Attachment_5_Past_Performance_Questionnaire_Ramstein.pdf
PDF 141 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- HE125419R2013
- Issued by
-
Department of Defense Education Activity
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire and information about a solicitation for student transportation services. The past performance questionnaire is for a contractor bidding on solicitation number HE1254-19-R-2013 issued by the Department of Defense Education Activity. It requests references and performance ratings for the contractor on criteria such as schedule compliance, business practices, quality, and overall performance.
The solicitation is for daily commute transportation services supporting Ramstein schools in Germany. It will be a single-award, firm-fixed-price IDIQ contract with a one-year base period and four one-year options, issued under FAR Parts 12 and 15. The Department of Defense Education Activity anticipates posting the solicitation on the Federal Business Opportunities website. It provides instructions for interested parties to monitor the website for updates and submit any questions in writing to the identified points of contact.
Attachment 5 Transportation Past Performance Questionnaire Ramstein
View the file
Other files
Show all 15
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
HE1254-19-R-2013 ATTACHMENT 5
Present and Past Performance Questionnaire
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EDUCATION ACTIVITY
PRESENT AND PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Please complete the following questionnaire and return via email to the attention of:
Department of Defense Education Activity
Attn: Contract Specialist: Laura Holder & Contracting Officer: Colleen C. Pritchard
4800 Mark Center Drive, Add Suite #
Alexandria, VA 22350
E-Mail: Laura.Holder@dodea.edu
E-Mail: Colleen.Pritchard@hq.dodea.edu
This Questionnaire Pertains to: (HE1254-19-R-2013 - Ramstein)
(Prime)- PLEASE ADD CONTRACTOR NAME
Reference Information Table
Business Name of Reference & Address
Point of Contact
Phone number
E-mail address
Contract Number
Type
Contract Value
Period of Performance
Brief Description of Effort mailto:Laura.Holder@dodea.edu mailto:Colleen.Pritchard@hq.dodea.edu
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104
Explain any problems and resolutions
Evaluation KEY: Please use the following abbreviations to assign an applicable rating for questions 1 thru 6 below:
P/U S G VG E N
Poor/Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Good Very Good Excellent Neutral
Does not meet minimum acceptable standards in one or more areas; remedial action required in one or more areas; deficiencies in one or more areas which adversely affect overall performance.
Meets or slightly exceeds minimum acceptable standards;
adequate results;
reportable deficiencies with identifiable, but not substantial, effects on overall
Effective performance;
fully responsive to contract requirements;
reportable deficiencies, but with little identifiable effect
Very effective performance; fully responsive to contract requirements;
contract requirements accomplished in a timely, efficient, and economical manner for the most part; only minor deficiencies with minimal effect on overall performance.
Of exceptional merit; exemplary performance in a timely, efficient, and economical manner; very minor (if any) deficiencies with no adverse effect
No record of relevant past performance or past performance information is not available
1. How would you rate the contractor’s compliance with the delivery schedule / performance milestones?
Comments:
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104
2. How would you rate the contractor’s business practices (e.g. maintaining a positive working relationship, business ethics, timely and effectively resolution of any problems etc.)?
3. How would you rate the contractor’s record of conforming to contract requirements and to standards of good workmanship/quality of the product or service/timeliness of performance/report submission?
4. How would you rate the contractor’s overall compliance with the terms and conditions of your purchase order /contract?
5. How would you rate the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior and commitment to customer satisfaction; and generally, the contractor’s business-like concern for the interest of the customer?
6. How would you rate the contractor’s overall performance?
7. Would you purchase services from this contractor again?
YES NO
Please provide any additional comments applicable to the contractor’s past performance:
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104
PAGE LEFT BLANK
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .