MRBM_T3c2_Industry_Day_Brief.pdf

Approved for Public Release 15-MDA-8131 (19 February15)

Targets and Countermeasures (TC) Medium Range Ballistic Missile

Type 3 Configuration 2 (MRBM T3c2) Industry Day

February 2, 2015

15-MDA-8131 (19 February15)

Purpose

• Provide a high level overview of the Medium Range Ballistic Missile T3 Configuration 2 (MRBM T3c2) Draft Request for Proposal (RFP) HQ0147-15-R-9000 and facilitate industry dialogue leading up to release of the final RFP

15-MDA-8131 (19 February15)

TC Director of Acquisition Mr. David Racey

15-MDA-8131 (19 February15)

Agenda (Day 1)

0800 – 0815 Welcome, Introduction and Administrative

Mr. David Racey

0815 – 0830 Opening Remarks Mr. Stanley Thomas

0830 – 0845 Acquisition Overview Mr. David Racey

0845 – 0915 Contracts Overview Mr. Dakar Shillingford

0915 – 0930 Small Business Overview Mr. Jerrol Sullivan

0930 – 1000 Technical Overview Mr. Jeff Starks

1000 – 1230 Break

1230 – 1330 Lunch

1330 – 1500 One on One Discussions with Industry

1515 – 1645 One on One Discussions with Industry

15-MDA-8131 (19 February15)

Agenda (Day 2)

0800 – 0930 One on One Discussions with Industry

0945 – 1115 One on One Discussions with Industry

1415 – 1545 One on One Discussions with Industry

Route from VBIII Auditorium to Cafeteria

15-MDA-8131 (19 February15)

Introductions

• Key TC Program Personnel

‒ Mr. Stanley Thomas – Program Director

‒ Mr. Timothy McRae – Deputy Program Director

‒ Mr. Jeff Starks – Technical Director

‒ Mr. David Racey – Director of Acquisition

‒ Mr. Dakar Shillingford – Contracting Officer

15-MDA-8131 (19 February15)

Security

• All sessions are classified

• All attendees must have at least a secret clearance

• No electronic devices

• There are designated towers outside of the conference rooms to hold wireless devices (don’t forget your key)

• Note taking during classified presentations or discussions is prohibited

• Please wear your visitor badge at all times

• No Offeror is allowed to release classified, FOUO, or controlled unclassified information without Missile Defense Agency approval

15-MDA-8131 (19 February15)

Opening Remarks TC Program Director Mr. Stanley Thomas

15-MDA-8131 (19 February15)

Targets and Countermeasures Overview

MISSION: Develop quality, cost-effective Target solutions that enable the BMDS to test system performance in threat relevant environments:

– Sustain performance level of MDA targets

– Improve ability to support MDA test schedules with on-time deliveries

– Improve cost performance

– Meet MDA requirements for matching threat characteristics

– Sustain ability to have flexible launch capabilities so Targets and Countermeasures(TC) can deliver targets of varying ranges and meet range safety requirements

Contribution to the BMDS Design, develop, and deliver targets that represent feasible future threats

MRBM

IRBM Common Components

SRBM

15-MDA-8131 (19 February15)

Acquisition Overview Mr. David Racey

15-MDA-8131 (19 February15)

Acquisition Overview

• MRBM T3c2 Acquisition Strategy ‒ Full & Open Competition ‒ Acquisition includes design, development, manufacture, delivery and launch of

MRBM T3c2 targets ‒ Base quantity of three (3) targets with options for up to an additional four (4) for a total of seven (7) targets ‒ Estimated Period of Performance (PoP)

• Five-year base (Award – CY20)

• Three options for up to three (3) additional years

• Award based on best value to the Government

• Contract award estimated by 1QFY16

• Planned contract types:

‒ Fixed Price Incentive ‒ Fixed Price Award Fee ‒ Firm Fixed Price ‒ Fixed Price Level of Effort

15-MDA-8131 (19 February15)

Contracts Overview Mr. Dakar Shillingford

15-MDA-8131 (19 February15)

Rules of Engagement

• The role of the Contracting Officer is to ensure impartial, fair, and equitable treatment of all contractors

• FAR 15.303(c) The Contracting Officer shall:

‒ (1) After release of a solicitation, serve as the focal point for inquiries from actual or prospective Offerors ‒ (2) After receipt of proposals, control exchanges with Offerors in accordance with 15.306 ‒ (3) Award the contract(s)

15-MDA-8131 (19 February15)

Rules of Engagement (con’t)

• Nothing discussed during the Industry Day event will change the terms or conditions of the draft or final RFP ‒ In any conflict the RFP prevails

• The Government team is PROHIBITED from discussing the Draft RFP outside this forum

• Verbal questions are allowed during the conference, but will be answered at the Government’s discretion ‒ if any uncertainty exists about the question, the Government will caucus prior to providing an answer

• All verbal questions during the conference must be followed up with a written question for formal Government response

15-MDA-8131 (19 February15)

Rules of Engagement (con’t)

• One-on-one meetings ‒ Limited to 6 Offeror representatives ‒ Strictly limited to 90 minutes in duration ‒ Intended to be focused on the Draft RFP and is an opportunity for industry to let

MDA know of any relevant concerns ‒ The Government will respect information regarding your proprietary approaches, but anything that is related to the Draft RFP is by definition not proprietary

• Offeror should advise the Government if they believe their question contains proprietary information ‒ Any non-proprietary information deemed worthy of distribution will be made public

15-MDA-8131 (19 February15)

Rules of Engagement (con’t)

• Written questions are required to be submitted:

‒ Unclassified questions must be received no later than 9 February

• Send via email to the MRBM T3c2 mailbox at:

MRBM_T3c2TargetsProc@mda.mil

‒ Classified questions must be received no later than 13 February

• Mail CD in accordance with the established procedures for handling classified material as specified in Section L 2.1.5 ‒ All questions will be answered in writing:

• The unclassified questions and answers will be posted to FedBizOpps

• An announcement will be posted to FebBizOpps when classified questions and answers are available ‒ A CD with classified questions and answers will be provided to Offerors, upon request to the Contracting Officer mailto:MRBM_T3c2TargetsProc@mda.mil

15-MDA-8131 (19 February15)

Section B CLIN Description

• CLIN 0001 System Engineering and Program Management ‒ Option CLIN 1001/2001/3001 ‒ System engineering and program management activities required to execute the program

• CLIN 0002 Data (NSP) ‒ Data deliverables in support of all CLINs

• CLIN 0003 MRBM T3c2 Development (Non-Recurring) ‒ Design and development activities to meet the SOW and TSPS threshold requirements

• CLIN 0004 MRBM T3c2 Production (Recurring) ‒ Option CLIN 1000/2000/3000 ‒ Production activities to meet the SOW and TSPS threshold requirements

• CLIN 0005 Ground Support Equipment ‒ Design, develop, assemble, integrate, and test all necessary support equipment

• CLIN 0006 Contractor Acquired Property (NSP) ‒ Contractor Acquired Property for all CLINs

15-MDA-8131 (19 February15)

Section B CLIN Description (con’t)

• CLIN 0007 Modeling and Simulation ‒ Option CLIN 1006/2006/3006 ‒ Develop and maintain models and simulations to support system design, analysis, testing, verification and validation

• CLIN 0010/0011/0012 Mission Unique Design and Analysis ‒ Option CLIN1003/2003/3003 ‒ Pre-mission analyses in support of each mission

• CLIN 0020 Logistics ‒ Option CLIN 1004/2004/3004 ‒ Logistics Management

• CLIN 0030/0031/0032 Mission Operations ‒ Option CLIN 1005/2005/3005 ‒ Launch site activation, target systems processing, target vehicle emplacement, ground support equipment installation, preflight checks and testing, mission rehearsals, launch execution, and post –mission services

• CLIN 0040 Unplanned Trade Studies and Analysis ‒ Trade studies and analysis executed via task instructions

15-MDA-8131 (19 February15)

Section B CLIN Description (con’t)

• CLIN 0050 Quality, Safety and Mission Assurance ‒ Option CLIN 1007/2007/3007 ‒ Implementation of tailored MAP and PMAP

• CLIN 0051 Quality, Safety and Mission Assurance (Alternate Approach) ‒ Option CLIN 1008/2008/3008 ‒ Implementation of Offeror’s command media and Industry practices to meet the intent of MAP and PMAP

• Option CLIN 0060 Objective Requirements (NRE) ‒ Design and development activities to meet TSPS objective requirements

• Option CLIN 0061 Objective Requirements (RE) ‒ Production activities to meet TSPS objective requirements

• Option CLIN 4000 Technical Data Package (Target Vehicle) ‒ MRBM T3c2 Target Vehicle product baseline Level (3) Production Level

Technical Data Package

• Option CLIN 4001 Technical Data Package (Ground Support

Equipment) ‒ MRBM T3c2 Ground Support Equipment product baseline Level 3 Production

Level Technical Data Package

15-MDA-8131 (19 February15)

Section B Contract Type by CLIN

CLIN Description Type 0001 MRBM T3c2 Systems Engineering & Program Management FPAF

0002 Data NSP

0003 MRBM T3c2 Development FPI

0004 MRBM T3c2 Production (Quantity 3) FPI

0005 Ground Support Equipment FPI

0006 Contractor Acquired Property NSP

0007 Modeling and Simulation FPI

0010 Mission Unique Design and Analysis SS# 1 FPI

0011 Mission Unique Design and Analysis SS# 2 FPI

0012 Mission Unique Design and Analysis SS# 3 FPI

0020 Logistics FPI

0030 Mission Operations SS# 1 FPI

0031 Mission Operations SS# 2 FPI

15-MDA-8131 (19 February15)

Section B Contract Type by CLIN (con’t)

CLIN Description Type 0032 Mission Operations SS# 3 FPI 0040 Unplanned Trade Studies and Analysis FFP-LOE 0050 Quality, Safety, and Mission Assurance FPI 0051 Quality, Safety, and Mission Assurance – Alternate Approach FPI 0060 OPTION – Objective Requirements (NRE) FPI 0061 OPTION – Objective Requirements (RE) FPI 1000 OPTION 1 – Target Vehicle Production (Quantity 1) FPI

1001 OPTION 1 – System Engineering & Program Management FPAF

1003 OPTION 1 – Mission Unique Design & Analysis FPI 1004 OPTION 1 – Logistics FPI 1005 OPTION 1 – Mission Operations FPI 1006 OPTION 1 – Modeling and Simulation FPI 1007 OPTION 1 – Quality, Safety, & Mission Assurance FPI

15-MDA-8131 (19 February15)

Section B Contract Type by CLIN (con’t)

CLIN Description Type

1008 OPTION 1 – Quality, Safety, and Mission Assurance – Alternate Approach FPI

2000 OPTION 2 – Target Vehicle Production (Quantity 1) FPI

2001 OPTION 2 – System Engineering & Program Management FPAF

2003 OPTION 2 – Mission Unique Design & Analysis FPI 2004 OPTION 2 – Logistics FPI 2005 OPTION 2 – Mission Operations FPI 2006 OPTION 2 – Modeling and Simulation FPI 2007 OPTION 2 – Quality, Safety, & Mission Assurance FPI

2008 OPTION 2 – Quality, Safety, & Mission Assurance – Alternate Approach FPI

3000 OPTION 3 – Target Vehicle Production (Quantity 2) FPI

15-MDA-8131 (19 February15)

Section B Contract Type by CLIN (con’t)

CLIN Description Type

3001 OPTION 3 – System Engineering & Program Management FPAF

3003 OPTION 3 – Mission Unique Design & Analysis FPI

3004 OPTION 3 – Logistics FPI

3005 OPTION 3 – Mission Operations FPI

3006 OPTION 3 – Modeling and Simulation FPI 3007 OPTION 3 – Quality, Safety, & Mission Assurance FPI

3008 OPTION 3 – Quality, Safety, & Mission Assurance – Alternate Approach FPI

4000 OPTION – Technical Data Package (Target Vehicle) FFP

4001 OPTION – Technical Data Package (GSE) FFP

15-MDA-8131 (19 February15)

Section F - Estimated Delivery Dates

CLIN Ship Set Delivery Window BETD Window

0004 1 3QFY18 4QFY18

0004 2 3QFY19 4QFY19

0004 3 3QFY20 4QFY20

1000 TBD FY20-21 FY20-21

2000 TBD FY21-22 FY21-22

3000 TBD FY22-23 FY22-23

3000 TBD FY22-23 FY22-23

15-MDA-8131 (19 February15)

Contract Clauses

• Section F-02 Milestones Events and Performance Based Payments ‒ Offeror may add additional “meaningful” events, FAR 52.232-28 ‒ Shall not exceed 90% of price ‒ Criteria/milestone based, not time based

• Section H Indemnification ‒ Contractor requests for indemnification must include information IAW FAR

50.104-3 and DFARS 235.070-1 ‒ Previous indemnification from other contracts does not carry over ‒ Legal authority to indemnify contractors for unusually hazardous conditions is 10

USC 2354 (R&D)

‒ Approval authority is MDA/D

15-MDA-8131 (19 February15)

Contract Clauses (con’t)

• Section H-9 Organizational Conflicts of Interest (OCIs) ‒ OCI rules as described in FAR Subpart 9.5 shall be applicable to any contract awarded and resulting subcontracts ‒ Contractor shall also comply with MDA OCI policy referenced in Section J, Attachment 5

15-MDA-8131 (19 February15)

Section J

• RFP Section J attachments will be incorporated in the awarded contract ‒ DD254 will be finalized at award ‒ Awardees’ Subcontract Management Plan, Small Business Subcontracting Plan, System Engineering Management Plan, Integrated Master Plan, OCI Mitigation Plan (if required), Contract Work Breakdown Structure, and Data Rights Assertions will be incorporated in Section J upon award

15-MDA-8131 (19 February15)

Section L

• 1.0 Program Overview ‒ MDA will procure MRBM T3c2 targets from the Offeror who will be responsible for all aspects of target performance including the Launch Vehicle and Modified Re-entry Vehicle (MBRV)

‒ Additionally, the MDA will procure logistics, mission design and analysis, mission operations, and trade studies and analysis.

‒ A single award, multiple awards, or no award may be made from this RFP

• 2.0 General Instructions ‒ The Offeror’s proposal must include all data and information requested by these instructions and must be submitted in accordance with these instructions. The offer shall be compliant with the requirements as stated in the Statement of Work (SOW), MRBM T3c2 Target Performance Specification (TSPS), Contract Data Requirements Lists (CDRLs), and all other terms and conditions of this solicitation

‒ Non-conformance with the instructions provided may result in an unfavorable proposal evaluation and/or elimination of a proposal from further consideration

15-MDA-8131 (19 February15)

Section M Overview

• 2.0 Basis for Award ‒ The Government may award a contract to the Offeror determined to provide the overall best value based upon an integrated assessment of the evaluation criteria in Section M

‒ The Government reserves the right to not make an award ‒ The Government may select for award the proposal with the lowest overall evaluated probable cost/price, when other proposals are not more advantageous under the non-cost/price factors

‒ The Government may select for award a proposal whose overall evaluated probable cost/price is not the lowest, but is determined to be more advantageous under the non-cost/price factors

‒ The Government may reject any proposal evaluated to be unrealistic in terms of the Offeror’s program commitments, costs, terms and conditions, or if the proposal is deemed to reflect an inherent failure to comprehend the complexity and risks of the program

‒ The Government intends to award without discussions, but reserves the right to conduct discussions

15-MDA-8131 (19 February15)

Section M Overview (con’t)

• 3.0 Evaluation Factors, Subfactors, and Their Relative Order of Importance ‒ The Government will make a best value award to the Offeror whose proposal is deemed most advantageous to the Government based upon an integrated assessment of the evaluation Factors and Sub-Factors as detailed in Section M of the solicitation

‒ Consistent with FAR 15.304, all evaluation factors other than Cost/Price, when combined, are significantly more important than Cost /Price

‒ The Cost/Price proposal is not a ranked evaluation Factor and will not be given a specific rating; however, it will be closely evaluated and considered in the integrated assessment of the proposals to determine the best value award

15-MDA-8131 (19 February15)

Section M Overview (con’t)

• Technical Execution is the most important non-cost factor, followed by Program Management, then Past Performance ‒ Factor 1: Technical Execution

• Sub-Factors 1 and 2 are equal and most important, followed by Sub- Factors 3 and 4 which are equal and of least importance ‒ Sub-Factor 1: Target Vehicle Development and Production ‒ Sub-Factor 2: Systems Engineering ‒ Sub-Factor 3: Mission Operations ‒ Sub-Factor 4: Quality, Safety, and Mission Assurance

‒ Factor 2: Program Management

• Sub-Factor 1 is the most important, followed by Sub-Factor 2, with Sub-

Factor 3 being of least importance ‒ Sub-Factor 1: Program Planning and Schedule ‒ Sub-Factor 2: Management and Program Control ‒ Sub-Factor 3: Small Business Participation and Commitment

‒ Factor 3: Past Performance ‒ Factor 4: Cost/Price (not a ranked evaluation factor)

• The compliance with the U.S. Arms Control Treaties and Policies is a pass/fail assessment

15-MDA-8131 (19 February15)

Small Business Overview Mr. Jerrol Sullivan

15-MDA-8131 (19 February15)

Small Business (SB)

• Components ‒ SB participation and commitment plan (evaluated) ‒ Individual subcontracting plan (accepted by CO) ‒ Comprehensive Subcontracting Plan (CSP) (DCMA approved)

• SB participation and commitment plan (all Offerors) ‒ Proposed SB goals ‒ Narrative description of proposed SB participation

• SB utilization SOW requirement with CDRL

• Past Performance ‒ Describe use of SBs on relevant contracts to comply with subcontracting plan and attain SB goals

• CSP participants provide relevant contract SB utilization data showing contribution(s) to corporate SB goals ‒ Provide applicable Individual Subcontracting reports, and/or Summary

Subcontracting Reports

15-MDA-8131 (19 February15)

MRBM T3c2 Technical Overview

Mr. Jeff Starks

15-MDA-8131 (19 February15)

Technical Overview

• Provide Industry a quick overview of key technical requirements ‒ TSPS Technical Highlights ‒ SOW Technical Highlights ‒ Section M Technical Highlights ‒ Summary

15-MDA-8131 (19 February15)

TSPS – Technical Highlights

• Offerors are required to provide objective evidence on how they will comply with All Target System Performance Specification (TSPS) “Threshold Requirements” in their proposals ‒ Provide details of Trajectory Performance & Signature Data relative to the TSPS

Design Reference Missions (DRMs)

• Offerors are encouraged to address TSPS “Objective Requirements” as priced options in their proposals ‒ The Government has assessed each objective requirement as low, medium, or high priority in the RFP Section L, Table L3a ‒ Offerors can address all, none, or a combination of the objective requirements

• Offerors will describe the extent of their compliance with each objective requirement

15-MDA-8131 (19 February15)

SOW – Technical Highlights

• Offeror is responsible for “Tip-to-Tail” MRBM Type-3 Configuration 2 (MRBM T3c2) Target Vehicle (i.e., All-Up-Round Target)

• Offeror is responsible for the complete Target System, including production and test equipment, logistics, support equipment, system engineering and analysis, and mission operations

• The Government will provide the aeroshell as GFP ‒The aeroshell will be provided in a “as-is, where-is” condition (non-refurbished) ‒The offeror shall ensure that the aeroshell can survive all loads and induced environments

• Target Vehicle is planned for ground launch, primary launch location is PMRF ‒ Mobile launch capability is a TSPS Objective Requirement

• Offeror will determine CONOPs (“ship and shoot” or “stack and shoot”)

• Offeror shall comply with all Compliance documents listed in Appendix A ‒ Offeror should NOT assume the compliance documents will be further tailored

15-MDA-8131 (19 February15)

SOW – Technical Highlights Systems Engineering

• Offeror will establish and implement a Systems Engineering Management Plan (SEMP) using the MDA TC System Engineering Plan (SEP) as a guide.

‒ The SEMP will define the approach for managing the overall technical development and specifications for this effort

• The Offeror will conduct technical reviews (SRR, PDR, CDR, PSRR, MRR, LRR, etc) ‒ Entrance/Exit Criteria and supporting objective evidence for each technical design review shall be approved by the Government ‒ Offeror shall provide 90% of objective evidence a minimum of 30 working days

(unless coordinated with the Government) prior to the scheduled technical design review

• “Product” Acceptance Reviews (ARs) will be conducted at contractor and subcontractors facilities with Government participation

15-MDA-8131 (19 February15)

SOW – Technical Highlights Systems Engineering

• To baseline the overall Target System design the Offeror will use the 4 Design Reference Missions (DRMs) in the TSPS ‒ 4 DRMs are MDA provided and intended to address the “flight envelope” for the design ‒ Proposal trajectory analysis will be based on these 4 DRMs ‒ Proposal RF and IR signature analysis will be based on the 4 DRMs

• Offeror will provide detailed models and simulations, including input data and results, for proposal evaluation

• Offeror will develop a software development plan and S/W test program in accordance with CMMI Level 3

15-MDA-8131 (19 February15)

SOW – Technical Highlights Mission Operations

• Offeror will establish launch plans to include:

‒ Launch site activation ‒ Range documentation ‒ Target systems processing ‒ Target vehicle emplacement ‒ Ground support equipment installation ‒ Preflight checks and testing ‒ Mission rehearsals ‒ Launch execution ‒ Post-mission services

• Offeror will support a L+4 hour briefing

• Offeror will provide a target vehicle performance and environments briefing 20 days after mission

15-MDA-8131 (19 February15)

Section M – Technical Highlights

• The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s proposed innovative and efficient solution to meet the key target vehicle design as listed in Section M Paragraph 3.1.1

• Offeror will identify the Technical Readiness Level (TRL) of their target vehicle solution down to the component level (hardware and software), including all supporting objective evidence.

‒ Furthermore, the Government will evaluate the detailed plans to raise the TRL to a higher maturity level prior to first flight

• Offeror will identify significant risks and completeness of mitigation approach

• Offeror will define their approach to verify that the Hit Detection System (HDS), GFP Blast Initiation Detector (BID) and lethality payload meets the TSPS Requirements

• Offeror will define their target vehicle propulsion system design, including verification of the flight loads and environments

15-MDA-8131 (19 February15)

Technical Overview Summary

• The MRBM T3c2 target is a complicated and challenging effort

• In addition to TSPS Threshold Requirement compliance, it is important to comprehend the Offeror’s capabilities related to Objective Requirements

• Specific and detailed design and performance data (objective evidence) is required in order to accurately evaluate proposals

15-MDA-8131 (19 February15)

Point of Contacts

• Points of Contact (include both on all correspondence):

‒ Contracting Officer: Dakar Shillingford

• Email: (Dakar.Shillingford@mda.mil)

• Phone: (256) 450-1428

‒ Contract Specialist: Wade Amis

• Email: (Wade.Amis@mda.mil)

• Phone: (256) 450-1795 mailto:Dakar.Shillingford@mda.mil mailto:Wade.Amis@mda.mil

Questions?