FAQs for Formative Research Nepal NOFO (1).pdf

PDF 221 KB Posted

Attached to
2023 Notification of Funding Opportunity - Formative Research on Child Trafficking in Nepal
Opportunity number
SFOP0009867
Issued by

About this file

This document provides frequently asked questions and responses regarding the Formative Research Nepal NOFO solicitation. Key details include:

  • Applicants should plan for a fall/winter 2023 start date for the research. Local organizations may be considered as contractors if their work is classified as a contract according to 2 CFR 200.331. Research teams must follow their IRB approval processes, and explain if working with a local advisory council instead of an IRB.

  • The solicitation requires engagement with a local Nepali research university or entity. It suggests but does not mandate partnership with an academic institution or researcher. The budget range is large, so cost proposals will be evaluated based on their appropriateness for the proposed research methodology and plan. Subcontractors may partner on multiple applications.

  • The related NOFO is for formative research on child trafficking in Nepal through the Department of State's Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor. It falls under the International Programs to Combat Human Trafficking federal grant program.

FAQs

View the file

Other files

Show all 11

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) and Responses

SFOP0009867: Formative Research on Child Trafficking in Nepal

1. Q: The NOFO indicates a start of fall/winter of 2023, but the Guidelines Document indicates March 2024. Can the TIP Office confirm the anticipated start date?

A: Applicants should anticipate a start date of fall/winter 2023.

2. Q: May local organizations/firms be considered contractors if the nature of the work is more appropriately classified as a contract rather than a subaward per 2 CFR 200.331?

A: Yes, please clearly identify if the work will either be classified as a subcontract or a subaward. 2 CFR 200.331 provides definitions and identifies that it is the substance of the relationship that determines whether it should be classified as a contract or a subaward.

3. Q: Page 21 states, “Engagement with a local research university or entity in Nepal is required and the methodology for the research will need to receive relevant ethical approvals.” The National Health Research Council (NHRC) provides IRB reviews of social sciences research, however local IRB approval is only required for health research in

Nepal (NHRC’s delegated universities/entities are all health-focused). Further, the NHRC will charge 3% of the project budget for an IRB review. Please clarify:

a. Given the high cost and lack of formal requirement for this research of this nature, would the TIP Office allow U.S.-based IRB approval coupled with a local research advisory council review in lieu of local IRB approval?

b. If not, can the TIP Office confirm that 3% of the award should be allocated for

NHRC review/approval?

A: Research teams should follow their required IRB approvals before conducting any research. Applicants should explain in their proposals how/why they will work with local research advisory council review if they are proposing that over a local IRB approval, should that path be acceptable to their US-based IRB.

4. Q: Relatedly, is partnership with an academic institution and/or academic researcher required? The language of the NOFO suggests partnership with a local research firm coupled with a qualified local TIP researcher/co-investigator would meet the requirements, but we wanted to confirm.

A: As noted in the NOFO on page 4, “Strong applicants will demonstrate, through letters of support or letters of commitment, existing relationships with the relevant government institutions, civil society organizations, as well as academic and/or research institutions based in Nepal.”

5. Q: Given the large gap between the budget minimum and maximum, can the TIP Office elaborate if/how the cost proposal will be weighted/evaluated relative to the technical proposal?

A: The cost and budget for any proposal should be appropriate for the research plan and methodology that is explained within the proposal. Applicants, no matter the total proposed budget of the proposal, will be evaluated based on their own merits using the evaluation criteria outlined in Section F of the notice of funding opportunity.

6. Q: Can a sub-contractor partner on more than one application or are they restricted to only one application?

A: The TIP Office does not have any restrictions that would prevent an organization from sub-contracting to more than one application under this funding opportunity.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .