MRO_HQ0034-13-R-0142.pdf

PDF 612 KB Posted

Attached to
Medical Review Officer Services
Solicitation number
HQ0034-13-R-0142
Issued by

About this file

MRO_SF1449

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
MRO_Past_Perf_Questionnaire.pdf PDF
MRO_Question_Responses.pdf PDF
MRO_Solicitation_Amendment_1.pdf PDF
MRO_CONUS-OCONUS_Region_Descriptions.pdf PDF
MRO_PWS_Final.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

WHS - ACQUISITION DIRECTORATE

1155 DEFENSE PENTAGON

WASHINGTON DC 20301-1155

UNDER DPAS (15 CFR 700)

11. DELIVERY FOR FOB

RFQ

SEE SCHEDULE

14. METHOD OF SOLICITATION

IFB RFP

CODE

SEE ADDENDUM

BLOCK IS MARKED

DESTINATION UNLESS

12. DISCOUNT TERMS

(No Collect Calls)

13b. RATING

13a. THIS CONTRACT IS A RATED ORDER

X

CODE

HQ0034-13-R-0142 26-Aug-2013

b. TELEPHONE NUMBER

703 545-0597

8. OFFER DUE DATE/LOCAL TIME

02:00 PM 06 Sep 2013

5. SOLICITATION NUMBER 6. SOLICITATION ISSUE DATE

AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION

PREVIOUS EDITION IS NOT USABLE

STANDARD FORM 1449 (REV 3/2005)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.212

(TYPE OR PRINT)

(SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER) 31c. DATE SIGNED

ADDENDA X ARE

26. TOTAL AWARD AMOUNT (For Gov t. Use Only )

22. UNIT 23. UNIT PRICE 24. AMOUNT21. QUANTITY

CODE 10. THIS ACQUISITION IS

UNRESTRICTED

FAX: NAICS:

TEL:

CODE 18a. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BYOFFEROR

SUCH ADDRESS IN OFFER

17b. CHECK IF REMITTANCE IS DIFFERENT AND PUT

BELOW IS CHECKED

TEL.

HQ0034

SIZE STD:

9. ISSUED BY

FACILITY

CODE

17a.CONTRACTOR/

18b. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN BLOCK 18a. UNLESS BLOCK

15. DELIVER TO CODE 16. ADMINISTERED BY

SEE SCHEDULE

7. FOR SOLICITATION

INFORMATION CALL:

a. NAME

ELIZABETH JOHNSON

2. CONTRACT NO. 3. AWARD/EFFECTIVE DATE 4. ORDER NUMBER

(TYPE OR PRINT)

30b. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER 30c. DATE SIGNED 31b. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER

30a. SIGNATURE OF OFFEROR/CONTRACTOR 31a.UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

1 27a. SOLICITATION INCORPORATES BY REFERENCE FAR 52.212-1. 52.212-4. FAR 52.212-3. 52.212-5 ARE ATTACHED.X

25. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

1. REQUISITION NUMBER

19. ITEM NO. 20. SCHEDULE OF SUPPLIES/ SERVICES

SEE SCHEDULE

TO ISSUING OFFICE. CONTRACTOR AGREES TO FURNISH AND DELIVER ALL ITEMS

SET FORTH OR OTHERWISE IDENTIFIED ABOVE AND ON ANY ADDITIONAL SHEETS

SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS SPECIFIED HEREIN.

SB

HUBZONE SB

SET ASIDE: % FOR

OFFEROR TO COMPLETE BLOCKS 12, 17, 23, 24, AND 30

SOLICITATION/CONTRACT/ORDER FOR COMMERCIAL ITEMS

EAJ0304131358

ARE NOT ATTACHED

27b. CONTRACT/PURCHASE ORDER INCORPORATES BY REFERENCE FAR 52.212-4. FAR 52.212-5 IS ATTACHED. ADDENDA ARE ARE NOT ATTACHED

TEL: EMAIL:

2 COPIES

(BLOCK 5), INCLUDING ANY ADDITIONS OR CHANGES WHICH ARE

SET FORTH HEREIN, IS ACCEPTED AS TO ITEMS:

.OFFER DATED YOUR OFFER ON SOLICITATION

28. CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO SIGN THIS DOCUMENT AND RETURN 29. AWARD OF CONTRACT: REFERENCE

X

8(A)

SVC-DISABLED VET-OWNED SB

EMERGING SB

X

32g. E-MAIL OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE

SOLICITATION/CONTRACT/ORDER FOR COMMERCIAL ITEMS

(CONTINUED)

SEE SCHEDULE

19. ITEM NO. 20. SCHEDULE OF SUPPLIES/ SERVICES 21. QUANTITY 22. UNIT 24. AMOUNT

PAGE 2 OF

23. UNIT PRICE

ACCEPTED, AND CONFORMS TO THE CONTRACT, EXCEPT AS NOTED: ______________________________________________________

32a. QUANTITY IN COLUMN 21 HAS BEEN

RECEIVED INSPECTED

32b. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT

REPRESENTATIVE

32c. DATE 32d. PRINTED NAME AND TITLE OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT

REPRESENTATIVE

32e. MAILING ADDRESS OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE 32f . TELEPHONE NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE

37. CHECK NUMBER

FINALPARTIALCOMPLETE

36. PAYMENT35. AMOUNT VERIFIED

CORRECT FOR

34. VOUCHER NUMBER

FINAL

33. SHIP NUMBER

PARTIAL

38. S/R ACCOUNT NUMBER 39. S/R VOUCHER NUMBER 40. PAID BY

41a. I CERTIFY THIS ACCOUNT IS CORRECT AND PROPER FOR PAYMENT 41b. SIGNATURE AND TITLE OF CERTIFYING OFFICER 41c. DATE

42a. RECEIVED BY (Print)

42b. RECEIVED AT (Location)

42c. DATE REC'D (YY/MM/DD) 42d. TOTAL CONTAINERS

STANDARD FORM 1449 (REV 3/2005) BACK

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.212

AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION

PREVIOUS EDITION IS NOT USABLE

HQ0034-13-R-0142

Section SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

CONUS ONSITE Northeast

FFP

See regional description attachment for description of regions.

