SF30-HE1254-19-R-2012-0001.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of Amendment 0001 is to update and clarify adenda at the provisions at 52.212-1 and 52.212-2, and the provision at 52.216-1.

No extension to solicitation period.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 11

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 04-Jun-2019

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X HE125419R2012

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

31-May-2019

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

04-Jun-2019

CODE

DOD EDUCATION ACTIVITY

4800 MARK CENTER DR

ALEXANDRIA VA 22350-1400

HE1254 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

HE125419R2012

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

The following have been modified:

52.212-1 ADDENDUM – INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS -- COMMERCIAL ITEMS (DEVIATION 2018-

O0018) (OCT 2018)

Addendum to Paragraph (b). Paragraph (b) is changed to read as follows:

(b) Communication.

The Contracting Officer and Contract Specialist are the sole points of contact for this acquisition.

Communications with other officials may compromise the integrity of this acquisition and result in cancellation of the requirement.

Intent to Submit Offer.

For planning purposes only, please send an e-mail to Mr. John H. Grimes at john.grimes@hq.dodea.edu, and Ms.

Colleen C. Pritchard at Colleen.Pritchard@hq.dodea.edu to give notification if your company intends to submit a proposal in response to this solicitation. The subject of the e-mail shall be “Intent to Submit a Proposal for HE1254- 19-R-2012.” Please provide the company’s name and point of contact to include name, title, address, e-mail, phone number, company’s DUNS, and NATO Cage Code. Failure to submit a notice of intent does not prohibit an Offeror from submitting a proposal.

Requests for Attachment 3 – Representative Route Sheets.

To obtain access to Attachment 3 – Representative Route Sheets, cited in the PWS for this solicitation, companies must first register and obtain a userid and password from www.fbo.gov. In addition, vendors interested in proposing against this solicitation and receiving the subject attachment, must submit an email requesting access with firm's CAGE and/or DUNS registration code/number. This email should be sent direct to the Contracting Officer/Contracting Specialist(s) for this solicitation, and must ensure the subject line of the e-mail reflects the correct solicitation number.

Submission of Questions.

Offerors shall submit questions concerning this solicitation, electronically, NO LATER THAN 4:00 p.m. (1600 hours) Eastern Daylight Time (EDT), 12 June 2019. Questions submitted after this date may not be considered for a response.

Submission of Offers.

Offerors must ensure that the signed and dated attached proposal and all attachments are virus free, legible, and arrives in Mr. Grimes’ and Ms. Pritchard's e-mail inboxes by the solicitation closing time. E-mails over 10 MB will be rejected by DoDEA’s network. If the electronic copy cannot be opened, the Contract Specialist or Contracting mailto:john.grimes@hq.dodea.edu mailto:Colleen.Pritchard@hq.dodea.edu

Officer will notify the Offeror and a replacement electronic copy shall be provided by the Offeror within one (1) working day after notification.

Documents shall be submitted in separate .pdf or Microsoft Office (e.g. Word, Excel, etc.) format by e-mail on or before the closing date and time stated in Block 8 of the solicitation to Mr. John H. Grimes, Contract Specialist, e-mail at john.grimes@hq.dodea.edu, and Ms. Colleen C. Pritchard, Contacting Officer, e-mail at Colleen.Pritchard@hq.dodea.edu.

As a minimum, offerors shall submit a package consisting of an Administrative Cover Letter, Signed SF 1449, Signed SF 30 (as applicable) and four separate volumes as follows:

1. Administrative Cover Letter The Administrative Cover Letter shall state the following:

a. The solicitation number

b. Unique Entity Identifier (DUNS Number)

c. Complete Business Mailing Address.

d. N/CAGE Code

e. NAICS Code

f. Contact Name

g. Contact Phone and e-mail address

h. Clear indication of which Zone(s) the firm is proposing for:

i. Zone A

ii. Zone B

iii. Zone C

iv. Zone D

2. Signed SF 1449 Offerors shall complete blocks 12, 17a, and 30a-c of the SF 1449 Solicitation/Contract/Order for Commercial Items. Offerors shall insert their company’s CAGE code in the box titled “CODE” in block 17.

By submission of its offer, the Offeror accedes to all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as evaluation factors or sub-factors. Offeror’s terms and conditions will not be accepted. The SF 1449 shall be signed and dated by an Official authorized to bind the Organization, and be included in the quotation submission.

3. Signed SF 30 Offerors shall complete blocks 8 and 15a-c of each SF 30 Amendment of Solicitation/Modification of Contract, issued for this solicitation. Each SF 30 shall be signed and dated by an Official authorized to bind the Organization, and be included in the quotation submission.

Document Title Page Limitations (Apply to each proposal submitted) Pages shall be numbered numerically

Administrative Cover Letter

Administrative Cover Letter 1 page

Signed SF 1449 SF 1449 1 page (includes only the first page of the SF 1449)

Signed SF 30 SF 30 1 page (for each SF 30, as applicable)

Volume I Factor 1-Technical Capability

15 pages New Time Roman, not less than 12-point font (excludes attachments, i.e., schematics, syllabi, lists, drafts report formats, and similar materials)

Volume II Factor 2- Past Performance 10 pages

Volume III Factor 3 - Price None

Volume IV Representations and Certifications None mailto:Mileska.Rodriguez@hq.dodea.edu mailto:Colleen.Pritchard@hq.dodea.edu

4. Volume I – Factor 1: Technical Capability

This solicitation covers four (4) Zones (Zone A, Zone B, Zone C, and Zone D). An offeror can submit a proposal for one, two, three, or all four (4) Zones. An offeror will not be penalized for submitting a proposal for fewer than four (4) Zones. The Government will evaluate each of the four (4) Zones separately, awarding to the lowest price, technically acceptable offeror for each Zone.

For each Zone for which an Offeror is submitting a proposal (Zone A, Zone B, Zone C, or Zone D), the Offeror’s proposal must clearly demonstrate the Offeror’s capability to meet the requirements of Objectives 1 and 2 as described in the Performance Work Statement (PWS) for the Zone being evaluated (Zone A, Zone B, Zone C, or Zone D).

Do not simply repeat back verbatim or paraphrase requirements along the lines of “we will do this or that.”

Instead, present your plans that describe or outline how you propose to meet the requirements, and do so in sufficient detail to explain clearly the procedures and processes you will put in place and use. In other words, treat each requirement as a question to be answered with “here’s my approach to do the job.” The Government will only evaluate an Offeror’s proposal based solely on the information provided.

5. Volume II – Factor 2: Past Performance.

Offeror shall submit past performance information on at least two (2), but not more than five (5), recent and relevant contracts for the prime and subcontractors (performing as the Prime on that effort). To be recent, the effort must be on-going or must have been completed within the last three (3) years by the closing date/time of this solicitation. To be relevant, the Offeror must demonstrate that performance involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Past Performance information submitted that is not recent (more than 3 years) and/or not relevant will not be evaluated.

i. Subcontractor/Teaming Information. If an Offeror proposes a teaming arrangement for services, the Offeror (proposed prime Offeror) shall provide past performance information on any subcontractor or teaming arrangement offered.

At a minimum, when a prime Offeror teams with a subcontractor, past performance information relevant to that subcontractor shall be provided on at least one (1) effort. The information required shall be the same as above. Offerors shall include in their proposal the written consent of their proposed subcontractor(s) to allow the Government to discuss the subcontractor’s past performance assessment with the Offeror.

ii. Questionnaires. Offerors must send Past Performance Questionnaires, Attachment 5, to their Customers’ points of contact (POCs) and instruct the POCs to complete the questionnaire in English. Offerors shall make their best effort to send out a sufficient number of past performance questionnaires to reasonably expect submission to the contracting officer at least one questionnaire on each cited contract/work effort. The questionnaire recipient should e-mail completed questionnaires directly to the contract specialist listed on the questionnaire. Past Performance Questionnaires are requested to be received in the issuing office by the closing date/time of the solicitation.

It is highly recommended that the questionnaires are sent to the Offeror's POCs at the earliest opportunity so there is sufficient time to complete the questionnaires and send to the Contract Specialist by the due date. The Government reserves the right to not consider past performance questionnaires received after the due date.

iii. The Government reserves the right to obtain information relative to present and past performance on its own, in addition to information provided by the Offeror and from contract and subcontract

POCs. If you are aware that one or more of your contracts in the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) specifically relates to the requirements in this acquisition, please provide this contract/work effort as one of the past performance submissions with your proposal.

6. Volume III: Facor 3: Price.

i. Offerors fully burden price proposals shall be complete, and represent an accurate reflection of the requirement as stated in the PWS.

ii. Offerors shall complete, in its entirety, all unit and extended prices per zone using the Government provided Microsoft Excel Pricing Sheet(s) labeled “Attachment 2(a)” for Zone A, “Attachment 2(b)” for Zone B, “Attachment 2(c” for Zone C, and “Attachment 2(d)” for Zone D; and submit each sheet in both the Excel and pdf format. The Pricing Sheet(s) will establish the maximum unit prices the Offeror may charge for services under the contract.

iii. The Government will not be obligated to pay the Offeror any amount in excess of the prices proposed. Offerors are advised that in the event unit prices multiplied by quantity have been incorrectly calculated, the unit price will govern. The total evaluated price per zone will be considered in making the final best value determination since pricing will be evaluated separately per zone.

iv. To account for the option period(s) possible under FAR 52.217-8 (maximum six months) Option to Extend Services, the Government has provided a table within Attachments 2(a), 2(b), 2(c), and 2(d) labeled “FAR 52.217-8 Option to Extend Services.” The contractor will provide a Unit Price for each CLIN Description. If the Government has to exercise the option under FAR 52.217-8, then the Government will use the rate given for the last year performance was completed.

v. The price proposal is presumed to represent the Offeror’s best effort to respond to the solicitation.

Any inconsistency, whether real or apparent, between promised performance and price should be explained in the proposal. Any significant inconsistency, if not explained, raises a fundamental issue of the understanding of the nature and scope of the work required.

vi. As referred to in paragraph (b) of FAR Clause 52.216-22, "Indefinite Quantity" of this contract, the contract minimum guaranteed to the offeror is a total of five (5) runs for base only and zero (0) runs for potential option periods. The maximum quantity is the total quantity for all items combined as set forth in pricing attachments 2(a), 2(b), 2(c), and 2(d).

7. Volume IV: Representations and Certifications

i. Representations and Certifications. Offerors shall complete the representations and certifications in the System for Award Management (SAM) on the website www.sam.gov; or submit the representations and certifications contained in FAR 52.212-3 with their proposal. Offerors are reminded that their registration in SAM must be accurate and active by the award date.

ii. Subcontractor/Teaming Agreement. Offeror shall submit a copy of any subcontracting/teaming agreements.

iii. Offerors shall also complete and submit the following necessary fill-in clauses, provision, and certifications contained in the solicitation:

A. 52.209-7 – Information Regarding Responsibility Matters.

B. 52.212-3 Alt 1– Offeror Representations and Certifications. Complete and/or submit as stated above.

C. 52.222-56 Certification Regarding Trafficking in Persons Compliance Plan: Submit Certification in accordance with the instructions written within the Clause.

D. Letter of Commitment, Attachment 6

E. FAR 42.15 – CPARS Form, Attachment 7

iv. Offeror Responsibility Determination. (SUBMIT WITH PROPOSAL)

In accordance with FAR 9.104. (a) Purchases shall be made from, and contracts shall be awarded to, responsible prospective contractors only; (b) No purchase or award shall be made unless the contracting officer makes an affirmative determination of responsibility. In the absence of information clearly indicating that the prospective contractor is responsible, the contracting officer shall make a determination of non-responsibility.

Per FAR 9.104, to be determined responsible, a prospective Offeror must comply with the following general and special standards:

A. General Standards.

1) Have adequate financial resources to perform the contract, or the ability to obtain them.

(submit Dunn and Bradstreet (D&B) Risk Assessment, letter from Offeror’s bank, stating declaration of solvency, line of credit, current available credit, and credit score if applicable etc.);

2) Be able to comply with the required or proposed delivery or performance schedule, taking into consideration all existing commercial and governmental business commitments;

3) Have a satisfactory performance record. A prospective Offeror shall not be determined responsible or non-responsible solely on the basis of a lack of relevant performance history;

4) Have a satisfactory record of integrity and business ethics (must not be debarred or suspended from doing business with the United States or Host Nation);

5) Have the necessary organization, experience, accounting and operational controls, and technical skills, or the ability to obtain them (including, as appropriate, such elements as production control procedures, property control systems, quality assurance measures, and safety programs applicable to materials to be produced or services to be performed by the prospective Offeror and subcontractors (to rent, purchase, or otherwise acquire the needed facilities, equipment, other resources, or personnel);

6) Have the necessary production, construction, and technical equipment and facilities, or the ability to obtain them (to rent, purchase, or otherwise acquire the needed facilities, equipment, other resources, or personnel);

7) Be otherwise qualified and eligible to receive an award under applicable laws and regulations; and

B. Special Standards. Be an operational business with the capability to provide bus transportation services on a regular basis on established routes.

Addendum to Paragraph (c). Paragraph (c) is changed to read as follows:

(c) Period for acceptance of offers. The Offeror agrees to hold the prices in its offer firm for 120 calendar days from the date specified for receipt of offers, unless another time period is specified in an addendum to the solicitation.

Addendum to Paragraphs (d) & (e). Paragraphs (d) & (e) are deleted in its entirety.

Addendum to Paragraph (g) Contract award. Paragraph (g) is changed to read as follows:

The Government intends to award without discussions. Therefore, the Offeror’s initial proposal should contain the Offeror’s best approach/terms for technical, past performance, and price. However, despite this intent, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Government determines they are necessary. If the Government determines that discussions are necessary, a competitive range will be established. In the event issues pertaining to this award cannot be resolved to the Government's satisfaction, the Government reserves the right to withdraw and cancel the solicitation. In such event, Offerors will be notified in writing.

Addendum to Paragraph (h). Paragraph (h) is changed to read as follows:

Multiple awards. DoDEA may award a single contract or multiple (up to four) contracts from this solicitation.

Offerors shall prepare and submit separate proposals if proposing for more than one requirement or zone.

Addendum to Paragraph (i). Paragraph (i) is deleted in its entirety.

(End of Addendum to FAR 52.212-1)

52.212-2 ADDENDUM – EVALUATION – COMMERCIAL ITEMS (OCT 2014)

Addendum to Paragraph (a). Paragraph (a) is changed to read as follows:

(a) This solicitation covers four (4) Zones (Zone A, Zone B, Zone C, and Zone D). An offeror can submit a proposal for one, two, three, or all four (4) zones. An offeror will not be penalized for submitting a proposal for fewer than four (4) zones. The Government will evaluate each of the four zones separately, awarding to the responsible Offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation requirements represents the lowest price, technically acceptable offer, meeting the minimum requirements of the non-price factors, Technical and Past Performance, for the zone being evaluated. This solicitation is being competed under FAR Parts 12 and 15.

(1) The Government will first evaluate the lowest-priced proposal for the Zone being evaluated (Zone A, Zone B, Zone C, or Zone D). If the Government determines that this lowest-priced response is technically acceptable, the Government intends to select that lowest-priced response for award and not conduct any further response evaluations.

(2) If the Government determines that the lowest-priced response is not technically acceptable, then the Government will evaluate the next lowest-priced response for technical acceptability for each Zone.

(3) The Government will continue this process of evaluation (evaluating the responses in order of lowest price to highest price) until the Government finds a technically acceptable response for each Zone. However, while the Government intends to use the above described evaluation procedure and does not intend to conduct exchanges with offerors, the Government may, in its discretion, conduct exchanges with offerors if exchanges are determined to be in the Government's best interest.

(4) An Offeror must receive an “acceptable” rating for Factor 1, Technical Capability and an “acceptable” or “neutral” rating for Factor 2, Past Performance in order to be considered technically acceptable.

i. Factor 1: Technical Capability. The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s proposal to determine if the

Offeror clearly demonstrates its capability to meet the requirements of PWS Objectives 1 (PWS section 2.1) and 2 (PWS section 2.2) for the Zone being evaluated (Zones A, B, C, or D).

Technical Capability will be rated in accordance with the following Rating Method:

Technical Capability Acceptable/Unacceptable Rating Method

Adjectival Rating Description

Acceptable Proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation.

ii. Factor 2: Past Performance. Will be evaluated to assess the Offeror’s ability to successfully meet the solicitation requirements based on the Offeror’s demonstrated recent and relevant record of how well the Offeror performed on previous contracts.

For the evaluation, the Government will assess Performance Recency and Relevancy as stated below.

A. Recency. An assessment of the past performance information will be made to determine if it is recent.

Past Performance Recency Ratings

Recent The effort must be ongoing or must have been completed within the last three (3) years by the closing date and time of this solicitation.

Not Recent The effort has been completed for more than three (3) years by the closing date and time of this solicitation.

B. Relevancy Assessment. The Government will determine how relevant the effort accomplished by the Offeror is to the effort to be acquired through the solicitation. The Government is not bound by the Offeror’s assessment of relevancy. To be relevant, the Offeror must demonstrate that performance involved similar scope, magnitude of effort, and complexities this solicitation requires.

Relevancy will be rated in accordance with the following Rating method:

Past Performance Relevancy Ratings

Relevant Past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant Past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

C. Past Performance Overall Rating. The past performance evaluation is an assessment of the Offeror’s probability of meeting the minimum past performance solicitation requirements. The Government will review the information collected, to include, but not limited to the Past Performance Questionnaire, Attachment 5, to determine the quality of the Offeror’s overall record of recent and relevant past performance.

Past Performance Acceptable/Unacceptable Rating method:

Past Performance Rating Method

Acceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown.

Unacceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government does not have a reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Neutral

An offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, a neutral rating shall be considered “acceptable.”

D. In addition to past performance information submitted by the Offeror and Questionnaires completed for the Offeror, past performance information may be obtained from Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), or other databases; the Defense Contract Management Agency; and interviews with Program Managers, Contracting Officers, or other sources known to the government.

E. In evaluating past performance, the Government reserves the right to give greater consideration to information on those individual contracts deemed most relevant to the effort described in this RFP. The Government also reserves the right to give greater consideration to an individual Offeror’s past performance information rather than the combined past performance information of an Offeror and its associates using teaming arrangements.

F. If the Government chooses to conduct negotiations, Offerors will be provided an opportunity to address any adverse past performance information not previously addressed. Adverse past performance is defined as past performance information which supports a less than satisfactory rating on any evaluation aspect or any unfavorable comments received from sources without a formal rating system.

G. The Government may reject a proposal if it is found that the Offeror deleted, misrepresented, or withheld any information that might have a negative impact on its past performance record.

iii. Factor 3: Price. Will not be assigned a rating. However, the proposal (Attachments 2(a), 2(b), 2(c), and 2(d) - Pricing Sheets) will be evaluated separately for each zone, to determine if the final agreed-to price(s) is/are fair and reasonable, using the techniques and procedures stated in FAR 15.404-1.

(b) Addendum to Paragraph (b). Paragraph (b) is changed to read as follows:

Options. The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. To account for the option period(s) possible under Clause 52.217-8 (maximum six months), Option to Extend Services, the Government will take the price for all CLINs of the final option period, prorate it/them to a six-month value, and add it to the sum of all CLINs (base plus all option periods). The sum of the prices for the base period, option periods (if any) and the 52.217-8 extension will be the total evaluated price.

The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced.

Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

(End of Addendum to FAR 52.212-2)

52.216-1 TYPE OF CONTRACT (APR 1984)

The Government contemplates award(s) of a Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP), indefinite-delivery indefinite quantity (IDIQ) contract(s) resulting from this solicitation.

(End of provision)

(End of Summary of Changes)