HQ0858-21-R-0014_Attachment L-02 PPQ Form 26Apr2021.docx
DOCX document 31 KB Posted
- Attached to
- TEAMS-Next Program Planning and Acquisition (PP&A) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- HQ0858-21-R-0014
- Issued by
- DOD Missile Defense Agency
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 40
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
HQ0858-21-R-0014
Attachment L-02 Past Performance Questionnaire
Background: This questionnaire will be used to provide information to support the Missile Defense Agency Program Planning and Acquisition (PP&A) services procurement, RFP HQ0858-21-R-0014.
Message to the Assessor: Your feedback is requested by the Missile Defense Agency (MDA) to assist with establishing the performance history for the Contractor identified below. To expedite receipt of the requested information, MDA requests that you e-mail the completed questionnaire(s) to: amanda.behel@mda.mil AND TN-PROGPLAN@mda.mil. Your support and participation in this matter is essential and greatly appreciated!
Instructions for Offeror/Subcontractor and Assessor:
· Sections I and II to be completed by the Offeror/Subcontractor and provided to the Assessor (the Government personnel that had experience with the Offeror/Subcontractor on a previous relevant contract). The Assessor, in turn, to verify Sections I through II, complete the questionnaire, and submit to the Contracting Office.
· Section II to be validated by the Assessor. If any information is incorrect herein, please annotate and provide the correct information accordingly.
· Sections III through VI to be completed in their entirety by the Assessor.
I. Customer Identification Customer or Agency Name
Customer or Agency Description
Geographic Description of Services Under This Contract (i.e. single location, multiple locations, CONUS (in U.S.), or OCONUS (Outside U.S.)
II. Current or Historical Contract Identification Contractor Name/Address
Contract Number:
Email:
Contract Type:
Initial Period of Performance:
Current/Final Period of Performance:
Initial Contract Value (base only):
Current/Final Contract Value (base and exercised options only):
Reason if Initial Contract Value and Current/Final Contract Value above are different.
Brief description of services provided
Contractor Role (Prime or Subcontractor)
ASSESSOR: The inform submitted by the company above is: CORRECT ☐ OR INCORRECT ☐
III. Assessor Information Assessor Name
Title
Phone Number/Email Address
Role (examples: PM/PCO/ACO/Contract Specialist/COR/Quality Assurance Specialist, etc.)
Assessor’s number of years working on contract
IV. Assessment Definitions
The following definitions should be used in your assessment of Contractor performance
| PERFORMANCE LEVEL |
| DESCRIPTION |
| EXCEPTIONAL (E) |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| VERY GOOD (VG) |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| SATISFACTORY (S) |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| MARGINAL (M) |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| UNSATISFACTORY (U) |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| NOT APPLICABLE (N) |
| No information or did not apply to your contract. Unable to provide assessment. |
V. Performance Evaluation
| Technical |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
Experience in Acquisition Analysis and Schedule Support
Experience in Earned Value Support
Experience in International Affairs Support and MDS Foreign Military Sales Planning
Experience in Strategic Planning Support
Experience in Human Capital Management
Please provide rationale for the assigned ratings:
All comments are appreciated; however, at a minimum, rationale must be provided for exceptional (E) or Unsatisfactory (U) ratings.
| Management |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
Ability to recruit and retain qualified personnel
Ability to solve employee performance problems
Responsiveness (cooperative behavior, teamwork, and customer satisfaction)
Program Management (effective coordination and integration of all activities)
Dispersed Locations (management of personnel in multiple/dispersed locations)
Subcontract Management (timely award and management of subcontracts)
Cost Control (ability to forecast, manage, and control costs)
Please provide rationale for the assigned ratings:
All comments are appreciated; however, at a minimum, rationale must be provided for exceptional (E) or Unsatisfactory (U) ratings.
Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance (Technical and Management) on contract being assessed:
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
Overall Rating (Technical and Management Combined)
VI. General Comments:
Assessor’s Signature Date
FOR SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – FAR 2.101 AND FAR 3.104 –
CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (WHEN FILLED IN)
Approved for Public Release 21-MDA-10824 (18 May 21)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .