GRANT ADMINISTRATION Scoring Sheet.pdf
PDF 200 KB Posted
- Attached to
- RFP- GRANT ADMINISTRATION State and local contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- PE-66397-NONST-2026-000000013
- Issued by
- Talbot County, Georgia
About this file
This document is a Request for Proposal (RFP) Rating Score Sheet for Grant Administration services, likely related to Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) programs. The evaluation criteria assess potential consultants across six key areas: knowledge of CDBG guidelines, organizational capacity to complete the scope of work, past performance, project administration experience, current workload, and fee structure. Each criterion is scored on a 0-2 point scale, with 2 representing the highest level of competence or value.
The scoring mechanism provides a comprehensive framework for evaluating grant administration consultants, with points awarded for experience (years working with CDBG and federal programs), ability to manage project scope, reference quality, prior project completions, workload management, and cost-effectiveness. The document includes blank spaces for recording the consultant's contact information, firm details, name, and date of review, suggesting it is a standardized evaluation tool used to systematically compare and rate potential grant administration service providers.
View the file
Other files for this state and local contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Grant Administration statement of qualificati.docx | DOCX document | |
| Section 3 Solicitation Package.pdf | ||
| Grant Administration RFP.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
GRANT ADMINISTRATION
RATINGS CRITERION
RFP Rating Score Sheet
Consultant’s knowledge of CDBG guidelines and regulations. Years of experience
0 No Experience.
1 One to five years of combined experience with CDBG and other federal programs.
2 Six or more years of combined experience with CDBG and other federal programs.
Capacity to complete scope of work.
0 Concerns administrator does not have organizational capacity to complete scope of work
1 Administrator has average organizational capacity to complete scope of work
2 Administrator has exceptional organizational capacity to complete scope of work
Consultant’s past performance. Check references.
0 Reference information is incomplete.
1 Three or less References are listed, with average recommendations
2 More than three references are listed, with strong recommendations
Consultant’s experience in administration of this type of project.
0 Administrator has not completed a project of this type.
1 Administrator has completed one to five projects of this type.
2 Administrator has successfully completed six or more projects of this type.
Consultant’s current workload.
0 Administrator has more work than they can handle.
1 Administrator has some difficulty managing their current work load.
2 Administrator has demonstrated they can handle their projected work load.
Consultant’s fee $______________________.
0 Fees are high, services do not appear to be a good value for the dollar.
1 Fee is normal, services do not appear to be a good value for the dollar.
2 Fee is normal, services appear to be a good value for the dollar.
Contact: ____________________________________ Name of Firm: _______________________________ Firm Address: ________________________________
Name: __________________________________________
Date of Review: ___________________________________
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .