HC101324R0005 Amendment 02.pdf
PDF 630 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- HC1013-24-R-0005
- Issued by
-
Defense Information Systems Agency
About this file
This solicitation requests proposals for telecommunications and network services to provide long haul communications between remote seismic monitoring locations and data centers for the Air Force Technical Applications Center (AFTAC) United States Atomic Energy Detection System (USAEDS) Network. Proposals are due by March 19, 2024 and must include the ability to transmit seismic, voice, and data communications between AFTAC's primary data center at Patrick AFB, FL and remote service points, as well as between service points and AFTAC's alternate data center at Naval Support Activity Mid-South Millington, TN. The communications network must function continuously with the capability to reroute data transmission from remote locations to the alternate data center if the primary data center becomes inoperable.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| RFP Questions.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| RFP HC1013-24-R-0005 Amendment 01.pdf | ||
| RFP Questions.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT
Except as p rovid ed herein, all terms and cond itions o f th e document referenced in Item 9A o r 10 A, as hereto fore chang ed , remains un ch an ged and in full force and effect.
15A. NAME AND T IT LE OF SIGNER (T ype or print )
30-105-04EXCEP TION T O SF 30
AP PROVED BY OIRM 11-84
STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) P rescribed by GSA
FAR (48 CFR) 53.243
The purpose of this amendment is to:
a. Update Addendum to FA R 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors based on industry questions received. A f ile of RFP Questions and A nswers w ill also be posted w ith this amendment.
b. All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.
1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES
J 1 10
16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)
16C. DATE SIGNED
BY 06-Mar-2024
16B. UNITED STAT ES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR
(Signature of Cont ract ing Officer)(Signat ure of person a ut horized t o sign)
8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONT RACT OR (No., St reet , County, Sta te and Zip Code) X HC101324R0005
X 9B. DATED (SEE IT EM 11)
14-Feb-2024
10B. DATED (SEE IT EM 13)
9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.
11. THIS IT EM ONLY AP PLIES TO AMENDMENT S OF SOLICITAT IONS
X Th e ab ove n umbered solicitation is amend ed as set forth in Item 1 4. Th e hou r and date sp ecified for receipt o f Offer is extend ed , X is not extended.
Offer mu st ackn owled ge receipt of this amen dment p rior to the h our an d d ate specified in the solicitation or as amen ded b y o ne of the following method s:
(a) By completing Items 8 and 15 , and returnin g 1 co pies of the amen dment; (b ) By ackn owled ging receipt of this amen dment o n each copy of the o ffer sub mitted ;
o r (c) By separate letter o r teleg ram wh ich includ es a reference to th e so licitation and amend men t nu mbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN
REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtu e of this amen dment y ou desire to change an offer already su bmitted, su ch change may be made by teleg ram or letter, p rovid ed each telegram o r letter mak es reference to th e so licitation and this amen dment, an d is receiv ed prio r to the op en ing hou r and date sp ecified.
12. ACCOUNTING AND AP PROP RIATION DATA (If required)
13. THIS ITEM AP PLIES ONLY T O MODIFICATIONS OF CONT RACT S/ORDERS.
IT MODIFIES T HE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.
A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED P URSUANT T O: (Spec ify aut horit y) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN T HE
CONT RACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.
B. T HE ABOVE NUMBERED CO NTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office , appropria tion dat e, et c.) SET FORT H IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO T HE AUT HORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).
C. T HIS SU PP LEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENT ERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUT HORITY OF:
D. OT HER (Specify type of modificat ion and aut horit y)
E. IMP ORTANT: Contrac tor is not, is required t o sign this document and re turn copies to t he issuing office.
14. DESCRIP TION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organize d by UCF sec tion headings, inc luding solic ita tion/contrac t subject mat t er whe re feasible.)
10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.
2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If app licable)
6. ISSUED BY
3. EFFECTIVE DATE
06-Mar-2024
CODE
DISA/DITCO-SCOT T-PS82
2300 EAST DRIVE
BLDG 3600
SCOT T AFB IL 62225-5406
HC1013 7 . ADMINISTERED BY (If o ther than item 6)
4 . REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.
CODE
See Item 6
FACILITY CODECODE
EMAIL:TEL:
HC101324R0005
SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE
SUMMARY OF CHANGES
SECTION SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET
The following have been modified:
ADDENDUMS
ADDENDUM TO 52.212-1
Addendum to 52.212-1(b), Submission of Offers is tailored as follows:
(b) Submission of offers:
(12) Other Instructions
(i) General Information
(A) Points of Contact: The contracting officer (KO) and contract specialist (CS) are the sole points of contact for this procurement. Address any questions or concerns you may have to the KO/CS. Written requests for clarification must be sent to the KO/CS at kari.l.kinzel.civ@mail.mil and katie.s.day.civ@mail.mil
(B) Discrepancies: If an offeror believes that the requirements in these instructions contain an error, omission, or are otherwise unsound, the offeror shall immediately notify the KO in writing with supporting rationale. The Government reserves the right to award this effort based on the initial proposal, as received, without discussion.
(C) Electronic Reference Documents: All referenced documents for this solicitation are available on the Contracting Opportunities page (SAM) web site at https://www.sam.gov. Potential offerors are encouraged to subscribe for real-time e-mail notifications when information has been posted to the website for this solicitation.
(D) Communications: Exchanges of source selection information between the Government and offerors will be controlled by the KO and CS. Email will be used to transmit such information to the offeror and will include “Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 & 3.104” in the Subject line.
(ii) Offerors are requested to submit a written technical proposal and a price proposal in response to the attached Performance Work Statement (PWS). The Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan is provided for contractor reference. Offerors must complete Blocks 6, 7, and 8 of the DD Form 254 with the appropriate information for their company and any subcontractors (when applicable). The completed DD Form 254 must be submitted with the proposal. Information on submission of technical and price proposals is provided below. The proposal shall be clear, concise, and include sufficient detail for effective evaluation and for substantiating the validity of statements asserted in the proposal. The proposal should not simply rephrase or restate the Government's requirements, rather, shall provide convincing rationale to address how the offeror intends to meet these requirements. Offerors shall assume the Government has no prior knowledge of their facilities and capabilities and will base its evaluation on the information presented in the offeror's proposal. The offeror's proposal must include all data and information requested by the RFP and must be submitted in accordance with these instructions. The proposal should sufficiently address the requirements as stated in the PWS. Non-conformance with these instructions may result in removal of the proposal from further evaluation.
(iii) In accordance with (IAW) DISA Special Contract Requirement H1, each offeror shall specifically identify in its proposal whether or not any potential or actual Organizational and Consultant Conflicts of Interest (OCCI), as described in Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Subpart 9.5, exists for this instant procurement. If the offeror believes that no OCCI exists, the OCCI response shall set forth sufficient details to support such a position. If an offeror believes that an actual or perceived OCCI does exist on the instant procurement, the offeror shall submit an OCCI plan with the proposal, explaining in detail how the OCCI will be mitigated and/or avoided.
(iv) Page limitations, if applicable, are identified below and will be treated as maximums. A page is defined as each face of a sheet of paper containing information. When both sides of a sheet display printed material, it shall be counted as two pages. Page size shall be
8.5 x 11 inches. If exceeded, excess pages will not be read or considered in evaluation of the proposal. The following items will not be considered when calculating page limits: cover page, table of contents, glossary, executive summary, generic resumes, past performances, OCCI mitigation plans, SCRM plans, GFP Attachment, Fixed Price Payment Plans, FAR/DFARS Provisions/Clauses attachment, and Section 508 compliance. In the event any evaluation notices are issued, page limitations may also be placed on those. Page limitations shall not be circumvented by including inserted text boxes/pop-ups or internet links to additional information; such inclusions are not acceptable and will not be considered part of a proposal.
The Government reserves the right not to consider for award any proposal that does not adhere to the administrative requirements of this RFP.
(v) Organization/Number of Copies/Page Limits. The offeror shall prepare the proposal as set forth in the Proposal Organization Table below. The titles and contents of the volumes shall be as defined in this table, all of which shall be within the required page limits and with the number of copies as specified. The contents of each proposal volume are described in the information to offerors paragraph as noted in the table below. To the greatest extent possible, each volume shall be written on a stand-alone basis so that its contents may be evaluated with a minimum of cross referencing to other volumes of the proposal. Information required for proposal evaluation which is not found in its designated volume will be assumed to have been omitted from the proposal. Cross-referencing within a proposal volume is permitted where its use would conserve space without impairing clarity. Each volume may contain a more detailed table of contents to delineate the subparagraphs within that volume. Tab indexing may be used to identify sections.
Additionally, each volume may contain a glossary of all abbreviations and acronyms used, and with an explanation for each. Glossaries do not count against the page limitations for their respective volumes.
Table 1 Proposal Organization
VOLUME Addendum to 52.212-1 Paragraph Number
VOLUME TITLE COPIES PAGE LIMIT
I (b)(12)(vii)(A) Executive Summary 1 electronic 1 II (b)(12)(vii)(B) Technical/Management 1 electronic 50 III (b)(12)(vii)(C) Price 1 electronic 30 IV (b)(12)(vii)(D) Contract Documentation 1 electronic No page limit
(vi) Electronic Offers. The offeror shall submit volumes I through IV in electronic format via email and must include “Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 & 3.104” in the Subject line. Each volume shall be a separate file. If files are compressed, the necessary decompression program must be included. Proposals shall be submitted to the KO/CS identified below:
Kari Kinzel (Contract Specialist) – kari.l.kinzel.civ@mail.mil Katie Day (KO) – katie.s.day.civ@mail.mil
(vii) Proposal Organization:
(A) Volume I - Executive Summary. In the executive summary volume, the offeror shall describe the significant attributes and theme of its proposal. It should be concise, to include addressing any significant risks, and highlighting any key or unique features, excluding price. Any summary material presented in the Executive Summary shall not be considered as meeting the requirements for any portions of other volumes of the proposal. E.g., the evaluation of the technical subfactors will be based solely on the technical/management volume. Include a master table of contents for the entire proposal.
(B) Volume II – Technical/Management. The technical/management volume should be specific and complete and will be evaluated against the technical/management subfactors defined in FAR 52.212-2, Evaluation – Commercial Items. The technical portion of the proposal is to be submitted as a Microsoft (MS) Word 2007 or newer file. The page format shall have a 1-inch margin using no smaller than an 11-point Arial, Times New Roman, or Courier New font for all text to include any text contained in a table. The file size of each document shall not exceed 20MB. Using the instructions provided below, provide as specifically as possible the actual methodology you would use for accomplishing/satisfying the factors/subfactors.
In the Technical/Management volume, address your proposed approach to meeting the minimum performance or capability requirements of each technical/management factor/subfactors, as well as any risks in your proposed approach in terms of technical/performance, price, and/or schedule.
The Government requests each offeror to detail a solution to replace the current automatic radio frequency (RF) switching feature, on a per site basis, to allow the Government to plan a phased transition to a newer, supportable automatic RF switching solution. Address any technical/management risk by identifying those aspects of the proposal considered to have the potential for disruption of schedule, increased cost, poor performance, the need for increased Government oversight, and/or the likelihood of unsuccessful contract performance. Describe the impact of each identified risk in terms of its potential to interfere with or prevent the successful accomplishment of other contract requirements (e.g., PWS/SOW or specification requirements), whether or not those requirements are identified as subfactors. Propose a realistic "work-around" or risk mitigation for identified risks that will eliminate or reduce risk to an acceptable level.
Identify any new risks introduced by such risk mitigation.
Volume II - Technical/Management shall be organized as follows:
-Table of Contents -List of Table and Drawings -Glossary -Subfactor One -Subfactor Two -Subfactor Three -All other aspects of the PWS
(C) Volume III – Price. The price proposal will be evaluated using one or more of the techniques defined in FAR Part 15.404 in order to determine reasonableness and completeness. Reasonableness is established through cost and price analysis techniques as described in FAR 15.404. For a price/cost proposal/quotation to be complete, all solicitation requirements must be priced, figures correctly calculated, and prices/costs presented in in a clear and useful format. You shall submit pricing for the base period and all option periods, including option pricing for an additional 6-month period that may be authorized IAW FAR 52.217-8. See FAR 52.217-8 which authorizes the Government to require continued performance of any services within the limits and at the rates specified in the contract. The CLIN Pricing Worksheet should include a separate line item for the additional 6-month period IAW FAR 52.217-8. These prices shall be identical to the proposed pricing in the 6 months prior to expiration of the base period, or the final option period, if option periods are present. The total evaluated price will consist of the contractor’s proposed price for the base period, all option periods, and the option pricing for the additional 6-month period. The price proposal spreadsheet shall be submitted in MS Excel 2007 format or newer. All formulas shall remain present in the spreadsheet for verification. The file size of each document shall not exceed 20MB. Information beyond that required by this instruction shall not be submitted, unless considered essential to document or support the price. All information relating to the proposed price, including all required supporting documentation must be included in the section of the proposal designated as the Price Volume. The eventual awardee will be authorized to invoice monthly for all approved travel costs incurred and approved by the COR. Under no circumstances shall the information and documentation from the Price Volume be included elsewhere in the proposal other than Volume III, Price Volume and Volume IV, Contract Documentation, which includes CLIN pricing.
Offerors should insert their pricing in Columns D and E of the Pricing Worksheet for all contract periods. Price submissions should be sufficiently detailed to demonstrate their reasonableness.
Offerors should ensure price proposals include detailed information regarding the resources required to accomplish the task (e.g., labor categories, labor hours, number of employees for each labor category, rates, materials, etc.). Data other than certified cost or pricing data may be required to support the price reasonableness of your proposal in accordance with FAR 15.403.
FAR 12.504(a) The following laws are not applicable to subcontracts at any tier for the acquisition of commercial items or commercial components at any tier:
(7) 41 U.S.C. 4706(d) and 10 U.S.C. 2313(c),Examination of Records of Contractor, when a subcontractor is not required to provide certified cost or pricing data (see FAR 15.209(b)), unless using funds appropriated or otherwise made available by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Pub. L. 111-5).
Volume III – Price shall be organized as follows:
-Attachment 4, CLIN Pricing Worksheet -Price Narrative - to include cost or pricing information, supporting data, estimating methodology.
(D) Volume IV - Contract Documentation. The purpose of this volume is to provide information to the Government for preparing the contract document and supporting file.
1. Complete blocks 30 a, b, and c of the SF Form 1449 and return this form with your proposal. Signature by the offeror on the SF1449 constitutes an offer, which the Government may accept.
2. Provide completed pricing information in the CLIN spreadsheet. The combined CLIN price will reflect the total in Column I on the CLIN Pricing Worksheet as that represents the total Monthly Recurring Cost and Non-Recurring cost combined.
3. This solicitation contains provisions that apply and clauses that will be applicable to the resulting award. Some of the provisions and additional DITCO text require a response from the offeror and shall be submitted with the proposal. This includes, but may not be limited to, FAR 52.212-3 Alt I (completed representations, certifications, acknowledgments, and statements), FAR 52.204-24, DFARS 252.204-7017, DFARS 252.239-7009, and DITCO Contract Administration Data G1, Points of Contact.
4. Complete Block 6, 7 and 8 of the DD Form 254 and return with the proposal.
5. Provide the completed Past Performance References sheet.
6. OCCI Mitigation Plan or a statement that an OCCI does not exist.
7. Authorized Offeror Personnel. Provide the name, title, and telephone number of the company/division point of contact regarding decisions made with respect to the proposal and who can obligate the company contractually. Also, identify those individuals authorized to negotiate with the Government. Contractor Point of Contract information will be used for the Contract Administration Data Item G1, Points of Contact.
8. Company/Division Address, Identifying Codes, and Applicable Designations. Provide company/division's street address, county and facility code; CAGE code;
DUNS code; TIN; size of business (large or small); and labor surplus area designation. This same information must be provided if the work for this contract will be performed at any other locations. List all locations where work is to be performed and indicate whether such facility is a division, affiliate, or subcontractor, and the percentage of work to be performed at each location.
52.212-1(c), Period for Acceptance of Offers is tailored as follows:
(c) Period for acceptance of offers. The offeror agrees to hold the prices in its offer firm for 150 calendar days, or adjudication of any protests unless other withdrawn, from the date specified for receipt of offers. The offeror shall make a clear statement in the proposal documentation volume that the proposal is valid through this date.
(End of provision revisions)
ADDENDUM TO 52.212-2(a)
Addendum to 52.212-2(a), Evaluation-Commercial Items is tailored as follows:
a. Basis for Contract Award
Award will be made to the responsible offeror whose proposal is determined to represent the overall best value to the Government using a lowest price technically acceptable (LPTA) process. The technical proposal should include all information the offeror wants the Government to consider and evaluate regarding its ability to perform all required tasks and conform to all required terms and conditions. To be eligible for award, the offeror’s proposal must address all aspects of the PWS. Failure to comply with the terms and conditions of the solicitation may result in the offeror being ineligible for award.
With regard to the best value analysis for the award decision, the below evaluation factors and subfactors will be used to determine technical acceptability. Section 508 Accessibility Standards do apply to this requirement. Section 508 requirements are listed in the attached PWS (Attachment 1). Compliance with Section 508 standards will be considered prior to evaluating any of the selection criteria listed below. Any proposal failing to meet the Section 508 Accessibility Standards, as listed in the PWS, may be eliminated from consideration for award.
b. Evaluation Factors and Subfactors
(1) The following evaluation factors and subfactors will be used to evaluate each proposal.
Past performance is not an evaluation factor, but shall be used in determining contractor responsibility in accordance with FAR 9.104:
Factor 1: Technical/Management
(a) Subfactor 1: Operational Availability, reference PWS Paragraphs 6.1.3, 6.1.5. In order for this subfactor to be rated Acceptable, the Government will evaluate the offeror’s ability for providing communication services between SP-A or SP-B2 and all associated terminal locations, demarcation point to demarcation point, operating on a continuous basis, 24 hours per day, 7 days per week in accordance with the PWS requirements for service availability (PWS 6.1.3). The offeror’s proposed solution should demonstrate their real-time network monitoring capability, and approach to ability to maintain and/or obtain spare equipment in accordance with PWS requirements for spare equipment. The offeror’s must demonstrate their ability to transition to a newer, supportable solution regarding their proposed automatic RF redundancy solution.
(b) Subfactor 2: Security, reference PWS Paragraphs 6.1, 6.1.5, 6.1.10, 6.1.15. In order for this subfactor to be rated Acceptable, the Government will evaluate the offeror’s ability to provide network security to prevent unauthorized users from accessing data, compromising files, and tampering with system configuration at all SPs. The Government will evaluate the offeror’s ability to implement encryption, Security Technical Implementation Guide (STIGs), and security patches to network devices, and their ability to identify and replace end-of-life and/or end-of-service devices. The Government will evaluate the offeror’s ability to interface with telecommunications carriers and local/foreign Government entities to obtain host nation approval to operate telecommunications and satellite teleports and connection authority necessary to implement the network.
(c) Subfactor 3: Transition Plan, reference PWS Paragraphs 10.1, 10.1.1. In order for this subfactor to be rated Acceptable, the Government will evaluate the offeror’s approach to provide all required services no later than one hundred fifty (150) days after award.
Factor 2: Price
(a) The Offeror’s firm-fixed price proposal will be evaluated for award purposes based upon the total evaluated price which consists of the offeror’s proposed prices for the base period, all option periods, including option pricing for an additional 6-month period that may be authorized IAW FAR 52.217-8, and surge pricing if addressed below. Evaluation of the options shall not obligate the Government to exercise such options. The offeror’s price proposal will be evaluated, using one or more of the techniques defined in FAR 15.404, in order to determine if it is reasonable and complete. Normally, price reasonableness is established through cost and price analysis techniques as described in FAR 15.404. For a price to be complete, all solicitation requirements must be priced, figures correctly calculated and prices presented in in a clear and useful format. The Government reserves the right, but is not obligated, to conduct a realism analysis.
(b) Past performance will be reviewed as part of a responsibility determination but will not impact the technical evaluation. If overall past performance is found to be unacceptable, this may be cause for the offeror’s proposal to be excluded from further evaluation. However, a prospective contractor shall not be determined responsible or non-responsible solely on the basis of a lack of relevant performance history. The ratings for past performance as it relates to responsibility determination are described in Table 1 below. Offerors shall submit no more than 3 recent past performance efforts and efforts must have occurred within the last 5 years for consideration. A current point of contact for each past performance effort shall be provided by completing the embedded Past Performance Reference sheet and including it with the proposal.
Table 1 Ratings for Past Performance as it Relates to Responsibility Determination
Rating Description
Acceptable The offeror has a satisfactory performance record, or lack of relevant performance history does not impact responsibility determination (see FAR 9.104-1(c) and 9.104-2).
Unacceptable The offeror's performance record is seriously deficient or otherwise unsatisfactory as defined in FAR 9.104-3(b).
(2) Relative Importance of Factors and Subfactors. The relative importance of each factor and subfactor is as follows: Within the Technical/Management factor, the subfactors are of equal importance. All non-price evaluation factors, when combined, are approximately equal to price.
c. Ratings
Each technical/management subfactor will receive one of the ratings described in Table 2.
The Technical/Management subfactors will be evaluated and rated either Acceptable or Unacceptable. In order for a proposal to be rated overall Technically Acceptable, each of the subfactors must be rated Acceptable.
Table 2 Technical Ratings
Rating Description
Acceptable Proposal meets the requirements of the technical subfactor.
Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the requirements of the technical subfactor.
d. Evaluation of Options
The base IDIQ contract will not include option periods, but the task orders for each Service Point issued off the base contract will be inclusive of options. The offeror shall submit pricing for the base period and all option periods, including option pricing for an additional 6-month period that may be authorized IAW FAR 52.217-8. See FAR 52.217-8 which authorizes the Government to require continued performance of any services within the limits and at the rates specified in the contract. The pricing proposal should include a separate line item for the additional 6-month period IAW FAR 52.217-8. These prices shall be identical to the proposed pricing in the 6 months prior to expiration of the base period, or the final option period, if option periods are present. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).
e. Discussions
The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without exchanges.
However, the Government reserves the right to conduct exchanges or seek clarifications if the KO determines they are necessary. If exchanges are required, the number of proposals being competitively considered may be narrowed to all of the most highly rated proposals. The Government further reserves the right to reduce the number of proposals being competitively considered to the greatest number that will permit efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals. If an offeror’s proposal is removed from further consideration for award, written notice of the removal will be provided to the offeror. In the event issues pertaining to the solicitation cannot be resolved to the KO's satisfaction, the Government reserves the right to cancel the solicitation. In such event, offerors will be notified in writing.
f. It is the sole responsibility of the offeror to ensure that the electronic files submitted are virus free and can be opened and read by the Government. Proposal submissions shall not be locked, encrypted, or otherwise contain barriers to opening the file(s). The Government is under no obligation to seek clarification regarding electronic proposal submissions if submissions cannot be opened or accessed. The Government reserves the right not to consider for award any proposal that does not adhere to the administrative requirements of this RFP.
(End of provision addendum)
(End of Summary of Changes)
| 2024-03-06T12:43:55-0600 | |
| DAY.KATIE.S.1386572140 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .