FBI REAPER PAST PERF.pdf

UNCLASSIFIED

Solicitation DJF-22-0700-PR-0000883 Page 1 of 6

Past Performance Questionnaire Version DRAFT 2021.11.15

UNCLASSIFIED

Past Performance Questionnaire

ACTION REQUESTED (Time-sensitive)

The organization/company shown below is submitting a proposal to the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s (FBI) solicitation DJF-22-0700-PR-0000883.

Company name:

Point of contact’s name:

Phone number:

E-mail address:

Contract number:

Contract value:

Period of performance:

Brief description of services:

Please complete the evaluation of the organization/company’s past performance on the following pages. This information as part of its selection for award process.

Please email the completed questionnaire directly to:

Ryan Dolan FBI Contracting Officer rdolan@fbi.gov

The FBI Contracting Officer must receive the questionnaire no later than:

12:00 PM EST on XX Month 2021

Please inform the organization/company who requested this performance evaluation if it cannot be completed before the due date/time.

If you are unavailable, you may designate an alternate individual within your organization to complete and submit the questionnaire in your stead.

Thank you for your assistance.

DJF-22-0700-PR-0000883 Page 2 of 6

Past Performance Questionnaire Version DRAFT 2021.11.15

UNCLASSIFIED

Instructions

Please rate the contractor based on the definitions below. Please also provide an explanation to support the rating. Responses need not be lengthy, but should provide specific examples where possible.

Exceptional

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Very Good

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Satisfactory

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear, or were, satisfactory.

Marginal

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective, or were not fully implemented.

Unsatisfactory

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Not Applicable (NA) Not Applicable should be used if the ratings are not going to be applied to a particular area for evaluation.

[See questionnaire beginning on next page.]

DJF-22-0700-PR-0000883 Page 3 of 6

Past Performance Questionnaire Version DRAFT 2021.11.15

UNCLASSIFIED

Person Completing Questionnaire

Name:

Agency/Organization:

Title:

Phone number:

E-mail address:

Evaluation

Company evaluated:

Management

Rate the contractor’s project/program management competence. Could the contractor successfully troubleshoot problems and propose reasonable solutions? Were issues resolved at the lowest management level possible?

Did contract personnel demonstrate full and complete understanding of requirements? Were contract personnel punctual to meetings and discussions?

Rating:

Description:

DJF-22-0700-PR-0000883 Page 4 of 6

Past Performance Questionnaire Version DRAFT 2021.11.15

UNCLASSIFIED

Communication

Rate the contractor’s ability to communicate with the customer. Did the contractor promptly return emails, phone calls, and requests for information. Were the contractor’s written products (such as reports, cost justifications, and presentations) written to professional standards and free of errors? Did the contractor actively listen, retain information, and convey instructions and details accurately?

Rating:

Description:

Schedule

Rate the contractor’s ability to maintain and manage a project schedule?

Were products and services delivered within the pre-determined time?

When problems and setbacks were encountered, were timelines adjusted within acceptable constraints? Did the contractor take advantage of opportunities to exceed schedule expectations?

DJF-22-0700-PR-0000883 Page 5 of 6

Past Performance Questionnaire Version DRAFT 2021.11.15

UNCLASSIFIED

Quality

Rate the contractor’s quality of products and/or services delivered. Did the contractor demonstrate attention to detail in meeting specifications? Did the contractor inspect and review work products for completeness and accuracy? Did the contractor identify and resolve defects prior to delivery?

Did the contractor demonstrate a culture of quality within it’s organization?

Rating:

Description:

Price

Rate the contractor’s pricing and control of costs. Were expenditures well planned and controlled? Did the contractor perform work within budget?

How did final costs compare with estimates? Were costs consistent with market research?

DJF-22-0700-PR-0000883 Page 6 of 6

Past Performance Questionnaire Version DRAFT 2021.11.15

UNCLASSIFIED

Overall Rate the contractor’s overall performance and ability to fulfill contract requirements.

Recommendation Would you recommend this contractor?

YES / NO:

Reason: