HQ0858-21-R-0014_Attachment L-02 PPQ Form 26Apr2021.docx

DOCX document 31 KB Posted

Attached to
TEAMS-Next Program Planning and Acquisition (PP&A) Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
HQ0858-21-R-0014
Issued by
DOD Missile Defense Agency

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to TEAMS-Next Program Planning and Acquisition (PP&A), newest first.
File Type Posted
HQ085821R0014 Amendment 0004.pdf PDF
HQ085821R0014 Amendment 0004 Conformed.pdf PDF
HQ085821R0014 Amendment 0003 Conformed.pdf PDF
HQ085821R0014 Amendment 0003.pdf PDF
HQ085821R0014 Amendment 0002 Conformed.pdf PDF
HQ0858-21-R-0014_Attachment L-01 PPI Form - 06.01.2021.docx DOCX document
HQ0858-21-R-0014_Attachment J-05 TERP Pricing Model 02Jun21.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
HQ085821R0014 Amendment 0002.pdf PDF
HQ0858-21-R-0014_Attachment L-05 EPW 02Jun21.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
HQ0858-21-R-0014_TN-PPA RFP Amendment 0001 Conformed.pdf PDF
HQ0858-21-R-0014_TN-PPA Section L 24May2021.pdf PDF
HQ0858-21-R-0014_TN-PPA RFP Amendment 0001.pdf PDF
HQ0858-21-R-0014_Section L 12May2021.pdf PDF
HQ085821R0014_Final RFP Industry Comment Matrix - Blank.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
HQ0858-21-R-0014_Attachment L-05 EPW 28Apr2021.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
HQ0858-21-R-0014_Attachment J-18 Mission Essential Functions 25Mar2021.pdf PDF
HQ0858-21-R-0014_Attachment J-11 Cost Report Template.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
HQ0858-21-R-0014_Attachment J-09 Authorized ODC Travel by CLIN.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
HQ0858-21-R-0014_Section M 12May2021.pdf PDF
HQ0858-21-R-0014_Attachment L-04 Client Authorization Letter.pdf PDF
HQ0858-21-R-0014_Attachment L-06 Accounting System Checklist.pdf PDF
HQ0858-21-R-0014_Attachment J-15 SOFA Travel Clauses.pdf PDF
HQ0858-21-R-0014_Attachment J-17 IMCP Supplier Compliance Supplement.pdf PDF
HQ0858-21-R-0014_Attachment J-13 Monthly Manpower Report Template.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
HQ085821R0014_Draft RFP-Industry Comment Matrix_18MAY21.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
HQ0858-21-R-0014_Exhibit A Combined CDRLs.pdf PDF
HQ0858-21-R-0014_Attachment L-07 OCI Disclosure Form.pdf PDF
HQ0858-21-R-0014_Attachment J-01 Statement of Work PPA 11May2021.pdf PDF
HQ0858-21-R-0014_Attachment J-06 NDA Individual Contractor.pdf PDF
HQ0858-21-R-0014_Attachment J-03 TERP Procedures 28Apr2021.pdf PDF
HQ0858-21-R-0014_Attachment J-04 TERP Form 28Apr21.docx DOCX document
HQ0858-21-R-0014_Attachment J-02 G-06 Allotment of Funds 07Apr2021.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
HQ0858-21-R-0014_Solicitation 20May2021.pdf PDF
HQ0858-21-R-0014_Attachment L-03 Sample Consent Letter.pdf PDF
HQ0858-21-R-0014_Attachment L-01 PPI Form 06Apr2021.docx DOCX document
HQ0858-21-R-0014_Attachment J-08 DD254.pdf PDF
HQ0858-21-R-0014_Attachment J-12 Travel and ODC Report.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
HQ0858-21-R-0014_Attachment J-14 Quarterly Accomplishments Reporting Format.pdf PDF
HQ0858-21-R-0014_Attachment J-21 TEAMS-Next OCI Guiding Principles 15Sep2020.pdf PDF
HQ0858-21-R-0014_Attachment J-05 TERP Pricing Model 14Apr2021.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Show all 40

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

HQ0858-21-R-0014

Attachment L-02 Past Performance Questionnaire

Background: This questionnaire will be used to provide information to support the Missile Defense Agency Program Planning and Acquisition (PP&A) services procurement, RFP HQ0858-21-R-0014.

Message to the Assessor: Your feedback is requested by the Missile Defense Agency (MDA) to assist with establishing the performance history for the Contractor identified below. To expedite receipt of the requested information, MDA requests that you e-mail the completed questionnaire(s) to: amanda.behel@mda.mil AND TN-PROGPLAN@mda.mil. Your support and participation in this matter is essential and greatly appreciated!

Instructions for Offeror/Subcontractor and Assessor:

· Sections I and II to be completed by the Offeror/Subcontractor and provided to the Assessor (the Government personnel that had experience with the Offeror/Subcontractor on a previous relevant contract). The Assessor, in turn, to verify Sections I through II, complete the questionnaire, and submit to the Contracting Office.

· Section II to be validated by the Assessor. If any information is incorrect herein, please annotate and provide the correct information accordingly.

· Sections III through VI to be completed in their entirety by the Assessor.

I. Customer Identification Customer or Agency Name

Customer or Agency Description

Geographic Description of Services Under This Contract (i.e. single location, multiple locations, CONUS (in U.S.), or OCONUS (Outside U.S.)

II. Current or Historical Contract Identification Contractor Name/Address

Contract Number:

Email:

Contract Type:

Initial Period of Performance:

Current/Final Period of Performance:

Initial Contract Value (base only):

Current/Final Contract Value (base and exercised options only):

Reason if Initial Contract Value and Current/Final Contract Value above are different.

Brief description of services provided

Contractor Role (Prime or Subcontractor)

ASSESSOR: The inform submitted by the company above is: CORRECT ☐ OR INCORRECT ☐

III. Assessor Information Assessor Name

Title

Phone Number/Email Address

Role (examples: PM/PCO/ACO/Contract Specialist/COR/Quality Assurance Specialist, etc.)

Assessor’s number of years working on contract

IV. Assessment Definitions

The following definitions should be used in your assessment of Contractor performance

PERFORMANCE LEVEL
DESCRIPTION
EXCEPTIONAL (E)
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
VERY GOOD (VG)
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
SATISFACTORY (S)
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
MARGINAL (M)
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
UNSATISFACTORY (U)
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
NOT APPLICABLE (N)
No information or did not apply to your contract. Unable to provide assessment.

V. Performance Evaluation

Technical
E
VG
S
M
U
N

Experience in Acquisition Analysis and Schedule Support

Experience in Earned Value Support

Experience in International Affairs Support and MDS Foreign Military Sales Planning

Experience in Strategic Planning Support

Experience in Human Capital Management

Please provide rationale for the assigned ratings:

All comments are appreciated; however, at a minimum, rationale must be provided for exceptional (E) or Unsatisfactory (U) ratings.

Management
E
VG
S
M
U
N

Ability to recruit and retain qualified personnel

Ability to solve employee performance problems

Responsiveness (cooperative behavior, teamwork, and customer satisfaction)

Program Management (effective coordination and integration of all activities)

Dispersed Locations (management of personnel in multiple/dispersed locations)

Subcontract Management (timely award and management of subcontracts)

Cost Control (ability to forecast, manage, and control costs)

Please provide rationale for the assigned ratings:

All comments are appreciated; however, at a minimum, rationale must be provided for exceptional (E) or Unsatisfactory (U) ratings.

Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance (Technical and Management) on contract being assessed:

E
VG
S
M
U
N

Overall Rating (Technical and Management Combined)

VI. General Comments:

Assessor’s Signature Date

FOR SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – FAR 2.101 AND FAR 3.104 –

CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (WHEN FILLED IN)

Approved for Public Release 21-MDA-10824 (18 May 21)

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .