GRANT ADMINISTRATION Scoring Sheet.pdf
PDF 200 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- PE-60120-NONST-2024-000000001
- Issued by
- Appling County, Georgia
About this file
This document is a Grant Administration Scoring Sheet for a CDBG (Community Development Block Grant) program. It outlines the rating criteria used to evaluate consultants' qualifications for grant administration services. The key criteria include the consultant's knowledge of CDBG guidelines and regulations, capacity to complete the scope of work, past performance, experience in administering similar projects, current workload, and the reasonableness of their proposed fees. Each criterion is scored on a scale of 0-2, with higher scores indicating greater qualifications. The scoring sheet also includes sections for the reviewer to provide contact information, the name of the firm being evaluated, and the date of the review.
The document does not provide any details about a specific contract opportunity, but rather serves as a general template for evaluating consultants' qualifications for CDBG grant administration services. There are no details provided about project scope, quantities, response deadlines, award dates, contract terms, or funding sources.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Grant Administration statement of qualificati.pdf | ||
| Umbrella RFP _ Admin.docx | DOCX document | |
| Section 3 Solicitation Package.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
GRANT ADMINISTRATION
RATINGS CRITERION
RFP Rating Score Sheet
Consultant’s knowledge of CDBG guidelines and regulations. Years of experience
0 No Experience.
1 One to five years of combined experience with CDBG and other federal programs.
2 Six or more years of combined experience with CDBG and other federal programs.
Capacity to complete scope of work.
0 Concerns administrator does not have organizational capacity to complete scope of work
1 Administrator has average organizational capacity to complete scope of work
2 Administrator has exceptional organizational capacity to complete scope of work
Consultant’s past performance. Check references.
0 Reference information is incomplete.
1 Three or less References are listed, with average recommendations
2 More than three references are listed, with strong recommendations
Consultant’s experience in administration of this type of project.
0 Administrator has not completed a project of this type.
1 Administrator has completed one to five projects of this type.
2 Administrator has successfully completed six or more projects of this type.
Consultant’s current workload.
0 Administrator has more work than they can handle.
1 Administrator has some difficulty managing their current work load.
2 Administrator has demonstrated they can handle their projected work load.
Consultant’s fee $______________________.
0 Fees are high, services do not appear to be a good value for the dollar.
1 Fee is normal, services do not appear to be a good value for the dollar.
2 Fee is normal, services appear to be a good value for the dollar.
Contact: ____________________________________ Name of Firm: _______________________________ Firm Address: ________________________________
Name: __________________________________________
Date of Review: ___________________________________
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .