N/O
Cost Consciousness
1
2
3
4
5
N/O

Comments (List specific strengths and weaknesses):

D. Business Relations - Assess the integration and coordination of relationships needed to execute the contract

Business/Contracting Relations
1
2
3
4
5
N/O
Response to Change
1
2
3
4
5
N/O
Subcontract Management
1
2
3
4
5
N/O
Interaction with End Users
1
2
3
4
5
N/O
Extent of End User Satisfaction
1
2
3
4
5
N/O
Responsiveness
1
2
3
4
5
N/O

Comments (List specific strengths and weaknesses):

E. Resolution of Problems - Assess the contractor’s performance in resolving problems that arose during performance of the contract.

Problem Resolution
1
2
3
4
5
N/O

Comments (List specific strengths and weaknesses):

2. Overall Assessment: (please circle)

NOT OBSERVED

Comments (List any major strengths and major weaknesses):

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .