Attach-4_Past-Peformance_Questionaire.pdf

Attachment #4

PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)

WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION IAW FAR 2.101 & 3.104

THANK YOU FOR YOUR PARTICIPATION

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

A. Contractor:

B. Contractor Cage Code:

C. Contract number:

D. Contract type:

E. Was this a competitive contract? Yes No

F. Period of performance:

G. Initial contract cost: $

H. Current/final contract cost: $

I. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs:

J. Description of service provided:

SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

A. Customer or agency name:

B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):

C. Location:

SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION

A. Evaluator's name:

B. Evaluator's title:

C. Evaluator's phone/fax number:

Length of time (number of years/months) evaluator worked on subject contract:

SECTION 4: EVALUATION

Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:

CODE PERFORMANCE RATING

B BLUE/EXCEPTIONAL - During the entire period, the contractor met and exceeded many of the requirements of the contract and consistently performed at a superior level. Performance was accomplished with very few minor problems, and the contractor took immediate and effective corrective actions for those problems that did occur.

P PURPLE/VERY GOOD - During the entire period, the contractor met and exceeded some of the requirements of the contract and consistently performed very well. Performance was accomplished with some minor problems, and the contractor took timely and effective corrective action for those problems that did occur.

G GREEN/SATISFACTORY - During the entire period, the contractor met the requirements of the contract and consistently performed at an acceptable level.

Performance was accomplished with some problems, and the contractor took effective corrective action for those problems that did occur.

Y YELLOW/MARGINAL – During the entire period, the contractor did not always meet some of the requirements of the contract and intervention was required to continue performance. There were instances where performance was at a less than acceptable level; performance was accomplished with some problems and some corrective actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

R RED/UNSATISFACTORY – During the entire period, the contractor did not meet the requirements of the contract and performance was at an unacceptable level.

There were a number of serious problems that required extensive oversight and involvement, and corrective actions were either ineffective or non-existent.

N/A NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, or information was not available. Do not know.

B P G Y R N/A

1. How well did the contractor meet the requirements of the specification?

2. What was the quality/integrity of the Test Plans, Tests, and Test

Results used during acceptance and/or factory testing?

3. What was the quality of Submitted Drawings and/or other Technical

Data?

4. How well, if it can be determined, did the contractor implement current quality processes, standard practices for design, operation, maintenance, upgrades and configuration control?

5. What was the quality of technical work performed by the contractor?

6. What was the quality of the technical support/skill level of the support provided by the contractor?

7. How effective was overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage, control and deliver on-time)?

8. How reasonable and cooperative was the contractor when dealing with program staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes)?

9. How timely and effectively did the contractor resolve contract problems without extensive customer guidance?

10. How well did the contractor understand/comply with customer objectives and technical requirements?

11. How did the contractor manage the quality and timeliness of sub-contracted efforts?

B P G Y R N/A

12. How effective was the contractor’s material management (including

Customer Furnished Property or Material)?

13. Was the work accomplished as proposed by the contractor?

14. How well did the contractor communicate progress schedule and progress reports? (If customer required.)

15. How well did the contractor perform against the delivery schedules of the contract? In the remarks, specify if the contractor met, exceeded, or failed to meet contractual delivery dates and, if schedule slips occurred, state the number of slips and cumulative schedule variance.

16. What was the quality of the received Written or Photographic

Records?

17. How accurately did the contractor forecast contract costs?

18. How well did the contractor meet forecasted costs and perform within contract costs?

19. How successfully did the contractor alert the customer of unforeseen costs before they occurred?

Please provide the following information regarding cost/price:

(1) Original Contract Cost or Price $

(2) Value of Negotiated Contract Changes $

(3) Actual/Projected Cost to Complete $

(4) Baseline Estimate at Completion $

(5) Total Negotiated Changes EAC $

(6) Cost Under run/Over run (-) $

2. Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated B/E (Blue/Exceptional), Y/M

(Yellow/Marginal) or R/U (Red/Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).

3. Government Contracts Only: Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

Yes Default Convenience Pending Terminations

No

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules).

SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY

Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?

Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.

Evaluator’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire to:

Mailing Address:

Arnold Engineering and Development Complex

Attn: Henry Daniels

100 Kindel Drive, Suite A-332

Arnold AFB, TN 37389

FAX to: 931-454-7330

E-Mail to: henry.daniels.2@us.af.mil