Attachment_L2_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.rtf

RTF text file 71 KB Posted

Attached to
Science & Technical Engagement Partnership Program (STEP)
Solicitation number
HDTRA1-16-R-0001
Issued by

About this file

Attachment L2 Past Performance Questionnaire

Text of this file

HDTRA1-16-R-0001, Amendment 1 5 Attachment L-2

ATTACHMENT L-2: PRESENT AND PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

SOLICITATION NUMBER: HDTRA1-16-R-0001, Amendment 1

1. Please complete this questionnaire. Handwritten responses are sufficient. If you need more space than that provided, please attach additional pages. Responses will be treated as source selection sensitive information. Please submit the completed questionnaire to the Contracting Officer at Leslie.f.simpson.civ@mail.mil.

2. Explanation of codes:

CODEPERFORMANCE LEVEL
EEXCEPTIONAL - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

V VERY GOOD - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some (requirements) to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

S SATISFACTORY - Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

M MARGINAL - Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

U UNSATISFACTORY - Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a score. Performance in this area not applicable to effort assessed.

3. Please complete the following identifying information and past performance assessment:

A. Contractor:________________________________________________
B. Contract number:________________________________________________
C. Period of Performance:________________________________________________
D. Negotiated price or cost at award:__________________________________________
E. Current estimated contract dollar amount:____________________________________

F. Describe product/service acquired:

4. Circle the appropriate letter for each item on the questionnaire and provide supporting narrative.

ASSESSMENT ELEMENTS

(a) Rate the contractor's ability to deliver at the agreed-to price. Describe the reasons for changes to contract value (e.g., scope changes, overrun/underrun, Government-imposed schedule changes, etc.).

E V S M U N

(b) Rate the contractor's ability to successfully manage the contracted services/support in order to meet the mission requirements on time.

E V S M U N

(c) Rate the contractor’s management of subcontractors.

E V S M U N

(d) Rate the contractor’s ability to hire and retain a quality workforce to support this effort.

E V S M U N

(e) Rate the effectiveness of assigned personnel in terms of the appropriate mix of education and experience to accomplish the requirement.

E V S M U N

(f) Rate the contractor's responsiveness to providing replacement personnel. Was training provided and proper security clearances issued to ensure smooth transition of personnel?

E V S M U N

(g) How would you rate the sufficiency of contractor internal quality control or review systems in place from the onset of the contract?

E V S M U N

(h) Rate the contractor’s responsiveness/effectiveness in resolving difficulties of a technical, business, performance, and/or quality nature.

E V S M U N

(i) Rate the effectiveness of overall contract management (including the ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program).

E V S M U N

(j) Rate the contractor’s ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge requirements without degradation to ongoing missions.

E V S M U N

(k) What is your overall rating of the contractor’s performance? Why?

E V S M U N

(l) Given the choice, would you award to this contractor again and why?

(m) Is there anyone else we should send this questionnaire to? Please identify by name, organization, and phone number.

(If more comment space needed, attach pages.)

5. Please provide the name, title, address, phone number, and email address of the person completing this questionnaire.

Name:__________________________________________ Title: ___________________________________________ Address: _________________________________________ Phone No.: _______________________________________ Email: ___________________________________________

6. Thank you for your assistance in this source selection. If you have any questions, please contact us via email at leslie.f.simpson.civ@mail.mil

Other files

File Type Posted
Amendment_3.pdf PDF
Amendment_2.pdf PDF
Attachment_4_Sample_Technical_Directives_01_April_2016_A02.doc DOC document
Attachment_L1_Past_Performance_Information_Form.doc DOC document
Exhibit_A_STEP_CDRLs_DD14231_11MARCH2016_0001.pdf PDF
Attachment_3_Cost_Summary_Template_11_March_2016_0001.xls XLS spreadsheet
Attachment_5_S-1_SocioEconomic_Commitment_11_March_2016_0001.xls XLS spreadsheet
Attachment_2_WBS_11_Mar_16_0001.pdf PDF
HDTRA1-16-R-0001-0001_STEP_RFP_Amendment_1.pdf PDF
Attachment_4_Sample_Technical_Directives_11_Mar_16_0001.doc DOC document
HDTRA1-16-R-0001_STEP_Pre-Solicitation_Conference_Final_Attendees.pdf PDF
Attachment_2_Work_Breakdown_Structure_WBS_28Jan2016.pdf PDF
STEP_Pre-solicitation_QAs_05Feb2016_PAO_GC_revised030316.pdf PDF
STEP_RFP_030216.pdf PDF
Attachment_4_Sample_Technical_Directives_15Jan2016.doc DOC document
Attachment_3_Cost_Summary_Template_27Jan2016.xls XLS spreadsheet
Attachment_L2_-_Past_Performance_Worksheet_L2_28Jan2016.doc DOC document
Exhibit_A_STEP_CDRLs_DD14231_28Jan2016.pdf PDF
Attachment_5_S-1_Socio-Economic_Commitment_-_Management_Template_28Jan2016.xls XLS spreadsheet
Attachment_L1_-_Past_Performance_Information_Form_L1_28Jan2016.doc DOC document
Attachment_1_STEP_SOW_14Jan2016.pdf PDF
HDTRA1-16-R-0001_Schedule_Announcement_10Feb2016.pdf PDF
HDTRA1-16-R-0001_STEP_Schedule_Announcement_for_RFP.pdf PDF
STEP_Pre-Solicitation_Conference_17-18Nov2015_PPT_FBO.pptx PPTX presentation
Attachment_3_Cost_Summary_Template_DRAFT.pdf PDF
Attachment_4_Sample_Technical_Directives_DRAFT.pdf PDF
HDTRA1-16-R-0001_STEP_DRAFT_RFP_FINAL_Signed.pdf PDF
Attachment_1_Statement_of_Work_DRAFT.pdf PDF
Exhibit_A_CDRLs_DRAFT.pdf PDF
Attachment_2_Work_Breakdown_Structure_WBS_DRAFT.pdf PDF
Show all 30

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .