SOLICITATION QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS 4.doc
DOC document 28 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Hazmart Operation
- Solicitation number
- HSCG38-09-R-800001
About this file
Questions and Answers 4
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| SOLICITATION QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS 5.docm | DOCM document | |
| SOLICITATION QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS 3.doc | DOC document | |
| SOLICITATION QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS 2.doc | DOC document | |
| SOLICITATION QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS 1.doc | DOC document | |
| HAZMART PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT.rtf | RTF text file | |
| WD05-2544.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
HSCG38-09-R-800001
Q&A #4
02 DEC 08
SOLICITATION QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS #4
1. Page 6 of 14, FAR 52.215-20(b). This clause requests information on the prices at which same or similar services have been sold in the commercial market. What exactly is the Government looking for here given that these services are provided exclusively by us to Government clients?
Answer: As the service has already been determined to be commercial in nature, if required, information on pricing other government customers will be acceptable.
2. Page 14 of 29, Section 1.12.3, Miscellaneous Reports. What are the specific Hazardous Waste Training requirements referenced in this table?
Answer: Training referred to is specifically HAZCOM training required for personnel using Hazardous Material and Hazardous Waste Handling Training. The HAZCOM training is provided by the vendor. Hazardous Waste Handling training will be provided by the local Environmental Compliance Division.
3. Page 21 of 29, Section 3.0. This section mentions “subsequent appropriate software”. Are there current plans to upgrade to an alternate software system?
Answer: Currently there are no plans to change the software being utilized. However, there is always a possibility of future change.
4. The weighting of the criteria noted here is different than that noted on page 5 of the
Solicitation. Attachment 1 claims that Past Performance is weighted lower than Price whereas page 5 claims that, in descending order of importance, Past Performance is more important than Price. Please clarify.
Answer: A correction has been made to FAR Clause 52.212-2 Evaluation Commercial Items. “3) Past Performance and 4) Price” have been replaced with “3) Price and 4) Past Performance”.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .