Amendment_000003.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 11. CONTRACT ID CODE I PAGE OF PAGES

1 I 2

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 15· PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

000003 07/24/2014

6. ISSUEDBY CODE 32 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE I

USCG R&DC CONTRACTING OFFICE

1 Chelsea Street New London CT 063205506

J

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, co1H1ty, State and ZIP Code)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO .

HSCG32-14-R-R00013

x 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

06/27/2014

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

IJl!The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers Dis extended. rais not extended.

Otters must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods: (a) By completing

Items 8 and 15, and returning 2 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which indudes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT

THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS. IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE

A. Ii~g{RH~~~~ ?,-~ifu,Efo~ ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor 0 is not, 0 is required to sign this document and return ------- copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

The purpose of this amendment is to address additional questions submitted in response to the RFP.

See Continuation Sheet ...

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

158. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

Previous edition unusable

15C. DATE SIGNED

Dinah L. Mulligan

~ES~~E~

(Signature of Contracting Offlcer)

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

CONTINUATION SHEET Page 2 of 2

SOLICITATION HSCG32-14-R-R00013 -000003

QUESTION # 20: Section L.12(b)(1)(v) of the RFP states that the Technical Proposal shall not exceed 25 pages (not including Resumes or Past Performance Data, if any). Does “Past Performance Data” only mean CPARS information or does it also include all information listed in Section L.13(a)2) Past Performance (i.e., list of contracts & associated background information; major subcontractor list of contracts; quality awards/certifications)?

RESPONSE # 20: “Past Performance Data” is any data submitted in accordance with RFP Section L.13,

(a) 2) Past Performance. The submitted Past Performance Data is not part of the 25 Page Technical Proposal Limit.

QUESTION # 21: L.13 (a) 2) (3) states that we are to “Provide similar past performance data for major subcontractors (those performing more than 25% of the effort).” Are we to provide a separate list of up to 10 recent projects for each major subcontractor or are the projects from major subcontractors expected to be included in the Offeror’s (Prime Contractor’s) list?

RESPONSE # 21: The list of projects submitted to document the Offeror’s past performance includes both the prime and major subcontractors, and is limited to 10 .

QUESTION # 22: Section L.13(a)2)(1) states that “The Offeror shall provide a list of all (maximum of

10) contracts and subcontracts with a value exceeding $150,000, which are currently in process or have been completed during the past 4 years. If the maximum is exceeded, list the 10 most current actions.”

Are we being asked to select past performances that are the most relevant and “provide evidence of the Offeror’s past performance in accomplishing the work,” or does the Government want just the 10 most recent contracts exceeding $150,000 in process or completed in the past 4 years, regardless of relevance?

RESPONSE # 22: In accordance with RFP Section L.13 (a) 2) (1) The list of contracts provided should be evidence of the Offeror’s past performance that is the same as, or substantially similar to, that required by the solicitation. This applies to both prime and subcontractors. If the maximum is exceeded, provide the 10 most current actions that support the preceding sentence.

2. The point of contact for this Solicitation is Mr. Richard J. Pecoraro, (860) 271-2837 or richard.j.pecoraro@uscg.mil

3. All other terms and conditions of this Solicitation remain unchanged.

HSCG32-14-R-R00013 000003

Integrated Design, Test & Evaluation (IDT&E) Services