FP Logic Model Template and How to Guide (Countering FTO Illicit Mining).docx
DOCX document 66 KB Posted
- Opportunity number
- DFOP0018686
About this file
This file is a logic model template and how-to guide designed to assist applicants and grantees in developing comprehensive logic models for counterterrorism programs funded by the Department of State Bureau of Counterterrorism. The guide explains the required components of a logic model as mandated by 18 FAM 301.4-2, which stipulates that every program must create a logic model articulating how the program will contribute to achieving stated counterterrorism outcomes. The document defines six key components: Inputs (resources needed such as staff, equipment, and facilities), Activities (actions undertaken to meet needs, including trainings, meetings, and equipment provision), Outputs (direct products and tangible results such as participants trained and curricula completed), CT Outcomes (expected changes already specified in the Notice of Funding Opportunity), Objectives and Goals (also pre-written in the NOFO and incorporated into proposals and Statements of Work), and Assumptions (factors and conditions necessary for program success). The guide emphasizes that goals and objectives should be drawn from high-level strategies including the National Security Strategy, Agency Strategic Plan 2026-2030, and relevant Executive Orders.
The document provides a template structure organized in columns for inputs, activities, outputs, outcomes, objectives, and goals, followed by sections for assumptions and theory of change. An illustrative example demonstrates how a logic model functions for a prosecutions-focused counterterrorism program, showing the logical flow from providing training and technical assistance through developing curricula and conducting mentoring to achieving outcomes related to adoption of U.S.-approved legal standards and strengthening prosecution of Foreign Terrorist Organizations. The theory of change in the example uses an "if-then" framework, stating that improved investigative and prosecutorial abilities under a strengthened legal framework will increase successful terrorist convictions. This template serves as a reference tool for applicants to the Countering Foreign Terrorist Organization Use of Illicit Mining initiative and other Global Counterterrorism Programs (CFDA 19.701).
Logic Model
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| NOFO_Illicit Mining.PDF | ||
| Q & A for Applicants.pdf | ||
| FP PMP Template & How To Guide (Countering FTO Illicit Mining).docx | DOCX document | |
| FP CT PITT Template (Countering FTO Illicit Mining).xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| FP Budget Template (Countering FTO Illicit Mining).xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Logic Model How-To Guide This How-To Guide is designed to help CT grant applicants and grantees develop and refine logic models and theories of change. 18 FAM 301.4-2 requires every program to create a logic model to articulate how and why the program is expected to contribute to achieving the stated CT program outcomes.
The logic model documents expected linkages between program inputs, activities, outputs, and outcomes, and sets the foundation against which progress can be monitored and evaluated. It is a visual representation that maps and shows the sequence of related events connecting planned goals and objectives with desired outcomes.
This visual “map” depicts the logical relationships between the need for the program, the resources (inputs), and activities that will address those needs, what will be produced or delivered or who will be trained from these activities (outputs), and the changes/achievements deriving from these outputs (outcomes).
The logic model has several components, which are described below:
I. Logic Model: Components/Examples
| Component |
| Explanation |
| Examples |
Inputs What are the resources you need to carry out the program?
| The resources you will need to carry out the program activities and deliverables. |
| · Staff |
· Equipment
· Facilities
Activities What activities will be conducted to meet the needs or address the problem?
An action or process undertaken over a specific period by an organization. Activities convert inputs (resources) to products or services to achieve outputs and outcomes.
· Trainings
· Meetings
· Provision of equipment
Outputs What will be produced or delivered or who will participate in activities?
| Direct products, services, equipment or other tangible results produced as a result of the activities. |
| · Participants |
· Trainings completed
· Curricula completed
· Equipment delivered
CT Outcomes What changes do we expect the program to achieve?
| The outcomes for this program should already be written into the program’s NOFO, and applicants should incorporate these into their proposal and, if the applicant wins the award, into a SOW. Please also copy and paste those into your logic model. |
| See “III. Logic Model: Example” below for illustrative CT outcomes. |
Objectives
The objectives are written into the program’s NOFO, and applicants should incorporate these into their proposal and, if applicant wins the award, into a SOW. Please also copy and paste these into your logic model.
This will already be included in the NOFO, likely pulling from the National Security Strategy, Agency Strategic Plan 2026-2030, National Security Presidential Memorandum (NSPM)-2, Executive Orders, and/or other relevant, high-level strategies.
Goals
The goals should be written into the program’s NOFO, and applicants should incorporate these into their proposal and, if applicant wins the award, into a SOW. Please also copy and paste these into your logic model.
This will already be included in the NOFO, likely pulling from the National Security Strategy, Agency Strategic Plan 2026-2030, National Security Presidential Memorandum (NSPM)-2, Executive Orders, and/or other relevant, high-level strategies.
Assumptions What factors need to occur, or which recipients or grantees need to be involved, for the program to be successful?
| Beliefs that the program and the people involved have about the ways in which the program will work. Assumptions frequently involve: the country’s political, social, economic, and security conditions; skills and knowledge level of intended recipients; organizational expertise; anticipated level of engagement by recipients, etc. If these hypotheses do not hold true, they can affect the progress or success of a program. |
| · Recipients will be motivated to engage in the program activities. |
· Staff will have the necessary skills and knowledge to deliver the program effectively.
· Recipient country organizations will collaborate and support the program.
· Relevant policies and regulations will remain stable throughout the program duration.
| Theory of Change |
| A brief statement that ties a logic model together by summarizing why, based on available evidence and consideration of other possible paths, the changes described in the model are expected to occur. It explains why we believe our program activities will result in particular outcomes. These can be written as “If X (activities), then Y (outcomes).” |
| See “III. Logic Model: Example” below for illustrative CT outcomes. |
U.S Department of State Bureau of Counterterrorism February 2026
II. Logic Model: Template Use the template below to fill in each column to develop the logic model for your program.
Inputs
Activities
Outputs
CT Outcomes
| Objectives |
| Goals |
Which resources will you need to carry out the program?
Which activities will be conducted to meet the needs or address the problem?
What will be produced or delivered or who will participate in activities?
[Add from the NOFO into proposal and, if applicant wins the award, into a SOW]
What are the changes we expect the program to achieve?
[Add from the NOFO into proposal and, if applicant wins the award, into a SOW]
[Add from the NOFO into proposal and, if applicant wins the award, into a SOW]
Assumptions: Which factors need to occur, or which recipients or grantees need to be involved, for the program to be successful?
Theory of Change: Why do we think the particular changes described in our logic model are expected to occur?
III. Logic Model: Example The following is an illustrative example of a logic model intended to provide additional guidance to applicants in preparing their proposals’ logic model. Applicants should therefore view this as a reference tool rather than as a substitute to use in place of developing their own logic model.
Inputs
Activities
Outputs
CT Outcomes
| Objectives |
| Goals |
Staff Equipment Facilities Implementers Training and technical assistance activities are provided.
Needs assessment conducted.
Resident Legal Advisors, Intermittent Legal Advisors provide mentoring to recipient country officials.
Events on prosecutions across recipient country organizations are coordinated.
Priority recipient country officials complete training courses.
A curriculum is developed based on a needs assessment.
Priority recipient country officials complete mentorship.
Prosecutions (CT Standard Outcome) - Outcome 1: Adopt U.S.-approved legal standards and practices enabling the prosecution of Foreign Terrorist Organizations (FTOs) and other terrorist actors that threaten the U.S. homeland, persons, and facilities.
Prosecutions (CT Standard Outcome) – Outcome 2: Protect U.S. citizens and interests by strengthening the prosecution of FTOs and other terrorist actors, consistent with U.S.-approved legal standards and practices.
This will already be included in the NOFO, likely pulling from the National Security Strategy, Agency Strategic Plan 2026-2030, National Security Presidential Memorandum (NSPM)-2, Executive Orders, and/or other relevant, high-level strategies.
This will already be included in the NOFO, likely pulling from the National Security Strategy, Agency Strategic Plan 2026-2030, National Security Presidential Memorandum (NSPM)-2, Executive Orders, and/or other relevant, high-level strategies.
Assumptions:
The threat of terrorism affecting the recipient country and the surrounding region will remain at or near levels experienced at the start of the program.
CT, DoS, and the U.S. government will continue to prioritize CT prosecutions programming.
Recipient country’s political will in support of the program will remain strong.
Theory of Change:
If recipient country officials’ abilities to investigate and prosecute terrorist crimes are improved under a strengthened prosecutions-based legislative framework, then successful conviction of terrorist suspects will increase.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .