HMEP Programmatic Review Checklist.pdf
PDF 36 KB Posted
- Attached to
- HMEP Tribal Grants - FY 2018
- Opportunity number
- HM-HMP-18-001
- Issued by
-
Department of Transportation
About this file
HMEP Programmatic Review Checklist
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 HMEP Expenditures Guide.pdf | ||
| HMEP Financial Review Checklist.pdf | ||
| Title VI Assurance Statement.docx | DOCX document | |
| ED-80 Form.pdf | ||
| FY2018 PHMSA HMEP Tribal NOFO.docx | DOCX document | |
| HMEP Grant Application Form.docx | DOCX document | |
| oppHM-HMP-18-001-cfda20.703-cidHM-HMP-18-001-instructions.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FY18 Tribal Programmatic Review Checklist Reviewer:
Applicant:
Date:
Section I: All Grant Requirements
A. Program Assurances
1. Did the applicant provide a narrative explaining if fees are assessed/collected for the transportation of hazardous materials?
Yes No N/A
2. Did the applicant provide a certification of aggregate expenditures?
3. Did the applicant provide a statement certifying that 75% of funds will be spent on programmatic activities?
4. Did the applicant submit a statement that all members of the SERC or TERC have been given an opportunity to review the grant application?
Section II: Application Review
A. Project Narrative
1. Did the applicant sufficiently state the need for HMEP training and planning grant funding?
Yes No N/A
2. Did the applicant adequately describe the proposed activities to be undertaken?
3. Did the applicant adequately provide goals/objectives and measurable outputs for the grant period?
4. Did the applicant provide a reasonable timeline of grant activities, including a schedule for implementing activities?
5. Did the applicant address how the project would be monitored and evaluated to ensure the project is successfully completed within the period of performance?
6. Where there any unallowable costs identified in the review?
(If so, list under Section III and IV)
Section III: Summary Recommendation
Exceptional Acceptable Unacceptable
Section IV: Outstanding Issues
Section IV: Recommended Special Terms and Conditions List any recommended special terms and conditions for the Remarks section of the NGA
Section V: Update List any update that resulted from correspondence with the grantee
File details come from the government source that posted it.