A23.1_HQ084719R0002_Attachment_0001_PPQ.docx
DOCX document 31 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Audiovisual Maintenance and Operations Support Services to DSCA-Marshall Center, Germany
- Solicitation number
- HQ084719R0002
- Issued by
-
Defense Security Cooperation Agency
About this file
Att 0001 PPQ
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| A24_Amd_HQ084719R0002-0001.pdf | ||
| A23.2_HQ084719R0002_Attachment_0002_Pricing.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| A23_RFP_HQ084719R0002_AV_11Jun19.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SUBJECT: Request for Past Performance Evaluation
TO: [Vendor fill in the Name]
You have been identified as a point of contact for a past and/or present performance evaluation of the firm listed on the attached questionnaire. This firm is currently being considered for an audiovisual support services contract for the Defense Security Cooperation Agency’s George C. Marshall European Center for Security Studies .
Your prompt attention to this questionnaire will be greatly appreciated. Please fill out and return the form directly to the Contract Specialist Mr. Andrew Gonzalez at andrew.e.gonzalez.civ@mail.mil If you have any questions concerning this request, please email me at the same address.
/signed/ Andrew E. Gonzalez, CFCM Contract Specialist WHS-AD-ESSD-Germany
1 Atch
PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104
Past and Present Performance Questionnaire
A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:
(Filled in by Vendor/Offeror) Contractor’s Name: ____________________ Address: __________________________
Telephone Number: ____________________ __________________________
Fax Number: ____________________ __________________________
Point of Contact: ___________________________
Brief Description of Work: _________________________________________________
Contract Number Provided by Offeror: ____________________ Dollar/Euro Amount: $/€____________
Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror: __________________________
Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel.
B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:
(Filled in by Respondent) Name of Respondent: ___________________________ Title: ____________________________
Address: _____________________ Telephone Number: ___________________
_____________________________ Fax Number: _____________________
_____________________________ Email Address: _____________________
C. EMAIL SURVEY FORM TO THE GOVERNMENT POC:
Andrew E. Gonzalez, andrew.e.gonzalez.civ@mail.mil
D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the number on the scale of 1 to 6 that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF 1 OR 2.
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| UNSATISFACTORY |
| MARGINAL |
| SATISFACTORY |
| VERY GOOD |
| EXCEPTIONAL |
| NEUTRAL |
| Performance did not meet most contractual requirements. There were serious problems and the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective. |
| Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. There were problems, some of a serious nature, for which corrective action was only marginally effective. |
| Performance met contractual requirements. There were some minor problems and corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory. |
| Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded some to the government’s benefit. There were a few minor problems, which the contractor resolved in a timely, effective manner. |
| Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded many to the government’s benefit. Problems, if any, were negligible and were resolved in a timely, highly effective manner. |
| No record of past performance or the record is inconclusive.[endnoteRef:1] [1: Signature of Respondent (Electronic signature is acceptable)] |
CONTRACTOR’S NAME: ________________________ CONTRACT NUMBER________________
The contractor:
| 1. |
| Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 2. |
| Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 3. |
| Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 4. |
| Home office participated in solving significant local problems. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 5. |
| Followed approved quality control plan. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 6. |
| Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 7. |
| Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 8. |
| Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 9. |
| Identified problems as they occurred. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 10. |
| Suggested alternative approaches to problems. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 11. |
| Displayed initiative to solve problems. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 12. |
| Developed realistic progress schedules. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 13. |
| Met established project schedules. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 14. |
| Was responsive to contract changes. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 15. |
| Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner, if applicable. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 16. |
| Cooperated with Government personnel after award. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 17. |
| How would you rate the contractor's overall performance? |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
18.
Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”
YES/NO
| 19. |
| Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.” |
YES/NO
| 20. |
| Is the contractor rated in CPARS? |
| YES/NO |
This space is for any ratings of 1 or 2 above, or for any additional notes as needed.
Remarks:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .