FOA SALINITY Application Worksheet.docx
DOCX document 32 KB Posted
- Opportunity number
- BOR-UC-20-F001
- Issued by
-
Department of the Interior
About this file
Word Version of FOA Salinity Application Worksheet
View the file
Other files
Show all 15
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
BOR-UC-20-F001
Bureau of Reclamation Colorado River Basinwide & Basin States Salinity Control Programs FOA Project Application FOA No. BOR-UC-20-F001
PROJECT NAME
PROJECT LOCATION
Date
APPLICATION TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I – PROJECT SUMMARY
PART II – PROJECT PROPOSED FOR FUNDING PART III – PROJECT COSTS AND FUNDING PLAN APPENDIX A – DETAILED COST ESTIMATE(S)
APPENDIX B – ESTIMATE OF ENABLED ON-FARM ACREAGE APPENDIX C – PROJECT MAPS
APPENDIX D – SUPPLEMENTAL DATA TABLES AND/OR DATA FOR OTHER TYPES OF SALINITY CONTROL (NON-IRRIGATION RELATED)
APPENDIX E – SALT LOAD REDUCTION ESTIMATE(S)
BOR-UC-20-F001
PART I – PROJECT SUMMARY
All information must be entered in the response boxes provided. Where information requested in not applicable enter “NA”.
| A. |
| APPLICANT/ENTITY NAME: |
City/town, State
Response:
| B. |
| PROJECT APPLICATION NAME: |
Response:
| C. |
| PROJECT APPLICATION PREPARED BY: |
Response:
| D. |
| PROJECT MANAGER (must be from Applicant) Contact Information SEE |
FOA SECTION I.V.B.3. PART I:
Name:
Title:
Address:
Telephone:
E-mail:
| E. |
| ENGINEER CONTACT INFORMATION (if applicable): |
Name:
Title:
Address:
Telephone:
E-mail:
| F. |
| Engineering firm for project (if selected) |
Title:
How was this Firm selected – Give details
DUNS #
SAM #
RECLAMATION MAY REMOVE APPLICANT ENGINEER PRIOR TO AWARD & REQUIRE A COMPETITIVE BID PROCESS FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES.
| G. |
| Two or more entities submitting one Application: SEE FOA SECTION III.B |
Entity:
Entity:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) Two or more applicants shall enter into one project agreement, if it combines ditches, laterals etc.
Please submit MOA as an attachment.
| H. |
| ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF FOA AMENDMENTS: Applicants shall acknowledge receipt of any amendment to this Funding Opportunity Announcement by identifying the amendment number and date. |
List Amendment No. and Date:
PART II PROJECT PROPOSED FOR FUNDING
PLEASE REFER TO FOA SECTION V. FOR INFORMATION THAT MUST BE SUMMITTED IN THE APPLICATION FOR THE HIGHEST RANKING – THE SECTIONS LINKED BELOW WILL ALSO HELP PREPARE APPLICATION
Provide a brief narrative or tabular data responding to each of the following sections that apply to the proposed salinity control project. All information must be entered into the response boxes provided in the application, except for maps or data tables which may be inserted in the appropriate appendix.
| A. |
| BACKGROUND & DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AREA: Describe project setting and geographic location. For irrigation-related applications, include general hydrology, geology, soils, |
climate (average rainfall, temperature, and growing season), water storage facilities, existing irrigation facilities (total mileage of canals & laterals and number of users), irrigated acreage, types of crops, etc.
Response:
| A.1 |
| IS THIS A RECLAMATION OR OTHER FEDERALLY OWNED PROJECT? SEE FOA SECTION IV.C.1. |
Response:
| B. |
| PROJECT MAPS: Attach, as Appendix C, detailed GIS map(s) showing existing facilities and proposed improvements as described in Parts B.1 and B.2 below. Printed maps shall be no larger than 11x17. |
| B.1 |
| MAP(S) OF EXISTING FACILITIES: SEE FOA SECTION IV.B.3. |
| B.2 |
| MAP(S) OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: SEE FOA SECTION IV.B.3. AND FOA SECTION |
| C. |
| WATER RIGHTS AND SUPPLY SEE FOA SECTION IV.B.3. |
Response:
| D. |
| EXISTING IRRIGATION DELIVERY SYSTEM (CANALS, LATERALS, DITCHES, ETC.): |
Response:
| E. |
| DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT & IRRIGATION DELIVERY SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS: SEE FOA SECTION IV.B.3. |
Response:
| E.1 |
| OTHER TYPES OF SALINITY CONTROL (NON-IRRIGATION RELATED): SEE FOA SECTION IV.B.3 AND SEE FOA SECTION IV.C.3. A. |
Response:
| E.2 |
| NEW WATER IMPOUNDMENT STRUCTURES: SEE FOA SECTION IV.C.1. B |
Response:
| E.3 |
| DESCRIPTION OF ON-FARM OPPORTUNITIES: SEE FOA SECTION IV.C.2. |
Response:
| E.4 |
| DESCRIPTION OF DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR STRATEGIC GOALS |
SEE FOA SECTION IV.B.3.
Response
| F. |
| ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: |
| F.1 |
| NEPA COMPLIANCE: SEE FOA SECTION IV.B.3. |
Response:
| F.2 |
| OTHER BENEFITS: SEE FOA SECTION IV.B.3. |
Response:
| F.3 |
| ENDANGERED SPECIES CONCERNS: SEE FOA SECTION IV.B.3. |
Response:
| F.4 |
| CULTURAL RESOURCES: SEE FOA SECTION IV.B.3. |
| F.5 |
| HABITAT REPLACEMENT PLAN: SEE FOA SECTION IV.B.3. |
Response:
| G. |
| OPERATION, MAINTENANCE & FUNDING AND MANAGEMENT PLAN: SEE FOA SECTION IV.B.3. |
Response:
| H. |
| EXPERIENCE IN IMPLEMENTING PROJECTS: SEE FOA SECTION IV.B.3. |
Response:
PART III – PROJECT COSTS AND FUNDING PLAN
ALL COST SHARE FUNDING MUST HAVE SIGNED DOCUMENTATION TO PROVE VALID. APPLICATION WILL BE REMOVED IF THIS STANDARD IS NOT MET.
FUNDING REQUEST SUMMARY: [Use * to denote an in-kind contribution]
| FUNDING SOURCE |
| FUNDING AMOUNT |
Salinity Control Program Funding:
Other (list each source): Funding MUST be secured prior to award.
| TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING: |
| $ 0 |
| A |
| COST EFFECTIVENESS: |
| A.1 |
| PROJECT LIFE IS 50 YEARS: The life of the project construction components and wildlife habitat mitigation must be maintained and operated for 50 years. |
TOTAL & AMORTIZED RECLAMATION COSTS:
Total Salinity Control Program cost:
Amortized Salinity Control Program cost:
(In the table provided, enter the total and amortized Salinity Control Program costs. The amortized cost can be determined by applying the amortization factor of 0.03795 to the Salinity Control Program costs. The amortization factor is based on the FY 2019 Federal planning interest rate of 2.875 percent and a project life of 50 years.)
| A.2 |
| ESTIMATE OF SALT LOAD REDUCTION TOTAL: Include written response from Reclamation providing salt load reduction estimate in Appendix E |
tons/year
| A.3 |
| COST EFFECTIVENESS VALUE: Divide the Amortized Salinity Control Program cost by the total annual salt load reduction estimate. |
$ /ton/year
| A.4 | |
| CONSTRUCTION & FUNDING PLAN: | Include a detailed schedule (Gantt chart) displaying anticipated major work items like the detailed cost estimate along with the major NEPA and Habitat Replacement milestones. Also include funding requirements (including other funding and in-kind services) on a Federal FY basis (October 1 – September 30) for each year of the project. No more than |
$2.0 million of Salinity Funds, can be budgeted, per year.Also give a paragraph summary of milestone dates etc.
Response:
APPENDIX A: DETAILED COST ESTIMATE
1) The cost estimates must be provided with sufficient detail to evaluate the reasonableness of your budget Application. For example, show items such as different pipe diameters, farm turnouts, road crossings, air vents, pressure reducing valves, fittings, isolations valves, diversion structures, trash cleaners, mechanical equipment, metalwork, earthwork, lining materials, concrete structures, canal obliteration, structure removal, re- vegetation, and right-of-way acquisition. The line item should show quantities and appropriate pricing either in unit prices or materials and installation. Add lines to this table and customize for your specific project.
2) All entries must match values and descriptions in the responses to Part II, Project Proposed for Funding.
3) Applicants must provide a detailed Budget Narrative which justifies the reasonableness of the cost estimates included in the budget Application. Failure to give enough detail will result in a lower ranking. Examples of acceptable justifications are quotes from more than one vendor in the competitive market, construction reference manual, historical documentation of actual costs on prior similar projects, open competitive requests for Applications (RFP) and/or evidence of the industry standards for your geographic area.
4) The cost for the Habitat Replacement Plan should be at least five percent (5%) of the Total Construction Cost, unless, justification is provided in the project Application for a different value. See FOA Section IV.D. Construction Costs include the following: Labor, Supplies and Materials, Equipment and Construction Management & Contract Costs.
5) Costs must be included for NEPA compliance and compliance with cultural resource laws. The applicant is responsible for any costs of mitigation of cultural resource impacts and should include sufficient allowances. See FOA Section IV.B.3.
6) Must include cost of Single Audit(s) for each of your fiscal years when Federal expenditures exceeded $750,000.00. Expenditures begin when the financial obligations were incurred.
7) For further guidance please refer to the Budget Pricing Guide document which can be downloaded from http://www.usbr.gov/uc/progact/salinity.
8) Applications may budget up to 10% contingency on supplies and materials only. No other contingency will be allowed on line items. Contingency may only be used if the Grant’s Officer gives written approval, based on future escalating supplies and material prices. SEE FOA SECTION III.D Contingency
COST ESTIMATE SHEET:
APPENDIX B: ESTIMATE OF ENABLED ON-FARM ACREAGE
APPENDIX C: GIS PROJECT MAPS
Map(s) of existing facilities shall be scaled appropriately to easily identify the project area, existing facilities, and major geographic features including roads, streams, reservoirs, towns, and land ownership (Federal, state, Tribal, private, etc. If the proposed project is irrigation related, the map(s) should show locations of canals, laterals, and irrigated lands. Those canals or laterals proposed for improvement or abandonment under this application should be clearly identified. A construction timeline should be included on the map(s) – PDF Format
APPENDIX D: SUPPLEMENTAL DATA TABLES AND/OR DATA FOR OTHER TYPES OF SALINITY CONTROL (NON-IRRIGATION RELATED)
APPENDIX E: SALT LOAD REDUCTION ESTIMATE(S)
Include the response letter from Reclamation providing the salt load reduction
File details come from the government source that posted it.