GRANT ADMINISTRATION Scoring Sheet.pdf
PDF 200 KB Posted
- Attached to
- CDBG Grant Writing and Administration
- Solicitation number
- PE-60350-NONST-2026-000000014
- Issued by
- Baldwin County, Georgia
About this file
This is a Grant Administration Ratings Criterion scoring sheet for evaluating consultants responding to the City of Alma, Georgia's request for CDBG Grant Writing and Administration services. The scoring sheet establishes evaluation criteria across six key dimensions: consultant knowledge of CDBG guidelines and regulations (scored 0-2 based on years of experience with federal programs), organizational capacity to complete the scope of work (0-2 scale), past performance verified through reference checks (0-2 based on quantity and quality of references), experience administering similar project types (0-2 based on number of successfully completed projects), current workload capacity (0-2 scale), and consultant fees relative to service value (0-2 scale). Each criterion allows evaluators to assign a score from 0 to 2, with narrative descriptors guiding the assessment. The sheet includes fields for recording contact information, firm name and address, evaluator name, and date of review.
The CDBG Grant Writing and Administration project seeks qualified consultants to provide comprehensive grant administration services including grant application preparation, environmental review records, draw and disbursement requests, financial administration and record keeping, public hearing coordination, URA-related acquisition assistance, bid document preparation and advertising, Davis-Bacon wage compliance and labor requirements monitoring, Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing requirements assistance, and close-out documentation. All contracts are subject to Federal and State provisions prescribed by the Georgia Department of Community Affairs and other federal agencies, and the project falls under Section 3 of the HUD Act of 1968, with Section 3 Business Concerns encouraged to apply.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Statement of Qualifications _ Admin.pdf | ||
| Grant Administration RFQ Notice.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
GRANT ADMINISTRATION
RATINGS CRITERION
RFP Rating Score Sheet
Consultant’s knowledge of CDBG guidelines and regulations. Years of experience
0 No Experience.
1 One to five years of combined experience with CDBG and other federal programs.
2 Six or more years of combined experience with CDBG and other federal programs.
Capacity to complete scope of work.
0 Concerns administrator does not have organizational capacity to complete scope of work
1 Administrator has average organizational capacity to complete scope of work
2 Administrator has exceptional organizational capacity to complete scope of work
Consultant’s past performance. Check references.
0 Reference information is incomplete.
1 Three or less References are listed, with average recommendations
2 More than three references are listed, with strong recommendations
Consultant’s experience in administration of this type of project.
0 Administrator has not completed a project of this type.
1 Administrator has completed one to five projects of this type.
2 Administrator has successfully completed six or more projects of this type.
Consultant’s current workload.
0 Administrator has more work than they can handle.
1 Administrator has some difficulty managing their current work load.
2 Administrator has demonstrated they can handle their projected work load.
Consultant’s fee $______________________.
0 Fees are high, services do not appear to be a good value for the dollar.
1 Fee is normal, services do not appear to be a good value for the dollar.
2 Fee is normal, services appear to be a good value for the dollar.
Contact: ____________________________________ Name of Firm: _______________________________ Firm Address: ________________________________
Name: __________________________________________
Date of Review: ___________________________________
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .