Attachment_5_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire_-_HSCG23-15-R-MIA047.doc

DOC document 61 KB Posted

Attached to
Administrative, Technical, and Financial Support Services for U. S. Coast Guard Directorate of International Affairs and Foreign Policy Advisor
Solicitation number
HSCG23-15-R-MIA047
Issued by

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
HSCG23-15-R-MIA047_Question_and_Answers_Amendment_One.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_3_-_Additional_Terms_and_Conditions_2015_08_13.pdf PDF
Attachment_1_-_Performance_Work_Statement_2015_08_13.pdf PDF
Attachment_2_-_Clauses_and_Provisions_2015_08_13.pdf PDF
Attachment_4_-_Pricing_Spreadsheet.xls XLS spreadsheet
Presolicitation_Notice_Questions_and_Answers.pdf PDF
Attachment_2_-_Clauses_and_Provisions_2015_08_04.pdf PDF
Attachment_1_-_Performance_Work_Statement_2015_08_04.pdf PDF
Attachment_3_-_Additional_Terms_and_Conditions_2015_08_04_.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

ATTACHMENT 5

HSCG23-15-R-MIA047

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Submit Completed Questionnaires to: Maroulla.P.Dallas@uscg.mil

See the below table for the adjectival ratings and definitions for the past performance evaluation:

Rating
Definition
Exceptional
Three or more examples where performance on the subject contract significantly exceeded requirements to the Government’s benefit.
Very Good
One or two examples where performance on the subject contract met requirements and exceeded some to the Government’s benefit.
Satisfactory
Performance on the subject contract met requirements.
Marginal
Performance on the subject contract did not meet some requirements.
Unsatisfactory
One or more examples where performance on the subject contract significantly failed to meet requirements due to fault of contractor.

Quality of Product or Service:

Remarks:

Timeliness of Performance:

Remarks:

Business Relations:

Remarks:

If subcontracts were involved, rate Contractor’s performance in managing them:

Remarks:

Was the contractor committed to customer satisfaction?: Check One: FORMCHECKBOX Yes FORMCHECKBOX No

Remarks:

Would you recommend the selection of this firm?: Check One: FORMCHECKBOX Yes FORMCHECKBOX No

Remarks:

Overall Rating:

_1398677679.doc Enclosure 3

HSCG23-12-Q-MOT001

Submit Completed Questionnaires to: Marlecia Newby

Email: Marlecia.M.Newby@uscg.mil

Contractor’s Name:

Customer’s Name:

Contract Number:

Contract Type:

Period of Performance:

Contract Value: $

Description of Requirement:

Quality of Product or Service:

Cost Control:

Timeliness of Performance:

Business Relations: Rating -

If subcontracts were involved, rate Contractor’s performance in managing them:

Was the contractor committed to customer satisfaction?: Check One: FORMCHECKBOX Yes FORMCHECKBOX No

Would you recommend the selection of this firm?: Check One: FORMCHECKBOX Yes FORMCHECKBOX No

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .