ULAD Attachment 4.doc
DOC document 175 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Ultra Light Aircraft Detection (ULAD)
- Solicitation number
- HSBP1010R0074
About this file
Attachment 4
View the file
Other files
Show all 41
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Ultra Light Aircraft Detection (ULAD) # HSBP1010R0074 Attachment # 4
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Agency/Owner Identification
Name (evaluator’s organization):
Respondents Name/Phone Number:
Contract Information
Contractor (company being evaluated):
Contract Number:
Contract Type
FFP
CPIF
CPAF
CPFF
T&M
Other
Competitive:
Yes
No
Follow-On:
Yes
No
Period Of Performance:
Initial Contract Value:
Current Contract Value:
Has this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience?
No
Yes
Default
Convenience
If yes, please explain.
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE (continued)
Please check the box next to the description, which best describes the Contractor’s performance on this contract. Use blank area below questions for any comments.
1. To what extent did the Contractor adhere to contract delivery schedules?
Always met schedule
Occasionally had delays of less than 30 days
Experienced one or more delay of greater than 30 days
Never met schedule
2. To what extent did the Contractor submit required reports and documentation in a timely manner?
Exceeded minimum requirements
Met minimum requirements
Less than minimum requirements
Not applicable
3. To what extent were the Contractor's reports and documentation accurate and complete?
Exceeded minimum requirements
Met minimum requirements
Less than minimum requirements
Not applicable
4. To what extent was the Contractor able to solve contract performance problems without extensive guidance from government counterparts?
Considerably successful
Generally successful
Little success
No success
5. Did the Contractor save/cost the Government/Owner money or provide other benefits as a result of innovative work applications?
Displayed considerable initiative
Displayed some initiative
Displayed little
Displayed no initiative
6. Did the Contractor commit adequate resources (people, materials, equipment, funding) in a timely fashion to meet contract requirement and successfully solve problems?
Provided abundant resources
Provided sufficient resources
Provided minimal resources
Provided insufficient resources
7. To what extent did the Contractor submit required proposals and/or responses in a timely manner?
Exceeded minimum requirements
Met minimum requirements
Less than minimum requirements
Not applicable
8. To what extent did the Contractor’s products fulfill contract requirements and customer expectations?
Exceeded minimum requirements
Met minimum requirements
Less than minimum requirements
Not applicable
9. To what extent did the Contractor’s performance of services fulfill contract requirements and customer expectations?
Exceeded minimum requirements
Met minimum requirements
Less than minimum requirements
Not applicable
10. Was the Contractor cooperative and responsive to changing needs of the customer?
Exceeded minimum requirements
Met minimum requirements
Less than minimum requirements
Not applicable
11. To what extent was the Contractor's problem tracking/reporting documentation timely, accurate, and of appropriate content?
Exceeded minimum requirements
Met minimum requirements
Less than minimum requirements
Not applicable
12. To what extent was the Contractor effective in interfacing with the Government’s staff?
Extremely Effective
Generally effective
Generally ineffective
Extremely ineffective
13. Were any instances of required re-work due to lack of quality control by the Contractor?
Exceeded minimum requirements
Met minimum requirements
Less than minimum requirements
Not applicable
14. To what extent did the Contractor coordinate, integrate, and provide for effective subcontractor management?
Exceeded minimum requirements
Met minimum requirements
Less than minimum requirements
Not applicable
15. Were the required Small Business utilization goals met?
Exceeded minimum requirements
Met minimum requirements
Less than minimum requirements
Not applicable
16. To what extent did the Contractor demonstrate sensitivity to environmental compliance?
Exceeded minimum requirements
Met minimum requirements
Less than minimum requirements
Not applicable
17. To what extent did the Contractor meet repair/response times required by the contract?
Exceeded minimum requirements
Met minimum requirements
Less than minimum requirements
Not applicable
18. To what extent did the Contractor submit invoices in a timely and accurate manner?
Always
Most of the time
Some of the time
Seldom
19. To what extent did the invoices provide sufficient detail so that the Government/Owner could accurately evaluate the cost and performance progress?
Always
Most of the time
Some of the time
Seldom
20. To what extent did the Contractor deliver the product at the original agreed to price?
Always
Most of the time
Some of the time
Seldom
Are there any additional comments the Government should consider regarding this Contractor’s performance under your contract?
ATTACHMENT 8
ACRONYMS AND DEFINITIONS
1.0 Acronyms
| AASHTO |
| American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials |
| ACI |
| American Concrete Institute |
| AE |
| architectural and engineering |
| AISC |
| American Institute of Steel Construction |
| ASTM |
| American Society for Testing and Materials |
| AWS |
| American Welding Society |
| BMP |
| best management practices |
| CBP |
| U.S. Customers and Border Protection |
| CIWMB |
| California Integrated Waste Management Board |
| COTR |
| Contracting Officer’s Technical Representative |
| CTIMR |
| Comprehensive Tactical Infrastructure Maintenance and Repair |
| DHS |
| Department of Homeland Security |
| EM |
| Engineering manual |
| ESP |
| Environmental Stewardship Plan |
| FAR |
| Federal Acquisition Regulation |
| FM&E |
| Facilities Management and Engineering |
| GFM |
| Government Furnished Material |
| HAZMAT |
| hazardous material |
| IBC |
| International Building Code |
| IBWC |
| International Boundary and Water Commission |
| LPOEs |
| Land Ports of Entry |
| M&R |
| maintenance and repair |
| MUTCD |
| Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices |
| NEC |
| National Electrical Code |
| NEPA |
| National Environmental Policy Act |
| NFPA |
| National Fire Protection Association |
| OSHA |
| Occupational Safety and Health Administration |
| SBI |
| Secure Border Initiative |
| SOW |
| statement of work |
| TI |
| Tactical Infrastructure |
| USACE |
| U.S. Army Corps of Engineers |
2.0 Definitions
| Improvements |
| Work that enhances the mission and functional capabilities of an asset through an addition, expansion, or adaptation. For example, replacement of fence sections with more permanent fence structures, improving the condition of a roadway by adding improved base or surfacing material, and replacing a drainage culvert with a larger diameter culvert. Improvements might be included in this work effort at the discretion of the Government, will be confined to the existing TI footprint, and will not exceed a dollar level threshold of $750,000 per activity |
| Maintenance |
| Work activities that preserve or sustain the ability of an asset to continue to carry out its intended function or preserve its established level of performance |
| Manmade damage |
| Damage made by vandalism and includes, but may not be limited to, the following attack/defeat vectors: cutting, burrowing below, climbing, prying/twisting, disassembly, ramming, bridging, pulling down, graffiti, cryogenic and fire/heating/burning. |
| Natural damage |
| The forces of nature that will act upon the fencing and include corrosion, erosion, water pooling, sand drifting, debris build-up, wind loading, temperature change (i.e., thermal expansion and contraction cycles that may create cracks) and ground shift. |
| Repairs |
| Work to restore an existing asset to pre-damage condition and level of performance so that it may be effectively utilized for its designated purpose. Any upgrades (i.e., improvements) will be thoroughly vetted for environmental compliance. |
| Routine |
| All non-urgent work requirements that can be planned or scheduled at a designated frequency. |
| Urgent |
| All work requirements resulting from willful or other destruction, a natural event such as severe weather or premature failure of the TI asset, and an immediate M&R response is necessary to support the mission requirements. It is anticipated that almost all urgent work requirements will be for breaches for fences, gates, and grates. During urgent servicing, the Contractor shall provide service to restore TI condition to its pre-damage state. |
� Contract Types: FFP = Firm Fixed Price; CPIF = Cost Plus Incentive Fee; CPAF = Cost Plus Award Fee; �CPFF = Cost Plus Fixed Fee; T&M = Time and Materials
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .