CDRL_A002_QA_Attachment.pdf

CDRL A002 – Contractor Self-Assessment Report SOCOM Wide Mission Support (SWMS) Quarterly Surveillance/Assessment Report

Note: Simplified QASP will be developed based on awardees QCP

INSTRUCTIONS:

1. PER THE SWMS QASP, PLEASE USE THE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS DEFINED BELOW

TO COMPLETE THIS ASSESSMENT.

2. ALL COMMENT BOXES MAY BE EXPANDED IN ORDER TO CAPTURE RELEVANT

COMMENTS.

PERFORMANCE RATING DEFINITIONS:

Exceptional

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

To justify an Exceptional rating, identify multiple significant events and state how they were of benefit to the Government. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

Very Good

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor was effective. To justify a Very Good rating, identify a significant event and state how it was a benefit to the Government. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

Satisfactory

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory.

To justify a Satisfactory rating, there should have been only minor problems, or major problems the Contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

Per DoD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that Contractor will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.

Marginal

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The Contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

To justify Marginal performance, identify a significant event in each category that the Contractor had trouble overcoming and state how it impacted the Government. A Marginal rating should be supported by referencing the management tool that notified the Contractor of the contractual deficiency (e.g., management, quality, safety, or environmental deficiency report or letter).

Unsatisfactory

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

To justify an Unsatisfactory rating, identify multiple significant events in each category that the Contractor had trouble overcoming and state how it impacted the Government. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating. An Unsatisfactory rating should be supported by referencing the management tools used to notify the Contractor of the contractual deficiencies (e.g., management, quality, safety, or environmental)

1. Contractor Name To Be Determined

2. Contract IDIQ Number To Be Determined

3. Current Surveillance/Assessment Period

4. PCOR Name: Office Symbol: Date:

5. PCOR-Validated Complaints (this reporting period)? YES NO If yes, how many?

If yes, provide details:

6. Performance Assessment: Place an “X” in the appropriate Low/High rating box

A. Quality of Service

Exceptional

Very Good

Satisfactory

Marginal

Unsatisfactory

Narrative:

Government Assessment Rating Concur with Contractor

Assessment Non-concur with Contractor Assessment

(please select new rating)

☐ Exceptional ☐ Very Good ☐ Satisfactory ☐ Marginal ☐

Government Comments (required if non-concur/new rating is selected):

B. Business Relations

Assessment Non-concur with Contractor Assessment

(please select new rating)

☐ Exceptional ☐ Very Good ☐ Satisfactory ☐ Marginal ☐

C. Management Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory of Key Personnel

Assessment Non-concur with Contractor Assessment

(please select new rating)

☐ Exceptional ☐ Very Good ☐ Satisfactory ☐ Marginal ☐

D. Utilization of Small Business

Assessment Non-concur with Contractor Assessment

(please select new rating)

☐ Exceptional ☐ Very Good ☐ Satisfactory ☐ Marginal ☐

Task Order Quarterly Assessment (Complete for each active TO during the assessment period)

1. Task Order Number

2. Task Order Period of Performance (PoP)

3. Current Surveillance/Assessment Period

4. COR Name: Office Symbol: Date:

5. COR-Validated Complaints (this reporting period)? YES NO If yes, how many?

If yes, provide details:

6. Performance Assessment: Place an “X” in the appropriate Low/High rating box

A. Quality of Service

Assessment Non-concur with Contractor Assessment

(please select new rating)

☐ Exceptional ☐ Very Good ☐ Satisfactory ☐ Marginal ☐

B. Schedule Exceptional

Assessment Non-concur with Contractor Assessment

(please select new rating)

☐ Exceptional ☐ Very Good ☐ Satisfactory ☐ Marginal ☐

C. Cost Control Exceptional

Assessment Non-concur with Contractor Assessment

(please select new rating)

☐ Exceptional ☐ Very Good ☐ Satisfactory ☐ Marginal ☐

D. Management of TO Personnel

Government Assessment Rating Concur with Contractor

Assessment Non-concur with Contractor Assessment

(please select new rating)

☐ Exceptional ☐ Very Good ☐ Satisfactory ☐ Marginal ☐