NET AMT

CONUS CLINIC Northeast

FFP

PURCHASE REQUEST NUMBER: EAJ0304131358

CONUS ONSITE Southeast

CONUS CLINIC Southeast

CONUS ONSITE Northcentral

CONUS CLINIC Northcentral

CONUS ONSITE Southcentral

CONUS CLINIC Southcentral

CONUS ONSITE Northwest

CONUS CLINIC Northwest

CONUS ONSITE Southwest

CONUS CLINIC Southwest

OCONUS ONSITE Europe

OCONUS ONSITE Pacific

OCONUS ONSITE Caribbean

OCONUS ONSITE Middle East

OCONUS ONSITE Africa

OCONUS ONSITE North America

MRO CLINIC Reviews

Expert Witness Testimony Telephonic

T&M

TOT ESTIMATED PRICE

CEILING PRICE

Expert Witness Testimony Court

ODC (Travel and Admin)

COST

ESTIMATED COST

OPTION CONUS ONSITE Northeast

OPTION CONUS CLINIC Northeast

OPTION CONUS ONSITE Southeast

OPTION CONUS CLINIC Southeast

OPTION CONUS ONSITE Northcentral

OPTION CONUS CLINIC Northcentral

OPTION CONUS ONSITE Southcentral

OPTION CONUS CLINIC Southcentral

OPTION CONUS ONSITE Northwest

OPTION CONUS CLINIC Northwest

OPTION CONUS ONSITE Southwest

OPTION CONUS CLINIC Southwest

OPTION OCONUS ONSITE Europe

OPTION OCONUS ONSITE Pacific

OPTION OCONUS ONSITE Caribbean

OPTION OCONUS ONSITE Middle East

OPTION OCONUS ONSITE Africa

OPTION OCONUS ONSITE North America

OPTION MRO CLINIC Reviews

OPTION Expert Witness Testimony Telephonic

OPTION Expert Witness Testimony Court

OPTION ODC (Travel and Admin)

OPTION CONUS ONSITE Northeast

OPTION CONUS CLINIC Northeast

OPTION CONUS ONSITE Southeast

OPTION CONUS CLINIC Southeast

OPTION CONUS ONSITE Northcentral

OPTION CONUS CLINIC Northcentral

OPTION CONUS ONSITE Southcentral

OPTION CONUS CLINIC Southcentral

OPTION CONUS CLINIC Northwest

OPTION CONUS ONSITE Southwest

OPTION CONUS CLINIC Southwest

OPTION OCONUS ONSITE Europe

OPTION OCONUS ONSITE Pacific

OPTION OCONUS ONSITE Caribbean

OPTION OCONUS ONSITE Africa

OPTION OCONUS ONSITE Africa

OPTION OCONUS ONSITE North America

OPTION Expert Witness Testimony Telephonic

OPTION CONUS ONSITE Northeast

OPTION CONUS CLINIC Northeast

OPTION CONUS ONSITE Southeast

OPTION CONUS CLINIC Southeast

OPTION CONUS ONSITE Northcentral

OPTION CONUS CLINIC Northcentral

OPTION CONUS ONSITE Southcentral

OPTION CONUS CLINIC Southcentral

OPTION CONUS CLINIC Northwest

OPTION CONUS ONSITE Southwest

OPTION CONUS CLINIC Southwest

OPTION OCONUS ONSITE Europe

OPTION OCONUS ONSITE Pacific

OPTION OCONUS ONSITE Caribbean

OPTION OCONUS ONSITE Middle East

OPTION OCONUS ONSITE Africa

OPTION OCONUS ONSITE North America

OPTION Expert Witness Testimony Telephonic

OPTION CONUS ONSITE Northeast

OPTION CONUS CLINIC Northeast

OPTION CONUS ONSITE Southeast

OPTION CONUS ONSITE Northcentral

OPTION CONUS ONSITE Northcentral

OPTION CONUS CLINIC Northcentral

OPTION CONUS ONSITE Southcentral

OPTION CONUS CLINIC Southcentral

OPTION CONUS CLINIC Northwest

OPTION CONUS ONSITE Southwest

OPTION CONUS CLINIC Southwest

OPTION OCONUS ONSITE Europe

OPTION OCONUS ONSITE Pacific

OPTION OCONUS ONSITE Caribbean

OPTION OCONUS ONSITE Middle East

OPTION OCONUS ONSITE Africa

OPTION OCONUS ONSITE North America

OPTION Expert Witness Testimony Telephonic

INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE TERMS

Supplies/services will be inspected/accepted at:

CLIN INSPECT AT INSPECT BY ACCEPT AT ACCEPT BY

0001 Destination N/A Destination Government 0002 Destination N/A Destination Government 0003 Destination N/A Destination Government 0004 Destination N/A Destination Government 0005 Destination N/A Destination Government 0006 Destination N/A Destination Government 0007 Destination N/A Destination Government 0008 Destination N/A Destination Government 0009 Destination N/A Destination Government 0010 Destination N/A Destination Government 0011 Destination N/A Destination Government 0012 Destination N/A Destination Government 0013 Destination N/A Destination Government 0014 Destination N/A Destination Government 0015 Destination N/A Destination Government 0016 Destination N/A Destination Government 0017 Destination N/A Destination Government 0018 Destination N/A Destination Government 0019 Destination N/A Destination Government 0020 Destination N/A Destination Government

0021 Destination N/A Destination Government 0022 Destination N/A Destination Government 1001 Destination N/A Destination Government 1002 Destination N/A Destination Government 1003 Destination N/A Destination Government 1004 Destination N/A Destination Government 1005 Destination N/A Destination Government 1006 Destination N/A Destination Government 1007 Destination N/A Destination Government 1008 Destination N/A Destination Government 1009 Destination N/A Destination Government 1010 Destination N/A Destination Government 1011 Destination N/A Destination Government 1012 Destination N/A Destination Government 1013 Destination N/A Destination Government 1014 Destination N/A Destination Government 1015 Destination N/A Destination Government 1016 Destination N/A Destination Government 1017 Destination N/A Destination Government 1018 Destination N/A Destination Government 1019 Destination N/A Destination Government 1020 Destination N/A Destination Government 1021 Destination N/A Destination Government 1022 Destination N/A Destination Government 2001 Destination N/A Destination Government 2002 Destination N/A Destination Government 2003 Destination N/A Destination Government 2004 Destination N/A Destination Government 2005 Destination N/A Destination Government 2006 Destination N/A Destination Government 2007 Destination N/A Destination Government 2008 Destination N/A Destination Government 2009 Destination N/A Destination Government 2010 Destination N/A Destination Government 2011 Destination N/A Destination Government 2012 Destination N/A Destination Government 2013 Destination N/A Destination Government 2014 Destination N/A Destination Government 2015 Destination N/A Destination Government 2016 Destination N/A Destination Government 2017 Destination N/A Destination Government 2018 Destination N/A Destination Government 2019 Destination N/A Destination Government 2020 Destination N/A Destination Government 2021 Destination N/A Destination Government 2022 Destination N/A Destination Government 3001 Destination N/A Destination Government 3002 Destination N/A Destination Government 3003 Destination N/A Destination Government 3004 Destination N/A Destination Government 3005 Destination N/A Destination Government 3006 Destination N/A Destination Government 3007 Destination N/A Destination Government 3008 Destination N/A Destination Government

3009 Destination N/A Destination Government 3010 Destination N/A Destination Government 3011 Destination N/A Destination Government 3012 Destination N/A Destination Government 3013 Destination N/A Destination Government 3014 Destination N/A Destination Government 3015 Destination N/A Destination Government 3016 Destination N/A Destination Government 3017 Destination N/A Destination Government 3018 Destination N/A Destination Government 3019 Destination N/A Destination Government 3020 Destination N/A Destination Government 3021 Destination N/A Destination Government 3022 Destination N/A Destination Government 4001 Destination N/A Destination Government 4002 Destination N/A Destination Government 4003 Destination N/A Destination Government 4004 Destination N/A Destination Government 4005 Destination N/A Destination Government 4006 Destination N/A Destination Government 4007 Destination N/A Destination Government 4008 Destination N/A Destination Government 4009 Destination N/A Destination Government 4010 Destination N/A Destination Government 4011 Destination N/A Destination Government 4012 Destination N/A Destination Government 4013 Destination N/A Destination Government 4014 Destination N/A Destination Government 4015 Destination N/A Destination Government 4016 Destination N/A Destination Government 4017 Destination N/A Destination Government 4018 Destination N/A Destination Government 4019 Destination N/A Destination Government 4020 Destination N/A Destination Government 4021 Destination N/A Destination Government 4022 Destination N/A Destination Government

DELIVERY INFORMATION

CLIN DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS UIC

0001 POP 16-SEP-2013 TO

15-SEP-2014

N/A N/A

FOB: Destination

0002 POP 16-SEP-2013 TO

15-SEP-2014

0003 POP 16-SEP-2013 TO

0004 POP 16-SEP-2013 TO

0005 POP 16-SEP-2013 TO

0006 POP 16-SEP-2013 TO

0007 POP 16-SEP-2013 TO

0008 POP 16-SEP-2013 TO

0009 POP 16-SEP-2013 TO

0010 POP 16-SEP-2013 TO

0011 POP 16-SEP-2013 TO

0012 POP 16-SEP-2013 TO

0013 POP 16-SEP-2013 TO

0014 POP 16-SEP-2013 TO

0015 POP 16-SEP-2013 TO

0016 POP 16-SEP-2013 TO

0017 POP 16-SEP-2013 TO

0018 POP 16-SEP-2013 TO

0019 POP 16-SEP-2013 TO

0020 POP 16-SEP-2013 TO

0021 POP 16-SEP-2013 TO

0022 POP 16-SEP-2013 TO

1001 POP 16-SEP-2014 TO

15-SEP-2015

1002 POP 16-SEP-2014 TO

1003 POP 16-SEP-2014 TO

1004 POP 16-SEP-2014 TO

1005 POP 16-SEP-2014 TO

1006 POP 16-SEP-2014 TO

1007 POP 16-SEP-2014 TO

1008 POP 16-SEP-2014 TO

1009 POP 16-SEP-2014 TO

1010 POP 16-SEP-2014 TO

1011 POP 16-SEP-2014 TO

1012 POP 16-SEP-2014 TO

1013 POP 16-SEP-2014 TO

1014 POP 16-SEP-2014 TO

1015 POP 16-SEP-2014 TO

1016 POP 16-SEP-2014 TO

1017 POP 16-SEP-2014 TO

1018 POP 16-SEP-2014 TO

1019 POP 16-SEP-2014 TO

1020 POP 16-SEP-2014 TO

1021 POP 16-SEP-2014 TO

1022 POP 16-SEP-2014 TO

2001 POP 16-SEP-2015 TO

15-SEP-2016

2002 POP 16-SEP-2015 TO

2003 POP 16-SEP-2015 TO

2004 POP 16-SEP-2015 TO

2005 POP 16-SEP-2015 TO

2006 POP 16-SEP-2015 TO

2007 POP 16-SEP-2015 TO

2008 POP 16-SEP-2015 TO

2009 POP 16-SEP-2015 TO

2010 POP 16-SEP-2015 TO

2011 POP 16-SEP-2015 TO

2012 POP 16-SEP-2015 TO

2013 POP 16-SEP-2015 TO

2014 POP 16-SEP-2015 TO

2015 POP 16-SEP-2015 TO

2016 POP 16-SEP-2015 TO

2017 POP 16-SEP-2015 TO

2018 POP 16-SEP-2015 TO

2019 POP 16-SEP-2015 TO

2020 POP 16-SEP-2015 TO

2021 POP 16-SEP-2015 TO

2022 POP 16-SEP-2015 TO

3001 POP 16-SEP-2016 TO

15-SEP-2017

3002 POP 16-SEP-2016 TO

3003 POP 16-SEP-2016 TO

3004 POP 16-SEP-2016 TO

3005 POP 16-SEP-2016 TO

3006 POP 16-SEP-2016 TO

3007 POP 16-SEP-2016 TO

3008 POP 16-SEP-2016 TO

3009 POP 16-SEP-2016 TO

3010 POP 16-SEP-2016 TO

3011 POP 16-SEP-2016 TO

3012 POP 16-SEP-2016 TO

3013 POP 16-SEP-2016 TO

3014 POP 16-SEP-2016 TO

3015 POP 16-SEP-2016 TO

3016 POP 16-SEP-2016 TO

3017 POP 16-SEP-2016 TO

3018 POP 16-SEP-2016 TO

3019 POP 16-SEP-2016 TO

3020 POP 16-SEP-2016 TO

3021 POP 16-SEP-2016 TO

3022 POP 16-SEP-2016 TO

4001 POP 16-SEP-2017 TO

15-SEP-2018

4002 POP 16-SEP-2017 TO

4003 POP 16-SEP-2017 TO

4004 POP 16-SEP-2017 TO

4005 POP 16-SEP-2017 TO

4006 POP 16-SEP-2017 TO

4007 POP 16-SEP-2017 TO

4008 POP 16-SEP-2017 TO

4009 POP 16-SEP-2017 TO

4010 POP 16-SEP-2017 TO

4011 POP 16-SEP-2017 TO

4012 POP 16-SEP-2017 TO

4013 POP 16-SEP-2017 TO

4014 POP 16-SEP-2017 TO

4015 POP 16-SEP-2017 TO

4016 POP 16-SEP-2017 TO

4017 POP 16-SEP-2017 TO

4018 POP 16-SEP-2017 TO

4019 POP 16-SEP-2017 TO

4020 POP 16-SEP-2017 TO

4021 POP 16-SEP-2017 TO

4022 POP 16-SEP-2017 TO

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

52.212-1 Instructions to Offerors--Commercial Items FEB 2012 52.212-4 Contract Terms and Conditions--Commercial Items JUN 2013 52.222-17 Nondisplacement of Qualified Workers JAN 2013 252.203-7000 Requirements Relating to Compensation of Former DoD

Officials

SEP 2011

252.203-7002 Requirement to Inform Employees of Whistleblower Rights JAN 2009 252.204-7004 Alt A Central Contractor Registration Alternate A MAY 2013 252.209-7004 Subcontracting With Firms That Are Owned or Controlled By

The Government of a Terrorist Country

DEC 2006

252.227-7016 Rights in Bid or Proposal Information JAN 2011 252.246-7004 Safety of Facilities, Infrastructure, and Equipment for Military

Operations

OCT 2010

252.247-7028 Application for U.S. Government Shipping Documentation/Instructions

JUN 2012

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT

52.212-1 Addendum

Washington Headquarters Services Acquisition Directorate (WHS/AD) is releasing this Request for Quote electronically only. This electronic version of the RFQ is the official version for this acquisition. No hard copy of this solicitation will be issued. Offerors will be sent any amendments to this solicitation electronically. Offerors shall submit electronic proposals by email only to the points of contact designated in this instruction.

1. Questions – The cut-off date for all questions is August 29, 2013 at 2:00pm ET. Offerors are required to email all questions to Elizabeth Johnson at elizabeth.a.johnson443.civ@mail.mil. Responses to all questions may be in the form of an amendment and electronically sent to all known Offerors. Telephonic requests or questions received after the designated timeframe may not be answered at the discretion of the Contracting Officer.

2. Offerors shall submit their proposals before the due date and time for receipt of quotes. Offers received after the due date and time for receipt of proposals will be considered late and may not be evaluated. Proposals submitted in response to the solicitation shall be formatted as follows and furnished in the number of copies stated herein.

Proposals shall be submitted as follows:

a. Text – Text shall be at least single-spaced, on 8½ x 11 inch paper, with a minimum one-inch margin all around. Pages shall be numbered consecutively. Pages submitted in excess of the page limitations stated throughout this document will not be evaluated.

b. Font Size – Print shall be of minimum 12 point font size spacing. Bolding, underlining, and italics may be used to identify topic demarcations or points of emphasis. Graphic presentations, including tables, while not subject to the same font size and spacing requirements, shall have spacing and text that is easily readable.

c. Labeling – Responses to Technical Capability, Past Performance and Price shall be in separate files. A cover sheet shall be included in each file, clearly marked as to the RFP identification, date of submittal, acknowledgement of any amendments, the Offeror’s name, address, Taxpayer ID number, CAGE code, and the Offeror’s POC name, phone, and email. The cover sheet shall not count against any page limitation.

mailto:elizabeth.a.johnson443.civ@mail.mil

d. In addition to their Technical Capability, Past Performance and Price proposal, Offerors are required to submit 1 electronic copy of a REDACTED proposal to File I – Technical Capability. Redacted proposals must be free of all identifying marks to include: company name, address, identity of employees/contingent employees, corporate logos, trademark colors, etc.

e. Pricing Data – Any and all pricing information shall only appear in the Price file.

f. Format – Offerors shall submit their proposal as attachments to the email having the text and graphics portions in a format readable by Microsoft (MS) Office 2010, MS Word 2010. Data submitted in spreadsheet files shall be readable by MS Office 2010, MS Excel 2010. All Cost/ Price information shall be in files separate from Technical Capability and Past Performance.

File Chapter /Title Page Limits Copies I – Technical Capability

Original plus 1 redacted copy

Subfactor 1 - Technical Approach 15 pages

Subfactor 2 - Program Management/Staffing Plan

3 pages per resume + 2 pages for additional information

Subfactor 3 –

QCP

10 pages

II – Past Performance

Original only

Past Performance 5 pages not including the questionnaire III - Price Original only Price 4 pages

3. Submission Requirements The Offeror is responsible for addressing each of the aspects addressed in the evaluation criteria and PWS.

Additional clarification regarding submissions can be provided during the Question and Answer period.

Factor 1 – Technical Capability:

Subfactor 1 - Technical Approach: The Offeror shall submit their technical approach to accomplish the requirements of the attached Performance Work Statement (PWS).

Subfactor 2 – Program Management/Staffing Plan: The Offeror shall demonstrate qualifications and experience of the Offeror in size, scope, and complexity to the requirements as defined in the PWS. The Offeror shall submit resumes for the individuals designated as “key” or non-key personnel. Resumes are limited to three (3) pages for each of the proposed personnel designated as “key” and shall describe the individual’s specific experience as it relates to the requirements of the PWS. This shall include the identification, the specific responsibilities and accomplishments, and the dates of involvement for each project supported. The resume shall also identify all formal education (e.g., college, training courses, etc.), the dates attended, and degrees or certifications earned. Each resume shall identify the employment status of the individual (e.g., current employee, sub-contractor, contingent hire, etc.).

The Offeror shall also identify the anticipated start date for all contingent hires, if any. Offeror’s shall quote adequate contractor personnel to ensure full and successful compliance with the PWS for the life of this contract.

Subfactor 3 – Quality Control Plan (QCP): The Offeror shall submit a Quality Control Plan which outlines its approach to ensure attainment of the performance standards outlined in the PWS. The Offeror shall establish and maintain this Quality Control Plan (QCP) as specified in PWS Para. 3.5. The Offeror shall develop and implement procedures to identify, prevent, and ensure non-recurrence of defective services. The Offeror’s quality control program is the means by which they ensure that the work complies with the requirement of the contract. At a minimum, the Offeror shall develop quality control procedures that address the areas identified in the Performance Requirements Summary of Section 2. The quality control should represent the Offeror’s best effort to maximize the use of resources and minimize risk on this requirement. The QCP is a living document and will be collaborated on with the Government after award.

Factor 2 – Past Performance

The Offerors shall complete the attached questionnaire. Offerors shall submit no more than five total project references. For Teaming Arrangements, when submitting past performance information for both parties, at least half of the past performance information should reflect the work of the prime contractor. If only one project is submitted for review the Offeror should be the prime on the project. Offerors shall provide a brief history of the project to include the agency or firm for whom the work was or is being performed, the contract number, the date of award, the period of performance, the contract/project value (to include all options), the type of contract (IDIQ, fixed price, cost reimbursable, time and materials, etc.), whether the Offeror performed as a subcontractor or as a prime, and point of contact information (including name, telephone, email, fax number and the title of a reference who can verify quality of performance on the project(s) identified).

1. Projects listed may include those entered into by Federal Government, agencies of state and local governments, and military customers for the same or similar services as described under this RFP. If a firm has no relevant past performance history of the same or similar scope, size, and complexity of this requirement, the proposal must affirmatively state that it possesses no past performance experience of the same or similar scope, size, and complexity. All projects submitted shall be completed or substantially completed within the past three (3) years of the RFP closing date to be considered in the evaluation.

2. Failure to provide the correct/current telephone, fax number, and/or email address for each point of contact (POC) listed may result in a lower rating for this factor.

3. Offerors are responsible for having each of their selected government POCs complete a Past Performance Questionnaire. The Offeror must email the questionnaire to the government POC for completion and CC the Contract Specialist Elizabeth Johnson at elizabeth.a.johnson443.civ@mail.mil. In this email, the Offeror shall instruct the government POC to submit the questionnaire to Elizabeth by September 12th at 2pm. In addition to the PPQ, the Government may use alternative means to collect past performance information, such as contacting the reference listed in the PPQ, and reviewing information, if any, contained in CPARs and PPIRS.

Factor 3 – Price

The Offeror shall prepare a Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) proposal for the base period and each ensuing 12-month option period to include CLINS 0001-0019. The Offeror shall prepare a an hourly rate for all Time and Material (T&M) CLINS in the price proposal (CLINS 0020 – 0021), for the base period and each ensuing 12-month option period.

CLIN 0022 ( and ensuing option period CLINS) has been identified as Other Direct Cost (ODC), to include antipated travel and other administrative cost to be handled as cost reimbursement type CLINS. The Offeror’s price proposal shall identify all labor categories, the number of hours for each labor category, any additional discounts, and any materials or supplies to be used in the price proposal.

(End of Clause)

52.212-2 EVALUATION--COMMERCIAL ITEMS (JAN 1999)

(a) The significant evaluation factors are (i) technical capability ; (ii) past performance , and (iii) price in accordance with FAR 15.304. Technical and past performance, when combined, are significantly more important than price. The mailto:elizabeth.a.johnson443.civ@mail.mil factors are listing in descending order of importance with Factor 1- Technical Approach being the most important factor. Subfactors will not be independently rated and are considered equal.

Factor 1 – Technical Approach:

The Technical Approach Factor is the most important factor. The following areas of consideration will contribute to the Offeror’s overall technical capability rating.

i.Subfactor 1- Technical Solution

The Offeror shall describe, in detail, its technical approach and overall ability to perform worldwide urinalysis collection services, compliance with SAMHSA guidelines, and transport of specimens in accordance with these guidelines to the designated testing laboratory.

The Offeror shall describe, in detail, its technical approach and overall ability to perform MRO services. This description of the technical solution shall include and address each of the aspects below:

• Processes and techniques for providing support for:

1. Reviewing lab test results and specimen custody and control forms to verify forensic and scientific reliability

2. Conducting donor interviews (as required)

3. Making determinations regarding test results '

4. Reporting verified test results to employer/Federal Agency

5. Maintaining records and confidentiality of drug testing information.

• A discussion of privacy and security, including the Offeror's approach and plan for the protection of information and for compliance with HIPAA

• An explanation on how the Offeror proposes a comprehensive plan that supports the requirements of licensure and certifications;

• A discussion of how the Offeror will maintain compliance with medical and health-related regulations and standards;

• An identification of risks, and proposed risk mitigation strategies.

Sub factor 2- Program Management/Staffing Plan This description of the program management and staffing plan shall include and address each of the aspects below:

i.The Offeror's proposal shall be evaluated on its demonstration of the Offeror's ability to provide project administration and perform MRO requirements as outlined in the solicitation and ensure that tasks are performed efficiently, accurately, on-time, and in compliance with the requirements. Consideration will also be given to the Offeror's ability to demonstrate an understanding and effective use of database processes and program reporting tools and provides accurate, timely, and transparent reporting of information as related to final drug test results analysis and documentation.

ii.The Offeror's proposal shall demonstrate the company's knowledge of applicable laws, codes, standards, directives, and criteria governing MRO functions as specified in the PWS.

iii.The Offeror's proposal shall demonstrate competence on analysis performance, drug test result reporting, and planning processes in relation to the MRO service activities. Additionally, the Offeror shall exhibit the ability to implement a transparent governance structure and reporting procedures that include clear lines of communication between the Contractor's team and the Government, and which provide proactive performance and project risk identification and management, escalation, mitigation and resolution.

iv.The Offeror's ability to provide project management and support for MRO services will be evaluated. The Offeror shall provide details of their organizational structure, policies, procedures, and techniques for efficiently managing the proposed work. The Offeror should identify all managerial positions by title as designated by the Offeror and include identification of key personnel and applicable lines of authority.

Sub factor 3- Quality Control Plan (QCP)

This description of the quality control plan shall include and address each of the aspects below:

i.The Offeror's proposal shall be evaluated on inclusion of a Quality Control Plan (QCP) that outlines sampling and measuring criteria to be included in a Performance Requirements Summary Matrix and the degree to which the Offeror's approach will ensure attainment of the Acceptable Performance Level for each PRS measure will be evaluated. The evaluation will consider the relevance, credibility, responsiveness, and completeness of performance and services offered. The evaluation will consider the degree to which the Offeror's proposed Quality Control Plan ensures conformance to contract requirements and reasonable MRO services. In addition, the evaluation will consider the degree to which the plan includes initiatives and self-reviews to ensure that: (1) services are provided on a timely basis and that records are properly maintained, and (2) Government databases are updated quickly and accurately.

The Vendor will receive an overall technical capability rating based on its ability to address the details of each sub factor for this evaluation factor. The ratings are described below:

Rating Description Excellent Proposal meets requirements and indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths far outweigh any weaknesses.

Risk of unsuccessful performance is very low.

Good Proposal meets requirements and indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements.

Proposal contains strengths which outweigh any weaknesses. Risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Acceptable Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements.

Strengths and weaknesses are offsetting or will have little or no impact on contract performance, if any. Risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Marginal Proposal does not clearly meet requirements and has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. The proposal has one or more weaknesses which are not offset by strengths. Risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet requirements and contains one or more deficiencies. Proposal is unawardable.

Factor 2 – Past Performance:

i. Should an Offeror receive an Acceptable (or better) rating in Technical Capability, its proposal will be evaluated for Past Performance.

ii. Offerors will be evaluated on the quality of their past performance for the contracts they have identified that are currently on-going or have been completed within three (3) years from the closing date of this RFP. Projects performed as the prime will be considered more favorably in the evaluation of past performance than projects performed as a subcontractor.

iii. The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s record of past performance in “recent” and “relevant” contract efforts. With regard to past performance, the term “Offeror” includes the prime contractor, subcontractors and/or teammates. “Recent” means contracts that are on-going or have been completed within three (3) years from the closing date of this RFP. “Relevant” means performance of work similar in size and scope under similar conditions.

Additionally, the Government will evaluate whether the Offeror has consistently demonstrated a commitment to customer satisfaction and timely delivery of quality services at fair and reasonable prices by reviewing the Offeror’s record of the following: a. Quality of products and services; b. Timeliness and adherence to schedules; c. Resource management; d. Customer satisfaction; e. Overall contract performance.

For this source selection the evaluation team will use, “Relevant” and “Not Relevant” past performance ratings. With respect to relevancy, more relevant past performance will typically be a stronger predictor of future success and have more influence on the past performance confidence assessment than past performance of lesser relevance.

Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

The second aspect of the past performance evaluation is to determine how well the contractor performed on the contracts. The past performance evaluation performed in support of a current source selection does not establish, create, or change the existing record and history of the Offeror’s past performance on past contracts; rather, the past performance evaluation process gathers information from customers on how well the Offeror performed those past contracts.

Requirements for considering the history of small business utilization is outlined at FAR 5.304(c)(3)(ii) and DFARS 215.305(a)(2).

Performance Confidence Assessment. In conducting a performance confidence assessment, each Offeror shall be assigned one of the ratings in the table below. (Reference FAR 15.305(2) for information on assigning an unknown/neutral confidence rating.)

Rating Description Substantial Confidence Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence

Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Limited Confidence Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the Offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Unknown Confidence (Neutral) No recent/relevant performance record is available or the Offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

iv. The Government reserves the right to contact and verify past performance information with references provided on the Past Performance Questionnaires, and to use any other past performance information available. Additional past performance data may be obtained through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) or similar systems, other Government departments and agencies, program managers, contracting officers, and other sources known to the Government (including commercial sources) including references other than those identified by the Offeror. Offerors will be given the opportunity to address any negative performance information resulting from the past performance assessment inquiries.

v. Offerors without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance and will be rated “Unknown Confidence” on Factor 2 – Past Performance.

Factor 3- Price i.The price will not be scored or rated. The Offeror’s price proposal will be evaluated to determine if it is reasonable.

The Government will consider the specific labor mix, hours, hourly rates, and other costs associated with this task order. The best value offer may be determined through tradeoff analysis. The Government is not bound to award to the lowest evaluated price.

The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible Offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

(b) Options. The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

(c) A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful Offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer's specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

Basis for Award: The Government intends to award to the Offeror whose proposal represents the best value and is the most advantageous to the Government. In determining best value, the Government may, in accordance with FAR 15.101-1 employ a tradeoff process allowing for award to other than the lowest priced Offeror or other than the highest technically rated offer.

If the Offeror’s Technical Capability rating is “Acceptable” or better, then the Offeror’s Past Performance and will be evaluated using the Past Performance Ratings outlined herein and price will be evaluated in accordance with the details of Factor 3.

The Government intends to award without discussions, therefore the Offeror’s initial proposal should contain the Offeror’s best terms from a cost or price and technical standpoint. The Government reserves the right to request revisions if the Contracting Officer later determines the need. In accordance with FAR 15.306 (c) the Government also reserves the right to establish a competitive range. The contracting officer shall establish a competitive range comprised of all of the most highly rated proposals, unless the range is further reduced for purposes of efficiency.

(End of provision)

52.212-3 OFFEROR REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS--COMMERCIAL ITEMS (DEC 2012)

An offeror shall complete only paragraph (b) of this provision if the offeror has completed the annual representations and certifications electronically via https://www.acquisition.gov. If an offeror has not completed the annual representations and certifications electronically at the ORCA website, the offeror shall complete only paragraphs (c) through (o) of this provision.

(a) Definitions. As used in this provision --

“Economically disadvantaged women-owned small business (EDWOSB) Concern” means a small business concern that is at least 51 percent directly and unconditionally owned by, and the management and daily business operations of which are controlled by, one or more women who are citizens of the United States and who are economically disadvantaged in accordance with 13 CFR part 127. It automatically qualifies as a women-owned small business eligible under the WOSB Program.

"Forced or indentured child labor" means all work or service-

(1) Exacted from any person under the age of 18 under the menace of any penalty for its nonperformance and for which the worker does not offer himself voluntarily; or

(2) Performed by any person under the age of 18 pursuant to a contract the enforcement of which can be accomplished by process or penalties.

Inverted domestic corporation, as used in this section, means a foreign incorporated entity which is treated as an inverted domestic corporation under 6 U.S.C. 395(b), i.e., a corporation that used to be incorporated in the United States, or used to be a partnership in the United States, but now is incorporated in a foreign country, or is a subsidiary whose parent corporation is incorporated in a foreign country, that meets the criteria specified in 6 U.S.C.

395(b), applied in accordance with the rules and definitions of 6 U.S.C. 395(c). An inverted domestic corporation as herein defined does not meet the definition of an inverted domestic corporation as defined by the Internal Revenue Code at 26 U.S.C. 7874.

Manufactured end product means any end product in Federal Supply Classes (FSC) 1000-9999, except--

(1) FSC 5510, Lumber and Related Basic Wood Materials;

(2) Federal Supply Group (FSG) 87, Agricultural Supplies;

(3) FSG 88, Live Animals;

(4) FSG 89, Food and Related Consumables;

https://www.acquisition.gov/

(5) FSC 9410, Crude Grades of Plant Materials;

(6) FSC 9430, Miscellaneous Crude Animal Products, Inedible;

(7) FSC 9440, Miscellaneous Crude Agricultural and Forestry Products;

(8) FSC 9610, Ores;

(9) FSC 9620, Minerals, Natural and Synthetic; and

(10) FSC 9630, Additive Metal Materials.

Place of manufacture means the place where an end product is assembled out of components, or otherwise made or processed from raw materials into the finished product that is to be provided to the Government. If a product is disassembled and reassembled, the place of reassembly is not the place of manufacture.

Restricted business operations means business operations in Sudan that include power production activities, mineral extraction activities, oil-related activities, or the production of military equipment, as those terms are defined in the Sudan Accountability and Divestment Act of 2007 (Pub. L. 110-174). Restricted business operations do not include business operations that the person (as that term is defined in Section 2 of the Sudan Accountability and Divestment Act of 2007) conducting the business can demonstrate--

(1) Are conducted under contract directly and exclusively with the regional government of southern Sudan;

(2) Are conducted pursuant to specific authorization from the Office of Foreign Assets Control in the Department of the Treasury, or are expressly exempted under Federal law from the requirement to be conducted under such authorization;

(3) Consist of providing goods or services to marginalized populations of Sudan;

(4) Consist of providing goods or services to an internationally recognized peacekeeping force or humanitarian organization;

(5) Consist of providing goods or services that are used only to promote health or education; or

(6) Have been voluntarily suspended.

Sensitive technology--

(1) Means hardware, software, telecommunications equipment, or any other technology that is to be used specifically--

(i) To restrict the free flow of unbiased information in Iran; or

(ii) To disrupt, monitor, or otherwise restrict speech of the people of Iran; and

(2) Does not include information or informational materials the export of which the President does not have the authority to regulate or prohibit pursuant to section 203(b)(3) of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1702(b)(3)).

Service-disabled veteran-owned small business concern--

(1) Means a small business concern--

(i) Not less than 51 percent of which is owned by one or more service-disabled veterans or, in the case of any publicly owned business, not less than 51 percent of the stock of which is owned by one or more service-disabled veterans; and

(ii) The management and daily business operations of which are controlled by one or more service-disabled veterans or, in the case of a service-disabled veteran with permanent and severe disability, the spouse or permanent caregiver of such veteran.

(2) Service-disabled veteran means a veteran, as defined in 38 U.S.C. 101(2), with a disability that is service-connected, as defined in 38 U.S.C. 101(16).

"Small business concern" means a concern, including its affiliates, that is independently owned and operated, not dominant in the field of operation in which it is bidding on Government contracts, and qualified as a small business under the criteria in 13 CFR Part 121 and size standards in this solicitation.

Subsidiary means an entity in which more than 50 percent of the entity is owned--

(1) Directly by a parent corporation; or

(2) Through another subsidiary of a parent corporation.

Veteran-owned small business concern means a small business concern--

(1) Not less than 51 percent of which is owned by one or more veterans (as defined at 38 U.S.C. 101(2)) or, in the case of any publicly owned business, not less than 51 percent of the stock of which is owned by one or more veterans; and

(2) The management and daily business operations of which are controlled by one or more veterans.

"Women-owned business concern" means a concern which is at least 51 percent owned by one or more women; or in the case of any publicly owned business, at least 51 percent of the stock of which is owned by one or more women;

and whose management and daily business operations are controlled by one or more women.

"Women-owned small business concern" means a small business concern--

(1) That is at least 51 percent owned by one or more women or, in the case of any publicly owned business, at least 51 percent of its stock is owned by one or more women; or

(2) Whose management and daily business operations are controlled by one or more women.

Women-owned small business (WOSB) concern eligible under the WOSB Program (in accordance with 13 CFR part 127)”, means a small business concern that is at least 51 percent directly and unconditionally owned by, and the management and daily business operations of which are controlled by, one or more women who are citizens of the United States.

(b) (1) Annual Representations and Certifications. Any changes provided by the offeror in paragraph (b)(2) of this provision do not automatically change the representations and certifications posted electronically on the Online Representations and Certifications Application (ORCA) website.

(2) The offeror has completed the annual representations and certifications electronically via the ORCA website accessed through https://www.acquisition.gov. After reviewing the ORCA database information, the offeror verifies by submission of this offer that the representations and certifications currently posted electronically at FAR 52.212- 3, Offeror Representations and Certifications--Commercial Items, have been entered or updated in the last 12 https://www.acquisition.gov/ months, are current, accurate, complete, and applicable to this solicitation (including the business size standard applicable to the NAICS code referenced for this solicitation), as of the date of this offer and are incorporated in this offer by reference (see FAR 4.1201), except for paragraphs ----------.

[Offeror to identify the applicable paragraphs at (c) through (o) of this provision that the offeror has completed for the purposes of this solicitation only, if any.) These amended representation(s) and/or certification(s) are also incorporated in this offer and are current, accurate, and complete as of the date of this offer. Any changes provided by the offeror are applicable to this solicitation only, and do not result in an update to the representations and certifications posted electronically on ORCA.]

(c) Offerors must complete the following representations when the resulting contract will be performed in the United States or its outlying areas. Check all that apply.

(1) Small business concern. The offeror represents as part of its offer that it ( ) is, ( ) is not a small business concern.

(2) Veteran-owned small business concern. (Complete only if the offeror represented itself as a small business concern in paragraph (c)(1) of this provision.) The offeror represents as part of its offer that it ( ) is, ( ) is not a veteran-owned small business concern.

(3) Service-disabled veteran-owned small business concern. (Complete only if the offeror represented itself as a veteran-owned small business concern in paragraph (c)(2) of this provision.) The offeror represents as part of its offer that it ( ) is, ( ) is not a service-disabled veteran-owned small business concern.

(4) Small disadvantaged business concern. (Complete only if the offeror represented itself as a small business concern in paragraph (c)(1) of this provision.) The offeror represents, for general statistical purposes, that it ( ) is, ( ) is not a small disadvantaged business concern as defined in 13 CFR 124.1002.

(5) Women-owned small business concern. (Complete only if the offeror represented itself as a small business concern in paragraph (c)(1) of this provision.) The offeror represents that it ( ) is, ( ) is not a women-owned small business concern.

Note to paragraphs (c)(8) and (9): Complete paragraphs (c)(8) and (c)(9) only if this solicitation is expected to exceed the simplified acquisition threshold.

(6) WOSB concern eligible under the WOSB Program. [Complete only if the offeror represented itself as a women-owned small business concern in paragraph (c)(5) of this provision.] The offeror represents that--

(i) It [ ] is, [ ] is not a WOSB concern eligible under the WOSB Program, has provided all the required documents to the WOSB Repository, and no change in circumstances or adverse decisions have been issued that affects its eligibility; and

(ii) It [ballot] is, [ballot] is not a joint venture that complies with the requirements of 13 CFR part 127, and the representation in paragraph (c)(6)(i) of this provision is accurate for each WOSB concern eligible under the WOSB Program participating in the joint venture. [The offeror shall enter the name or names of the WOSB concern eligible under the WOSB Program and other small businesses that are participating in the joint venture: ----------.] Each WOSB concern eligible under the WOSB Program participating in the joint venture shall submit a separate signed copy of the WOSB representation.

(7) Economically disadvantaged women-owned small business (EDWOSB) concern. [Complete only if the offeror represented itself as a WOSB concern eligible under the WOSB Program in (c)(6) of this provision.] The offeror represents that--

(i) It [ballot] is, [ballot] is not an EDWOSB concern, has provided all the required documents…

This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .