GC Reference n ATTACHMENT 11.docx

This form is to be used for reference submittals.

RFP GS11P10MKC0059, PHASE 1B TUNNELS

ST. ELIZABETHS WEST CAMPUS CONSOLIDATION PROGRAM

Washington, DC

GC Reference Form

VOL. I/B. TECHNICAL PROPOSAL EVALUATION FACTOR: TAB 2 – PAST PERFORMANCE

Offeror shall submit references (a person or persons who may be contacted regarding the quality of the Offeror’s past performance) for at least two (2) of the projects submitted under the Experience Factor. The Offeror must provide a GC Reference Form for each reference.

Name:

Title:

Company Name:

Current Address:

Current Phone No.: Current FAX No.:

Additionally ATTACHMENT 11: FIRM’S PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE is included and should be offered to references for completion and submission in support of past performance references.

ATTACHMENT 11: FIRM’S PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Your assistance is requested in support of a source selection.

Please complete this Questionnaire and send by facsimile [(202) 373-0164] or PREFERED electronic mail [ tiphenie.wise-traynham@gsa.gov]o:

GSA, St Elizabeths Campus Development Team 301 7th Street, SW; Room 4606 (WP) Washington, DC 20407 Bonnie E. Echoles, Contracting Officer Desired Response Date:

August 23, 2010

When complete, the information on this form is SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION (41 U.S.C. 423) and shall be protected accordingly.

TO BE COMPLETED BY FIRM OFFEROR for THE ST ELIZABETHS TUNNEL/INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT GS11P10MKC0059

1. FIRM’S NAME & ADDRESS:

4. CONTRACT NO.:

5. CONTRACT START DATE / COMPLETION DATE:

6. CONTRACT VALUE (AT AWARD / FINAL VALUE):

2. OWNER’S NAME AND ADDRESS

7. CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT VALUE (AT AWARD / FINAL VALUE):

8. TYPE OF CONTRACT:

3. PROJECT NAME:

9. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT’S KEY CHARACTERISTICS:

Please add a continuation page if additional space is necessary.

TO BE COMPLETED BY EVALUATING ORGANIZATION REPRESENTATIVE (REFERENCE)

10. EVALUATION: a. EVALUATOR'S NAME, POSITION DURING PROJECT EXECUTION ( Project Manager/ COR/ Other) AND ORGANIZATION:

b. EVALUATOR'S PHONE NUMBER: c. EVALUATOR’S FAX NUMBER:

d. EVALUATOR'S E-MAIL ADDRESS: e. MONTHS PERFORMANCE MONITORED BY EVALUATOR:

Did the construction project contain any of the following characteristics?

The project was part of a construction program with multiple phases and multiple interdependent projects managed in a coordinated way to obtain benefits and controls not available from managing them individually.

The project was for the Construction of Concrete Tunnel.

The project was substantially completed within the past ten (10) years.

The project was set in a restricted/congested urban site requiring extensive coordination with adjacent landowners/occupants and the community.

The project involved work in the area of an historic property.

The project involved civil/site work and structural concrete.

Questions: (Some questions may not apply to roles)

Experience:

1. What was the actual work performed by the firm? Who was the Senior Project Manager (Coordination Executive) on the project?

2. Did the key personnel ensure that the finished product met your requirements as set forth in the documents? Did the management cooperate with the administration of routine matters and unexpected difficulties?

3. Did the firm demonstrate adequate technical knowledge for the referenced project?

Performance:

[Using the following scale, please rate the following areas of performance. The scale is defined with each factor.]

EX- Excellent; VG- Very Good; S- Satisfactory; MG- Marginal; US- Unsatisfactory; NO- Not Observed

4. How effective was the firm in identifying and resolving potential problems?

US – Firm failed to identify and resolve problems resulting in extensive modifications, claims or cost/schedule overruns.

EX - Firm was proactive in identifying potential problems and recommending solutions to minimize cost/schedule impacts.

Rating: ________ Comments:____________________________________________________________________

5. How effective was the firm in managing the project’s budget and controlling costs?

US – Firm failed to manage the budget and control costs.

EX - Firm maintained tight control of budget and costs and was proactive in identifying potential costs and recommending solutions to minimize cost/schedule impacts

Rating: ________ Comments:____________________________________________________________________

6. How effective was the firm in maintaining project quality, enforcing the contract documents, and identifying and resolving defects and omissions to the owner’s satisfaction and in a timely fashion?

US – Firm did not adequately enforce the contract documents and left resolution of defects and omissions until the punch list.

EX - Firm actively enforced the contract documents, maintained high standards for quality and workmanship, and quickly resolved defects and omissions, leaving a minimal punch list at project completion.

Rating: ________ Comments:____________________________________________________________________

7. Rate the firm’s overall management of the project.

US – Firm was often not available and work seemed to suffer significantly due to lack of management capabilities.

EX - Firm’s work flowed smoothly, management was always available and responsive and the project was efficiently and effectively completed.

Rating: ________ Comments:____________________________________________________________________

8. If you had a choice, would you contract with the firm again? Why or Why not?

9. What are the company’s strong points, or what did you like about them?

10. What are the company’s weak points and what do you like least about them?

11. If you were GSA, would you contract with this firm? Why or Why not?

12. Do you know of any other projects performed by this firm?

13. In summary would you choose to describe the quality of their services and overall performance as:

____ a. significantly better than acceptable (EX);

____ b. slightly better than acceptable (VG);

____ c. acceptable (S);

____ d. slightly less than acceptable (MG); or

____ e. entirely unacceptable (US).

image3.png image1.wmf image2.png