MEETING MINUTES.doc

MEETING MINUTES

Pre-Proposal Conference

AFRTS Radio & Television Spot Production

HQ0028-09-R-0024

1.

The pre-proposal conference for solicitation HQ0028-09-R-0024 was conducted at 10:00 AM on 24 Jun 2009 at the Defense Media Activity HQ, 601 North Fairfax St, 3rd Floor, Alexandria, VA. Leila Miller, contract specialist for the acquisition, made opening remarks. She advised attendees that any remarks or explanations made at the conference are not intended to qualify the terms and conditions of the solicitation. Any changes or clarifications need to be made will be done by amendment to the solicitation.

2.

The following Government personnel were in attendance during the pre-proposal conference:

Paul Waldrop – Chief of Radio & Television Production Office (RTPO)

Sharlene Dunn – RTPO Project Manager

SFC Karry James – RTPO Project Manager 3.

In referring to the agenda, Ms. Miller informed the attendees that the proposals due date will be 2:00 PM (PST), 10 Jul 2009, and that if the proposal has to be hand carried it must be handed between 8:00 and 2:00 PM (PST). In order to be eligible for contract award, the successful offeror has to be registered in the Central Contractor Registration (CCR) by the time of award. Ms. Miller also mentioned that whoever will be the successful offeror, a pre-con meeting may be sooner than 30 days from the time the contract is awarded. She also informed the offerors that they must strictly follow the format for proposal submission as indicated in the Addendum to 52.212-1 (Proposal Submission Format); there will be no deviations allowed to the format specifically the price proposal (SF 1449 and Exhibits As thru Cs). The offerors must use SF 1449 and Exhibits As thru Cs for their price proposal. Offerors unable to follow the proposal submission format may be rejected. Offerors are only to submit the number copies required as indicated in the solicitation and in two several parts only (price proposal and technical proposal); no loose documents will be allowed in the submission of proposal. Contractor need not submit or complete the requirement of 52.212-3 if they are ORCA certified. ORCA certification will be acceptable. The floor was then turned over to Mr. Paul Waldrop, Chief of RTPO.

4.

An overview of the organization and a review of the requirement were provided by the Mr. Waldrop as follows:

Overview of AFRTS – AFRTS has 10 TV channels and 13 radio stations; what is unique about AFRTS is its creativity and ability to reach viewers around the world.

Overview of DMA – DMA is a new organization established on 1 Oct 2008. This organization is made up of what used to be American Forces Information Service (AFIS);

AFRTS is a support organization of DMA, and DMA will be moving to Fort Meade, MD in the spring of 2011.

The Government provided video presentation of selected television and radio spots representing different styles and techniques.

The Government notified the vendors notified that they must have the ability to broadcast in HD and audio 5.1 surround sound by the time DMA-Alexandria move to Fort Meade, MD.

4.

After the overview and video presentation, a question and answer session followed:

Question #1: What do you want to change or improve with the current requirement?

Answer: Content wise, the Government is happy.

Question #2: Will we have the opportunity to roll up our sleeves and become strategic partners?

Answer: We always work as a team, but we make the ultimate call. We will communicate on a daily basis.

Question #3: Do we have a research base about topics?

Answer: We do, but it mostly depends on what service commanders’ want. Scientifically, it is very tough to obtain accurate numbers. All spots have SME’s (subject matter experts).

Question #4: When the conversion to HD takes place, will an adjustment be made?

Answer: Yes.

Question #5: What are the HD specifications?

Answer: They are still in research.

Question #6: Talent

Answer: SAG; may have a special DoD rate; looking for long term because spots will be aired for 5 years; spots will be aired strictly overseas; must have music rights.

Question #7: How will the RTPO help so that tasks run smoothly on military posts?

Answer: The Government will accompany the crew and ask for prior authorization and notification.

Question #8: Music? Does DoD get a special deal? Is it part of the budget?

Answer: The cost should be part of your price proposal.

Question #9: Military Advisor?

Answer: Military advisor must be someone that understands the military and is very detail-oriented. They need to be up-to-date on military regulations.

Question #10: How strict are you when it comes to proposal?

Answer: Everyone must submit what is asked for in the RFP.

Question #11: Is there a forum to watch additional spots?

Answer: No; feed is strictly overseas and is encrypted.

Question #12: Shooting film or delivered electronically?

Answer: We will be flexible; we are all on the technology train and we will be evolving.

