FOH Response to Questions.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 15 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- PSCFOH-WHP-PSC336161-Continuation
About this file
The file contains a Sources Sought notice and responses to vendor questions for a Wellness and Health Promotion (WHP) Web Portal Services contract for the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Federal Occupational Health (FOH) is seeking a web-based portal to support health services for federal employees, with capabilities including online health appraisals, fitness center attendance tracking, virtual fitness classes, and personalized health information. The anticipated contract will be a single award for up to five years, covering services for approximately 1.7 million federal employees across 180 health centers and 25 wellness programs nationwide.
Key technical requirements include a contractor-owned/operated (COCO) platform with comprehensive self-management tools, interactive health tracking, and assessment capabilities. The solution must support fitness center membership tracking, usage data collection, and provide customizable health promotion services. Interested vendors must submit a 20-page capability statement by March 31, 2025, at 2:00 PM Eastern Time, detailing their technical approach, staff expertise, past performance, and company information. The government is open to solutions hosted on FedRAMP-authorized cloud platforms and is interested in exploring innovative approaches from small businesses that can meet the specified requirements.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| WHP Web Portal Services RFI Questions-Rvsd.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| FOH_WHP Web Portal DRAFT SOW_Rev 3.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet1
| Wellness and Health Promotion (WHP) Web Portal Services - Sources Sought | ||
| Questions from Interested Vendors | ||
| No. | Question | Response |
| 1 | The WHP Draft SOW indicates approximately 1,000 members use the fitness center attendance tracking tool: | There are now between 2,000-3,000 users of the fitness center attendance tracking tool. |
| 1.a. | Are these fitness centers all internal to the government offices/facilities or do they include commercial fitness centers (e.g., Anytime Fitness, Planet Fitness, etc.)? | These are government fitness centers only in government buildings, managed by Federal Occupational Health. |
| 1.b. | What data is required to be captured by the fitness center attendance tracking tool? | The web tool must track fitness center membership by customer agency (including start date and expiration date), and attendance including fitness center usage by hour, by day, and by month. |
| 1.c. | How is that data currently captured (e.g., is it through a bar code or QR Code scan at the fitness center welcome desk? Entered manually ? From a fitness-center-system data feed? etc.)? | The data captured varies across government sites. The data capatured may include sign in sheets, manual Member ID entry, key fob or card swipe at the fitness center front desk. |
| 2 | Could you provide an updated or correct link for Objective 13: Emphasize Prevention and Healthy Living? The current link appears to direct to a page that cannot be found. (Draft SOW C.2) | This will removed from the draft Statement of Work (SOW). |
| 3 | Could the Government kindly provide some insight into the rationale behind the decision to compete this requirement rather than awarding it back to the incumbent contractor? | The findings of this sources sought will determine if there are sources capable of meeting the requirements. |
| 4 | Is this requirement similar to that being addressed by the current solution? If not, to what degree is this requirement different? | This requirement is similar to the current requirement. |
| 5 | What requirements are lacking in the current solution that the government hopes to address through this new acquisition? Please provide list. | Refer to question #4. |
| 6 | Would the Government consider a solution that is hosted on a FedRAMP authorized cloud service provider (CSP), such as Microsoft Azure Government or AWS GovCloud, as opposed to the solution itself possessing a FedRAMP authorization? This scenario benefits the Government with the platform's pre-vetted security controls, while opening the market to a broader range of small and disadvantaged businesses offering emerging solutions in the market today. | Information Security requirements will be required as stated in section C.4 of the attached draft SOW. |
| 7 | Is the Government interested in learning more about the benefits of engaging with small businesses in terms of innovation, agility, and cost-effective solutions? | Yes, if it aligns with the draft Statement of Work. |
| 8 | Could you please advise on the best way to proceed or whether subcontracting opportunities might be available? | The government is seeking information on Offerors with the capability to meet the requirements in the draft Statement of Work. The Offeror may choose to subcontract if desired to meet the requirements. |
| 9 | Given the recent government freezes, I wanted to confirm whether this initiative is currently on hold or if it is still progressing toward a potential solicitation | The government intends to proceed. |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .