FY23_CZ_CSE Exhibits.docx

DOCX document 5 MB Posted

Attached to
MBR-Brush Creek/Hayden Ranger District- CONT Common Stand Exam
Solicitation number
1240LP23Q0052
Issued by

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Questions and Answers.docx DOCX document
FY23_CZ _CSE_PWS.pdf PDF
1240LP23Q0052-CZ CSE-Draft.pdf PDF
WD-WY 1979-0948 rev 65 date 02-09-23.pdf PDF
WD-CO 1976-1351 rev 68 date 12-27-22.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Exhibit 1 – Maps Exhibit 1a- Vicinity Map

Exhibit 1b- Project Area Maps

1240LP22Q0030

FY23 CZ Common Stand Exam (CSE)

Exhibit 2 – Sample Design Specifications

The following specifies the sample design to be used. The contractor will need to include the sample design with each stand.

Sample Design

REGION: 02_ PROC. FOREST: 06 _ DISTRICT: 02/05_ LOCATION: ____ STAND NO.___________

Form

Sample Selection Method

XXX

Sample Expansion Factor

XXXXX.X

Starting Azimuth

XXX

Subpop.

Filter

XXXXXXXX

Selection Criteria Number

XX

Subpop.

Variable

XXX

Subpop.

Minimum Value

XXXX.X

Subpop.

Maximum Value

XXXX.X

TREE
BAF
XX*
LIVE
1
DBH
5.0
999.9
LIVE
2
DRC
5.0
999.9
DEAD
3
DBH
5.0
999.9
DEAD
4
DRC
5.0
999.9
TREE
FRQ
100
LIVE
5
DBH
0.1
4.9
LIVE
6
HGT
0.5
4.4
LIVE
7
DRC
0.1
4.9
DEAD
8
DBH
1.0
4.9
DEAD
9
DRC
1.0
4.9

1. Using a 20/30 BAF, sample all standing trees, both live and dead, 5.0” DBH/DRC and larger. Appropriate values shall be entered by the contractor to achieve an average of 5 large trees per plot.

2. Using a 100-acre plot, sample DBH of live and dead trees between 0.1” and 4.9” DBH or DBH of live and dead trees between 0.5’ and 4.4’ in height, and sample DRC live and dead trees between 0.1” and 4.9” DRC.

Exhibit 3 – CSE Sample Data Forms Exhibit 3a - Setting Form

Project Name:_________________________________________________________(25 characters total)

Region*

XX

Proc.

Forest*

District*

Location*

XXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Stand # *

XXXX

Owner

State

County

XXX

Admin.

Forest

XX

Admin.

Region

Date*

MM/DD/YYYY

Photo ID

XXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Exam Level*

XXXX

Exam Purpose

Stratum

XXXXXX

Exist. Veg. Ref.

XXXX

Existing Vegetation

XXXX

Potential Veg. Ref

XXX

Potential Vegetation

XXXXXXXX

Structure

Capable Growing

Fuel Model

Elevation

XXXXX

Aspect

Slope

Slope Position

Acres

Radial Growth Interval

XX

Radial Growth Interval 2

XX

Height Growth Interval

Fuel Photo Reference

Precision Protocol

XXXXXX

Examiner

XXXXXXXXXXXX

Remarks (242 characters)

Damage Category

Damage Agent

XXX

Damage Severity

XXX

Species of Management Interest

XXXXXXXX

User Code

Exhibit 3b – Sample Design Form

REGION:__________ PROCLAIMED FOREST:__________ DISTRICT:__________

LOCATION:_______________ STAND NO.:_______________

Sample Selection Method*

XXX

Sample Expansion Factor*

XXXXX.X

Starting Azimuth

XXX

Subpop. Filter

XXXXXXXX

Selection Criteria Number*

XX

Subpop. Variable

XXX

Subpop. Min. Value

XXXX.XX

Subpop. Max. Value

XXXX.XX

Sample Design Remarks: (242 characters)

Exhibit 3c – Plot Data Form

REGION:________ PROC. FOREST:________ DISTRICT:________ LOCATION:____________________ STAND NUMBER:________

Plot # *

Lat.

DDDMMSS

Long.

DDDMMSS

Cap Grow Area

Asp

Slope

Slope Pos.

XX

Slope Horz.

Shape

XX

Slope Vert.

Shape

Elev

XXXXX

Existing Vegetation

XXXXXXXX

Potential Vegetation

XXXXXXXX

Fuel Mod

XX

Residue Desc.

Code

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Dist. Seed Wall

Hist

Hist Date

YYYY

User Code

Plot Remarks (255 Characters)

Exhibit 3d – Tree Data Form

BAF:_____ FIXED PLOT SIZE:_______ MIN. DBH:______ LOCATION:____________________ STAND NUMBER:________

Plot

XXX

Ta g

XXXX

Tree Status

X

Tree Class

XX

Site/

GST

X

Species

XXXXXXXX

Tree Count

XXX

DRC

Stems

XXX

DBH/

DRC

XXX.X

Height

Height to Crown

XXX

Rad Grow

XX

Rad Grow

XX

HGT

Grow

XX.X

Age

Crown Ratio

XXX

Crown Class

XX

Crown Width

XXX

Wildl.

Use

XX

L/S Decay

X

Cone Serotiny

X

Damage Category

XX

Damage Agent

XXX

Tree Part

XX

Damage Severity

XXXXX

Tree Remarks

30 charact

User Code

XXXX

Ttmnt.

Option

X

Chapter 4: Collecting DataUser Guide V1.7
FY23 CZ Stand Exam (CSE)1240LP22Q0030

FY23 CZ Common Stand Exam (CSE)

4-2 05/12/2004 Exhibit 3e – FS FSVEG Spatial Field Data Collection/Verification Form

POLYGON AND SAMPLE INFORMATION

Region Forest District
Location

Polygon

ID

Species Survey Method
Recorder
Previous Cover Type
Stocking Flag

Date

Purpose Code
Horizontal

Diversity Tree Condition Habitat Structural Stage Tree

CROWN

Closure

PHOTO INFORMATION

Photo Project Photo Date

SPECIES/COVER ATTRIBUTES

Life Form/

GSC

Layer (Shrubs & Tree) Species (NRCS TAXA Code) Cover % (Live) Size Class Dead Percent

Remarks **Do not collect remarks for the walk through**

Exhibit 3e (pg. 2) – FS FSVEG Spatial Field Data Collection/Verification Form

Example of Completed Data Form

POLYGON AND SAMPLE INFORMATION

Region Forest District
Location

Polygon

ID

Species Survey Method
Recorder
Previous Cover Type
Stocking Flag
020605
091701
09
CROWN
Bear, Smokey
TPP
Y

Date

Purpose Code
Horizontal

Diversity Tree Condition Habitat Structural Stage Tree

CROWN

Closure

06/01/2022
WV
C
A
NA
10

PHOTO INFORMATION

Photo Project Photo Date

NAIP 2009
06/01/2009

SPECIES/COVER ATTRIBUTES

Life Form/

GSC

Layer (Shrubs & Tree) Species (NRCS TAXA Code) Cover % (Live) Size Class Dead Percent

T
1
PIPO
10
V
T
2
PIPO
10
E
S
1
QUGA
25
M
S
2
QUGA
10
S
S
2
QUGA
10
S
S
3
MARE11
10
S

F

GRA
15

BS

Remarks **Do not collect remarks for the walk through**

Exhibit 4 – Inspection Forms Exhibit 4a. Common Stand Exam Inspection Forms with Accuracy Standards- Page 1 of 2

1. PROJECT NAME --- CONTRACT NUMBER

2. FOREST / UNIT Side 1

3. DATE BLOCK RECEIVED

4. DATE BLOCK INSPECTED
5. INSPECTORS

6. NUMBER OF

SETTINGS:

7. NUMBER OF SETTINGS

INSPECTED:

10. L.T. TREE RECORDS INSPECTED:

11. S.T. TREE RECORDS INSPECTED:

12. GSC RECORDS INSPECTED:

13. VEG. RECORDS INSPECTED:

14. DOWN WOODY RECORDS INSPECTED:

8. NUMBER OF

PLOTS:

9. NUMBER OF PLOTS

INSPECTED:

Section B. OFFICE INSPECTION

ACCEPTABLE
UNACCEPTABLE
N/A

1. ALL REQUIRED MATERIALS RETURNED IN GOOD CONDITION

2. CORRECT NUMBER OF PLOTS COMPLETED IN EACH STAND

3. ALL REQUIRED FORMS AND FIELDS COMPLETED AND LEGIBLE

4. MIN. NO. OF SITE/GROWTH TREES COLLECTED FOR EACH SETTING

5. ALL SETTINGS MEET MINIMUM TREE PER PLOT AVERAGES

6. ALL DIGITAL PHOTOS ARE PRESENT AND IN FOCUS/LEGIBLE

7. ELECTRONIC DATA COMPLETE AND ACCEPTABLE

Section C. FIELD INSPECTION

ACCEPTABLE
UNACCEPTABLE
N/A

1. ALL REFERENCE POINTS AND PLOT CENTERS RELOCATABLE

2. ALL PLOT LOCATIONS CORRECT AND UNBIASED

3. ALL STANDS HAVE A PLOT DISTRIBUTION THAT EQUALLY SAMPLES ALL 4PORTIONS OF THE ENTIRE STAND

4. SUFFICIENT ERRORS ACCUMULATE TO INDICATE A DISCREPANCY TREND

5. ALL INFORMATION ON SAMPLE DESIGN FORMS COMPLETE AND CORRECT

6. ALL SETTINGS AND PLOTS HAVE CORRECT SETTING ID

Section D. TOTAL FORM SCORE CALCULATION

1.
Field Verification Polygon Data Form Score
2.
Setting Form Score
3.
Sample Design Form Score
4.
Plot Form Score
5.
Total Tree Form Score
6.
Ground Surface Cover Form Score
7.
Vegetation Composition Form Score
8.
Downed Woody Form Score
9.
TOTAL SCORE (sum of all scores)

OFFICE AND FIELD INSPECTION

-- ANY UNACCEPTABLE ITEM FAILS INSPECTION BLOCK

INSPECTION BLOCK

TOTAL FORM SCORE CALCULATION

All form scores < 5.0 and Total Score < 10.0
= pass (full payment)

PASS

Any Form >= 5.0
= rework forms that fail for entire inspection block
Total Score >= 10.0
= rework all forms for entire inspection block

FAIL

Errors in any field that has a Point Value of "unacceptable" will fail the block

INSPECTION CREW SIGNATURES:

DATE

DATE

COMMENTS AND FOLLOW-UP ACTION on side 2

Exhibit 4a – Common Stand Exam Inspection Forms with Accuracy Standards- Page 2 of 2 COMMON STAND EXAM INSPECTION FORM side 2

POINTS INSPECTED

LOCATION/WATERSHED ALIAS)
STAND
PLOT NUMBERS

COMMENTS -- OFFICE EDIT:

COMMENTS -- FIELD INSPECTIONS:

FOLLOW-UP ACTION:

Exhibit 4b – Setting Inspection Form

SETTING INSPECTION FORM

A
B
C
FIELD NUM
NAME
ACCURACY STANDARD
POINT VALUE
# OF ERRORS
DEDUCTION (A X B)
1
Region
no errors
unacceptable
2
Proclaimed Forest
no errors
unacceptable
3
District
no errors
unacceptable
4
Location/Watsershed Alias
no errors
unacceptable
5
Stand Number
no errors
unacceptable
6
Ownership
no errors
unacceptable
7
State
no errors
unacceptable
8
County
no errors
unacceptable
9
Administrative Forest
no errors
unacceptable
10
Date
no errors
2
11
Photo ID
no errors
1
12
Exam Level
no errors
unacceptable
13
Exam Purpose
no errors
unacceptable
14
Stratum
no errors
2
15
Existing Veg
no errors
5
16
Potential Veg Reference
no errors
unacceptable
17
Potential Veg
+/- phase
20
18
Structure
no errors
2
19
Cap. Growing Area %
+/- 10 units
1
20
Fuel Model
no errors
2
21
Elevation
+/- 2 contour intervals
3
22
Aspect
+/- 45 degrees
3
23
Slope
+/- 10 units
2
24
Slope Position
+/- 1 class
2
25
Acres
no errors
unacceptable
26
Radial Growth Interval
no errors
unacceptable
27
Radial Growth Interval #2
no errors
unacceptable
28
Height Growth Interval
no errors
unacceptable
29
Fuel Photo Reference
no errors
unacceptable
30
Precision Protocol
no errors
unacceptable
31
Examiner
no errors
1
32
Setting Remarks
complete and accurate
5
33
Damage Category
no errors
2
34
Damage Agent
no errors
1
35
Damage Severity
no errors
1
36
Species of Mgt. Interest
no errors
1
37
Sketch Map & Traverse Notes
complete and accurate
10

Total Deductions (sum of Col ‘C’)

D

Number of Stands Inspected

E

Setting Form Score (D / E)

F

Exhibit 4c – Sample Design Inspection Form

SAMPLE DESIGN INSPECTION FORM

A
B
C
FIELD NUM
NAME
ACCURACY STANDARD
POINT VALUE
# OF ERRORS
DEDUCTION (A X B)
1
Selection Method Type
no errors
unacceptable
2
Sample Expansion Factor
no errors
unacceptable
3
Starting Azimuth
no errors
7
4
Points Installed
no errors
unacceptable
5
Subpop Filter
no errors
unacceptable
6
Sample/Select Remarks
complete and accurate
5
7
Selection Criteria
no errors
unacceptable
8
Subpop Variable
no errors
unacceptable
9
Subpop Min Value
no errors
unacceptable
10
Subpop Max Value
no errors
unacceptable

Total Deductions (sum of column 'C')

D

Number of Stands Inspected

E

Sample Design Form Score (D / E)

F

Exhibit 4d – Plot Inspection Form

PLOT INSPECTION FORM

A
B
C
FIELD NUM
NAME
ACCURACY STANDARD
POINT VALUE
# OF ERRORS
DEDUCTION (A X B)
1
Plot Number
no errors
unacceptable
2
Plot Latitude
no errors
unacceptable
3
Plot Longitude
no errors
unacceptable
4
Cap. Growing Area %
+/- 10 %
2
5
Plot Aspect
+/- 45 degrees
6
6
Plot Slope %
+/- 10 units
6
7
Slope Position
+/- 1 class
6
8
Slope Horizontal Shape
+/- 1 class
2
9
Slope Vertical Shape
+/- 1 class
2
10
Elevation
+/- 2 contour intervals
6
11
Existing Veg
no errors
10
12
Potential Veg
no errors
10
13
Plot History
no errors
6
14
Plot History Date
1)
2
15
Fuel Model
no errors
2
16
Residue Descriptive Code
no errors
2
17
Distance to Seed Wall
no errors
2
18
Remarks
complete and accurate
10

Total Deductions (sum of column 'C')

D

Number of Plots Inspected

E

Plot Form Score (D / E)

F

1) Year required if field #13 is other than code 10 or blank

Exhibit 4e -Tree Inspection Form (1 of 2 pages)

SAMPLE PLOT for LARGE TREES (L.T.) -- Variable Radius

A
B
C
FIELD NUM
NAME
ACCURACY STANDARD
POINT VALUE
# OF ERRORS
DEDUCTION (A X B)
1
Plot Number
no errors
unacceptable
2
Tag ID Number
no errors
10
3
Tree Status
no errors
50
4
Tree Class
no errors
2
5
Site Tree/GST - field correct
no errors
50
5
Site Tree -- Selection
no errors
20
6
Tree Species
no errors
50
7
Tree Count (live/dead)
1)
75
7
Tree Count (stumps/down)
2)
20
8
Number of Stems
no errors for DRC species
2
9
DBH/DRC
3)
17
10
Tree Height
4)
10
11
Height to Crown
+/- 10 %
2
12
Radial Growth
+/- 1/20 inch
5
13
Radial Growth #2
+/- 1/20 inch
5
14
Height Growth
+/- 1 foot
5
15
Tree Age
+/- 10 %
10
16
Crown Ratio
+/- 10 units
5
17
Crown Class
no errors
5
18
Crown Width
+/- 20%
5
19
Wildlife Use
no errors
2
20
Log/Snag Decay
no errors
5
21
Cone Serotiny
no errors for PICO, PIBA
5
22
Damage Category
no errors
10
23
Damage Agent
no errors
2
24
Damage Part
no errors
2
25
Damage Severity
no errors
5
26
User Defined (Age Class)
no errors
2
27
Tree Remarks
complete and accurate
10

L.T. Deductions (sum of column 'C')

D

L.T. Tree Records Inspected

E

L.T. Sample Score (D / E)

F

1)Tree Count

2) Tree Count (stumps/down) Accuracy Standard

Intensive/Extensive Exam
no errors

All Exam Levels

Quick Plot
+/1 tree

Stumps/Down

1 - 5
No Errors

3) DBH/DRC Accuracy Standards

6 - 10
+/- 1 tree

Intensive/Extensive Exam Levels

>= 11
+/- 3 trees
a.
subpop min value to 13.9 inches
+/- 0.1 inch
4) Height
b.
14.0 inches to 23.9 inches
+/- 0.2 inch
All Exam Levels
c.
24.0 inches - 34.9 inches
+/- 0.3 inch
Site Trees
+/- 3%
d.
> 35.0 inches
+/- 0.5 inch
GST
+/- 10%
e.
Borderline variable plot trees
+/- 0.1 inch
All other
+/- 10%

Quick Plot

a.
All Trees
+/- 1.0 inch

(for the purpose of determining trees in or out)

SAMPLE PLOT for SMALL TREES (S.T.) -- Fixed Area Plot

A
B
C
FIELD NUM
NAME
ACCURACY STANDARD
POINT VALUE
# OF ERRORS
DEDUCTION (A X B)
1
Plot Number
no errors
unacceptable
2
Tag ID Number
no errors
10
3
Tree Status
no errors
20
4
Tree Class
no errors
2
5
Site Tree/GST - field correct
no errors
10
6
Tree Species
no errors
10
7
Tree Count
1)
20
8
Number of Stems
no errors for DRC species
2
9
DBH/DRC
2)
10
10
Tree Height
+/- 10 %
10
11
Height to Crown
+/- 10 %
2
12
Radial Growth
+/- 1/20 inch
5
13
Radial Growth #2
+/- 1/20 inch
5
14
Height Growth
Height > 6 ft +/- 1.0 foot
5

Height <= 6 ft+/- 0.1 foot

15
Tree Age
+/- 10 %
10
16
Crown Ratio
+/- 10 units
5
17
Crown Class
no errors
5
18
Crown Width
+/- 20%
5
19
Wildlife Use
no errors
2
20
Log/Snag Decay
no errors
5
21
Cone Serotiny
no errors for PICO, PIBA
5
22
Damage Category
no errors
10
23
Damage Agent
no errors
2
24
Damage Part
no errors
2
25
Damage Severity
+/- 10 % or +/- 1 class
5
26
User Defined (Age Class)
no errors
2
27
Tree Remarks
complete and accurate
10

S.T. Deductions (sum of column 'C')

D

S.T. Tree Records Inspected

E

S.T. Sample Score (D / E)

F

Total Tree Form Score
(Sum of L.T. score and S.T. score)
(ST)
+ (LT)

1) Tree Count Accuracy Stds:

All Exam Levels

2) DBH/DRC Accuracy Standards:

Height
Diameter
Actual Trees
Accuracy
Intensive/Extensive Exam Level
Range/Grouping
Range/Grouping
On Plot
Standard
a.
< 0.5 inch
no errors
*All
All
0
0 trees
b.
0.5 inch to subpop max
+/- 0.1 inch

*If non-stocked and tree is recorded, this is an error.

< 0.5 feet

1 - 5
+/- 2 trees
c.
Estimated DRC
+/- 1.0 inch

< 0.5 feet

>= 6
+/- 50%

>= 0.5 feet - <4.5 feet

1 - 5
+/- 1 tree

>= 0.5 feet - <4.5 feet

>= 6
+/- 20%
All
0.1" - subpop max dbh/drc
1 - 5
+/- 1 tree
All
0.1" - subpop max dbh/drc
>= 6
+/- 10%

Exhibit 4f - R2 FSVEG Spatial Polygon Vegetation Attributes Inspection Form

INSPECTION FORM WITH ACCURACY STANDARDS

A
B
C
FIELD NUM
NAME
ACCURACY STANDARD
POINT VALUE
# OF ERRORS
DEDUCTION (A X B)
1
Region, Forest, District
no errors
unacceptable
2
Location
no errors
unacceptable
3
Polygon ID
no errors
unacceptable
4
Survey Method
no errors
10
5
Recorder Name
no errors
3
6
EV Regen/Prev Trees
no errors
10
7
Stocking Flag
no errors
10
8
Survey Date
no errors
6
9
Purpose Code
no errors
unacceptable
10
Horizontal Diversity
no errors
6
11
Tree Condition
no errors
6
13
Tree Crown Closure
+/- 20%
10
14
Photo Project
no errors
3
15
Photo Date
no errors
3
16
Lifeform/GSC
no errors
10
17
Layer
no errors
3
18
Species
no errors
10
19
Percent Cover
+/- 20%
6
20
Size Class
no errors
6
21
Percent Dead
+/- 20%
6

Total Deductions (sum of column 'C')

D

Number of Polygons Inspected

E

Polygon Attribute Form Score (D / E)

F

Exhibit 5 – Site Specific List by Location

This form will be provided at the Prework Meeting

Differences between site specific lists and maps: the site specific list will govern. If the map shows more plots than the list, discussion on selecting the plots will be held at the prework meeting or when/if the inconsistency arises. Or for further determination, contact the CO for clarification.

**Example List:

SETTING_ID
LOCATION
POLY_ID
ACRES
Plot_Num
X
Y
020605UL06050037
UL0605
37
33.12
1
404654
4577681
020605UL06050037
UL0605
37
33.12
2
404671
4577866
020605UL06050026
UL0605
26
35.88
1
405641
4577957
020605UL06050026
UL0605
26
35.88
2
405680
4578146
020605UL06050101
UL0605
101
28.31
1
405941
4577527
020605UL06050101
UL0605
101
28.31
2
405530
4576864
020605UL06060114
UL0606
114
76.85
1
405573
4580504
020605UL06060114
UL0606
114
76.85
2
405592
4580688

Exhibit 6 - Sketch Map

Project Name:____________________________Location:______________________
Date:_______________Setting:______________

NORTH

Notes :

Exhibit 7 - List of Acceptable Site Tree Species

Scientific Name
Common Name
Symbol
Picea engelmanii
Engelmann Spruce
PIEN
Pinus contorta
Lodgepole pine
PICO
Pinus ponderosa
Ponderosa pine
PIPO
Pseudotsuga menziesii
Douglas-fir
PSME

Exhibit 8 – Performance-Based Payment Certificate

PERFORMANCE BASED PAYMENT CERTIFICATION

Page of

Unit (Region, Forest, District)
Project:
Contract No.
Name and Address of Contractor:
Invoice No.
Invoice Date:

I hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that –

1. The amounts requested are only for performance in accordance with the specifications, terms, and conditions of the contract;

1. Payment to subcontractors and suppliers have been made from previous payments received under the contract, and timely payments will be made from the proceeds of the payment covered by this certification, in accordance with subcontract agreements and the requirements of chapter 39 of Title 31, United States Code; and

1. This request for progress payments does not include any amounts, which the prime contractor intends to withhold or retain from a subcontractor or supplier in accordance with the terms and conditions of the subcontract.

(Signature)

(Typed Name)

(Title)

(Date) image3.jpeg image4.jpg image5.jpg image6.jpg image1.jpg image2.jpeg

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .