Attachment_F_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.doc

SUBMIT TO CLIENT REFERENCES FOR PAST PERFORMANCE

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT'S TECHNICAL MANAGER, CONTRACTING OFFICER REPRESENTATIVE (COR) or CONTRACTING OFFICER (CO) Please forward completed Past Performance Questionnaire to Kris Murray, Contracting Officer, at kmurray@usgs.gov. Please ensure delivery no later than close of business on October 15, 2015.

____ Fixed-Price

____ Cost-Reimbursement

____ Other (Please Specify) ____________________

5. Client / Agency Name:

Address:

6. Client / Agency Point of Contact:

Name:

Title:

Phone:

E-mail Address:

9. Title of Project:

10. Please describe the work that was accomplished focusing on the scope and complexity of the work:

Definitions for the Past Performance ratings to be assessed:

O

OUTSTANDING

· Performance exceeds many of the contract requirements to the Government’s benefit.

· Contract performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

· Based on the contractor’s performance record, no doubt exists that the contractor will successfully perform the required effort.

V

VERY GOOD

· Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit.

· Contract performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

· Based on the contractor’s performance record, little doubt exists that the contractor will successfully perform the required effort.

S

SATISFACTORY

· Performance meets contractual requirements.

· Contract performance contains some minor problems for which proposed corrective actions taken by the contractor appear satisfactory, or completed corrective actions were satisfactory.

· Based on the contractor’s performance record, some doubt exists that the contractor will successfully perform the required effort.

M

MARGINAL

· Performance does not meet some contractual requirements.

· Contract performance reflects serious problems for which the contractor has submitted minimal corrective actions, if any. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

· Based on the contractor’s performance record, substantial doubt exists that the contractor will successfully perform the required effort.

U

UNSATISFACTORY

· Performance does not meet contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely or cost effective manner.

· Contract performance reflects serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

· Based on the contractor’s performance record, extreme doubt exists that the contractor will successfully perform the required effort.

N

NEUTRAL

· No performance record identifiable; unknown performance.

The questions on the questionnaire shall be rated in accordance with the definitions provided. Supporting comments are highly encouraged as applicable. Any unsatisfactory or marginal rating should be supplemented with an explanation in the space provided.

QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE

1. Rate the contractor’s compliance with contractual terms and conditions.

O V S M U N

2. The contractor exhibited technical excellence which enhanced the quality of the end O V S M U N product or service.

3. Any defects or discrepancies identified before acceptance were resolved in a highly O V S M U N effective and quality manner by the contractor.

4. Overall rating of quality of product or service.

O V S M U N

COMMENTS:

SCHEDULE

1. Delivery of product or service was within time period specified in the contract.

O V S M U N

2. Contractor tracked interim milestones and coordinated progress with client.

3. Overall rating of contractor conformance to schedule.

BUSINESS RELATIONS

1. Rate the working relationship between contractor’s management and your contract, O V S M U N personnel to include contract administration and technical representatives.

2. To what extent were the reports required by the contract timely, in compliance with O V S M U N contract requirements, and accurate?

3. Rate the contractor’s responsiveness to questions of compliance or quality during O V S M U N contract performance.

4. Overall rating of contractor’s business relations.

MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL

1. Rate the contractor’s ability to select, retain, support, and replace key personnel.

O V S M U N

2. Rate the working relationship between contractor’s key personnel and your

O V S M U N contract personnel, to include contract administration and technical representatives.

3. Rate the contractor’s ability to effectively manage subcontractor compliance and O V S M U N performance.

COMMENTS:

If given the opportunity, would you award another contract to this contractor?

_______Wouldn’t hesitate to award another contract to this contractor.

Would most likely award another contract to this contractor.

Would hesitate to award another contract to this contractor, but would do so if no better alternative existed.

Do not want to award another contract to this contractor, would search diligently for a better alternative.

Would not award another contract to this contractor, whether or not a better alternative existed.

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

G14PS000

Attachment H Past Performance Questionnaire

G15PS00850

Attachment F Past Performance Questionnaire