Attachment 4.PDF

Ultra Light Aircraft Detection (ULAD) # HSBP1010R0074 Attachment # 4

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Agency/Owner Identification Name (evaluator's organization):

Respondents Name/Phone Number:

Contract Information Contractor (company being evaluated):

Contract Number:

Contract Type': FFP CPIF CPAF CPFF T&M Other

Competitive: Yes No Follow-On: Yes No

Period Of Performance:

Initial Contract Value:

Current Contract Value:

Has this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience?

Default ConvenienceNo Yes

If yes, please explain.

1 Contract Types: FFP = Firm Fixed Price; CPIF = Cost Plus Incentive Fee; CPAF = Cost Plus Award Fee;

CPFF = Cost Plus Fixed Fee; T&M = Time and Materials

Ultra Light Aircraft Detection (ULAD) # HSBP1010R0074 Attachment # 4

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE (continued)

Please check the box next to the description, which best describes the Contractor's performance on this contract. Use blank area below questions for any comments.

To what extent did the Contractor adhere to contract delivery schedules?

Always met schedule Occasionally had delays of less than 30 days Experienced one or more delay of greater than 30 days Never met schedule

2. To what extent did the. Contractor submit required reports and documentation in a timely manner?

Exceeded minimum requirements Met minimum requirements Less than minimum requirements Not applicable

To what extent were the Contractor's reports and documentation accurate and complete?

Exceeded minimum requirements Met minimum requirements Less than minimum requirements Not applicable

4. To what extent was the Contractor able to solve contract performance problems without extensive guidance from government counterparts?

Considerably successful Generally successful Little success No success

Did the Contractor save/cost the Government/Owner money or provide other benefits as a result of innovative work applications?

Displayed considerable initiative Displayed some initiative Displayed little Displayed no initiative

Did the Contractor commit adequate resources (people, materials, equipment, funding) in a timely fashion to meet contract requirement and successfully solve problems?

Provided abundant resources Provided sufficient resources Provided minimal resources Provided insufficient resources

Ultra Light Aircraft Detection (ULAD) # HSBP1010R0074

Attachment # 4

To what extent did the Contractor submit required proposals and/or responses in a timely manner?

Exceeded minimum requirements Met minimum requirements Less than minimum requirements Not applicable

To what extent did the Contractor's products fulfill contract requirements and customer expectations?

Exceeded minimum requirements Met minimum requirements Less than minimum requirements Not applicable

To what extent did the Contractor's performance of services fulfill contract requirements and customer expectations?

Exceeded minimum requirements Met minimum requirements Less than minimum requirements Not applicable

Was the Contractor cooperative and responsive to changing needs of the customer?

Exceeded minimum requirements Met minimum requirements Less than minimum requirements Not applicable

To what extent was the Contractor's problem tracking/reporting documentation timely, accurate, and of appropriate content?

Exceeded minimum requirements Met minimum requirements Less than minimum requirements Not applicable

To what extent was the Contractor effective in interfacing with the Government's staff?

Extremely Effective

Generally effective Generally ineffective Extremely ineffective

13. Were any instances of required re-work due to lack of quality control by the Contractor?

Exceeded minimum requirements Met minimum requirements Less than minimum requirements Not applicable

To what extent did the Contractor coordinate, integrate, and provide for effective subcontractor management?

Exceeded minimum requirements Met minimum requirements Less than minimum requirements Not applicable

Were the required Small Business utilization goals met?

Exceeded minimum requirements Met minimum requirements Less than minimum requirements Not applicable

To what extent did the Contractor demonstrate sensitivity to environmental compliance?

Exceeded minimum requirements Met minimum requirements Less than minimum requirements Not applicable

To what extent did the Contractor meet repair/response times required by the contract?

Exceeded minimum requirements Met minimum requirements Less than minimum requirements Not applicable

To what extent did the Contractor submit invoices in a timely and accurate manner?

Always Most of the time Some of the time Seldom

To what extent did the invoices provide sufficient detail so that the Government/Owner could accurately evaluate the cost and performance progress?

Always Most of the time Some of the time Seldom

To what extent did the Contractor deliver the product at the original agreed to price?

Always Most of the time Some of the time Seldom

To what extent did the Contractor comprehend the technical and operational needs of law enforcement agencies and officers that will operate the Contractor's system?

Always Most of the time Some of the time Seldom

To what extent is the Contractor experienced in developing and executing planning, including planning and demonstrating system acceptance of its commercial products and maintenance services?

Always Most of the time Some of the time Seldom

To what extent has the Contractor previously performed maintenance of its commercial products?

Always Most of the time Some of the time Seldom

To what extent has the Contractor conducted training for customer operators and maintenance personnel on how to operate and maintain its commercial products?

Always Most of the time Some of the time Seldom

To what extent has the Contractor performed technology insertion on their system to eliminate obsolescence?

Always Most of the time Some of the time Seldom

26. Has the Contractor shown the capabilities to transfer data over from their system to the customers system on a continuous basis?

Exceeded minimum requirements Met minimum requirements Less than minimum requirements Not applicable

Are there any additional comments the Government should consider regarding this Contractor's performance under your contract?

Ultra Light Aircraft Detection (ULAD) # HSBP1010R0074 Attachment # 4

ATTACHMENT 8

ACRONYMS AND DEFINITIONS

1.0 Acronyms

AASHTO American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials

ACI American Concrete Institute

AE architectural and engineering

AISC American Institute of Steel Construction

ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials

AWS American Welding Society

BMP best management practices

CBP U.S. Customers and Border Protection

CIWMB California Integrated Waste Management Board

COTR Contracting Officer's Technical Representative

CTIMR Comprehensive Tactical Infrastructure Maintenance and Repair

DHS Department of Homeland Security

EM Engineering manual

ESP Environmental Stewardship Plan

FAR Federal Acquisition Regulation

FM&E Facilities Management and Engineering

GFM Government Furnished Material

HAZMAT hazardous material

IBC International Building Code

IBWC International Boundary and Water Commission

LPOEs Land Ports of Entry

M&R maintenance and repair

MUTCD Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices

NEC National Electrical Code

NEPA National Environmental Policy Act

NFPA National Fire Protection Association

OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration

SBI Secure Border Initiative

SOW statement of work

TI Tactical Infrastructure USACE U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

2.0 Definitions

Improvements Work that enhances the mission and functional capabilities of an asset through an addition, expansion, or adaptation. For example, replacement of fence sections with more permanent fence structures, improving the condition of a roadway by adding improved base or surfacing material, and replacing a drainage culvert with a larger diameter culvert. Improvements might be included in this work effort at the discretion of the Government, will be confined to the existing TI footprint, and will not exceed a dollar level threshold of $750,000 per activity

Maintenance Work activities that preserve or sustain the ability of an asset to continue to carry out its intended function or preserve its established level of performance

Manmade damage

Damage made by vandalism and includes, but may not be limited to, the following attack/defeat vectors: cutting, burrowing below, climbing, prying/twisting, disassembly, ramming, bridging, pulling down, graffiti, cryogenic and fire/heating/buming.

Natural damage

The forces of nature that will act upon the fencing and include corrosion, erosion, water pooling, sand drifting, debris build-up, wind loading, temperature change (i.e., thermal expansion and contraction cycles that may create cracks) and ground shift.

Repairs Work to restore an existing asset to pre-damage condition and level of performance so that it may be effectively utilized for its designated purpose.

Any upgrades (i.e., improvements) will be thoroughly vetted for environmental compliance.

Routine All non-urgent work requirements that can be planned or scheduled at a designated frequency.

Urgent All work requirements resulting from willful or other destruction, a natural event such as severe weather or premature failure of the TI asset, and an immediate M&R response is necessary to support the mission requirements. It is anticipated that almost all urgent work requirements will be for breaches for fences, gates, and grates. During urgent servicing, the Contractor shall provide service to restore TI condition to its pre-damage state.