Question #13: Relationship?

Answer: The contractor will not be on the DMA site very much. Creative development conference will be held at the contractor’s office. Scripting conference will be held on AFRTS site. AFRTS is a firm believer of FIT IT NOW.

Question #14: Could we have a profile of the panel that will be screening the proposals?

Answer: The proposals will be evaluated by Government Technical Team.

Question #15: Contract?

Answer: One contractor for 1 full year and 4 full option years.

Question #16: Why one contractor?

Answer: To create consistency and quality.

Question #17: Creativity of the proposal?

Answer: Concepts of each spot – not a campaign; create a spot for each objective.

Question #18: Are the 4 TV and 4 Radio concepts for the Creative Proposal meant to be part of a campaign?

Answer: The Government wants to see independent concepts. We do not want a campaign. The idea is to see the vendor's creative ability.

Question #19: Same theme among each concept or are you looking for 4 independent concepts?

Answer: The Government wants to see independent concepts. We do not want a campaign. The idea is to see the vendor's creative ability

Question #20: Combination of both?

Answer: The Government wants to see independent concepts. We do not want a campaign. The idea is to see the vendor's creative ability.

Question #21: I noticed you're putting a restriction on past performance work and a cut off for year being produced/broadcast. Is the cut off 2006 or 2007?...it mentioned it as 2 different years in the Subpart.

Answer: The cut-off is 2006. To make an informed decision we need to see examples of recent work, not something that is 10 years old.

Question #22: If the spot is stellar and unique but produced in 2000 will you consider this? It truly is great.

Answer: The cut-off is 2006. To make an informed decision we need to see examples of recent work, not something that is 10 years old.

Question #23: We are acting as Prime Contractor and is teaming with several incredible and talented subcontractors. Since I am representing them as Prime Contractor and Executive Producer I can present them as examples to AFRTS correct? As long as they did creative development, scripting, production, and post-production.

Answer: Yes, a prime contractor can submit the work of a sub-contractor if that sub-contractor will be performing the work.

Question #24: Do you have any other Prime Contractor/Subcontractor requirements or preferences not listed in the provisions in the solicitation?

Answer: No.

Question #25: A question on the distribution of the spec spots for the AFRTS proposal. We are to develop a total of 16 spots spread between two topics (suicide prevention and smokeless tobacco). My understanding is that 8 would be radio, 8 would be television. Are you looking for multiple concepts under each topic with multiple lengths? For examples:

Suicide Prevention TV concept 1 :29 seconds and :59 seconds

Suicide Prevention TV concept 2 :29 seconds and :59 seconds

Suicide Prevention Radio concept 1 :29 seconds and :59 seconds

Suicide Prevention Radio concept 2 :29 seconds and :59 seconds

The same distribution would follow for Smokeless Tobacco. If this is not a correct assumption, please advise on the distribution of the spots.

Answer: The RFP requirement is to provide spot concepts not produced spots. Vendors should reference the format sheets in the PWS for TV and radio concepts. Yes, there are a total of 8 TV and radio spots. Yes, we are looking for multiple concepts to help us determine the vendor's creative ability.

Question #26: Are the radio and television spot concepts typically similar? Or, if the topics do not lend themselves to similar executions, will AFRTS accept differing concepts between radio and television?

Answer: Yes, we are looking for multiple concepts to help us determine the vendor's creative ability.

Question #27: Is there a preference to produce :29 television and :59 radio?

Answer: We do not require multiple run times. Although :29 seconds is the length we use the most, if a vendor chooses to provide a :59 second concept instead that is OK. The length of all concepts should be either 29 or 59 seconds. More importantly, all vendors should understand that RTPO is looking for one radio and one television spot concept per objective.

Question #28: I wanted to reach out to you about two areas concerning AFRTS Radio and television spot production. First As a company we have yet to do any substantial production work under our brand. Our company is made up of accomplished freelance staff and management who have a breath of experience in television, and radio. My question is can we present a collection, or reel of radio, and television spots as a collective representation of our capability?

Answer: Yes, we will accept the independent work of a newly formed but experienced staff as an example of their capabilities. Vendors should be as clear and specific as possible about what each person’s role was in producing a specific spot or spots. The work must be relevant (spots) and recent (no later than 2006).

Question #29: Secondly, as a startup our gross receipts would not be an adequate reflection of our ability in the service areas you would need.

Answer: Although company experience is important we do recognize that a newly formed company will not have a financial history and would not disqualify a vendor's proposal based solely on a lack of past gross receipts. All vendors should be aware that technical ability is considered twice as important as experience and/or past performance. However, we do expect each potential vendor to adhere to the requirements of the RFP, to include clear explanations of any anomalies.

Question #30: In Subpart A of the Technical/Management Proposal can my company gross receipts be also represented through any of my subcontractors gross receipts since they are an important part of the proposal?

Answer: No. You can stipulate that you are using subcontractors and then list the subcontractors' gross receipts as examples. The gross receipts of the subs cannot be represented as belonging to the prime contractor.

Question #31: In Subpart A of the Technical/Management Proposal can I represent my company's average annual dollar amount and the percentage of the average annual gross receipts derived from each of the following four categories: (a) Creative development and scripting services, (b) Production services. (c) Postproduction services. (d) All other…from also my subcontractors since they are an important part of my proposal.

Answer: Again, you can state that you will be using subcontractors and list the legitimate figures that belong to your subcontractors but they cannot be represented as the prime contractors.

Question #32: In Subpart A of the Technical/Management Proposal can I represent my company experience in providing commercial spot announcements and/or public service spot announcements by representing information through my subcontractors since they are an important part of this proposal? .

Answer: No you can only say that you would be using subcontractors to perform the contract and that although the prime contractor may not have extensive company experience the subcontractors do.

Question #33: The proposal appears to have a conflict: Under Proposal Format and Content for Submission, Subpart C-1, it indicates all samples shall have been completed and/or first released in calendar year 2007 or later. However, in C-2 (b), it indicates that submissions completed and/or first released prior [my emphasis] to 2006 will not be evaluated. Can we in fact submit spots from 2006?

Answer: Subpart C-1 should indicate ..."in calendar year 2006 or later” . The solicitation will be amended to reflect "2006 or later" on Subpart C-1, and also Subpart B(1), B(1)(a), and Subpart B(2) to reflect 2008, 2007 and 2006.

Question #34: Under the mock RTPO project described in Subpart D, 2., I need clarification on the last sentence: Offerors shall not propose the use of videotape for original recordings for either topic in the simulated tasking statement. I assume this means that you do not want any concepts that would use ANALOG videotape, but would allow us to choose between film (16mm or 35mm) or digital video for concepting and budgeting purposes. Please confirm if this is a correct assumption, or if you as asking all bidders to concept using film for budgeting purposes.

Answer: The last sentence of Subpart D, 3 (correct para #) refers to not using analog videotape as the primary means of production. Unless approved in advance by RTPO, spots should generally be shot in film or high-end digital format.

Question #35: Where is the bid to be submitted: the Virginia address shown in Box 15 of Form 1449 or the California address shown in “SUBMISSION OF OFFERS” on page 37?

Answer: The bid submission is as indicated on page 37, the California address.

Question #36: What is the make-up (number of profile, background, bio) of the judge or judges who “appraise,” “gauge”, and “scrutinize” the offeror’s Creative Proposal as described in 52.212-2(1)(iii)(B)?

Answer: All of the technical evaluation team are Federal Government employees that are professionals in audio visual production field.

Question #37: Where is the addendum referenced in 52.212-3 9(c)(8)(ii)?

Answer: It is within 52.12-3(c)(9)(i).

Question #38: Is there a section 52.225-4?

Answer: You can check or download this clause at www.arnet.gov

Question #39: Regarding “Place of Manufacturer”, the RFP states that “the contracting officer is to check a box to indicate if paragraph (k)(1)(2) applies, and yet the RFP asks to the offeror to certify. Which rule applies?

Answer: I’m not quite sure what you’re referring here as you did not indicate the FAR clause ref number.

Question #40: Who is the incumbent contractor?

Answer: Film House, Inc., at Nashville, TN.

Question #41: Will the Government accept two separate and different bids from a single offeror.

Answer: Please be more specific. What do you mean by two separate or different bids from a single offeror?

Question #42: Please provide clarification on how specific the budget needs to be for Attachments 3 and 4 (television and radio concepts, respectively). Are you looking for an aggregate figure, four line items that correspond to milestone deliverables (creative development, scripting, production with a breakout of any extraordinary items, and post-production), or something more detailed? If you are looking for something more detailed, can we get a sample of a previous cost proposal associated with a concept form?

Answer: We are looking for an overview of what the vendor believes it will cost them to produce their concepts. We do not need or want a detailed/line item budget.

Question #43: Exhibits B and C contain many items that are not typically charged by the hour and instead are available by the unit or by the day. Additionally, many of the personnel listed in Exhibit A are contracted with on a day-rate basis for production. Under Proposal Format & Content, Item 2, it indicates flexibility in the exhibit pricing units, but not the formatting of the columns. Additionally, there appears to be precedence for varied units of purchase as described in Sections 2.11, 2.12.1, 2.12.2 and 2.12.3 (described as hour, day, concept, script, etc.). However, at the pre-proposal conference, it was suggested that we not deviate from any part of the form. Please clarify. We would prefer to indicate pricing based on conventional units of purchase such as hour, day and unit, as appropriate.

Answer: If items are typically charged by some other measurements than hours, then that is the unit of measurement the vendor shall use. Vendors should indicate pricing based on conventional units of purchase. NOTE: Solicitation will be amended to make changes to some unit of measurement.

Question #44: We have worked in television and radio production for 18 years and have a relationship with an established proposed subcontractor that is a production company/studio for as long. Our ideal teaming relationship would be prime/subcontractor. As prime, we have examples for Subpart C of the technical proposal where we provided creative development services for scripting and casting, provided direction during shooting as well as editing for a Fortune 100 company (Mattel), but they contracted directly with the production company and paid the talent directly. Although we were involved in every aspect of the work, the billing did not go through us. Please confirm that we may submit such an example on our reel provided we disclose all of this. Likewise, our subcontractor has outstanding current examples of television and radio that were produced completely outside of our involvement. Based on information shared at the pre-bid, it appears to be acceptable for us to include their work on the submitted reel. Please confirm.

Answer: Yes, this type of submission is acceptable as long as it is clearly explained as in the e-mail.

Question #45: This procurement has been designated as a small business set aside and we intend to have a subcontract with another small business. We understand that no subcontracting plan is necessary. Because we intend to be the primary creative resource with our sub providing production services, it is possible a large percentage (over 51%) of the direct costs of production would be billed through them. Is there a restriction on the percentage of the total contract that can be billed through the subcontractor? If there is a prohibition against a substantial percentage of the contract going through the subcontractor, would the DMA/AFRTS look favorably or unfavorably upon a joint venture between the two firms?

Answer: First just want to let you know that any subcontractors of a prime contractor cannot billed directly to the Government, as the Government contract is only with the prime contractor and as such the prime contractor is the only one can billed to the Government. In accordance with FAR 52.219-4, it has to be 50 percent of the costs of contract performance incurred for personnel shall be expended for employees of the concern.

Question #46: For the purposes of budgeting the mock exercise, should we assume travel to RPTO for the script conference that would typically take place?

Answer: No, we are only asking for concepts and how much the vendor believes it will cost to produce their concept. The scripting conference would come later and is not a part of this proposal.

Question #47: We assume payment will be made through WAWF electronically. If we offer a prompt payment discount, can payment be expedited beyond the normal 30 days?

Answer: Yes the payment will be made through WAWF. You can offer a prompt payment discount and the DFAS payment system should expedite the payment beyond the normal 30 days. However, keep in mind that DFAS is a separate agency, and as such contracting has no control on how quick DFAS can process the payment.

Question #48: If we enter into a teaming agreement as a subcontractor with a Prime that fits the Small Business Set-Aside criteria, are we able to submit samples of our work for review and evaluation along with media production samples from the Prime?

Answer: Yes, the subcontractor can and should submit samples of their work if they would be the ones doing the work under the contract. If you are doing the work, we need to see samples whether you’re the prime or the sub. It should be clearly stated who did the work.

Question #49: Can you confirm that providing a print out from our ORCA registration will satisfy the 52.212-3 and 52-212-7000 requirements?

Answer: Yes, that’s correct.

Question #50: When completing the pricing in exhibits A and B, can we eliminate any labor or equipment categories or add any additional categories?

Answer: Please follow the guidelines as stated in the RFP. If the vendor believes an item is outdated or a new item should be added they may do so with a clear explanation of why they feel the change is necessary.

Question #52: Can you please define the Talent classification: i.e. AFTRA/SAG – “Broadcast” or “Industrial”? (During the meeting it was identified as Broadcast, but the SOW indicates non-commercial.)

a. If “Broadcast”, will the government provide the usage reports required for residuals?

b. We assume that the contractor is responsible for all requirements for

“Signatory” and “Paymaster”, is this correct?

c. If non commercial, with a few exceptions (As described in the SOW) how will the government identify when a spot will be used commercially?

Answer: The contractor is responsible for negotiating a special arrangement/contract with SAG/AFTRA on behalf of AFRTS. Typically, they charge one broadcast session rate or fee for a spot that will have a shelf life of 5 to 10 years, vice the typical 13 weeks. There is no requirement for usage reports.

Question #52: What information is required if we will be partnering with another company as a sub? Where should this information be included in the response.

Answer: I believe there is a clause in the RFP where it asks about a joint venture, and to my knowledge, that’s the only information required.

Question #53: What rules might apply concerning the business size for a sub?

Answer: As indicated in the RFP, this requirement is set-aside for small business only, and as such there is no requirement for subcontracting. However, if you are a small business and you intend to subcontract this requirement with another company, I am not aware of any business size requirement.

Question #54: Can you confirm the request for two “Original Creative Efforts”?

(a) My understanding is that we will provide two (1 on Suicide Prevention and 1 on Smokeless Tobacco) creative television spots.

Answer: All radio and TV spot concepts must be original creative efforts.

(b) In addition, we need to price out the cost for creative development, scripting, production, and post production, based on a $235,000 budget for 16 spots in the total project?

Answer: Correct, the Government needs to know how much the vendor believes it will cost to produce their concepts.

(c) We not have to provide 16 “Original Creative Efforts”?

Answer: All 16 concepts must be original creative efforts. Two topics with 4 radio concepts and 4 TV concepts for each topic.

Question #55: Page 61: Section 3.4 states: The Government anticipates that 75% of original photography will be accomplished utilizing a digital video format, and 25% of original photography will be accomplished in 16mm or 35mm film. We’ve found great success in acquiring original footage on HD or other digital cinema formats (eg: RED) that allow for the same quality as film acquisition at an overall dollar savings to the production. If we are proposing using HD technology for acquisition, do we still need to price out film related expenses?

Answer: The important factor is that the quality remains as high as possible. Red or a high end HD format is comparable to film and in most cases should be an acceptable substitute. However, this does not mean that a vendor does not have to have film capability.

Question #56: Page 32: Regarding demonstrated samples of recent spot announcements, the RFP states: At least two of the television spots shall have been shot on film. If our samples have all been shot at HD or better, are spots acquired on film still necessary as part of the demonstration?

Answer: We will accept HD or better.

Question #57: Page 8 of the RFP (section 1.b) states that creative proposals are to be submitted for two spot announcement topics. Page 33 states the task calls for a total of 16 spot announcements (eight television and eight radio) over the two topics.

Q: Are you looking to have respondents provide two creative approaches (one overall for each topic) 4 creative approaches (one radio and one TV for each of the two topics) or 16?

Answer: For each of the two topics the vendor must provide 8 creative proposals; 4 radio and 4 TV for a grand total of 16.

Question #58: Can you provide a sample pricing proposal from a previous project?

Answer: No, we cannot provide a sample pricing proposal.

Question #59: We are a small business. Q: If we partner with another company for this proposal, are there any restrictions on how much work can be performed by a partner that is not a small business?

Answer: 50 percent.

Question #60: Are there requirements or restrictions regarding the use of union or non-union talent?

Answer: Yes. Please read the performance work statement. A vendor must have an agreement with SAG/AFTRA on behalf of AFRTS.

Question #61: If union talent is used, does the contractor need to be a signatory or is the use of a paymaster acceptable?

Answer: Either is acceptable.

Question #62: What was the total dollar volume of the contract for each of the past 3 contract years?

Answer: 700K per year.

Question #63: What is your time frame for awarding of this RFP?

Answer: Not later than 30 Sep 2009.

Question #64: In order for us to provide the government with the best response and solutions, we request that an extension be granted for an additional week, with a new submission date of 17 July 2009.

Answer: At this time the submission date is 10 Jul 2009; if we have to extend we will amend the solicitation.

Question #65: The www.fbo.gov site states “Response due: June 29, 2009”. However, on the cover page of the Solicitation/Contract order it is stated “Response due July 10, 2009 @ 2 PM”. Please verify the correct due date and time for response.

Answer: Right now, as stated in the SF 1449, response due date is 10 Jul 2009 @ 2PM.

Question #66: If individuals have submitted questions prior to today’s due date, have those questions and answers been posted? And if so, where can we go to reference that information?

Answer: They will be posted on the same web site and same link where the RFP was posted. I haven't posted them yet; however, will try to post them not later than this week.

Question #67: In the solicitation it states that all hand-carried proposals will be accepted during the hours of 0800-1400 PST. Will this be every day; so if an offer wishes to submit a proposal before the due date they can? Or is this only for the due date of the proposal?

Answer: Sure you can submit before the due date; however, please ensure that you have also acknowledged receipt of amendments, if any, when you submit your proposal before the due date.

Question #68: Has the incumbent contractor met all previous contract objectives?

Answer: Yes

Question #69: Who is signatory to the Screen Actors Guild (SAG) commercial talent contract? The Gov’t, the Defense Dept.? AFRTS? If those parties are not, then will the government require the offeror to be signatory, or use a signatory (like a talent paymaster)?

Answer: The contractor is the signatory with SAG and AFTRA. Yes

Question #70: If the government is signatory and thus the offeror must use SAG talent, then is there any pre-contracted arrangement that the Government (or whoever) has with SAG whereby there is a waiver for residual talent fees? Much like the 501c3 waiver with SAG that only requires session fees paid, with residuals waved for a year for non-profits.

Answer: Please read the performance work statement.

Question #71: And if there is a waiver, what are the terms?

Answer: Please read the performance work statement.

Question #72:

If the government is signatory and don’t have a waiver on residuals, then how long do the spots air (e.g. how many 13 week cycles)?

Answer: Please read the performance work statement.

Question #73: Finally, please understand, in my first set of questions, I asked if the offeror may present two, different proposals. Our reason for asking is that we have relationships with diverse pools of high quality creative talent, each of whom would have a qualified, but different, creative approach to the AFRTS mission. Since the government would be a beneficiary of evaluating multiple quality approaches, we would like the option of proposing two. Would that be acceptable?

Answer: I'm not quite sure what you mean here; however, you can submit different proposals as long as it covers the whole Government requirement as required in the PWS on each of the proposal; that means you can not breakdown your proposal to complement the Government requirement as required in the PWS; that is not allowed.

Question #74: Regarding Section C-2 (a), which requires a “statement certifying your company was responsible for the creative development, scripting, production, and post production of the spot announcement”, which, if any, of the following three scenarios would not comply with such a certification:

the prime was responsible for all four of the above areas the prime’s proposed subcontractor was responsible for all four areas the prime or its proposed subcontractor were responsible for one or more of the four areas

Answer: Scenarios one and two apply. All work must be done by prime or sub. We don't want to see work done by someone who is not a part of the solicitation. We can't and will not grade a prime or sub on someone else's work.

Question #75: Finally, I recall being told in the bidder’s conference that all bidders would have access to all questions asked and answered. Is that still the case, or will I only see the answers to questions asked by my company?

Answer: Yes, all bidders.

Question #76: In section 52.215-6 we are asked to supply addresses for all plants or facilities used in the performance of any contract resulting from this solicitation. As those locations are to be decided by the government at some future date, how should we answer this question?

Answer: We're asking for the vendor's address or addresses.

Question #77: Is the incumbent contractor permitted to bid on and win this contract?

Answer: Yes, the incumbent contractor is allowed to bid on this requirement, and if selected, is allowed to win also.

Question #78: Will the contract allow the prime to add to or exchange subcontractors during the life of the contract as needed to maintain service quality? If yes, what involvement does the government expect or require?

Answer: Only with prior Government approval.

Question #79: During the conference, a reference was made to a requisite ratio of prime employees to subcontracted staff. Where can that ratio be found?

Answer: We're not sure what ratio you're talking about here. If you're talking about the percentage of total work to be performed by a subcontractor, the answer is 50% of the total cost of the contract performance.

Question #80: The RFP refers to a “price statement” and “price proposal”. How are these different?

Answer: Price proposal is the total price (including all the costs associated); I’m not sure where you found price statement which it should mean cost breakdown.

5.

Ms. Miller stated that the meeting minutes, list of attendees, questions and answers, and any amendment to the solicitation will be posted on the FedBizOps website.

LEILA S. MILLER

Contract Specialist