HERO Framework 26Oct26.pdf

HERO (Hanscom’s Execution & Rapid Operations) -

Hanscom AFB

HERO

Hanscom’s Execution & Rapid Operations – Hanscom AFB Umbrella Program Notice ID: HERO-FY27

Department of the Air Force 66 ABG Civil Engineering Group, Hanscom AFB In Coordination with 66ABG and AFLCMC/PZI Email: courtney.petterson@us.af.mil

BLUF Disclaimer: This umbrella notice is issued pursuant to 10 U.S.C. § 2808a. Any resulting agreement will be an Other Transaction Agreement (OTA) for facility construction and repair and NOT a procurement contract, grant, or cooperative agreement. Consequently, neither the Revolutionary Federal Acquisition Regulation Overhaul (RFO), the Defense Revolutionary Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (R-DFARS), nor the Commercial Solutions Opening (CSO) constraints of 10 U.S.C. § 3458 apply to this notice or any resulting agreements.

SECTION 1 – INTRODUCTION & GENERAL

GUIDELINES

1.1 Background and Authority

The 66 ABG Civil Engineering Squadron (CES), Hanscom AFB serves as the foundational backbone of Hanscom Air Force Base, Massachusetts. The group is responsible for providing, operating, maintaining, restoring, and protecting the managed infrastructure, facility assets, and natural resources of the installation. Managing over 756 facilities and 606 buildings, 66 CES is dedicated to comprehensive environmental stewardship, real estate and space management, energy and utility systems, roads and grounds, and emergency management services. The group's primary objective is to enhance base resilience, ensure safety, and key industrial areas fully mission-ready for daily peacetime operations and strategic wartime mobilizations.

Contracting support and oversight for this framework are executed by the Air Force Life Cycle Management Center Contracting Directorate (AFLCMC/PZI), specifically the AFLCMC/PZIA operating branch at Hanscom AFB. AFLCMC/PZIA is tasked with supporting the 66th ABG, including the CES, Medical Squadron, and other assigned support and tenant organizations. This robust organization executes over 500 contracting actions per year, totaling over $100M in obligations.

AFLCMC/PZIA is dedicated to providing the fastest, most effective acquisition support possible.

Living by the motto, “Lead The Way!”, the branch is committed to utilizing “Art of the Possible” principles to remove constraints and obstacles, delivering rapid and reliable support to local mission partners. AFLCMC/PZIA executes contract administration, tracks deliveries, ensures superior contractor performance, accomplishes quality surveillance, and performs contract closeout functions while fostering a culture of mentorship and professional growth.

The joint mission of 66 CES and AFLCMC/PZI is to deliver rapid, innovative, and modernized civil engineering and infrastructure development solutions. Our vision is to be the premier engineering execution cell of choice, keeping our warfighters ready and our installation infrastructure robust.

To achieve this, the 66 ABG CES utilizes the HERO (Hanscom Execution & Rapid Operation) framework. HERO is designed to bypass the administrative lag of traditional procurement and leverage industry expertise, leading capabilities, and highly flexible project delivery models.

The 66 ABG CES executes this program under the standalone statutory authority of 10 U.S.C. § 2808a(a), which authorizes the Secretary concerned to enter into transactions (other than contracts, cooperative agreements, or grants) to carry out repair and construction projects for facilities, including the planning, design, engineering, prototyping, piloting, and execution of such repair and construction projects.

Unlike Other Transactions for Prototype Projects authorized under 10 U.S.C. § 4022, 10 U.S.C.

§ 2808a does not require the project to be a prototype, nor does it mandate non-traditional defense contractor participation or cost-sharing requirements. It is a standalone, flexible construction and repair execution tool designed to align with modern business practices.

1.2 General Guidelines for Respondents

• Unclassified Submissions: All White Papers, Pitches, and Proposals must be unclassified.

• Simplicity: Unnecessarily elaborate brochures, designs, or proposals are not desired.

Clear, concise, and industry-standard documentation is highly preferred.

• System Registrations: To receive an OTA award under this HERO framework, companies must be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) and the prescribed Government electronic invoicing system (e.g., Wide Area Work Flow, Invoice Receipt Acceptance Property Transfer). The specific platform will be specified in the resulting agreement.

• Government Reservations: The Government reserves the unilateral right to cancel an Area of Interest (AOI) or proposal request at any time prior to award. Proposals will only be requested, and awards made, if appropriate funding is available.

1.3 The "Living Document" HERO Procedure

HERO serves as an umbrella notice framework (the "Parent Notice"). The 66 ABG CES, Hanscom AFB will periodically publish specific facility requirements and project statements as individual AOIs via amendments to the Parent Notice. No proposals are being requested against the Parent Notice; proposals will only be accepted in response to active, published AOIs.

AOIs will seek innovative, agile, or modernized construction and delivery capabilities, including but not limited to:

• Owner's Advisor (OA) Models: Professional oversight, engineering, and advisory services to protect the Government's interests during complex delivery.

• Progressive Design-Build (PDB): Collaborative, early-phase contractor involvement to progressive pricing and risk allocation.

• Accelerated Design-Build (ADB): Overlapping design and construction phases optimized for rapid, mission-critical delivery.

• Design-Build to Budget (DBtoBudget): Target-price design and construction modeling that maximizes scope within capped funding thresholds.

• Industrialized Construction (IC): Off-site manufacturing, modular assembly, and pre-fabricated building components.

• Advanced & Emergent Technologies: 3D printing of infrastructure, automated civil engineering systems, and smart facility integrations.

HERO outlines a competitive, streamlined three-phase procedure to submit a response to an active AOI:

1. Phase 1 - Solution Brief (White Paper): A written technical brief or presentation communicating the delivery concept and relevant capabilities.

2. Phase 2 - Pitch (Oral Presentation): An interactive presentation of the proposed project approach which may include but is not limited to topics such as logistics, rough orders of magnitude (ROM), and schedule.

3. Phase 3 - Full Proposal (As Applicable): Collaborative project planning and direct negotiation of the OTA via either a direct pathway or a competitive "bake-off."

Note on Delivery Methods: The requirement for a Phase 3 Full Proposal prior to award is dependent on the acquisition strategy of the specific AOI. For certain collaborative delivery models, such as PDB, the Government may elect to forego a Phase 3 Full Proposal during the initial selection process. In such cases, the Government may select an OT-recipient based on the results of Phases 1 and 2 to negotiate an initial agreement for pre-construction and design services. The 'full proposal' (e.g., a Guaranteed Maximum Price) would then be developed post-award during the collaborative design phase, incorporating established 'off-ramps' if an agreement on final construction costs cannot be reached.

1.4 Optional Industry Days and Site Visits

The 66 ABG CES, Hanscom AFB and AFLCMC/PZI reserve the right to incorporate collaborative industry engagement events during the planning or execution phases of specific AOIs.

1.4.1 Industry Days

• Purpose: The 66ABG CES reserves the right to conduct an Industry Day to provide an overview of the project, acquisition strategy, and anticipated requirements. This event will offer interested parties an opportunity to gain additional insight and ask questions in advance of the AOI release.

• Disclaimers: General questions from industry participants will be permitted during the Industry Day; however, all discussions and responses provided during the event are considered unofficial and are for informational purposes only. Statements made during Industry Day do not constitute commitment, authorization, or binding guidance related to the future AOIs. Official Questions and Answers (Q&A) will be accepted and addressed following the release of the AOIs.

• Registration Instructions: RSVP will be requested at the time of notification for upcoming industry days. Base access forms will be attached to the future notification;

please fill out the boxes in Section IV only. This location will be on a military installation and base access for every attendee is mandatory. Base access forms must be submitted on time to meet the required timeline set by the security office.

1.4.2 Site Visits

• Purpose: The Government reserves the right to host optional Site Visits for active or upcoming AOIs. These visits provide potential respondents with the opportunity to evaluate the physical site, existing facilities, utility systems, and operational parameters firsthand before compiling Phase 1 Solution Briefs.

• Coordination: Specific site visit logistics, protocols, safety equipment requirements (e.g., hard hats, steel-toed boots), and itinerary details will be published directly within the respective AOI amendment.

• Access Control: All site visits require base clearance. Attendees must follow the provided registration instructions and submit base access clearance forms within the designated timeline to ensure base entry approval prior to the scheduled visit.

SECTION 2 – DEFINITIONS

• "Agreements Officer" (AO) means a Government official with authority to enter into, administer, or terminate OTAs. For all transactions executed under this framework, the AO must be a warranted Contracting Officer appointed in accordance with Air Force policy.

• "Area of Interest" (AOI) means a specific construction challenge, facility repair requirement, or project delivery statement posted as an amendment under this HERO framework, which may result in the award of an OTA.

• "Facility Construction or Repair Project" under 10 U.S.C. § 2808a refers to projects covering the planning, design, engineering, prototyping, piloting, and execution of physical facility repair, modernization, or construction.

SECTION 3 – EVALUATION PHASES AND STANDING

CRITERIA

Note: The formatting requirements and page limitations detailed in this section represent the Government's standard baseline for all submissions. To ensure flexibility for complex projects, the Agreements Officer (AO) reserves the right to tailor or adjust these limitations within an individual Area of Interest (AOI) at their discretion.

3.1 Phase 1: Solution Brief (White Paper)

When an AOI is published through a Request for Construction Qualifications (RFCQ), interested companies will submit a Solution Brief. These briefs should not exceed five (5) written pages or 15 presentation slides, focusing on construction capability. Submissions must include:

• Format: Maximum five (5) page White Paper (or 15-slide deck) unless otherwise specified in a specific AOI.

• Title Page: Must include Company Name, Title, Date, POC Name, E-Mail, Phone, SAM UEI, Address, and the specific AOI being addressed.

• Executive Summary: Maximum one (1) page overview of the construction approach.

• Core Concept: Outline of the construction/repair methodology, estimated schedule, disruption mitigation strategy, and a Rough Order of Magnitude (ROM) price unless otherwise specified in the specific AOI.

• Credentials: Past performance and credentials on similar construction or alteration projects.

Standing Evaluation Criteria for Phase 1:

The Government will evaluate Phase 1 submissions on their own merit (not compared against other submissions) using the following standing criteria:

1. Relevance to AOI: Does the executive summary accurately target the problem outlined in the AOI? (If irrelevant, evaluation stops here).

2. Merit of Constructability Concept: Does the submission outline a methodology that is technically reasonable, credible, and worthy of further investigation?

3. Company Viability: Does the company demonstrate the necessary experience to execute the work, and are they in good standing on SAM.gov(including verification that the company is not on the federal excluded parties list)?

3.2 Phase 2: Oral Presentation / Pitch

Companies whose Phase 1 Solution Briefs are evaluated to have merit may be invited to Pitch. Pitches may be conducted in-person or virtually.

• Format: An oral presentation accompanied by a 15-slide deck that addresses the standing evaluation criteria for Phase 2 and the evaluation criteria specified in the AOI.

• Content: Detailed technical methodology, site logistics plan, constructability approach, and specific strategies for meeting the criteria outlined in the AOI.

• Participation Limits: The Government reserves the right to limit the number of companies invited to pitch.

Standing Evaluation Criteria for Phase 2:

Individual pitches will be evaluated on their own merit using the following standing criteria:

1. Technical & Logistical Depth: How effectively does the presentation detail the means, methods, site footprint, and operational integration?

2. Schedule Approach & Acceleration: Does the team demonstrate a credible strategy to accelerate project delivery in alignment with the intent of the OTA authority? While a final construction schedule is not required at this stage for collaborative delivery models (e.g., PDB), does the team present a realistic timeline for the pre-construction/design phases and outline effective methods for schedule management and risk mitigation?

3. Responsiveness to Criteria: How well does the solution address the specific criteria identified in the AOI (e.g., safety protocols, advanced manufacturing, or specialized facility requirements)?

3.3 Timeline & Collaborative Department of War (DoW) Sharing Notes

• Timeline Holding Status: If a solution is highly rated but Government resources or funding are currently unavailable to move to Phase 3, the Company may be placed in a holding status. The Government may re-engage with the Company to proceed to the next phase once resources become available.

• Collaborative DoW Access: To maximize the utility of submitted solutions and prevent duplication across defense agencies, the Government may, with appropriate confidentiality protections, share Phase 1 or Phase 2 submissions with other Department of the Air Force (DAF) units to leverage for similar construction requirements.

3.4 Future Use & Solutions Repository

To maximize acquisition agility and speed-to-capability across the enterprise, the Government will establish a Solutions Repository from the Phase 1 Solution Briefs (White Papers) submitted in response to published AOIs under this HERO framework.

• Validity Period: To maximize acquisition agility, submitted Phase 1 Solution Briefs may be placed in a Solutions Repository. Submissions are considered current and valid for 12 months. For submissions considered for a new project after this period, the Government reserves the right to request that the respondent refresh or revalidate their submission to ensure the information regarding their capabilities, personnel, and approach remains current.

• Future Projects: Other Government Program Managers (PMs) or AOs managing construction, design, or engineering projects requiring modernized project delivery services (e.g., Owner’s Advisor, PDB, ABD, Industrialized Construction, etc.) may review the submissions in this repository. If a previously submitted Solution Brief aligns with a new project’s specific requirements, the Government may invite that respondent directly to Phase 2 (Oral Presentation / Pitch) or Phase 3 (Full Proposal) for a separate OTA award under 10 U.S.C. § 2808a, without re-advertising the requirement on SAM.gov.

• Opt-Out: Respondents may elect to opt-out of the Solutions Repository by explicitly stating so on the cover page of their Phase 1 submission. Opting out will not prejudice the evaluation of a submission for the current, active AOI project.

• Other Arrangements: The Government may consider a teamed approach with multiple respondents should the AOI, Solutions Briefs, or Pitches present an opportunity to meet program goals more effectively with a combination of several respondents. This decision will be based on agreement between the affected respondents and the Government collectively.

No Award: The Government reserves the right to make no award if the AO determines that it is in the Government’s best interest.

3.5 Menu of Evaluation Criteria for AOIs

To ensure evaluations are tailored to the unique needs of each construction, repair, or alteration project, individual AOIs may draw from this comprehensive menu of evaluation criteria. Each published AOI will specify which of these criteria (and any specific priority) will be applied.

Menu of Evaluation Criteria Industry Standard & Government Focus

Past Relevant Construction Experience

Demonstrating a minimum of five (5) years of experience successfully executing construction projects of comparable size, scope, and complexity to include an established reliable network or sub-contractors.

Team Composition and Organization

Implementing an agile material procurement strategy (e.g., local supplier agreements, just-in-time delivery) to prevent supply chain bottlenecks from stalling short-duration tasks.

Collaborative Execution and Problem-Solving

Demonstrating the ability to work cooperatively with base stakeholders and the Project Delivery Team to resolve real-time field conflicts, safety incidents, or schedule recovery actions.

Constructability & Delivery

Expediting design and delivery using industrialized construction methods, advanced manufacturing, modularization, or novel building techniques.

Schedule & Execution Risk

Realism of the 100% Government-furnished design, methodology for physical work execution, utility outage coordination, and the realism of the proposed master schedule. The evaluation will assess the team's ability to provide continuous on-site leadership and effectively coordinate with Government personnel daily.

Site Logistics & Disruption

Means, methods, staging footprint, traffic control, and operational workflows designed to minimize disruptions to ongoing base operations.

Financial Risk & Bonding

Evaluation of the company's financial health, cash flow stability, and capacity to provide payment and performance bonds.

Site Safety & Prevention

Adherence to OSHA standards, strength of the site-specific safety plan, and historical safety metrics (e.g., EMR).

Differing Site Conditions

The proposed risk-sharing model and rapid mitigation strategy for managing unknown subsurface, utility, or hidden structural anomalies.

Environmental Considerations

Mitigation of environmental impact, SWPPP, hazardous materials handling, and compliance with local environmental regulations.

Quality & Inspection Criteria

The proposed quality management plan, methods for independent third-party testing, milestone inspections, and final commissioning.

Energy & Lifecycle Cost

Incorporation of high-efficiency systems (e.g., HVAC, building envelope) and durable materials that reduce utility consumption and total cost of ownership.

Commercial Warranties

The breadth, duration, and robustness of standard and extended warranties covering both materials and workmanship.

Cybersecurity Security protocols for Facility-Related Control Systems (FRCS), smart building infrastructure, and safeguarding digital architectural data.

Intellectual Property Allocation of data rights, digital twins, or design licenses allowing the Government to operate, maintain, and potentially replicate the project.

Adaptability & Scalability

The degree to which the construction solution can be rapidly scaled or adapted to a variety of geographical locations and environments.

Safety & Building Standards

Ensuring permanent infrastructure complies with industry building codes (e.g., IBC, NEC) and site-specific hazard mitigation.

DoD Engineering Compliance

Adherence to applicable Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) and Anti- Terrorism/Force Protection (AT/FP) requirements, where mandated by the AOI.

Access & Security Strict adherence to Base access, badging, and security protocols.

Specialized Credentials

Requirements for specialized certifications and professional qualifications, including SCIF construction standards (ICD 705), IT infrastructure credentials, or unique structural/engineering certifications.

Price

Evaluated for reasonableness, realism, and completeness. Cost breakouts must show all divisions rounded to the nearest whole dollar.

The evaluation will include a review of the required cost breakouts (AOI specific) to ensure the price accurately aligns with the proposed schedule, phasing approach, and the Government-furnished design.

3.6 Phase 3: Full Proposal

Following Phase 2, the AO will transition the process to Phase 3. The AO will select one (1) of two (2) execution pathways:

Pathway A: Direct Negotiation

If a single respondent’s solution is evaluated to be uniquely advantageous and of outstanding merit, the AO may issue a Request for Project Proposal (RFPP) directly to that respondent. The selected Company will collaboratively develop a detailed written proposal, statement of work, and negotiate the final OTA terms and conditions.

Pathway B: Competitive "Bake-Off"

If multiple respondents submit solutions of merit and the AO determines that a competitive environment is beneficial to refine technical approaches, design options, or pricing structures:

1. Evaluation Amplification Letter (EAL): The AO will issue an EAL to the selected qualified respondents. The EAL serves as a customized addendum to the AOI, detailing the specific, amplified criteria, deliverables (e.g., conceptual designs, target pricing, scheduling milestones), format requirements, and evaluation weights that will govern the final evaluation phase.

2. Bake-Off Evaluation: Respondents will submit their refined proposals in accordance with the EAL. The Government will evaluate these submissions against the criteria established in the EAL to select the single partner for final OTA negotiation and execution.

3. Payment: The Government may choose to provide funding incentive(s) for the “bake-off” but it is not required and is subject to funds availability.

Mandatory Price Validation:

Validation of a Fair and Reasonable Price is mandatory and will be evaluated for all projects during Phase 3, regardless of the specific menu options selected for the AOI. Price proposals must include information allowing the Government to make a fair and reasonable determination.

The Request for Project Proposal will specify the information required, which may include commercial price catalogs or other published price information, subcontractor quotes, financial information, similar item comparisons, historic price information provided to other clients, or parametric estimates to support validation. Please provide a copy of the price proposal in Excel format without any locked cells.

3.7 Phase 3: Vendor Portal

The Government may place Phase 3 “bake-off” non-selected vendors in a Vendor Portal to further maximize acquisition agility. This allows for AOs working new and similar project requirements throughout various DAF Installations to consider the “Portaled Vendors” as a viable solution in meeting Government needs. The AO will issue a Request for Information to gauge vendor interest and capability prior to then issuing a new RPPP to the identified, interested ‘portaled vendors’ for their consideration and response in competing for a new OTA award.

SECTION 4 – AWARDS, LIMITATIONS, & FOLLOW-

ON TRANSACTIONS

4.1 General Award Guidelines

The AO will negotiate terms directly with the Company and execute the OTA on behalf of the Department of the Air Force. In accordance with Air Force policy for the HERO framework, only a designated and warranted Agreements Officer (AO) has the authority to enter or modify a binding agreement on behalf of the Department of the Air Force.

To support the rapid and collaborative nature of modernized project delivery, agreements awarded under this HERO framework may be structured using any pricing or payment arrangement that best aligns with the solution, risk profile, and execution strategy as determined by the AO. Permissible pricing structures include, but are not limited to:

• Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP): For highly defined, lower-risk construction scopes.

• Fixed-Price Incentive (FPI) / Target Cost: To incentivize schedule acceleration or cost savings through shared incentive pools.

• Firm-Fixed-Unit-Price: For supplies and services with fixed price per unit, non-fixed quantity.

• Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP): Commonly utilized in Progressive Design-Build structures where design progressively matures and a cap on project costs is collaboratively established.

• Expenditure-Based or Cost-Reimbursable Equivalents: For early design, exploratory sitework, or high-uncertainty repairs where fixed pricing is not viable.

• Hybrid Milestone Structures: Combining fixed design services with incentive-based or GMP construction phases.

The specific agreement type, milestone criteria, and payment arrangements will be tailored to each AOI and negotiated directly by the AO to maximize alignment with industry standards and protect the Government’s interests.

4.2 Congressional Notification Requirement

Pursuant to 10 U.S.C. § 2808a(d), the Air Force must submit a notification of the intent to use this authority to the congressional defense committees in an electronic medium. This notification must occur not later than 14 days before entering into a transaction under this section. Each notification must include:

1. The project title;

2. A description of the project and its location;

3. The estimated project cost and source of funds;

4. The recipient or contractor selected to execute the project, if known; and

5. The rationale for using 10 U.S.C. § 2808a instead of the standard military construction/repair procurement processes under Chapter 169 of Title 10.

4.3 Follow-On Transactions

Pursuant to 10 U.S.C. § 2808a(c), a transaction entered into under this section for a project may provide for the award of a follow-on transaction or agreement to the participants without further competition, if:

1. Competitive procedures (i.e., this competitive HERO parent notice and subsequent AOI selection process) were used for the selection of parties for participation in the original transaction; and

2. The participants in the original transaction successfully delivered:

o (A) a complete and useable facility; or o (B) a complete and useable improvement to a facility.

This statutory mechanism allows the 66 ABG CES, Hanscom AFB to scale successful projects (such as an initial PDB, ADB, or IC pilot) into full installation-wide delivery, campus modernization, or subsequent regional phases with the same participant, rapidly and non-competitively, provided the initial project successfully met its completion criteria.

4.4 Funding and Appropriation Flexibility ("Colors of Money")

Pursuant to 10 U.S.C. § 2808(a), the Air Force may carry out projects under this authority using any funds legally available for such purposes. The specific source and type of funding will be determined by the Government for each individual project.

Non-FAR Statutory Compliance Note: Agreements Officers must comply with any non-FAR statutory or regulatory requirements that apply to the selected funding source or authority (including statutory cost or scope variation limits that are tied to specific appropriation streams, such as MILCON or FSRM limits under 10 U.S.C. § 2853, or minor military construction thresholds).

4.5 Statutory Labor Compliance

The applicability of statutory labor requirements (such as the payment of prevailing wages under the Davis-Bacon Act (DBA)) to Other Transaction Agreements is a complex and evolving area.

Therefore, this framework does not make a universal determination. Each Area of Interest (AOI) will specify the particular labor standards and prevailing wage requirements, if any, that will apply to that specific project based on Government policy and the nature of the work.

Respondents will be required to adhere to the labor standards specified in the AOI and resulting agreement.

SECTION 5 – Agreements Officer Technical Representative

(AOTR)

The AOTR is a critical component of the C-OT operation. Each agreement order will have a defined AOTR who will ensure the programmatic responsibilities of the Customer are adequately accomplished. AOTR’s must receive AOTR training prior to any Agreement Order being executed to ensure their roles and responsibilities are clearly understood. Primary duties of the AOTR include:

● Constant communication and coordination with Contractor during all phases of the agreement order

● Reviewing and approving of invoices

● Acceptance and confirmation of deliverables as outlined in the agreement order

● Adherence to the terms and conditions as reflected in the C-OT

● Ensuring proper site access to user groups

● Ensuring timely and streamlined access to data

● Coordinating and execution for ensuing DD 254 requirements

● Alignment of resources for current and future agreement orders

● Coordinating of the funds to the Contracting Activity for agreement orders

● Timely updates to AOR in the event issues with the agreement order occur

● Remaining AOTR for duration of agreement order and notification to the AOR and AO in the event the AOTR can no longer perform duties. In the event of transfer, it is the AOTR’s responsibility to provide sufficient notice and identifying an appropriate replacement to assume responsibilities

● Completion of Human Trafficking and Ethics training within the last year

● Approval of AOTR duties from direct supervisor (provided by AOR)

For inquiries regarding active AOIs, formatting submission materials, or coordinating internal Air Force civil engineering requirements with the HERO framework, please contact the 66 ABG CES, Hanscom AFB Agreements Officer team at: courtney.petterson@us.af.mil.

3.7 Phase 3: Vendor Portal

SECTION 5 – Agreements Officer Technical Representative (AOTR)