Past_Performance_Questionnaire_-_SSS__Appendix_A_(new).doc

DOC document 71 KB Posted

Attached to
MARKETING & ADVERTISING SERVICES
Solicitation number
HSBP1015Q0042
Issued by

About this file

Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Please complete the following questionnaire and return by electronic mail to Eva I. Shaw-Taylor at eva.shaw-taylor@dhs.gov or fax to (202) 344-3322 This questionnaire pertains to:

Request for Quotation / HSBP1015Q0042 – Advertising & Marketing Services Department/Component:

US Department of Homeland Security/US Customs and Border Protection

PLEASE COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING:

Contract Number: ______________________Date of Survey: _______________

Name of Person Completing Survey:

Signature of Person Completing Survey:

Your Company/Agency:

Your role in this Contract (check one) :

( Contracting Officer

( Other ___________________ Contract Value (including options): $___________________________________

Performance Period: _______________________________________________

(Including Options)

Type of Contract: _________________________________________________

Approximate percentage of work being performed (or completed) by subcontractor(s): _______________%

Information on subcontractor(s) (where the subcontractor completed more than

50% of work):

Subcontractor

Program Manager

Phone

General description of products/services required under the contract:

RATINGS

Please answer each of the following questions with a rating that is based on objective measurable performance indicators to the maximum extent possible. Commentary to support rating shall be noted on Page 4.

Assign each area a rating of 0 (Unsatisfactory), 1 (Poor), 2 (Fair), 3 (Good), 4 (Excellent), or 5 (Outstanding). Use the attached Rating Guidelines as guidance in making these evaluations. Circle the appropriate rating. If you do not have enough personal knowledge or feedback from internal customers who directly received products and services from the contractor to make a determination on any of the performance criteria below, please circle “N/A” (not applicable/no opinion).

QUALITY OF SERVICE

1. Compliance with contract requirements:

N/A

2. Accuracy of reports:

3. Effectiveness of personnel:

4. Technical Excellence:

N/A

COST CONTROL (Not applicable to Fixed Price Type Contracts)

1. Record of forecasting and controlling target costs:

2. Current, accurate and complete billings:

3. Relationship of negotiated costs to actual:

4. Cost efficiencies:

N/A

TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE

1. Met interim milestones:

2. Reliability:

3. Responsive to technical direction:

4. Completed on time including wrap-up and contract administration:

5. Met delivery schedules:

N/A

6. Liquidate damages assessed: ( Yes ( No

BUSINESS RELATIONS

1. Effective management, including management of subcontracts:

2. Reasonable/cooperative behavior:

3. Responsive to contract requirements:

4. Notification of problems:

5. Flexibility:

6. Pro-active vs. reactive:

N/A

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

1. The contractor is committed to customer satisfaction:

( Yes

( No

2. Would you recommend selection of this firm again?

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

RATING GUIDELINES

QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE
COST CONTROL
TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE
BUSINESS RELATIONS
0-Unsatisfactory
Contractor is not in compliance and is jeopardizing achievement of contract objectives
Contractor is unable to manage costs effectively
Contractor delays are jeopardizing performance of contract objectives
Response to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues is not effective
1-Poor
Major problems have been encountered
Contractor is having major difficulty managing costs effectively
Contractor is having major difficulty meeting milestones and delivery schedule
Response to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues is marginally effective
2-Fair
Some problems have been encountered
Contractor is having some problems managing costs effectively
Contractor is having some problems meeting milestones and delivery schedule
Response to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues is somewhat effective
Good
Minor inefficiencies/errors have been identified
Contractor is usually effective in managing costs
Contractor is usually effective in meeting milestones and delivery schedule
Response to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues is usually effective
4-Excellent
Contractor is in compliance with Contract requirements and/or delivers quality products/services
Contractor is effective in managing costs and submits current, accurate, and complete

Billings

Contractor is effective in meeting milestones and delivery schedule
Response to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues is effective

5-Outstanding: The contractor has demonstrated an outstanding performance level in any of the above four categories that justifies adding a point to the score. It is expected that this rating will be used in those rare circumstances when contractor performance clearly exceeds the performance levels described as "Excellent."

Relevant Contract Reference Data Forms Please complete the following questionnaire and return by electronic mail to Eva Shaw-Taylor at eva.shaw-taylor@dhs.gov or fax to (202) 344-3322

This survey pertains to:

Request for Quotation/HSBP1015Q0042 — Advertising & Marketing Services

Department/Component:

US Department of Homeland Security/US Customs and Border Protection

PLEASE COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING:

Contract Number: ______________________Date of Survey: _______________

Name of Person Completing Survey:

Signature of Person Completing Survey:

Your Company/Agency:

Your role in this Contract (check one):

Contract Value (including options): $___________________________________

Performance Period: _______________________________________________

(Including Options)

Type of Contract: _________________________________________________

Approximate percentage of work being performed (or completed) by subcontractor(s):

Information on subcontractor(s) (where the subcontractor completed more than

50% of work):

RATINGS

Please answer each of the following questions with a rating that is based on objective measurable performance indicators to the maximum extent possible. Commentary to support rating shall be noted on Page 4.

Assign each area a rating of 0 (Unsatisfactory), 1 (Poor), 2 (Fair), 3 (Good), 4 (Excellent), or 5 (Outstanding). Use the attached Rating Guidelines as guidance in making these evaluations. Circle the appropriate rating. If you do not have enough personal knowledge or feedback from internal customers who directly received products and services from the contractor to make a determination on any of the performance criteria below, please circle “N/A” (not applicable/no opinion).

N/A

N/A

N/A

6. Liquidate damages assessed: ( Yes ( No

N/A

QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE
COST CONTROL
TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE
BUSINESS RELATIONS
0-Unsatisfactory
Contractor is not in compliance and is jeopardizing achievement of contract objectives
Contractor is unable to manage costs effectively
Contractor delays are jeopardizing performance of contract objectives
Response to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues is not effective
1-Poor
Major problems have been encountered
Contractor is having major difficulty managing costs effectively
Contractor is having major difficulty meeting milestones and delivery schedule
Response to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues is marginally effective
2-Fair
Some problems have been encountered
Contractor is having some problems managing costs effectively
Contractor is having some problems meeting milestones and delivery schedule
Response to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues is somewhat effective
Good
Minor inefficiencies/errors have been identified
Contractor is usually effective in managing costs
Contractor is usually effective in meeting milestones and delivery schedule
Response to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues is usually effective
4-Excellent
Contractor is in compliance with Contract requirements and/or delivers quality products/services
Contractor is effective in managing costs and submits current, accurate, and complete

Billings

Contractor is effective in meeting milestones and delivery schedule
Response to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues is effective

5-Outstanding: The contractor has demonstrated an outstanding performance level in any of the above four categories that justifies adding a point to the score. It is expected that this rating will be used in those rare circumstances when contractor performance clearly exceeds the performance levels described as "Excellent."

Relevant Experience Please complete the following questionnaire and return by electronic mail to Eva I. Shaw-Taylor at eva.shaw-taylor@dhs.gov or fax to (202) 344-3322

This questionnaire pertains to:

Request for Quotation / HSBP1015Q0042 – Advertising & Marketing Services

Department/Component:

US Department of Homeland Security/US Customs and Border Protection

PLEASE COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING:

Contract Number: ______________________Date of Survey: _______________

Name of Person Completing Survey:

Signature of Person Completing Survey:

Your Company/Agency:

Your role in this Contract (check one):

RATINGS

Please answer each of the following questions with a rating that is based on objective measurable performance indicators to the maximum extent possible. Commentary to support rating shall be noted on Page 4.

Assign each area a rating of 0 (Unsatisfactory), 1 (Poor), 2 (Fair), 3 (Good), 4 (Excellent), or 5 (Outstanding). Use the attached Rating Guidelines as guidance in making these evaluations. Circle the appropriate rating. If you do not have enough personal knowledge or feedback from internal customers who directly received products and services from the contractor to make a determination on any of the performance criteria below, please circle “N/A” (not applicable/no opinion).

N/A

N/A

N/A

6. Liquidate damages assessed: ( Yes ( No

N/A

QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE
COST CONTROL
TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE
BUSINESS RELATIONS
0-Unsatisfactory
Contractor is not in compliance and is jeopardizing achievement of contract objectives
Contractor is unable to manage costs effectively
Contractor delays are jeopardizing performance of contract objectives
Response to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues is not effective
1-Poor
Major problems have been encountered
Contractor is having major difficulty managing costs effectively
Contractor is having major difficulty meeting milestones and delivery schedule
Response to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues is marginally effective
2-Fair
Some problems have been encountered
Contractor is having some problems managing costs effectively
Contractor is having some problems meeting milestones and delivery schedule
Response to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues is somewhat effective
Good
Minor inefficiencies/errors have been identified
Contractor is usually effective in managing costs
Contractor is usually effective in meeting milestones and delivery schedule
Response to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues is usually effective
4-Excellent
Contractor is in compliance with Contract requirements and/or delivers quality products/services
Contractor is effective in managing costs and submits current, accurate, and complete

Billings

Contractor is effective in meeting milestones and delivery schedule
Response to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues is effective

5-Outstanding: The contractor has demonstrated an outstanding performance level in any of the above four categories that justifies adding a point to the score. It is expected that this rating will be used in those rare circumstances when contractor performance clearly exceeds the performance levels described as "Excellent."

PAGE

PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION SURVEY HSBP1015Q0042

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .