Attachment_L2_-_Past_Performance_Worksheet_L2_28Jan2016.doc
DOC document 82 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- HDTRA1-16-R-0001
- Issued by
-
Defense Threat Reduction Agency
About this file
Attachment L-2
View the file
Other files
Show all 30
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment 6 – HDTRA1-16-R-0001 – 28 Jan 2016
ATTACHMENT 6
PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
When filled in this document is source selection sensitive information iaw FAR 3.104
SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
A. Contractor:
B. Cage Code of contractor contract was awarded to:
C. Role (check): Prime Subcontractor Teaming Partner Joint Venture Partner Other (specify)
If subcontractor, partner or other, who is the Prime?
D. Contract Number:
E. Contract (Cost/Fee) Type:
F. Contract Clearance Requirement (e.g. Unclassified, NAC, Secret, Top Secret): Unclassified G. Was this a competitive contract? Yes _____ No _____
H. Period of performance:
I. Initial contract cost:
J. Current/final contract cost:
K. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs:
L. Description of service provided:
SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION
A. Customer or agency name:
B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):
C. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands:
SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION
A. Evaluator's name:
B. Evaluator's title:
C. Evaluator's phone and email:
D. Number of years evaluator worked on subject contract:
SECTION 4: EVALUATION
Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:
CODE
PERFORMANCE LEVEL
E EXCEPTIONAL - The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
S SATISFACTORY – The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
M MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
U UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
N NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to rate the contractor’s performance.
FOR EACH OF THE EIGHT FOCUS AREAS LISTED BELOW IDENTIFY WITH AN “X” WHICH AREAS PERTAIN TO THE CONTRACT YOU ARE EVALUATING.
Training Center Development, Design, and Construction: is composed of the development of functional and performance objectives, design, and construction of a multi-purpose law enforcement training center for domestic and international students with specialized skills in accordance with the functions and mandates pertaining to law enforcement activities. The design shall also consider a separate facility for cafeteria and common rooms to serve students of the training center. This area includes: the analysis of requirements and alternative design solutions, with consideration of performance, cost, sustainability and other parameters in order to meet requirements; as well as design reviews, management/oversight and construction of the facility.
Boat Haul-Out System Design and Implementation: is comprised of the development of functional and performance objectives, design, and construction of systems to support the hauling out of harbor patrol craft at two small boat maintenance facilities weighing up to 100 tons and 50 tons, respectively. Design reviews will consider multiple technical solutions based on the waterfront layouts near the maintenance facilities. This area includes: the analysis of requirements and alternative design solutions, with consideration of performance, cost, sustainability and other parameters in order to meet requirements; as well as management/oversight and construction of the facility.
Small Boat Maintenance Facility Design and Construction: is composed of the development of functional and performance objectives, design, and construction of a shell that will house a small boat maintenance facility near the relevant waterfront. This area includes: the analysis of requirements and alternative design solutions, with consideration of performance, cost, sustainability and other parameters in order to meet requirements; as well as design reviews, management/oversight, and construction of the facility.
Radio Communications Survey: is comprised of a high-level survey of radio and other communications capabilities. The survey includes identification of capability gaps, dead zones in which voice transmissions from existing radio communications systems are obstructed by terrain, foliage, or other obstacles, or are not properly transmitted to and from district headquarters, station headquarters, detachments and corresponding patrol areas or vessels due to physical distance or other factors, and recommended solutions. This area includes: the analysis of alternative solutions, with consideration of performance, cost, sustainability and other parameters in order to meet requirements.
Training Development and Implementation: is composed of the development of a training approach, materials, and schedule for a system in order to provide the end user with the ability to operate, administer, and maintain all aspects of the system as well as the implementation of this approach. Training approach takes into consideration multiple formats, such as classroom instruction, on the job training, and train-the-trainer.
Maintenance and Sustainment Planning and Implementation: is composed of the development of a comprehensive integrated logistics support plan for a system as well as the implementation of this plan.
| Technical Performance |
| E |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
T-1. Training Center Development, Design, and Implementation. Ability to develop/design a multi-purpose law enforcement training center meeting all requirements and achieving the project objective.
T-2. Boat Hall-Out System Design and Implementation. Ability to develop functional and performance objectives, design, and construct boat haul-out systems meeting all requirements and achieving the project objective.
T-2. Small Boat Maintenance Facility Development, Design, and Implementation. Ability to develop/design a small boat maintenance facility meeting all requirements and achieving the project objective.
T-3. Radio Communications Survey. Ability to perform a high-level radio communications survey meeting all requirements and the project objective.
T-3. Testing and Evaluation. The ability to develop and implement test plans and procedures that effectively evaluate system performance against requirements.
T-4. Training. The ability to develop training methodologies, materials, and plans as well as to effectively implement these plans.
T-5. Maintenance and Sustainment. The ability to develop a robust, effective maintenance and sustainment plan for both project execution and completion.
Please provide a summary of the Technical Performance ratings you provided including particular attention to E (Exceptional), M (Marginal) or U (/Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary):
| Management Approach |
| E |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
MA-1. Personnel Management. Ability to recruit, staff, train, and replace qualified personnel with appropriate engineering and administrative expertise.
MA-2. Metrics and Reporting. Ability to track and accurately report all required metrics, reports and meeting/conference minutes.
MA-3. Risk Management. Ability to identify, mitigate, and manage challenges that place performance at risk.
MA-4. Subcontractor. Ability to partner with and manage the work of qualified subcontractors were appropriate.
MA-5. International. Ability to manage a complex project in international markets, particularly in developing countries.
Please provide a summary of the Management ratings you provided including particular attention to E (Exceptional), M (Marginal) or U (/Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary):
| Schedule Performance |
| E |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
S-1. Development. Ability to develop a realistic performance schedule that meets all system milestones as early as possible within the contract Period of Performance.
S-2. Management. Ability to manage to the established schedule.
S-3. Risk Mitigation. Ability to plan for and address/correct challenges that place schedule at risk.
Please provide a summary of the Schedule ratings you provided including particular attention to E (Exceptional), M (Marginal) or U (/Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary):
| Cost Performance |
| E |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
C-1. Forecast. Forecasted contract costs accurately.
C-2. Performance. Performed within the forecasted contract costs (excluding issues completely outside of contractor control).
Please provide a summary of the Cost ratings you provided including particular attention to E (Exceptional), M (Marginal) or U (/Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).
3. Government Contracts Only: Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for convenience or default or are there any pending terminations?
Yes___ No ____
Convenience___ Default___ Pending Terminations___
If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc).
SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY
Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?
Do you know of another source that has knowledge of this contractor’s performance?
Name / Company:
Phone Number:
Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.
Evaluator’s Signature
Date
Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!
Please return this completed questionnaire via email to:
dtra.belvoir.J3-7.room.step@mail.mil Attachment 6 – HDTRA1-16-R-0001 – 28 Jan 2016
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .