HAESI 2.0 - Industry Day Presentation 2026 05 Aug 2026_Updated 07Aug2026_FINAL08192026.pptx

U.S. Army Engineering and Support Center, Huntsville

5 AUGUST 2026

HUNTSVILLE ARCHITECT ENGINEERING & SUPPORT INDEFINITE DELIVERY CONTRACT (HAESI 2.0)

Virtual industry day

“The views, opinions and findings contained in this report are those of the authors(s) and should not be construed as an official Department of the Army position, policy or decision, unless so designated by other official documentation.”

.59

Government representatives

Daniel Cook – Chief Systems Cost Division

Tammy Cinnamon/Anna Tonnang – Acquisition Project Manager

Johnna Sebben – Contracting Officer, Facilities, Specialty Services, and Technology Support (FST)

Shete McCants-Robinson– Contract Specialist, FST

Nicole Boone – Office of Small Business Programs

Todd Lewis - Safety & Occupational Health Manager

Clay Weisenberger – Office of Counsel

RULES OF ENGAGEMENT

Meeting will be recorded.

Everything discussed is subject to change!

We are looking for your INPUT!

Submit your questions to shete.q.mccants-robinson@usace.army.mil.

The Presentation Slides, Responses to Questions, Transcript and Recording, and Attendees List will be posted to SAM.gov on or before 19 August.

NOTE: Until all required acquisition related documents are approved, the expectations shared herein are subject to change.

agenda Introduction – Mr. Cook HAESI 2.0 Overview – Ms. Cinnamon Acquisition Approach – Mrs. Sebben Small Business and Resources – Mrs. Boone ØCMMC Requirements – Mr. Weisenberger Safety Overview – Mr. Todd Lewis Questions and Wrap up – Mrs. Sebben

Highlights of the expected program elements. HAESI 2.0 provides comprehensive architect-engineer support services for planning, design, engineering, and technical solutions supporting facility and infrastructure projects worldwide.

INTRODUCTION

DANIEL COOK

CHIEF – SYSTEMS COST DIVISION

.59 HAESI 2.0 overview The Huntsville Architect Engineering Support Indefinite Delivery Contract (HAESI 2.0) contract is the primary tool providing comprehensive architectural, engineering, planning, design, survey, analysis, and technical support services for new and existing facilities and infrastructure projects.

Primary customers/stakeholders include the Department of Defense (DoD) and Facilities Repair Reduction, S&C, Planning and Programming (P&P), Secure Facilities, Access Control Point (ACP), Power Reliability Enhancement Program (PREP), Facility Technology Integration (FTI), Resource Development Coordinating Committee (RDCC) and Construction Branch.

Services include facility planning and programming, feasibility studies, geotechnical investigations, permitting, master planning, value engineering, surveying, cost estimating, engineering studies, architectural and engineering design, CADD/BIM support, design reviews, construction-phase services.

The numerous locations of these projects can be inside or outside the U.S. Possible overseas work locations include –Germany, Italy, Japan, and the Republic of Korea.

Highlights of the expected program elements for HAESI 2.0 include the delivery of architect-engineer services through qualifications-based task order competitions supporting facility planning, design, engineering studies, surveying, commissioning, and construction-phase services.

OVERVIEW

Tammy Cinnamon Program Manager

.59 HAESI 2.0 overview: Scope & intent The scope of services may include but are not limited to:

AE Design Services:

• Facility planning, programming, and master planning services

• Architectural and engineering design services

• New construction, renovation, and modernization support

• Feasibility studies and engineering analyses

• Geotechnical investigations and site assessments

• Surveying and field/site investigations

• Cost estimating and value engineering services

• Permitting and regulatory compliance support

• CADD/BIM development, documentation, and reviews

• Construction-phase support and commissioning services

• Economic analyses, technical studies, and specification development

HAESI 2.0 overview: Scope & intent (Continued…):

Technical Support:

• Engineering studies, evaluations, and technical analyses

• Design reviews and quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) support

• CADD/BIM modeling, drawing development, and document management

• Site investigations, field assessments, and data collection Engineering Surveys and Assessments:

• Engineering surveys and site characterization

• Facility condition assessments and evaluations

• Geotechnical investigations and subsurface analyses

• Site and field investigations supporting project development

• Feasibility studies and infrastructure assessments

Engineering Studies:

Technical Analyses Original Research Engineering Studies Feasibility Studies Value Engineering Simulation Modeling Cybersecurity Systems Engineering policy development assistance Economic Analyses Engineering Forensics Decision Support studies

Facility Planning:

Master planning Facility planning Long-range facility Planning studies Programming

Solicitation & Other Documents Preparation:

Requests for Proposal (Design-Build) Specifications Submittal Registers Environmental Documentation DD1391 Planning Documents DD1354 documents, etc.

Commissioning:

Fundamental, enhanced, recommissioning, and retro-commissioning Measurement & verification Post-occupancy validation

Construction Phase Services:

Construction proposal evaluation Construction submittal review Requests for Information response Shop drawing review Site visits & construction inspection services Engineering During Construction Construction Management at Risk (CM@Risk)

Due to the diversity of the types of requirements that may be required, USACE is seeking professional and responsive architect-engineering firms that are thoroughly familiar with all aspects of DoD facility planning, programming, engineering, and construction.

Incumbent firms on the current HAESI 1.0 contract include:

AECOM Technical Services Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp.

Burns & McDonnell Engineering Company, Inc.

Dynotec-KZF Joint Venture, LLC (SB) The Mason & Hanger Group Inc.

Michael Baker – Stanley Joint Venture Rogers, Lovelock & Fritz, Inc acquisition approach

JOHNNA SEBBEN

CONTRACTING OFFICER, (FST)

Overview of our expected procurement strategy for the contracts and how we will select for task orders. Each task order will establish project-specific scope, deliverables, schedule, and performance requirements, ensuring flexible and efficient execution of architect-engineer services across a diverse portfolio of requirements.

.59 HAESI 2.0 - Acquisition approach North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Code – 541330, Engineering Services

Small Business Size Standard - $25.5 Million

Anticipated Contract Value - $399 Million

Period of Performance: One (1) three-year base period and two (2) two-year option periods for a total of seven (7) years if all options are exercised. Contract will also include FAR 52.217-8, Option to Extend Services, allowing for a 6-month extension (if needed).

Contract Type: Multiple Award Indefinite Delivery Contract (IDC) suite.

Work will be issued by negotiated Firm-Fixed Price (FFP) Task Orders.

HAESI 2.0- Acquisition approach

Selection of firms will be qualifications-based.

Per RFO 36.602-1 and DFARS PGI 236.602-1 Selection Criteria, award will be made to the most highly qualified firms, as determined by an evaluation of the following criteria provided in the SF330, A-E Qualifications:

Specialized Experience & Technical Competence Professional Qualifications Past Performance Capacity Knowledge of Locality Other appropriate selection criteria

Secondary criteria will be used by the selection board as a tie-breaker, if necessary. These criteria will be identified in the synopsis and listed separately in relative order of importance after the listing of the primary selection criteria.

*EP 715-1-7 Construction Architect-Engineer Contracting in the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

HAESI 2.0- Acquisition approach

IDC includes a portion of the awards reserved for small business concerns, under Section 1331 of the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010 in Public Law 111-240

Intend to make six (6) unrestricted awards and one (1) restricted-small business reserve award

Instead of two separate pools, the Government will issue a single unrestricted synopsis

IDC to allow Small Businesses to be considered for each task order Task orders estimated at less than $1M will be set aside, unless determination is made that the requirement is not appropriate based on technical complexity

FAR 52.219-14, Limitations in Subcontracting will still apply to prime small business concerns

HAESI 2.0- ANTICIPATED MILESTONES

Closed 10 JULY 2025

NICOLE BOONE

CHIEF, HNC OFFICE OF SMALL BUSINESS

OFFICE OF SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAMS

.59

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION (SBA)

TABLE OF SMALL BUSINESS SIZE STANDARDS

FOR SMALL BUSINESSES ONLY

For those portions of the contract that are reserved for small business, FAR 52.219-14, Limitations on Subcontracting applies.

For services (except construction), the prime will not pay more than 50% of the amount paid by the Government for contract performance to subcontractors that are not *similarly situated entities. Any work that a similarly situated entity further subcontracts will count towards the prime contractor’s 50% subcontract amount that cannot be exceeded.

* Similarly situated entity: A first-tier subcontractor that has the same SB program status, without regard to its socioeconomic status AND is considered small for the size standard under the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code as the prime contractor assigned to the subcontract.

IAW OPORD 2026-03 (Implementation of Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) and CUI-FCI Compliance)

Cybersecurity maturation model Certification (CMMC)

Clay Weisenberger Office Of Counsel

.59 CMMC 2.0 Program Guidance CMMC 2.0 Effective 10 SEP 25, Department of War (DoW) contractors handling Federal Contract Information (FCI) or Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) must achieve specific cybersecurity maturity levels to protect sensitive data to be eligible for applicable contract actions. CMMC requirements are detailed in DFARS 252.204-7021 and 7025. Immediate action needed to align with NIST and DoW mandates. Implementation will be phased over three (3) years.

Phased implementation.

Registration – Tracked in Supplier Performance Reporting System (SPRS). Contracting Officers will ensure/document status in SPRS prior to award.

Cmmc Requirements at a glance The CMMC Program provides assessments at three levels, each incorporating security requirements from existing regulations and guidelines.

Level 1: Basic Safeguarding of FCI - Annual self-assessment and annual affirmation of compliance with the 15 security requirements in FAR clause 52.204-21.

Level 2: Broad Protection of CUI - Either a self-assessment or an independent assessment by authorized Third-Party Assessment Organization (C3PAO) every three years. Decided type of info processed, transmitted, or stored on the contractor or subcontractor information systems. Annual verification of compliance with the 110 security requirements in NIST SP 800-171 Revision 2.

Level 3: Higher-Level Protection of CUI Against Advanced Persistent Threats - Achieve CMMC Status of Final Level 2 and undergo an assessment every three years by Defense Contract Management Agency’s (DCMA) Defense Industrial Base Cybersecurity Assessment Center (DIBCAC). Meet 24 addition requirements of NIST SP 800-172.

CMMC Phase II Suspension – Key Takeaways (July 2026) 13 July 2026 – DoW Immediately Suspends Phase II Start

Impact:

Rollout of mandatory 3rd-party assessments paused 60-day comprehensive review Phase I requirements remain unchanged, including Level 2 Self-Assessments (as applicable) DFARS 252.204-7012, NIST SP 800-171 and SPRS reporting still apply.

Contractors must continue protecting FCI and CUI

TAKEAWAY: Fluid situation. Monitor and stay vigilant.

TODD D. LEWIS

SAFETY MANAGER

SAFETY OVERVIEW

.59

USACE Safety & Occupational Health Requirements

COMPLIANCE WITH EM 385-1-1 IS REQUIRED:

Must utilize the ENG 6293 APP Worksheet More stringent than OSHA It requires site specific SOH plans It requires a qualified Site Safety & Health Officer onsite at all times work is being performed, employed by the Prime.

Chapter 2, EM 385-1-1, Program Management requires:

Documented inspections Specific training prior to start of work A robust bulletin board with deficiency log, OSHA posters, OSHA 300, visitors log

HNC has implemented a Safety Management System Safety is top down, proactive not reactive Leading indicators are tracked for trends Near-miss reporting, mitigations and controls Contractors MUST be proactive with Injury and Illness Prevention Programs

Questions & wrap up Everything discussed is subject to change.

We are looking for your INPUT!

Submit any additional questions to shete.q.mccants-robinson@usace.army.mil.

The Presentation Slides, Responses to Questions, Transcript and Recording, and Attendees List will be posted to SAM.gov on or before 7 AUG 2026

Thank you!

.59 image14.png image15.png image16.png image17.png image18.png image19.png image1.png image2.png image3.png image4.png image5.png image6.jpeg image7.png image8.tiff image9.jpeg