St. Es USCG DB Questionnaires.doc

DOC document 89 KB Posted

Attached to
RECOVERY: Construction of New U. S. Coast Guard Headquarters Building, Washington, DC
Solicitation number
GS11P09MKC0051
Issued by

About this file

Questionnaires

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
DB Stage II Shortlist.docx DOCX document
Amend02.doc DOC document
St. Es USCG DB RFQ_r5 1 .doc DOC document
Memo deleted.doc DOC document
Amend01.doc DOC document
St. Es DBB Delivery Model RFQ.ppt PPT presentation
PBS Order 3490.1.pdf PDF
PBS Order 3490.1.pdf PDF
Memo.doc DOC document
St. Es USCG DB RFQ_r4 1 .doc DOC document
Design Build USCG HQ FBO.docx DOCX document
Show all 11

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT 1: ORGANIZATION’S PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Your assistance is requested in support of a source selection.

Please complete this Questionnaire and mail or send by facsimile [FAX (202401-6075] to:

Bonnie Echoles, Contracting Officer

GSA, NCR, ROB (WPP)

301 7th Streets, SW; Room 7719 Washington, DC 20407

Desired Response Date:

May 11, 2009

When complete, the information on this form is SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION (41 U.S.C. 423) and shall be protected accordingly.

TO BE COMPLETED BY D-B CONTRACTOR OFFEROR for U.S. CENSUS BUREAU PROJECT

1. CONTRACTOR’S (DBC MEMBER’S) NAME & ADDRESS:
4. CONTRACT NO.:

5. CONTRACT INITIATION DATE:

6. COMPLETION DATE:

2. OWNER’S NAME AND ADDRESS

7. CONTRACT VALUE $

8. TYPE OF CONTRACT:

3. PROJECT NAME

9. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT’S KEY CHARACTERISTICS:

Please add a continuation page if additional space is necessary.

TO BE COMPLETED BY EVALUATING ORGANIZATION REPRESENTATIVE

10. EVALUATION: :

a. EVALUATOR'S NAME, POSITION DURING PROJECT EXECUTION ( Project Manager/ COR/ Other) AND ORGANIZATION

b. EVALUATOR'S PHONE NUMBER: c. MONTHS PERFORMANCE MONITORED BY EVALUATOR:

Please circle the response code for each topic that best reflects your experience with this Contractor.

EX = Exceptional VG = Very Good

S = Satisfactory MG = Marginal

US = Unsatisfactory N/O = Not Observed

A. Quality of Products and Services - Assess the Contractor’s conformance to contract requirements.

EX

VG

S

MG

US

N/O

B. Overall Performance – Assess the Contractor’s overall performance as the General Contractor or Architect/Engineer (as appropriate) for the project.

S

MG

US

C. Schedule – Assess the timeliness of the Contractor against the design or construction schedule of activities (as appropriate).

S

MG

US

D. Technical Requirements – Assess the Contractor’s ability and capacity to fulfill the technical requirements of the contract.

S

MG

US

E. Cost Control – Assess the Contractor’s willingness and ability to manage the contract budget and control costs.

S

MG

US

F. Customer Satisfaction – Assess the Contractor’s responsiveness to customer concerns and “user friendliness” in ROUTINE matters.

S

MG

US

G. Customer Satisfaction – Assess the Contractor’s responsiveness to customer concerns and “user friendliness” in UNEXPECTED DIFFICULTIES.

S

MG

US

H. Repeat Business -- Assess the likelihood that you would want this contractor to perform another contract for you in the near future.

S

MG

US

N/O

I. List Contractor’s Weak Points:

J. List the Contractor’s Strong Points:

K. List any other projects this contractor has completed for you:

If an Award Fee contract, what was the average Award Fee % earned?

ATTACHMENT 1: ORGANIZATION'S PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

CONTINUATION SHEET

ATTACHMENT 2: INDIVIDUAL’S PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Your assistance is requested in support of a source selection.

Please complete this Questionnaire and mail or send by facsimile [FAX (202)401-6075] to:

Bonnie Echoles, Contracting Officer

GSA, NCR, ROB (WPP)

301 7th Streets, SW; Room 7719 Washington, DC 20407

Desired Response Date:

May 11, 2009

When complete, the information on this form is SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION (41 U.S.C. 423) and shall be protected accordingly.

TO BE COMPLETED BY D-B CONTRACTOR OFFEROR for U.S. CENSUS BUREAU PROJECT

1. INDIVIDUAL’S NAME, COMPANY & DBC NAME:
4. CONTRACT NO.:

5. CONTRACT INITIATION DATE:

6. COMPLETION DATE:

2. OWNER’S NAME AND ADDRESS

7. CONTRACT VALUE $

8. TYPE OF CONTRACT:

3. PROJECT NAME

9. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT’S KEY CHARACTERISTICS:

Please add a continuation page if additional space is necessary.

TO BE COMPLETED BY EVALUATING ORGANIZATION REPRESENTATIVE

10. EVALUATION: a. EVALUATOR'S NAME, POSITION DURING PROJECT EXECUTION ( Project Manager/ COR/ Other) AND ORGANIZATION:

b. EVALUATOR'S PHONE NUMBER: c. MONTHS PERFORMANCE MONITORED BY EVALUATOR:

Please circle the response code for each topic that best reflects your experience with this Individual.

EX = Exceptional VG = Very Good

S = Satisfactory MG = Marginal

US = Unsatisfactory N/O = Not Observed

A. Quality of Products and Services - Assess the Individual’s performance in assuring conformance to contract requirements.

S

MG

US

B. Overall Performance – Assess the Individual’s overall performance on the project.

S

MG

US

C. Initiative – Assess the Individual’s use of initiative to avoid problems and to respond to problems.

S

MG

US

D. Technical Requirements – Assess the Individual’s knowledge and ability to fulfill the technical requirements of the contract.

S

MG

US

E. Cost Control – Assess the Individual’s ability and willingness to manage the contract budget and control costs.

S

MG

US

F. Customer Satisfaction – Assess the Individual’s responsiveness to customer concerns and “user friendliness” in ROUTINE matters.

S

MG

US

N/O

G. Customer Satisfaction – Assess the Individual’s responsiveness to customer concerns and “user friendliness” in UNEXPECTED difficulties.

EX

VG

S

MG

US

H. Repeat Business – Assess the likelihood you would be willing to have this Individual work on another of your projects in the future.

S

MG

US

If an Award Fee contract, what was the average Award Fee % earned?

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .