Attachment 3 - Past Performance Questionnaire AMD.pdf
PDF 159 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Career Transition Seminar
- Solicitation number
- H9224026QE003
- Issued by
-
United States Special Operations Command
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire issued by Naval Special Warfare Command for a Career Transitional Seminars contract (Solicitation H92240-26-QE-003). The questionnaire is designed to evaluate a potential contractor's past performance by requesting detailed feedback from previous clients, with the goal of assessing the offeror's performance history within the last three years.
The document provides a comprehensive evaluation framework with five key performance assessment areas: 1) compliance with specification requirements, 2) training effectiveness, 3) ability to maintain consistent high-quality services, 4) capability to coordinate trainings, and 5) commitment to customer satisfaction. Respondents are asked to rate performance using adjectival ratings ranging from Outstanding to Unacceptable, with space for detailed comments. The questionnaire is to be returned via email to Ashley Helvak-Leslie and Kristen Lawrence, with contact information provided for any questions.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Govt Responses to Questions Received_2.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2 - ELIN TABLE AMD.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| RFQ H9224026QE003 AMD 2.pdf | ||
| RFQ H9224026QE003 AMD.pdf | ||
| Government Responses to Questions Received.pdf | ||
| RFQ H9224026QE003.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2 - ELIN TABLE.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 3 - Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 - Performance Work Statement.pdf.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment 3 – Past Performance Questionnaire
H92240-26-QE-003
UNCLAS//FOUO (Upon completion)
Past Performance Questionnaire
Please return directly to: ashley.n.helvak-leslie.civ@socom.mil and kristen.k.lawrence.civ@socom.mil with “PP Reference H92240-26-QE-003” in the subject line.
Dear Sir or Madam:
Naval Special Warfare Command is acquiring Career Transitional Seminars to fulfill its mission.
An offeror interested in proposing on this work has identified you as a Point of Contact (POC) on a past or present contract which the offeror deems relevant to this effort. We are, therefore, requesting your assistance in completing the attached Past Performance Questionnaire so that we may evaluate the offeror under the Factor of past performance.
Please provide your comments regarding the overall assessment of the offeror’s performance on the contract identified and any additional information that your organization deems relevant to our evaluation team. It is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators.
Please complete and submit the Questionnaire as soon as possible via e-mail to the address above or contact Ashley Helvak-Leslie at 858-409-3001 if you have any questions. Thank you very much in advance for your assistance.
Ashley Helvak-Leslie Contract Specialist
Kristen Lawrence Contracting Officer mailto:ashley.n.helvak-leslie.civ@socom.mil mailto:kristen.k.lawrence.civ@socom.mil
UNCLAS//FOUO (Upon completion)
Part I - REFERENCE CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION (To be completed by the Offeror)
IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE
Name:
Title:
Telephone:
Email Address:
PART II - EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent)
The following questions pertain to the contractor’s record of past (within the past three years) and current performance. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of a federal contract. Therefore, it is important that our information be as factual and accurate as possible. Please provide examples and/or explanations (use additional pages if necessary). The following adjectival ratings shall be used in your response.
Outstanding: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Acceptable: Performance meets contractual requirements. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective.
Unacceptable: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective.
Contractor/Company Name/Division and Address:
Contract Number:
Prime Contractor Name:
Award Date:
Contract Type:
Total Obligated Value:
Period of Performance:
Specific Nature of the Contractual Effort
1. Compliance of performed services to specification requirements that were initially requested.
Outstanding (Please comment below) Good Acceptable Marginal (Please comment below) Unsatisfactory (Please comment below)
Comments:
2. Effectiveness of Training (Clear, Relatable).
Acceptable Marginal (Please comment below)
3. Ability to maintain consistent, continuous high quality services without gaps or significant government oversight.
Acceptable Marginal (Please comment below)
4. Capability to coordinate all trainings.
Acceptable Marginal (Please comment below)
5. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest.
Acceptable Marginal (Please comment below)
6. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .