HC1021-14-T-0003_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 20 KB Posted
- Attached to
- INSTALL SECURE LOCKING SYSTEM Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- HC1021-14-T-0003
- Issued by
- Defense Information Systems Agency
About this file
Updated Past Performance document
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| HC1021-14-T-0003_FINAL.doc | DOC document | |
| J-4_Attachment_Past_Performance_Information.docx | DOCX document | |
| J-2_MASTER_PLAN_FOR_SECURE_LOCKING_SYSTEM.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| J-1_Attachment_Requirement_List.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| J-3_Attachment__PRICE_CLIN_STRUCTURE.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Past performance Questionnaire
SECURE LOCK SYSTEM
We are currently in the process of preparing our proposal for Secure Locking System in support of DISA Europe.
As part of our proposal, we have listed you as a reference on our performance for this type of service with your agency under the previous/current contract listed below. Your input on our performance is therefore requested.
Please complete this Questionnaire and e-mail to Contract Specialist, e-mail angelina.hutson.civ@mail.mil .
Questionnaire is due to Ms. Angelina Hutson no later than 2:00 PM Central European Time on 08 July 2014. Questionnaire must be submitted directly to the Contract Specialist.
If you will not be available on 09-10 July 2014 for verification of this past performance evaluation, please indicate another POC for the Contract Specialist to contact.
Alternate POC name: ________________________________________
Alternate POC phone number: _________________________________
Alternate POC e-mail address: _________________________________
Thank you.
NAME OF OFFEROR:
Phone: Fax:
E-Mail:
I. Current or Historical Contract Information
CONTRACT REFERENCED:
1. Contract or Identifying Number: ________________________________________________
2. Contract Value: _____________________________________________________________
3. Period of Performance: ______________________________________________________________________________
4. Brief description of items provided:
5. Name of Person Completing Questionnaire: _______________________________________
Agency/Company:
Title: __________________________________ Phone: _____________________________
E-mail: _____________________________________________________________________
II. EVALUATION. Please rate the Contractor utilizing the guide below. Explanatory narratives for as many responses as possible would be appreciated. These narratives need not be lengthy, just detailed. Attach additional pages if more space is needed.
Evaluation Definitions –
The following definitions should be used in the assessment of Contractor performance.
| EXCEPTIONAL |
| Performance EXCEEDS MOST contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns. |
| VERY GOOD |
| Performance EXCEEDS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns, for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were highly effective. |
| SATISFACTORY |
| Performance MEETS contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed contains minor issues or concerns, for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective. |
| MARGINAL |
| Performance MEETS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed includes significant problems, issues, or concerns for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were only somewhat effective. |
| UNSATISFACTORY |
| Performance DOES NOT MEET contractual requirement. The performance of the areas being assessed includes serious problems, issues, or concerns for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective. |
| NOT APPLICABLE (N/A) |
| Performance information not recent or relevant as defined in the Solicitation. Unable to provide assessment. |
Past Performance Evaluation
Question 1. Performance
What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet your requirements?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Performance
Comments, if any.
Questions 2 and 3. Timeliness
What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to provide services/products in a timely manner?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Timeliness
Ability to Resolve Timeliness Problems
Question 4. Quality of Shipments
What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet requirements of shipping (including packing, marking, etc) and the overall quality of the delivery?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Quality of Shipments
Question 5. Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance
What is your overall rating of Contractor’s performance (requirements, schedule, and price) on contract being assessed?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
General Comments:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .