ATTACHMENT_3_PP_Part_2.pdf
PDF 11 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Grades K-5 Science Curriculum Materials for DoDEA Schools Worldwide Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- HE1254-17-R-0001
- Issued by
- Department of Defense Education Activity
About this file
Attachment 2: Past Performance Part 2
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment_0004.pdf | ||
| Amendment_0003.pdf | ||
| Amendment_02.pdf | ||
| Att_7-_Amended_Pricing_Schedule.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment_6_Quantico_Base_map.pdf | ||
| Amendment_0001_K-5_Science_HE1254-17-R-0001.pdf | ||
| ATTACHMENT_4_CLOUD_INFO.pdf | ||
| RFP_HE1254-17-R-0001_K-5_Science.pdf | ||
| ATTACHMENT_2_PP_Part_1.pdf | ||
| ATTACHMENT_5_GPAT.pdf | ||
| Att_1_-_Pricing_Schedule_K-5_Science_2-1-17.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 3: Past Performance Part 2: Questionnaire
RFP: HE1254-16-R-0001 DoDEA Grades K-5 Science
** Information to be completed by vendor’s references and emailed directly to DoDEA Procurement to Nina.Lin@hq.dodea.edu by February 24, 2017 at 10:00 A.M. EST.
REFERENCE INQUIRY
Name of Vendor: ____________________________________________________________________
1. Reference Firm Contacted
2. Project Title: __________________________________________________________________________
3. Contract Number (if known):
4. Name of Key Person Contact:
5. Key Contact Phone No.:
6. Did the Key Contact work directly on the contract referenced? Yes [ ] No [ ]
7. Contract period: From to
8. Brief Description of Work Performed:
9. Quality of Work Performed and Products Delivered:
10. Degree of Cooperation by Contractor and Your Organization.
(a) How well overall did the Contractor work with the Contracting Organization?
(b) How well did the key personnel and Contractor’s staff work with COTR and Contracting Organization’s staff?
11. Timeliness of Contract Work.
(a) Was work completed on time?
(b) Were there any unresolved problems during performance or afterwards? ____________
12. Effectiveness of Cost Controls (For Cost Reimbursement Contracts Only).
(a) Was the project completed within budget?
(b) Were costs properly controlled? ____________________________________________
13. Would you recommend the Contractor? Yes No If no explain why
Rating __________________ (Excellent, Satisfactory or Unsatisfactory) Supporting Comments:
Common DoD Assessment Rating System
Excellent (E) - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Satisfactory (S) - Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
Unsatisfactory (U) - Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
(End of Attachment 3)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .